More stories

  • in

    What does the new Brexit deal mean for fishing?

    Critics have branded Keir Starmer’s fishing deal with the EU “a horror show” for the industry after he granted European trawler fleets 12 years of access to UK waters.The roll over of the existing fisheries deal to 2038 will benefit the British fishing industry, the prime minister has claimed, by allowing the sale of fish caught in UK waters to be sold in the EU without veterinary checks, removing a costly post-Brexit barrier. Sir Keir has also unveiled a £360m fund to support fishing communities and modernise the British fishing fleet.He told reporters: “It’s time to look forward. To move on from the stale old debates and political fights to find common sense, practical solutions which get the best for the British people.”But he faces another argument with the Scottish government after failing to consult them before signing his deal, which impacts Scottish fisheries. The Scottish Fishermen’s Federation (SFF) branded the UK-EU deal a “horror show” for the sector, while Scottish constitution secretary Angus Robertson blasted the UK for agreeing a fisheries deal in principle “without any recourse, involvement or approval of devolved administrations”.However, government sources have briefed that UK hands were tied because the Windsor Framework Agreement struck last year by Rishi Sunak meant the UK would have to negotiate fishing rights at the same time as access to the energy market.The core elements remain unchanged from the Conservatives’ post-Brexit fisheries deal, first implemented in 2020, and continues to allow EU fishermen access to UK waters. However, Tory Party leader Kemi Badenoch claimed that the fishing agreement was three times longer than the government wanted.But Richard Kilpatrick, head of campaigns at thinktank European Movement UK, said the certainty provided by the longer timeframe will benefit the industry. Scottish SNP First Minister John Swinney said the deal showed Scotland is an ‘afterthought’ to UK ministers. (Andrew Milligan/PA)“This will open a serious food deal with the EU, which is of huge benefit to all of us – including the fishing industry,” he told the Independent.“Even if it is not quite what they wanted, [the fisheries deal] gives the industry certainty, which can guide their investment decisions – much clearer than returning to it every few years.”‘Betrayal’ over fisheriesThe EU is still Britain’s top market for fish but since Brexit, the UK’s seafood exports have dropped by 26 per cent to just 336,000 tonnes in 2023 compared to 454,000 in 2019. EU fishing vessels will have access to UK waters until 2038 under the new agreement, though quotas will see no increase. More

  • in

    Starmer’s Brexit reset hailed for ‘turning page’ on relations with EU

    Sir Keir Starmer today “turned a page” on Britain’s relations with the EU as he ushered in a “new era” of cooperation and friendship with his landmark Brexit reset deal.A clearly jubilant prime minister said the deal — his third major international agreement this month after securing trade deals with India and the US — would be a “win-win” for both sides and showed Britain is “back on the world stage”. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen described it as an “historic moment” as she appeared alongside the PM at a press conference in London, just hours after frantic negotiations concluded to get the deal over the line. “We are turning a page,” she said. “We are opening a new chapter in our unique relationship.”The agreement, which officials claim will boost the UK economy by £9 billion by 2040, appears to be a major coup for the Labour leader with “the pragmatic and positive” elements of removing red tape and border checks lauded by some.It represents the first serious attempt to fix the harms caused by Brexit from Boris Johnson’s flawed deal in late 2019 which Rishi Sunak tinkered with last year in the Windsor Framework.European Council president Antonio Costa, Britain’s prime minister Keir Starmer and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen host a joint press conference More

  • in

    Solicitors criticise ‘antiquated’ Legal Aid Agency IT system after cyber attack

    The “antiquated” IT system used by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) has come under fire after a major cyber attack saw potentially millions of pieces of personal data stolen, including criminal records.A “significant amount of personal data” of people who applied to the agency since 2010 was accessed and downloaded in a cyber attack in April this year, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said.Those eligible to apply for legal aid include domestic violence and modern slavery victims, people involved in cases in the family court, as well as those accused of criminal offences.The group that carried out the attack has claimed it accessed 2.1 million pieces of data but the MoJ has not verified that figure.Richard Atkinson, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, a professional body that represents solicitors, said: “It is extremely concerning that members of the public have had their personal data compromised in this cyber security incident and the LAA must get a grip on the situation immediately.“The incident once again demonstrates the need for sustained investment to bring the LAA’s antiquated IT system up to date and ensure the public have continued trust in the justice system.“The fragility of the IT system has prevented vital reforms, including updates to the means test that could help millions more access legal aid, and interim payments for firms whose cash flow is being decimated by the backlogs in the courts, through no fault of their own.“If it is now also proving vulnerable to cyber attack, further delay is untenable.“Legal aid firms are small businesses providing an important public service and are operating on the margins of financial viability. Given that vulnerability, these financial security concerns are the last thing they need.”The National Crime Agency is investigating the breach. It is understood that so far there is not believed to be any link to the cyber attacks on Marks and Spencer, the Co-op and Harrods, but investigators are keeping an open mind.The Government became aware of a cyber attack on the LAA’s online digital services on April 23, but realised on Friday that it was more extensive than originally thought.The data accessed may include contact details and addresses of legal aid applicants, their dates of birth, national insurance numbers, criminal history, employment status and financial data such as contribution amounts, debts and payments.Officials will try to contact anyone identified in the data believed to be at significant risk of harm.The LAA’s online digital services, which are used by legal aid providers to log their work and get paid by the Government, have been taken offline.An MoJ source put the breach down to the “neglect and mismanagement” of the previous government, saying vulnerabilities in the LAA’s systems have been known for many years.“This data breach was made possible by the long years of neglect and mismanagement of the justice system under the last government.“They knew about the vulnerabilities of the LAA digital systems, but did not act,” the source said.It is understood the attack happened as the MoJ has been working on replacing the internal system with a new version hoped to be up and running in the coming weeks.The MoJ is urging anyone who has applied for legal aid since 2010 to be alert for unknown messages and phone calls and to update any passwords that could have been exposed.The ministry has been working with the National Crime Agency and the National Cyber Security Centre, and has informed the Information Commissioner.Legal Aid Agency chief executive Jane Harbottle apologised for the breach.“I understand this news will be shocking and upsetting for people and I am extremely sorry this has happened.“Since the discovery of the attack, my team has been working around the clock with the National Cyber Security Centre to bolster the security of our systems so we can safely continue the vital work of the agency.“However, it has become clear that, to safeguard the service and its users, we needed to take radical action. That is why we’ve taken the decision to take the online service down,” she said.Ms Harbottle said contingency plans are in place to make sure those in need of legal support and advice can continue to access it.Reacting to the attack, global cyber security adviser Jake Moore, from software company ESET, said it highlights how critical it is for public bodies to invest in stronger cyber defences and be transparent immediately when things go wrong.“When criminal records and other sensitive personal data are exposed, it is not just a matter of IT failure, it’s a breach of trust, privacy, and even safety in this case,” he said.“Many of the individuals affected may already be in vulnerable situations and could now face the added stress of not knowing where their data will end up or how it might be used.“Delays in notifying victims or vague reassurances can often worsen the damage whether it’s a Government agency or private company.” More

  • in

    Will UK-EU deal really result in British travellers using e-gates at EU airports?

    “British holidaymakers will be able to use more e-gates in Europe, ending the dreaded queues at border control” – so says the government after the “post-Brexit reset deal” was agreed between the UK government and the European Union.Ministers have been talking up the prospect of speeding up passport formalities for British travellers at EU airports.Nick Thomas-Symonds, European Union Relations minister, says it will give British travellers “more time to spend on holiday or work trips… doing what you want, not being stuck in queues”.But how will it work – and when might UK passport holders notice? Simon Calder, travel correspondent of The Independent, has had plenty of time to contemplate the subject while waiting in long queues at EU airports.What are the rules for UK passport holders travelling to and from the EU?After the 2016 vote to leave the European Union, the UK negotiated for British travellers to be “visa-exempt third-country nationals” – the same as dozens of other nationalities from Australia to Venezuela.Despite some newspaper claims that “Brussels is forcing Brits to queue”, we actually demanded the right to wait in line for longer – surrendering the right to fast-track lanes.While citizens of the EU and the wider Schengen area (including Iceland, Norway and Switzerland) speed through frontier formalities, British passport holders join the “other nations” queue.What does this mean in practice? If you fly into a European airport just after an Airbus A380 arrives from Dubai with more than 500 people on board, you’ll know that you’re going to be waiting for some time.Queuing for an hour or more for British travellers are not unusual at busy airports such as Amsterdam Schiphol, Milan Malpensa and Paris Charles de Gaulle, while holders of EU passports or identity cards speed through. UK travellers also face problems when travelling home, because of the need to be checked on the way out of the EU. Some airline passengers have missed flights because the exit queues for passport control are so slow.Why do passport queues move so slowly?For each UK arrival, EU frontier officials are required to check:The traveller has “sufficient means of subsistence” during the planned visitThey will not breach the maximum stay limit of 90 days in Europe in the past 180 daysThey have “the means to return to the country of origin” (ie a ticket out of the EU)In addition, the border guard must stamp the passport – which is also necessary on departure. What’s different for EU citizens?The Schengen Border Code of the European Union, which is the Bible of frontier rules, stipulates “separate lanes, indicated by uniform signs … in international airports” in order “to reduce the waiting times of persons enjoying the Union right of free movement”.Those separate lanes move quickly because the only check made for EU citizens is that their travel document is valid and that it belongs to them. This verification can be made swiftly and efficiently by e-gates which match the traveller’s face with the biometric information on the travel document.So how will the passport process for UK travellers be improved?British travellers are not currently allowed in the EU fast track queue as arrangements stand, because of two obstacles: The legal requirement for British travellers to be checked to ensure they meet the conditions of entry to the EUUnhappiness among Europeans if the British, who voted to surrender the benefits of membership of the European Union, are allowed to swerve into their lane and slow things downThe solution is to accelerate processing using e-gates – which is already being done.Two versions are currently being offered:Special “third-country national” e-gates, speeding up the face check for British and other nationalities. This happens in Rome.Allowing UK (and other favoured nations) passport holders to use the e-gates for EU citizens and British travellers are then flagged to see a border guard, as is the practice at Amsterdam Schiphol and Lisbon.Using e-gates is a win for the host country as well as for British travellers, because it allows the authorities to process routine passengers more swiftly.Facial recognition is now so sophisticated that matching the traveller against their passport is a task that e-gates can do easily and quickly, leaving officers to concentrate on “persons of interest”.What exactly have UK ministers negotiated?The exact wording is that “British holidaymakers will be able to use more e-gates in Europe” (my italics).The roll-out of e-gates to UK travellers is happening anyway, because it helps the authorities process travellers more efficiently, but that process could accelerate with new impetus from Brussels.But “more e-gates being agreed” and “rejoining the fast track passport queues” are by no means the same thing.Where did the idea that we would actually be able to join those fast-track lane come from?This is all to do with the EU’s much-delayed entry-exit system – which is now due to begin being rolled out in October.The plan involves every Schengen area external border being connected with a central database, with comings and goings registered digitally rather than through stamps in passports. The aim is to keep tabs on arriving and departing travellers and detect over-stayers more easily.Initially it will be something of a nightmare. The EES will require third-country nationals such as British visitors to provide facial biometrics and fingerprints. The time taken to process a planeful of UK passengers arriving at Palma could quadruple – and even longer at Dover and Folkestone for motorists heading across to France.On that subject: ministers and transport companies hope EU officials will accept that the latest facial recognition technology is so accurate that fingerprinting isn’t necessary – which would accelerate the whole process.In time, when the system is fully up and running, it is feasible that British passport holders will be allowed to go through an e-gate with no further check – because the database will know about previous comings and goings.When the Etias “euro-visa” comes online (no less than six months after the entry-exit system is running flawlessly) the digital infrastructure will also be able to verify if the traveller has a valid permit.Any change on the ‘90-day rule’?No. That limit remains firmly in place, and will be made easier to enforce with the entry-exit system.I have an Irish passport. What does this mean for me?Nothing changes: you are still able to use the fast track, and the EU border officer is allowed only to check that your passport is valid and that it belongs to you.For more travel news and advice, listen to Simon Calder’s podcast More

  • in

    The key takeaways from Keir Starmer’s Brexit reset deal with EU

    A landmark deal has been agreed between Britain and the European Union after a last minute breakthrough in Sir Keir Starmer’s reset talks.Sir Keir — who has made the Brexit reset a centrepiece of his administration — said Monday’s summit marks a “new era” of relations with the bloc, adding that it is about “moving on from stale old debates” and “looking forward, not backwards”.Some issues have proven thornier than others, with the topic of fishing rights understood to have been a key stumbling bloc for negotiators that was only solved in the early hours of the morning. Meanwhile, talks surrounding a youth mobility scheme appear to have ended in a deadlock. As the the prime minister faces judgement on how successful his mission to reset relations with the EU has really been,The Independent takes a look exactly what has been agreed. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen More

  • in

    Reform voters enjoy more dating app success than Tories, study finds

    Your support helps us to tell the storyFrom reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.Your support makes all the difference.Read moreNew research suggests that your political leanings could significantly impact your chances of finding love online.A joint study by the University of Southampton and Harvard University has revealed a distinct political divide in the world of online dating. The analysis found that not only are voters unlikely to “swipe right” on a profile from the opposite end of the political spectrum, but Reform and Conservative voters generally have less success on dating apps than their Labour, Green, and Lib Dem counterparts.While the study showed a clear aversion to cross-party matches, researchers noted that those identifying as centre-right were more inclined to choose profiles further to their political right, rather than those with centre-left views.Researchers hypothesise that the relative success of left-leaning daters may be due to the demographics of dating app users. The study suggests that because dating apps tend to attract a younger demographic, who are often more socially liberal, this could account for the disparity in match rates.open image in galleryUsers of dating apps are not likely to swipe right on those from the other side of the political divide More

  • in

    UK and EU officials locked in last-minute negotiations over post-Brexit reset deal

    Sir Keir Starmer’s post-Brexit reset is going down to the wire just hours before the prime minister is to host Ursula von der Leyen and Antonio Costa in London. British and European negotiators were working overnight to hash out a deal before the prime minister appears at a press conference alongside Ms Von der Leyen, the European Commission president, and Mr Costa, president of the European Council, on Monday. Downing Street sources said there are “outstanding issues on both sides”. “Negotiations are going down to the wire and a deal is not yet done… conversations will continue overnight,” an official said. EU ambassadors were reportedly meeting in Brussels on Sunday to agree to any further compromises on either side. Keir Starmer will unveil the results of his post-Brexit reset on Monday More

  • in

    How your political leanings can impact your success on dating apps

    Your support helps us to tell the storyFrom reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.Your support makes all the difference.Read moreNew research suggests that your political leanings could significantly impact your chances of finding love online.A joint study by the University of Southampton and Harvard University has revealed a distinct political divide in the world of online dating. The analysis found that not only are voters unlikely to “swipe right” on a profile from the opposite end of the political spectrum, but Reform and Conservative voters generally have less success on dating apps than their Labour, Green, and Lib Dem counterparts.While the study showed a clear aversion to cross-party matches, researchers noted that those identifying as centre-right were more inclined to choose profiles further to their political right, rather than those with centre-left views.Researchers hypothesise that the relative success of left-leaning daters may be due to the demographics of dating app users. The study suggests that because dating apps tend to attract a younger demographic, who are often more socially liberal, this could account for the disparity in match rates.open image in galleryUsers of dating apps are not likely to swipe right on those from the other side of the political divide More