Public trust has been “eroded” by ministers flirting with diluting food and animal welfare standards in post-Brexit trade deals, an official report is warning.
An independent commission – which trade secretary Liz Truss agreed to set up – demands that protections are maintained and calls for them to be enhanced, in the years to come.
“With busy lives, people often don’t have the time to scrutinise what they buy and expect the reassurance that the government has this in hand,” it states.
“For some, this trust in the framework of standards has recently been eroded. High environmental, ethical and animal welfare standards that have been built up in our domestic food system, over many decades.
“They appear to be threatened by the potentially pernicious impact of signing agreements with countries whose food standards appear to be weaker than our own.”
A pledge that chlorinated chicken would be outlawed was dropped, before Ms Truss was forced to reinstate it after a revolt by Conservative backbenchers.
She was then forced to give teeth to the new Trade and Agriculture Commission, to make it properly independent, permanent and with the power to scrutinise each trade agreement.
In its first report, the Commission backs the government’s policy to liberalise trade in food and agriculture with other countries, following withdrawal from the EU.
But it tells ministers this should be balanced with a commitment to “international leadership by the UK on climate, environment, animal welfare and ethical trade”.
“We will not see a backsliding on standards. We are recommending very solidly that our standards remain,” said Tim Smith, its chairman and the former chief executive of the Food Standards Agency.
“We need to balance the need to be open to liberalised trade with the importance of long-established UK standards.”
Vicki Hird, of the coalition Sustain, welcomed the focus on protecting food standards, but added: “However, they seem to prioritise trade liberalisation over other considerations.”
The National Farmers Union also welcomed the report, but said the government must set out urgently “how those trade-offs are managed and weighed”.
One trade expert, David Henig, said the report showed “the Commission couldn’t actually agree on a way forward “ and was “an opportunity missed”.
“No potential solution is likely to be acceptable to both farmers and supporters of a US trade deal among the members,” he warned.
