More stories

  • in

    Trump announces 25% tariffs on vehicle imports in fresh blow to Reeves

    Donald Trump has announced 25 per cent tariffs on all motor vehicle imports to the United States, in a move that will inflict another blow on the UK economy.During a press conference in the Oval Office, the US president announced that cars and light trucks imported into the US would be subject to the levy in the latest escalation of the Trump administration’s far-reaching trade war.“What we’re going to be doing is a 25% tariff for all cars that are not made in the United States,” Trump said.The announcement raises fears of greater economic pain in the UK, whose largest vehicle export market is the US, having sold £6.4bn in motor vehicles to the country in 2023, according to the Office of National Statistics.Rachel Reeves announced a series of cuts to benefits on Wednesday to balance the budget amid economy uncertainty More

  • in

    Rachel Reeves defends freebies: ‘I’m not personally a huge Sabrina Carpenter fan, being a 46-year-old woman’

    Rachel Reeves said she recognised her acceptance of free tickets to see Sabrina Carpenter in concert was “a bit odd”.The Chancellor has faced criticism over her decision to take free tickets to the show before announcing cuts to welfare during Wednesday’s spring statement.Ms Reeves told reporters at a press conference today (26 March) that she is “not personally a huge Sabrina Carpenter fan, being a 46-year-old woman”, but that a member of her family “did want to go and see that concert”.The chancellor said she is “not in a position” to “easily just go and sit in a concert”. More

  • in

    Labour minister apologises for comparing disability benefit cuts to children’s pocket money

    A Labour minister has apologised for comparing disability benefit cuts to children’s pocket money.Darren Jones, chief secretary to the Treasury, attempted to defend Labour’s welfare cuts, announced by chancellor Rachel Reeves in the spring statement on Wednesday (26 March).He told BBC Politics Live: “My understanding is what the impact assessment doesn’t account for is the benefit that you get from our additional money into support for training, skills or work.“Take, for example, if I said to my kids, ‘I’m going to cut your pocket money by £10 per week, but you have to go and get a Saturday job’.“The impact assessment on that basis would say that my kids were down £10, irrespective of how much money they get from their Saturday job.’Appearing on ITV’s Peston show on Wednesday evening, Mr Jones admitted his earlier comment was “tactless”. More

  • in

    Labour MP’s awkwardly long silence when asked if government has been a disappointment

    A Labour MP remained awkwardly silent when asked if his party’s government has been a disappointment.Clive Lewis remained silent for five seconds when he was asked by Sky journalist Sophy Ridge: “Has this Labour government been a disappointment?”The Norwich South MP appeared on Sky on Wednesday (26 March) just hours after chancellor Rachel Reeves’ spring statement.The chancellor unveiled a £14bn package to repair the UK economy that includes cuts to welfare, as the Office for Budget Responsibility halved its forecast for growth in gross domestic product in 2025 from 2 per cent to just 1 per cent. More

  • in

    Reeves rejects own government’s findings of cuts pushing 250,000 into poverty

    Rachel Reeves has denied her own government’s findings that her welfare reforms will push 250,000 people into poverty while refusing to rule out further cuts.The chancellor wants to save £5 billion from the UK’s ballooning welfare bill by making it harder to claim Personal Independence Payments and cutting Universal Credit.An impact assessment, published today by the Department of Work and Pensions, said 3.2 million families – including current and future benefit claimants – will lose an average of £1,720 a year as a result of the changes.It added: “We estimate there will be an additional 250,000 people (including 50,000 children) in relative poverty after housing costs in 2029/30 as a result of modelled changes to social security.”But in an interview with HuffPost UK, the chancellor rejected those findings, claiming they did not take account of what the government is doing to get people back into work.”Those numbers are based on not a single person moving from welfare into work and we are, alongside this package of welfare reforms, putting in £1 billion of targeted, personalised and guaranteed support for anybody on sickness and disability benefits to help them find work that’s appropriate for the situation that they are in,” Ms Reeves said.Rachel Reeves has rejected DWP findings that 250,000 people will be plunged into poverty More

  • in

    Duchess of Edinburgh urges ‘collective effort’ to tackle online child abuse

    Tackling online child abuse requires a “collective effort by all” including governments and technology companies, the Duchess of Edinburgh has told senior European politicians.Sophie and safeguarding minister Jess Phillips joined forces to highlight the need to tackle child sexual abuse and exploitation online.They met in Brussels on Wednesday, where European politicians gathered to draw attention to the harms children face in the digital world.In her role as the patron of the NSPCC and Plan International UK, two charities that are raising awareness about the dangers, the duchess addressed senior European politicians at an event hosted by the European Parliament intergroup on children’s rights.Delivering the keynote speech, Sophie said: “The last time I addressed policymakers here in Brussels was in 2021 when, sadly, the world was already far behind the curve in generating the tools needed to prevent the explosion in the abuse of children online.“Today children everywhere in the world are not only falling victim to adults wishing to groom them but are exposed to an enormous amount of dangerous, harmful and inappropriate content including materials on suicide, self-harm, eating disorders, violence, and pornography, all with consequences which can prove devastating, and can even lead to them taking their own lives.”More than 300 million children have been affected by online child exploitation and abuse in the past year, she said, citing the Global Child Safety Institute.The duchess said 79% of teenagers are using generative AI (artificial intelligence) to learn but they also receive “misleading or dangerous information from chatbots on topics including mental health, suicide and grooming”.“It is a challenge we need to tackle urgently, particularly given the emergence of generative AI”, she added.She noted the introduction of Britain’s Online Safety Act, but added that “neither the UK’s Government nor that of any one country can do it alone.”Sophie said the victim, perpetrator and tech company hosting the online platform may all be in different countries, adding that protecting children “will take a collective effort by all, including governments, technology companies, regulators and legislators, civil society and law enforcement”.Sophie concluded: “Therefore I implore you now, on behalf of the children of today and tomorrow, to redouble your efforts in prioritising their safety and well-being”.The joint visit between the Royal and a Government minister came amid an uptick in the number of the most extreme images online.The Internet Watch Foundation, a charity that monitors child sexual abuse images and urges companies and governments to work to remove them, recorded a 22% increase in category A images – its most serious classification – between 2022 and 2023.This was the worst year on record for child sexual abuse online, according to the IWF.Ahead of the visit, Ms Phillips, said: “Child sexual abuse is a horrific crime that is impacting more and more children, victims and survivors in all of our communities across the world and the effects can last a lifetime.“This most devastating of crimes transcends international borders – victims are often exploited in their homes by offenders across the globe using platforms that are headquartered in many different countries.“It is therefore crucial that we drive forward a global response and improve global capacity to tackle this crime. Enough is enough. We must act now and urgently see strong action from governments, tech, frontline professionals, police and law enforcement.”Ministers plan to introduce stronger laws to clamp down on online child sexual abuse as part of domestic efforts to tackle its spread.Measures in the Crime and Policing Bill currently making its way through Parliament will make it illegal to create or own AI tools designed for making child sexual abuse images, among other new offences. More

  • in

    Will families be £500 better off after Reeves’ Spring Statement? Here’s what experts say

    In her Spring Statement, Rachel Reeves promised that the average household would be “over £500 a year better off” under Labour – even after inflation. For millions feeling the pinch, it was a headline moment.As a positive, it was one for the chancellor to hang her hat on – though pales in comparison to 250,000 being sent into poverty by other cuts to the welfare bill.But how real is that £500? Is it money in your pocket, or just clever forecasting? Within minutes, the message had already started to shift – and the fine print tells a very different story.The first question is easy to answer in part: given the data was from the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR), it should be trusted to have been arrived at in diligent fashion, factoring in the latest economic data to give Ms Reeves the headline that household disposable income was growing “at almost twice the rate” as had been forecast last year.However, there may have already been some revisionism on that within minutes – and the lack of clarity and consistency is arguably as concerning as any quickfire change – with Labour posting to social media that average households would be £500 better off in the final year of parliament, not each year. But the second part of the question is arguably more real for those families she’s talking about – and, sadly, it probably isn’t one they’ll be delighted by.It is not, of course, as though it means £500 is suddenly deposited in bank accounts or pockets.Some have even interpreted those words as being £500 better off across the entire course of parliament, with Martin Lewis of MoneySavingExpert.com surmising on social media from OBS notes that the sum is generated “over the life of parliament not per year.”“Most of it comes in the last two years, after [it] drops first, and is based on assumptions that some current tax proposals eg. freezing tax thresholds will end,” he continued.Economics experts are largely in agreement and even suggested the sums meant a more modest improvement of the national economy over the mid-term than Ms Reeves and co had initially been forecasting. Get a free fractional share worth up to £100.Capital at risk.Terms and conditions apply.Go to websiteGet a free fractional share worth up to £100.Capital at risk.Terms and conditions apply.Go to website“This is hardly ground breaking and I’m not sure anyone will or should be celebrating this modest increase,” Blick Rotherberg CEO Nimesh Shah told The Independent.“This, in itself, suggests that the economy is not going to grow to anywhere near the extent that Labour were promising when they came into government and the policies aren’t working – despite Rachel Reeves suggesting otherwise at the start of her Spring Statement.“Households being £500 a year better off [over the full term] is less than £2 per week. But sticky inflation will wipe that out with some ease.“When inflation remains high, interest rates aren’t coming down as quickly as expected and the economic growth has been halved, £500 in five years (an awfully long time away) doesn’t touch the sides and I don’t expect provides any encouragement.”As to exactly where that increase in money comes from, the outlook is uncertain – and it is a lower real income rise than families have seen previously too, says Oxford Economics analyst Michael Saunders.“The rise in real incomes per household comes from pay growth running slightly ahead of inflation, in the OBR’s forecast,” he told The Independent.“As to whether it matters: to put it in context, real disposable income per head in 2024 Q3 (the latest available data) was just 1.0 per cent above the 2019 level.“We don’t know what the per cent rise implied by the £500 is, but the OBR expect real disposable income per head to rise by 3.2 per cent from the end of 2024 to the start of 2031.“Will people notice this faster income? Perhaps, but its not going to transform things. From 1997 to 2007, real income rose by 27 per cent, so the OBR’s outlook is pretty low compared to that.” More

  • in

    Ofsted chief backs headteachers taking ‘tough’ decision to ban phones in schools

    The chief inspector of Ofsted has said smartphones should be banned in schools in England.Sir Martyn Oliver said the watchdog will back headteachers who take the “tough” decision to ban phones as he warned that exposure to online content on devices can be “harmful” and “damaging” to children.Sir Martyn, who used to be chief executive of a large academy trust, said he had walked into schools in the past in “utter chaos” where phones were “rife”.In a Q&A with parents in London, the Ofsted boss said: “Headteachers already have the power to ban them and they should ban them.“Ofsted will support schools in banning phones.”Speaking at an event run by charity Parentkind on Wednesday, Sir Martyn said children with developing brains do not need to be “bombarded by non-human algorithms that might be preying upon them”.He added: “It’s harmful and it’s damaging. So I do believe they should be banned.”Schools in England were given non-statutory guidance under the former Conservative government in February last year intended to stop the use of mobile phones during the school day.Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch questioned why the Government opposed a Tory amendment to the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill to require schools to ban the use of phones.In the Commons on Wednesday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer described the proposal as “completely unnecessary” as he claimed “almost every school” already bans phones.When asked about phone bans in schools, Sir Martyn said: “I think it’s crucial that Ofsted doesn’t ask schools to do beyond what the Government asks them to do, but I would absolutely support headteachers to take that tough decision even if it led to a spike in behaviour, for example, in the first instance.”He added: “I’ve walked into – I can’t remember exactly how many – special-measures schools in utter chaos, but it’s an awful lot.“Some of them you could easily describe as in some of the most challenging circumstances in the entire country when I went in to sponsor them and there were phones rife everywhere.“And within those schools, within days of banning phones, and as hard as that is initially, you get an immediate sense of calmness across the school.”In a speech on Wednesday, the Ofsted chief called on parents to engage with schools “in the right way” rather than joining a social media “pile-on”.He warned that social media can “hand a microphone to the pub bore, a megaphone to the bully and help the rabble-rouser find his or her rabble without leaving their armchair”.Sir Martyn said: “The world seems to be getting more antagonistic and adversarial. So you can understand why a school leader might be wary of engaging with parents.“But I always found that the way to defuse tensions, tackle rumours and build common purpose with parents is more communication, not less.“More openness, not less. And more information sharing, not less.“So I say join the PTA, don’t join the pile-on.”Earlier this month, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said she had tasked officials with exploring how to “more effectively monitor” what is happening in schools in England around the use of smartphones.In a speech to school and college leaders in Liverpool, Ms Phillipson said: “The Government’s position is clear, you have our full backing in ridding our classrooms of the disruption of phones.” More