For weeks, left-leaning New York City Democrats have publicly debated whether to launch a third-party bid in a race for a rare open House seat in the heart of New York City.
But on Tuesday, they decided to take a pass, as Yuh-Line Niou, a state assemblywoman who finished second to Daniel S. Goldman in August’s Democratic primary, declared that she would not seek a rematch using the Working Families Party ballot line in November after all.
“We are conceding the primary and I will not be on the WFP line for the general,” Ms. Niou, 39, said, referring to the Working Families Party, during a seven-minute video she posted to Twitter around 9 p.m.
“We simply do not have the resources to fight all fights at the same time, and we must protect our democracy now,” Ms. Niou added.
The decision provided a reprieve not just to Mr. Goldman, a former assistant U.S. attorney who made his name prosecuting the first impeachment case against President Donald J. Trump, but also to some Democratic Party leaders, who feared a fight between the party’s left and more centrist wings would divert resources from races more pivotal to retaining control of Congress.
Mr. Goldman, 46, is now all but assured of a victory in November; the Republican candidate, Benine Hamdan, is thought to have little chance in the heavily Democratic district.
Progressive activists, who had eagerly stoked a fight to block that path, were certain to be disappointed in the outcome. They believe that Mr. Goldman was too moderate and accused him of buying one of the city’s most liberal districts, which connects Lower Manhattan and parts of Brooklyn, by pouring nearly $5 million of his own fortune into the race. With a 13-person primary field narrowed to just two, they argued Ms. Niou stood a better chance.
But other allies bluntly advised Ms. Niou that she could not win a rematch given Mr. Goldman’s personal fortune, the compressed timeline and the institutional support rallying around him in New York and Washington. Ms. Niou and the Working Families Party, which was prepared to share its ballot line with her in November, grudgingly came to agree.
Though it is its own fully fledged political party, the W.F.P. is more typically a force in Democratic primaries, acting to push candidates to the left. Only rarely does it back a challenger to a Democrat in a general election. It has never done so in a congressional race.
“We have always been sober about the structural barriers we face when running grass-roots candidates against the power of immense wealth,” Sochie Nnaemeka, the party’s director in New York, said in a statement.
Ms. Nnaemeka added that the party would be focused on defeating Republicans, and urged Mr. Goldman to “take note of the progressive positions shared by candidates who cumulatively received a majority of the vote.”
Prominent New York City Democratic officials had worked to head off Ms. Niou in recent days by uniting around Mr. Goldman, making a possible electoral path even more tenuous.
What we consider before using anonymous sources.
How do the sources know the information? What’s their motivation for telling us? Have they proved reliable in the past? Can we corroborate the information? Even with these questions satisfied, The Times uses anonymous sources as a last resort. The reporter and at least one editor know the identity of the source.
Among them were former opponents, including former mayor Bill de Blasio, who suggested a third-party bid was not electorally viable, and Elizabeth Holtzman, an independent-minded former congresswoman who during her own run for the congressional seat had urged voters to elect a woman.
“I do not plan to support any Working Families Party candidate against the Democratic nominee,” Ms. Holtzman said before Ms. Niou’s decision.
Mr. Goldman also got a significant show of support from Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the House Democratic leader, who endorsed him publicly and worked behind the scenes to encourage labor unions to publicly endorse him, according to two people familiar with the outreach. Ms. Pelosi had backed another challenger, Representative Mondaire Jones, who Mr. Goldman defeated in the August primary.
On Aug. 23, The Associated Press declared Mr. Goldman the winner of a 13-way Democratic contest. But because there were so many candidates — including a sitting congressman, a former congresswoman and two state lawmakers — Mr. Goldman won with only 25.8 percent of the vote. Ms. Niou gathered 23.8 percent. The New York City Board of Elections is poised to certify the final vote count next week.
Ms. Niou’s supporters believed that a surfeit of like-minded candidates split the progressive vote in the primary, enabling Mr. Goldman to emerge victorious, and that with far fewer candidates, Ms. Niou would consolidate that progressive support. W.F.P. officials commissioned a poll in recent days to test her electoral viability, but kept the results private.
Her supporters argued that Mr. Goldman’s more moderate stances on issues like abortion and universal health care, coupled with Democrats’ distaste for the fact that he spent $5 million of his own money on the race, would unite left-leaning Democrats against him.
But to win, Ms. Niou would have had to convince voters that the relatively narrow policy differences between her and Mr. Goldman were worth bucking a well-funded candidate who won the Democratic primary fairly.
Many of her allies were convinced she could not clear those hurdles, and told Ms. Niou so bluntly in calls in recent days.
Source: Elections - nytimes.com
