Anti-poverty campaigners have warned that war in Ukraine is stretching the UK’s overseas aid budget “to breaking point”.
Researchers from the ONE Campaign said the Russian invasion has destroyed the government’s rationale for cutting aid spending from the level of 0.7 per cent to 0.5 per cent of gross national income in 2020.
The non-profit group has called on chancellor Rishi Sunak to bring forward the planned restoration of the 0.7 per cent figure, warning that failure to do so will mean life-saving programmes will be withdrawn from some of the world’s poorest nations.
The Ukrainian war means that the UK will no longer be able to meet its strategic priorities and international obligations within the reduced budget, it added.
Some £220m of UK aid money has been diverted so far to meet immediate humanitarian needs in Ukraine. Meanwhile, the disruption to Ukrainian wheat exports, which make up 10 per cent of global supply, has sent food prices soaring around the world, including in developing countries.
ONE UK director Romilly Greenhill said it was “absolutely the case” that refugees fleeing Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine need to be supported as much as people facing famine in east Africa do.
But she said “by keeping our aid budget unnecessarily reduced, the UK is not in a position to do both; it’s forcing itself into a situation where it has to choose between people in crisis,” adding that “we’re seeing a convergence of crises that mean you can’t just pick and choose which problem to deal with in a vacuum”.
The aid cut – equivalent to £4.5bn a year – was described as a “temporary” measure. Mr Sunak has said he hopes to restore spending to its previous level in 2024-25, but Ms Greenhill said this timetable needs to be accelerated.
A report by ONE found that a series of humanitarian disasters, including the Ukraine refugee crisis and the controversial decision to include Covid vaccines in the aid budget, had made the argument for the cut increasingly “out of date”.
The group’s report comes days before Mr Sunak’s mini-budget statement on Wednesday and ahead of the expected publication of the Foreign Office’s international development strategy.
“We’re in a different place to when the aid budget was first cut,” said Ms Greenhill. “Since the chancellor announced the cut in 2020, circumstances have changed, and the justification that was used then no longer holds.
“The government cannot deliver on its own agenda at the current budget, and with more and more spend being added, UK aid is being stretched to breaking point. It’s pushing existing anti-poverty work out.”
ONE’s analysis, carried out before the invasion of Ukraine, found that the decision to cut UK aid meant 4 million fewer girls will have access to a decent education and that 1 million women and children under five will be at risk of malnutrition.
It also found that aid to low-income countries like Ethiopia, Somalia, South Sudan and Yemen had been slashed, while some middle-income countries like China and Brazil saw a rise in funds received.
UK overseas development aid to Ethiopia fell by 55 per cent from £240.5m in 2020-21 to £107.5m in 2021-22, while China’s funding rose from £2.2m to £13.7m in the same period, the report found.
The Independent has approached the Foreign Office for comment.
