Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has said “phenomenal” Rishi Sunak will find a way of saving his Rwanda deportation plan without leaving the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR).
The sacked home secretary Suella Braverman is among the right-wingers pushing to withdraw from the convention, after the Supreme Court rejected the plan to put asylum seekers on one-way flights to Rwanda.
But Mr Hunt insisted the government did not want to quit the ECHR – and claimed Mr Sunak would “succeed” in getting the flights going and stopping the boats by next year.
“With Rishi Sunak we have the most persistent and most determined prime minister I have ever worked with,” the chancellor told BBC Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.
“When it comes to solving fearsomely complex problems, I never worked with anyone as phenomenal as Rishi … when you interview me next year, we will be having a discussion about how we succeeded in this plan.”
Grilled on whether the government could leave the ECHR, Mr Hunt said: “We don’t believe at this stage that that is necessary … We don’t believe it will come to that, at this stage – we don’t want to do that.”
However, the chancellor added that the government was determined to stop “foreign judges” deciding who comes to the UK. “In the end our bottom line is clear – it is elected representatives in parliament that should make the decision.”
Mr Sunak’s two-pronged strategy for dealing with the Supreme Court ruling is to announce an emergency law that he says will enable parliament to “unequivocally” declare Rwanda a safe destination for asylum seekers.
The PM will also publish an upgraded agreement with the country which is expected to attempt to address the court’s concerns around “refoulement” – the potential for refugees rejected by Rwanda to be sent back to the country they are fleeing.
But Ms Braverman and some Tory MPs want to go further – saying the UK’s domestic and international obligations – the Human Rights Act and ECHR – need to be made invalid using “notwithstanding clauses”.
Mr Sunak is said to be weighing up some elements of the hardline plan proposed by Ms Braverman – including a move to make clear that this designating Rwanda a safe country overrides the Human Rights Act.
One senior Tory MP, a moderate ally of Mr Sunak, told The Independent it was “almost certainly necessary” to avoid further court challenges to the Rwanda flights. Some Tory MPs are pushing Mr Sunak to go further still by coming up with a “derogation” of the ECHR when it comes to Rwanda.
Mr Sunak’s Rwanda plan is “probably dead” in its current form, former Supreme Court judge Lord Sumption told Sky News. He also suggested judges at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, which oversees the convention, would ultimately come to a similar view as the UK Supreme Court.
Challenged on whether the government would be able to introduce emergency Rwanda legislation quickly, Mr Hunt told Sky News on Sunday: “I think so – that’s the plan … We will do it lawfully, and if we need to change the law we’ll do that.”
Tory ministers are considering whether to give an “effective amnesty” to migrants who arrived via small boats since July and are facing the prospect of being sent to Rwanda, according to the Sunday Times.
The Home Office is mulling whether they should be allowed to make an asylum claim – having been left in limbo by July’s Illegal Migration Act – over fears of a fresh legal challenge following the Supreme Court’s Rwanda ruling.
Meanwhile, the government will reportedly send Home Office officials to Rwanda, as it attempts to tweak a treaty with the central African country.
A government source told the Sunday Telegraph that British civil servants “will be doing training and assisting with case working in Rwanda”. But sources played down the idea it was anything new – pointing to the fact that the Home Office already has a team in Rwanda.
The new home secretary James Cleverly told the newspaper: “We have been working on a new treaty with Rwanda, which will be ratified without delay. It will guarantee in law that those who are relocated from the UK to Rwanda will be protected against removal from Rwanda.”
Mr Sunak is expected to set out a new treaty with Rwanda this week, but the far trickier business of emergency legislation could take several weeks.
It comes as Ms Braverman gave an interview with the Mail on Sunday criticising Mr Sunak after he sacked her in the wake of her accusing police of bias over pro-Palestine rallies and suggesting people sleeping rough was a “lifestyle choice”.
She said the prime minister had been lacking “moral leadership” over the Gaza marches in the last month – accusing him of making “tepid and timid statements”.
The former cabinet minister also said that she has “got a copy” of a pact she alleges she signed with Mr Sunak in exchange for her support for him to become PM last October. But she said she was not releasing it – yet.
Ms Braverman described her sacking as a “bit odd” and “confusing” – suggesting Downing Street had approved her now-notorious op-ed accusing the police of bias.
“It was a bit odd because on the Wednesday we had agreement with No 10 that I should write an article for The Times. We had put a draft together and exchanged versions with the team at No 10 so I find it all very confusing,” Ms Braverman said.