More stories

  • in

    Riots test the new British prime minister in his first month in the job

    Support trulyindependent journalismFind out moreCloseOur mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.Louise ThomasEditor Just a month into the job, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer sounds more like the prosecutor he used to be than the leader of a powerful nation as he tries to quell riots that have swept the country in the past week.The unfolding crisis presents his first major test since taking power on July 5. Starmer has blamed far-right instigators for circulating rumors and organizing protests that have targeted mosques, singled out minority communities and featured Nazi salutes, racist rhetoric and attacks that have wounded more than 100 police officers. Misinformation began circulating on social media last week about the teen charged with fatally stabbing three girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class and wounding 10 others on July 29. The suspect was incorrectly identified as a Muslim asylum seeker, spiking racial and ethnic tensions that led to violent unrest. “I guarantee you will regret taking part in this disorder whether directly or those whipping up this action online, and then running away themselves,” Starmer said Sunday after a weekend of violence that included a mob storming and setting fire to a hotel housing migrants. “This is not protest. It is organized, violent thuggery.”The unrest has quickly overshadowed plans Starmer rolled out when he came to power last month after his Labour Party swept Conservatives out of office in a landslide. The new government wanted to focus on getting a sluggish economy moving and fixing public services, such as Britain’s revered national health care system, that have been hobbled by deep cuts following the 2008 financial crisis, said Patrick Diamond, a public policy professor at Queen Mary University of London.“It doesn’t ideally want to be dealing with these kind of identity conflicts,” Diamond said. “I think the protests, the riots are undoubtedly uncomfortable. Governments have plans when they come to office but they often get blown off course and this is another demonstration of that.” Diamond, who was a policy adviser to the previous two Labour prime ministers, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, likened it to the crisis Brown faced when he found his agenda swamped by a flooding crisis when he took office in 2007.Starmer, who was chief prosecutor for England and Wales during the last major outbreak of riots in 2011, has responded with a message of reassurance that communities will be kept safe and perpetrators will be harshly punished.He has also announced plans to create a “standing army” of specialist police to deal with rioting and improve communication and cooperation between law enforcement agencies as mobs of protesters are believed to be traveling to different towns to stir up trouble. One of the political issues facing Starmer is whether he’s seen to be in control of events and is using the whole government in response, effectively providing public services and dealing with issues of community cohesion, Diamond said. “It’s an important early test of the ministers,” Diamond said. “Are they in control of the crisis or is the crisis in control of them?”So far, Starmer’s main political foes have been united in condemning the violence and there hasn’t been much criticism of his response. James Cleverly, the former Conservative home secretary, has said the government should have been quicker in its response to the riots. He has also questioned the purpose and need for the so-called army of police Starmer has called for. Nigel Farage, leader of the right-wing populist Reform UK party, which only has five seats in Parliament despite winning 14% of the vote, has been widely criticized for making the divisive claim that rioters are subject to “two-tier policing” and are treated more harshly than others, such as Black Lives Matter protesters.A large fiscal shortfall could complicate efforts to respond to the crisis as Starmer’s government pledges to pay police overtime, potentially hold night and weekend court sessions to deal with an influx of cases from the mayhem and make space in an already overcrowded prison system for more than 500 additional inmates.On the day of the stabbings in the northeast seaside town of Southport, Treasury Secretary Rachel Reeves had announced what she said was a newly discovered 22-billion-pound ($28 billion) “black hole” in public finances left by the previous administration.“The dire state of the criminal justice system that the new Labour government has inherited from the Conservatives makes this difficult situation especially challenging in terms of a lack of available prison spaces, a really severe backlog in the courts that limits how cases can be processed,” said Cassia Rowland, a senior researcher at the Institute for Government think tank. “All of these things will affect the ability of the police to respond to unrest and disorder, and maintain law and order in the streets.”More than 400 people have been arrested over violence in more than two dozen towns and cities and about 100 have been charged. Few have been released on bail, as some judges have said they don’t want to run the risk of a defendant being released and rejoining the fray.With cases being fast-tracked for swift justice, which is how Starmer responded in 2011, some of those who pleaded guilty at their initial appearance have already been sentenced. A man who punched a police officer in the face outside a Southport mosque the day after the stabbing was sentenced Wednesday to three years in prison. Two others in the mob got prison terms of at least 20 months.Before the unrest began July 30, the government had announced plans to free inmates before their release date to make room in crowded prisons from next month. They may have to do that even sooner now than planned, Rowland said. While an overstretched criminal justice system has the ability to handle a surge of cases in the short term, Rowland said urgent action is needed to prevent a breakdown in the future. “If people are, say, going out and looting or committing very serious criminal damage and arson, getting arrested and then getting released because there’s nowhere to put them, that sends a pretty bad message about the ability of the police and the wider system to maintain law and order,” she said. The initial problem of stopping the violence will eventually give way to other political realities behind the disorder — in particular, how to deal with a migration crisis Europe faces as people desperate to escape flood, famine, war and poverty risk their lives on perilous sea crossings. Far-right and populist rhetoric has been focused on preventing immigration, with protesters chanting “stop the boats,” the slogan former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak used in his vow to stem the tide of small, unstable craft ferrying migrants across the English Channel. “This is an outpouring of violence targeted at immigrants,” said Anand Menon, director of the U.K. in a Changing Europe academic think tank. “It plays into the fact that there is a section of the population that is incredibly concerned about immigration. So I think actually the real challenge for Labour is going to come … around its ability and plans to deal with the broader debates about immigration.” More

  • in

    Social media moderation: How does it work and what is set to change?

    Support trulyindependent journalismFind out moreCloseOur mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.Louise ThomasEditorThe role of social media in the violence and disorder on Britain’s streets has become a key issue in recent days, with the moderation and regulation of platforms coming under scrutiny.Here is a closer look at how content moderation currently works and what regulation of the sector could change it.– How do social media sites moderate content currently?All major social media platforms have community rules that they require their users to follow, but how they enforce these rules can vary depending on how their content moderation teams are set up and how they carry out that process.Most of the biggest sites have several thousand human moderators looking at content that has been flagged to them or has been found proactively by human staff or software and AI-powered tools designed to spot harmful material.– What are the limitations as it stands?There are several key issues with content moderation in general, including; the size of social media makes it hard to find and remove everything harmful posted; moderators – both human and artificial – can struggle to spot nuanced or localised context and therefore sometimes mistake the harmful for the innocent; and moderation is heavily reliant on users reporting content to them – something which doesn’t always happen in online echo chambers.Furthermore, the use of encrypted messaging on some sites means not all content is publicly visible and can be spotted and reported by other users; instead, they rely on those inside encrypted groups reporting potentially harmful content.Crucially, a number of cuts have also been made to content moderation teams at many tech giants recently, often because of financial pressures, which have also impacted content teams’ ability to respond.At X, formerly Twitter, Elon Musk drastically cut back the site’s moderation staff after taking over the company as part of his cost-saving measures, and as he repositioned the site as a platform that would allow more “free speech”, substantially loosening its policies around prohibited content.The result is harmful material is able to spread on the biggest platforms, and why there have long been calls for tougher regulation to force sites to do more.– So how realistic is it to expect all harmful content to be removed?Under the current set-up, not very.In many instances, social media platforms are taking action against posts inciting or encouraging the disorder.As well as through enforcing their own rules, offences around incitement of violence are covered under the Public Order Act 1986, meaning the police as well as social media firms can take action based on any such posts.However, the speed at which this harmful or misleading content spreads can make it difficult for platforms to get every post taken down or have its visibility restricted before it is seen by many other users.New regulation of social media platforms – the Online Safety Act – became law in the UK last year but has not yet fully come into effect.Once in place, it will require platforms to take “robust action” against illegal content and activity, including around offences such as inciting violence.– So how will the Online Safety Act help?The new laws will, for the first time, make firms legally responsible for keeping users, and in particular children, safe when they use their services.Overseen by Ofcom, the new laws will not specifically focus on the regulator removing pieces of content itself, but it will require platforms to put in place clear and proportionate safety measures to prevent illegal and other harmful content from appearing and spreading on their sites.Crucially, clear penalties will be in place for those who do not comply with the rules.In a few months, new safety duties under the Online Safety Act will be in place, but you can act now – there is no need to wait to make your sites and apps safer for usersOfcom open letterOfcom will have the power to fine companies up to £18 million or 10% of their global revenue, whichever is greater – meaning potentially billions of pounds for the largest platforms.In more severe cases, Ofcom will be able to seek a court order imposing business disruption measures, which could include forcing internet service providers to limit access to the platform in question.And most strikingly, senior managers can be held criminally liable for failing to comply with Ofcom in some instances.A set of penalties it hopes will compel platforms to take greater action on harmful content.In an open letter published on Wednesday, Ofcom urged social media companies to do more to deal with content stirring up hatred or provoking violence on Britain’s streets.The watchdog said: “In a few months, new safety duties under the Online Safety Act will be in place, but you can act now – there is no need to wait to make your sites and apps safer for users.”The letter, signed by Ofcom director for online safety Gill Whitehead, said it would publish guidance “later this year” setting out what social media companies are required to do to tackle “content involving hatred, disorder, provoking violence or certain instances of disinformation”.It added: “We expect continued engagement with companies over this period to understand the specific issues they face and we welcome the proactive approaches that have been deployed by some services in relation to these acts of violence across the UK.” More

  • in

    Outrage as Jenrick says people shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ on London streets should be arrested immediately

    Support trulyindependent journalismFind out moreCloseOur mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.Louise ThomasEditorRobert Jenrick has sparked outrage after saying people shouting “Allahu Akbar” on London streets “should be arrested immediately”.“Allahu Akbar” is an Arabic phrase meaning “God is greater” or “God is [the] greatest” which is commonly used in prayer and as a declaration of faith.Asked whether he believes the UK has a system of “two-tier policing”, Mr Jenrick told Sky News: “I have been very critical of the police in the past, particularly around the attitude of some police forces to the protests that we saw since October 7.“I thought it was quite wrong that somebody could shout ‘Allahu Akbar’ on the streets of London and not be immediately arrested. Or project genocidal chants onto Big Ben and that person not be immediately arrested. That attitude is wrong and I’ll always call out the police.”In February, pro-Palestine protesters projected the phrase “From the river to the sea” onto Parliament during a demonstration, drawing anger from some pro-Israel supporters who argue the disputed phrase calls for the eradication of the state of Israel.Sharing a video on X of men in balaclavas chanting “Allahu Akbar”, Mr Jenrick later added: “’Allahu Akbar’ is spoken peacefully and spiritually by millions of British Muslims in their daily lives.“But the aggressive chanting below is intimidatory and threatening. And it’s an offence under Section 4 and 5 of the Public Order Act.“Extremists routinely abuse common expressions for their own shameful ends. All violence must end. All violence must be called out.”Mr Jenrick has been accused of stoking tensions rather than easing them as England faces racist rioting More

  • in

    Polish man sentenced to four months, deported from Denmark for June assault on Danish prime minister

    Support trulyindependent journalismFind out moreCloseOur mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.Louise ThomasEditor A Polish man on Wednesday was sentenced to four months in jail for assaulting the Danish prime minister as well as separate sexual harassment charges. He will also be deported and banned from returning to Denmark for the next six years. The unidentified 39-year-old man, held in pretrial custody since the assault, has been charged with punching Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen’s right shoulder with a clenched fist, causing her to lose her balance but not fall. Frederiksen suffered whiplash at the time. The Copenhagen District Court issued the sentencing, which the defendant didn’t appeal. The court said the assault “emphasized the nature of the violence and that the violence against the prime minister occurred in connection with her performance of her duties as prime minister.”The man had also confessed before the court to other charges, including sexual harassment by exposing himself to passing people and groping a woman at a commuter train station, and fraud involving deposit-marked bottles and cans at two supermarkets. Prosecutor Anders Larsson on Wednesday demanded four months in jail for assaulting the prime minister and for exposing his private parts to passersby, saying while his sexual acts were not gross, they “were certainly uncomfortable” for those seeing it, according to public broadcaster DR. “His behavior and demeanor are far removed from a citizen who should be in our society,” Larsson said in court, according to DR.Frederiksen was on a private break from the Social Democratic Party’s campaign for the elections to renew the European Parliament when the assault took place on a busy downtown Copenhagen plaza. The 46-year-old prime minister, who has been in office since 2019, had been campaigning for her party’s EU lead candidate, Christel Schaldemose, who was elected. The attack was not linked to the campaign event.The assault happened as violence against politicians in Europe spread in the run-up to the European Union elections.In May, a candidate from Germany’s center-left Social Democrats was beaten and seriously injured while campaigning.In Slovakia, the campaign was overshadowed by an attempt to assassinate populist Prime Minister Robert Fico on May 15, sending shockwaves through the nation and reverberating throughout Europe. Fico was shot in the abdomen and seriously wounded. The suspect was immediately arrested and faces terror charges. More

  • in

    Rachel Reeves says Canadian model for pension funds can ‘fire up’ UK economy

    Support trulyindependent journalismFind out moreCloseOur mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.Louise ThomasEditorRachel Reeves wants to create a ‘Canadian style’ pensions model to “fire up” the UK economy. The government is considering consolidating local government pension schemes – to become big enough to invest billions in Britain. It comes as Labour faces pressure to deliver on its ambitious growth targets.The National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) has questioned the Starmer government’s decision to cancel infrastructure projects which would have boosted growth. Last week, in response to what she said was a newly discovered £22 billion black hole in the public finances, Ms Reeves scrapped rail projects and a new hospital building program.Rachel Reeves says Canadian model for pension funds can ‘fire up’ UK economy (Dominic Lipinski/PA) More

  • in

    Tory councillor’s wife who called for mass deportations and hotel fires arrested for inciting racial hatred

    Support trulyindependent journalismFind out moreCloseOur mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.Louise ThomasEditorThe wife of a Tory councillor has been arrested for hate crimes after she called for hotels with asylum seekers in them to be set ablaze.Lucy Connolly, 41, took to X (formerly Twitter) writing: “Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f***ing hotels full of the b******* for all I care… If that makes me racist, so be it.”She has since deleted the tweet and apologised, claiming she had acted on “false and malicious” information. But a number of people made complaints to the police about her allegedly inciting violence.Northamptonshire Police confirmed on Tuesday night that a 41-year-old woman had been arrested on suspicion of inciting racial hatred and remains in custody.Lucy Connolly has been arrested over a Twitter post More

  • in

    Sadiq Khan warns far-right targeting London they will feel ‘full force’ of the law

    Support trulyindependent journalismFind out moreCloseOur mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.Louise ThomasEditorSadiq Khan has warned members of the far-right targeting London they will feel the “full force” of the law. The Labour mayor has also asked Londoners to check on their friends and neighbours as the capital braces for violence. “Show them that care and compassion is what Londoners are all about,” he wrote on X, formerly Twitter.”In London, we have zero-tolerance for racism, Islamophobia, antisemitism or any form of hate and we pride ourselves on being open, diverse and welcoming of all faiths and backgrounds. It’s woven deeply into the fabric of our great city and is why those who seek to divide our communities will never win.”Riot police hold back protesters near a burning police vehicle after disorder broke out in Southport last week More

  • in

    Half of people think Keir Starmer is handling far right riots badly, YouGov polls says

    Support trulyindependent journalismFind out moreCloseOur mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.Louise ThomasEditorHalf of Britons believe Sir Keir Starmer is handling the riots sweeping the UK badly, a new poll has found.Some 49 per cent of people said they felt the prime minister is dealing with the disorder poorly, while just 31 per cent of those surveyed said he was managing it well.The polling, conducted by YouGov on Monday, also saw 43 per cent of respondents say home secretary Yvette Cooper was handling the situation badly, with only 23 per cent saying her response has been good. Sir Keir Starmer will chair a second Cobra meeting in two days amid ongoing violent disorder. (Alberto Pezzali/PA) More