When Gabrielle Goidel and her husband turned to fertility treatment they had already endured the grief and pain of three miscarriages. The couple, who had recently moved from Texas to Alabama, turned to IVF. It was stressful, uncomfortable and very expensive but they were determined to start a family. But just when Gabriele’s treatment had progressed to the stage where her eggs were about to be retrieved they hit an unexpected hurdle.
In February, Alabama’s Supreme Court made a ruling in a case in which embryos in an IVF clinic were accidentally destroyed. In their judgements, they classified the embryos as “extra uterine children”. That decision had the potential to change everything about the use of IVF in the state. If embryos were children, with the same rights, what would that mean for the storage and transportation of embryos? What about embryos that are discarded, either because a previous embryo has already been implanted in the patient, or because they are not viable?
In the face of such confusion, explains the Guardian’s US health reporter, Jessica Glenza, the biggest IVF providers in the state paused treatment. She explains how the courts ruling aligns with other assaults on reproductive rights in the US, such as abortion, and explains what part the Christian right has played in the decision. Hannah Moore hears how the fall out is playing with Republican and Democratic voters – and whether this assault on IVF could spread to other states. Amid the uncertainty, Gabrielle explains the pain and fear potential parents are feeling as their hopes for a child are left in limbo
Source: US Politics - theguardian.com
