Trump Is Making Major White House Renovations. See What’s Changing.
East Wing Ballroom Rose Garden Oval Office Cabinet Room West Colonnade More
125 Shares119 Views
in Elections
East Wing Ballroom Rose Garden Oval Office Cabinet Room West Colonnade More
250 Shares139 Views
in European Politics
Prime Minister Dick Schoof called fresh elections following the first collapse of his government, which would go on to fall a second time within a few months. More
250 Shares139 Views
in European Politics
Dutch voters are to elect a new parliament for the third time in just five years on October 29. Prime Minister Dick Schoof called a snap election following the collapse of his cabinet in June, just 11 months after it was sworn in.
The immediate trigger was the withdrawal of Geert Wilders’s far-right Party for Freedom (PVV) from the governing coalition. The PVV quit after coalition partners rejected its controversial ten-point plan on migration, which included using the army to secure borders and turning back all asylum seekers.
The Schoof government continued in a caretaker capacity, made up of the remaining three coalition parties: the liberal-conservative People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD), the newcomer Christian-democratic New Social Contract (NSC), and the agrarian populist Farmer–Citizen Movement (BBB).
However, on August 22, the caretaker government unravelled when NSC foreign affairs minister Caspar Veldkamp resigned over internal disagreements about policy toward Israel. His departure prompted the entire NSC delegation to step down, triggering the second cabinet collapse in as many months.
To understand the current political turmoil, we have to go back to the formation of the Schoof cabinet following the election of November 2023. That resulted in a landslide victory for Wilders’ PVV, paving the way for the most rightwing government in Dutch post-war history.
After months of tense and protracted negotiations, all four coalition party leaders, including Wilders, opted against taking the prime minister role themselves. Instead, they appointed Dick Schoof, a civil servant and former intelligence chief, as prime minister. This unusual “one-foot-in, one-foot-out” arrangement allowed Wilders to exert significant influence over policy without assuming executive responsibility – an unprecedented level of access to power for the far right.
Parliamentary debates soon reflected this shift, with previously fringe ideas like “remigration” and “omvolking” (akin to the great replacement conspiracy) being openly discussed.
The four-party structure was inherently fragile. Deep ideological divisions meant the coalition stumbled from one crisis to another. The inexperience of the cabinet members and the unpredictability of the PVV only made this situation more volatile.
Legislatively, the cabinet achieved little during its 11 months in office, leaving key structural problems such as housing shortages unresolved. Meanwhile, the coalition attempted to bypass parliamentary checks to push through its immigration proposals.
The overall result of a year of chaos: the erosion of democratic norms and principles, and the rapid normalisation of far right ideas.
A gravitational shift to the right
For the past 50 years, rightwing parties such as the VVD, the Christian-democratic CDA and the far-right PVV have consistently outnumbered their leftwing counterparts in Dutch politics – a trend that runs counter to the popular image of the Netherlands as a progressive beacon.
On average, rightwing parties have held around half of the 150 parliamentary seats. This gives them an advantage once votes are counted since they can often form coalitions among themselves. Leftwing parties generally have to seek coalition partners beyond their own bloc.
This pattern is largely driven by voter behaviour. Most voters stay within their ideological lane, switching only between parties on the same side of the spectrum. The only party that regularly attracts support from both sides is the centrist-progressive D66.
Dutch elections generally involve dozens of parties.
EPA
Since 2021, a third bloc has emerged: the far right, led by Wilders’ PVV and including the extreme-right Forum for Democracy (FvD) and the FvD-splinter party JA21. This bloc appears to have permanently shifted the political centre of gravity to the right.
As in 2023, the far right is set to play a major role in the 2025 election. Despite a turbulent year in government, the PVV continues to lead the polls. Voters appear undeterred by the party’s failure to govern effectively. This time, Wilders has explicitly said he wants to be the prime minister.
But Wilders isn’t the far right’s only contender. JA21 presents itself as a more “reasonable” alternative on the right, while FvD has undergone a key leadership change: controversial founder Thierry Baudet has handed over the reins to Lidewij de Vos. This move that reflects a broader far-right trend of using female leadership to soften the party’s image.
The centre-right camp, meanwhile, is in flux. The VVD has been slipping in the polls. At the same time, party leader Dilan Yeşilgöz has ruled out further partnerships with Wilders and signalled scepticism towards cooperation with the GreenLeft–Labour alliance. These positions have narrowed the VVD’s coalition prospects and raised questions about the party’s strategy.
The NSC is in free fall. After winning 20 seats from scratch in its 2023 debut, the party now appears likely to secure at most one seat – or potentially none at all. In contrast, the long-struggling CDA is staging a surprising comeback.
Following a historic low of just five seats in 2023, the party is now polling at 22 to 26 seats. This surge has been attributed to the so-called “Bontenbal effect,” named after the party’s popular leader, Henri Bontenbal.
The main contender on the left is the GreenLeft–Labour alliance, led by former European Commissioner Frans Timmermans, which is currently polling in third place behind the PVV and CDA. But the broader picture remains unchanged: the left is a structural minority, facing long odds of governing without support from the centre-right.
Finally, after significant losses in 2023, D66 appears to be recovering. Now polling between 11 and 14 seats, the party may once again play a pivotal role in coalition talks, potentially bridging the centre-left and centre-right blocs.
An uncertain outcome
No fewer than 27 parties are running in this election, and in a political landscape that has become notoriously fragmented and volatile, many voters make their final decisions only at the last minute.
With many medium-sized and smaller parties in the mix, and the PVV effectively barred from government participation, it is difficult to envision what a viable coalition might look like – so protracted coalition talks after election day are likely.
But beyond this uncertainty, the stakes for Dutch democracy are unusually high. The Netherlands has seen an alarmingly rapid normalisation of far-right rhetoric. This election may prove more than just another chapter in political instability, but a defining moment for the country’s democratic future. More
75 Shares159 Views
in Elections
8/15
1 month
In SF..
re: catch-22
doubt
bc
I’m glad it
about
KMD
would’ve
an
unjustified catastroph
Crazy
slow
1
lack of vigney.
10/22
1.5 months. This investor conference is
0
true
Lack of routine / sleep schedule/ exercise
See Spiral
Windfall. It embodies health system,
everything wrong
with
575
and
–
most
importantly –
the
That said, I finally
what
will
coming together. And
about
whether
it’s right / justified.
feel confident about do. The details
finally
The problem with
message becomes. Salt evident
most revolutionary acts,
1
don’t feel
i >
that
the
any
message
is
For example, Ted K
тако
–
TA
allowed
ULIC.
вети
ST
way-
that
I’ve procrastinated,
on
the
0m normies some good point? future of humanity, but to
(osi
Make
m.s
to
Learn
Moro
his point
he
Indiscrimanally mailbombs.
Normies categorice him
innocents.
is an
injane
Serial
Killer
focus
cim
the act 1
‘
alucitio
themselves,
and
dismus
his
ideas
that would
be perceived mostly
95
more
importantly unhelpful
to
Spread
avarness
l
improve people’s
SICK, Would do nothing. lives
bet
And most importantly – by committing indescrimine
attrocities
–
he
makes matter
his
Ideas
becomes those of
а
Monster,
which
a
how
true.
I’m
Feeling
foggy, so I
Can’t
wife w/
revolutionary anarchist
Lle crosses
to formist
Monster the
, no
line from
the work
Speed
– clarity
– Confidence,
++
these
thing
a
persin
can
бр.
·Jeas
have
lash
few days
16T2
Hoating
around
for
and
Lant
to
wite
This
is
The
donn
often cal
Comad An
The target
is
Insurance
It checks
The
Impact of ther
the problem with
rebel against
attority, either whose honor outweight
distance
most
militants that
–
injustines; they
message,
Cr
whose More
75 Shares159 Views
in Elections
new video loaded: More
188 Shares199 Views
in Elections
Welcome to Lit Trivia, the Book Review’s regular quiz about books, authors and literary culture. This week’s challenge celebrates allusions to characters and plots from classic novels found in music and television. In the five multiple-choice questions below, tap or click on the answer you think is correct. After the last question, you’ll find links to the books. More
113 Shares149 Views
in Elections
Wednesday was a major moment for the coverage of the United States military. Scores of journalists with access to the Pentagon handed in their press passes rather than sign on to new rules laid out by Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense. The news organizations that have refused to agree to the rules include large […] More
This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.