Rachel Reeves ‘wrongly claimed to have work published in leading economics journal’
Your support helps us to tell the storyFrom reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.Your support makes all the difference.Read moreFurther questions are being raised over alleged exaggerations of Rachel Reeves’s credentials, after the chancellor was reported to have incorrectly claimed some of her work was published in one of the world’s leading economics journals. According to The Times, her Who’s Who entry lists her as a contributor in the Journal of Political Economy, when in fact she had just one article published in the European Journal of Political Economy – a far less prestigious publication. Sources close to the chancellor told the newspaper there was no record of how the entry had come to be made or who had approved the description of her publication record. But the entry has reportedly been listed under her name in Who’s Who since she became an MP in 2010. It is understood individuals supply their own details to Who’s Who and have the opportunity to edit them each year. Who’s Who is one of the world’s longest established reference books, which contains more than 32,500 autobiographical entries. The book’s publisher says it has been “carefully updated for maximum accuracy from information personally supplied by the biographee”.Sir Richard Barnett, an emeritus professor at the University of Ulster, said any academic economist would know the difference between the two journals, claiming they were “chalk and cheese”. “One is world leading, it’s where economists aspire to publish and it’s incredibly competitive to get published in the Journal of Political Economy — if you’re seeking an academic post or a professorship where you’ve published matters as much as what you’ve published,” he told The Times. Rachel Reeves More