More stories

  • in

    Voices: ‘We failed those who protected us’: Independent readers react to UK’s ‘shameful’ MoD data breach

    A catastrophic Ministry of Defence data breach that exposed the details of thousands of Afghans seeking refuge in the UK was kept secret for nearly two years under an unprecedented superinjunction, The Independent has revealed.The leak, which occurred in February 2022, compromised sensitive information about applicants to the MoD’s Arap resettlement scheme – a programme for Afghans who had supported British forces and now feared Taliban reprisals. Officials launched a top-secret response, codenamed Operation Rubific, resulting in the covert evacuation of more than 16,000 people to the UK. The government was prepared to relocate up to 42,000 in total at a projected cost of £7bn.The extraordinary cover-up meant MPs, the public and even many within Whitehall were kept in the dark. A court battle led by The Independent and other media finally overturned the superinjunction this week, raising serious questions about transparency, accountability, and the treatment of those who risked their lives for Britain.Reactions from readers have been swift and damning, touching on moral responsibility, government secrecy, institutional incompetence, and the human cost of this breach. Many drew parallels with past scandals, while others demanded consequences and urgent reform.Here’s what you had to say:Britain has a moral responsibilityIt is an expensive programme, that is true, but the problem is a very big one. The whole thing was bungled from the start – remember Dominic Raab staying on his holiday in Crete while Kabul was being evacuated? And the nature of the leak is just incredible.The billions this costs, spread out over several years, are desperately needed elsewhere, but as with the Gurkhas, Britain has a moral responsibility.RegCostelloThis story has shocked many – what’s your reaction? Add your voice in the comments.(i) ‘Prioritisation of Ukrainian nationals’ and (ii) ‘drastically increased work-from-home arrangements for civil servants’ were the main reasons given for the months-long consular waits for visas and passport processing in 2022 and 2023. I wonder whether this massive evacuation from Afghanistan contributed to that strain, or whether it was all managed by a separate–and–covert department. Either way, covert or not, every resource has its limit, doesn’t it?Ever more freely and transparently may truths emerge!IndySpannerPhonesMany are still in dangerHopefully the Labour government will quickly step up the process of getting all to safety. It’s been over a year, but many are still in danger.The government needs to ensure that 10 per cent of evacuees do not end up homeless, as they suggested could be the case in October 2024.PropagandaoftheDeedA national shameThe way we treated these people who helped us at great risk is a national shame.Albert GinwallahCorruption or shambles?Hmmm… so Britain’s security is more at risk from the government and MoD! Well, I for one am not surprised at all. And that goes for the cover-up and lies from successive governments! Look at the Post Office and Horizon, the blood contamination saga. Is it corruption or a shambles?Red DragonHas the person been sacked?My first question is: has the person who sent the email been sacked and prosecuted for breaching confidentiality as well as costing the country some £400m?If not, why not?TomHawkSpare a thought for Afghan womenThis was a chaotic Tory mess-up, as is traditional. Against the scale of the issue, this ethical UK response is tiny. Spare a thought for the 450k Afghan refugee women forcibly repatriated from Iran and Pakistan since Jan 2025, who are instantly criminalised for travelling alone back to a medieval regime where women and girls have a value less than livestock.HerbaciousScandal after scandalIs there anything the UK government can run?Scandal after scandal after scandal. Billions upon billions p***** up the wall. A little bridge in a London park, £36 million?ChicheeLet’s have an expensive public inquiryWow – a government cover-up. That’s a surprise. Let’s have an expensive public inquiry at the cost to us taxpayers that will last the next five years, with the familiar outcome stating lessons will be learnt…Once that’s out of the way, we can then promote the ‘guilty’ individuals to the House of Lords.theSpycatcherA get-out clauseA “superinjunction” is basically the get-out clause for despotic governments (or in the case of Britain, the rancid ruling class).stoniaKeeping the public in the darkHow ironic that the British establishment invests huge efforts in keeping the public in the dark about so many things of public interest – and yet is incapable of protecting sensitive data when lives actually depend on it.DanilovData like this should never leave a secure government server. What on earth is it doing being emailed to random people and posted on Facebook? And how do you “inadvertently share” a file?sj99Incompetence should have consequencesIncompetence on such a massive scale should have consequences; otherwise, it sends the wrong message. It says: don’t worry about being diligent, do what you like, it doesn’t matter.Sean As if the data breach itself wasn’t appalling enough, the fact that this individual is still employed in another department at the MoD is absolutely shameful.Cyclone8Only in the UK public sector…Where else but the UK public sector can someone do something that puts people’s lives at risk and costs £400m to sort out, yet keep your job and your pension?If there is any better illustration of how we are let down by our public sector, I can’t think of it.These days, our public sector is the refuge of those who should not be let loose with a broom, let alone handle sensitive matters.TomHawkWe are failing to protect those we put at riskBloody shambles. We should have offered sanctuary to those who were at risk just because of who their former employer was – the MoD. While the news and politics are all about ‘illegal immigrants, ’ we are failing to protect those we put at risk. Shameful.SnaughterSome of the comments have been edited for this article for brevity and clarity.Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day’s top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click ‘log in’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here. More

  • in

    Not our finest hour: When Britain’s allies put their lives on the line, we abandoned them – and covered it up

    Perfidious Albion, in modern terms, means that when it comes to international affairs, Britain is seen as treacherous and unreliable – and has turned mendacity into an art.Students of imperial history will recall the hundreds of treaties signed with local chiefs, kings and leaders that were waved aside in the interests of the empire. The French call their deep distrust of Les Anglo-Saxons “Fashoda syndrome” – named after a sordid episode of British duplicity that delivered an obscure bit of southern Sudan to the UK in the 19th century, and triggered the enduring distrust of our closest neighbour up to this day.Now we have the Kabul cock-up. It will inevitably serve to undermine Britain’s woeful and feeble international reputation – and drive some of those who have been betrayed into the arms of our enemies.Afghan special forces soldiers are waiting on help from the UK More

  • in

    How much tax do Britain’s billionaires pay? HMRC has no idea, damning report finds

    The taxman has no idea how much is being collected from billionaires amid mounting calls for a wealth tax, a powerful Commons committee has found. With Rachel Reeves seeking billions of pounds to plug a gaping hole in the public finances, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) cannot identify how much tax is paid by Britain’s billionaires. Despite there being relatively few billionaires, and the group contributing a significant amount to the government’s coffers, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) said HMRC “does not know how many billionaires pay tax in the UK or how much they contribute overall”. The authority “can and must” do more to understand how much tax the very wealthiest are paying, it added.Rachel Reeves needs to find billions of pounds in her autumn Budget More

  • in

    Rachel Reeves vows to take ‘the boot of regulation off the throat of businesses’ in red tape bonfire

    Rachel Reeves vowed to “take the boot of regulation off the throat of businesses” as she unveiled a bonfire of red tape to boost the economy in her keynote Mansion House speech.The beleaguered chancellor has bet her future and her hopes of achieving elusive economic growth on a massive round of City deregulation.It comes as Treasury sources say Ms Reeves wants to see more “risk taking” and move back to the pre-2008 model for financial services, before the banking collapse.In his speech at the same event, however, the Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey stressed he could not “underestimate the challenges” involved in the global trade war triggered by US president Donald Trump’s tariffs, saying the current shift in policy was the “most sudden and fundamental in the post-war era”.In a stark warning, he added: “Increasing tariffs creates the risk of fragmenting the world economy, and thereby reducing activity.” Ms Reeves’s speech came just hours after she had also announced the new “Leeds reforms” to the mortgage market in a bid to open up the opportunity of buying a house to more than 30,000 first-time buyers.Rachel Reeves has set out a package of financial services reforms she hopes will deliver a boost to the economy More

  • in

    Slashing of UK’s international aid more responsible than Trump’s overnight cuts, minister claims

    The UK’s deep cuts to international aid will be carried out in a “responsible and careful” way – not the “overnight” slashes conducted most obviously by nations such as the US – the government has claimed.Charities and international aid experts have lined up to decry the UK cuts, first announced in February, which will bring spending from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of gross national income (GNI). A report also published on Tuesday by the Independent Commission for Aid Impact found UK aid spending overseas could fall to as low as 0.24 per cent once spending at home on asylum accommodation was factored in. But development minister Jenny Chapman has told MPs that “not all aid cuts are the same and I think the way that we’ve done it… is slowly and in a considered way”. “I would contrast that to the way that others have done it, where medications just stop being distributed overnight, where I know of warehouses with vaccines that there’s no way of distributing,” Baroness Chapman said. “That’s a real problem and that will have a huge impact.”In the US, Trump cut roughly 80 per cent of foreign aid spending virtually overnight, in a move that could cause 14 million extra deaths by 2030. The speed of the cuts caused chaos as clinics closed, access to lifesaving medicines was disrupted and health staff didn’t know if they could turn up to work one day to the next. Baroness Chapman added that the withdrawal of the United States from global health funding was proving a “huge problem” but that, “it isn’t possible for us to backfill that capacity sadly”. Baroness Chapman also confirmed during the session of parliament’s international development committee that a world-leading programme to tackle antimicrobial resistance was being cut and suggested a project giving millions access to contraception was under question.The scale of the UK cuts means they are expected to hit virtually all programmes. Even when it comes to the global vaccine alliance, Gavi, of which the UK has been a major champion and is now the biggest funder, its contribution this year fell by £400 million.Baroness Chapman said antimicrobial resistance and the risk of another pandemic were the two biggest threats facing the UK’s health security, but public health and prevention minister Ashley Dalton confirmed during the session that the Fleming programme, which supports countries in Africa and Asia to monitor and prevent antimicrobial resistance, has already been cancelled. Antimicrobial resistance happens when antibiotics are used too much or incorrectly, causing germs to evolve resistance against them and creating dangerous illnesses that can’t easily be treated with the available drugs. Resistant bug strains can cross borders and the phenomenon is estimated to kill a million people a year. Asked about a programme to family planning access and information to 2.6 million women and girls across West and Central Africa, Baroness Chapman said she was “looking at it”.The minister has previously signalled that specialised programmes for women and girls may be hit hard by the cuts. This piece has been produced as part of The Independent’s Rethinking Global Aid series More

  • in

    Not our finest hour: When Britain’s allies put their lives on the line, we abandoned them – and hushed it all up

    Perfidious Albion, in modern terms, means that when it comes to international affairs, Britain is seen as treacherous and unreliable – and has turned mendacity into an art.Students of imperial history will recall the hundreds of treaties signed with local chiefs, kings and leaders that were waved aside in the interests of the empire. The French call their deep distrust of Les Anglo-Saxons “Fashoda syndrome” – named after a sordid episode of British duplicity that delivered an obscure bit of southern Sudan to the UK in the 19th century, and triggered the enduring distrust of our closest neighbour up to this day.Now we have the Kabul cock-up. It will inevitably serve to undermine Britain’s woeful and feeble international reputation – and drive some of those who have been betrayed into the arms of our enemies.Afghan special forces soldiers are waiting on help from the UK More

  • in

    What would a wealth tax mean for Britain? Ask Chris Blackhurst anything

    Welcome to an exclusive Ask Me Anything with me, Chris Blackhurst – business commentator at The Independent.Scroll down to read more – or jump straight to the Q&A by clicking here.Talk of a wealth tax is back. And this time, it’s being pushed not from the political fringe, but from within the Labour Party itself.Former party leader Lord Kinnock has called for a 2 per cent tax on assets over £10 million, arguing it could raise up to £11 billion a year and help shore up the UK’s finances. His intervention has reignited debate over an “asset tax” on the super-rich.With five trade unions now backing the idea, and Rachel Reeves refusing to rule anything out ahead of her Mansion House speech, Labour’s direction on tax policy is under real scrutiny.I’ve spent decades reporting from the Square Mile and speaking to the people who keep Britain’s economy turning. And from where I sit, a wealth tax is not just economically risky – it’s a political signal that the UK is no longer serious about prosperity, investment, or growth.The wealthy, contrary to popular myth, don’t live in a vacuum. They create jobs, fund philanthropy, and help drive economic confidence. Drive them away, and it’s not just the rich who suffer – it’s the exchequer, small businesses, and the very public services Labour wants to support. The UK’s loss is another’s gain. There are plenty of countries lining up to entice the wealthy to relocate. So what’s really going on here? Is a wealth tax a fair way to close Labour’s fiscal black hole – or a dangerous misstep that could stall Britain’s recovery just as it gets going?Join me live at 6pm BST on Wednesday, 16 July, as I take your questions and comments on wealth, taxation, and the high-stakes economic choices facing this new Labour government.Submit your questions in the comments below. If you’re not already a member, click “sign up” in the comments section to participate. For a full guide on how to comment, click here.Get a free fractional share worth up to £100.Capital at risk.Terms and conditions apply.Go to websiteADVERTISEMENTGet a free fractional share worth up to £100.Capital at risk.Terms and conditions apply.Go to websiteADVERTISEMENTDon’t worry if you can’t see your question right away – some may be hidden until the Q&A starts. See you at 6pm! More

  • in

    EU ministers discuss deal with Israel to increase Gaza aid

    The European Union is seeking updates from Israel on implementation of a new deal to deliver humanitarian aid to Gaza, according to Kaja Kallas, the bloc’s foreign policy chief.Foreign ministers from the EU’s 27-member nations are meeting Tuesday in Brussels in the wake of a new aid deal for Gaza largely forged by Kallas and Israeli foreign minister Gideon Saar.Saar met with EU leaders on Monday after agreeing last week allow desperately needed food and fuel into the coastal enclave of 2.3 million people who have endured more than 21 months of war.“We have reached a common understanding with Israel to really improve the situation on the ground, but it’s not about the paper, but actually implementation of the paper,” Kallas said before the meeting of the Foreign Affairs Council.“As long as it hasn’t really improved, then we haven’t all done enough,” she said, before calling for a ceasefire.Kallas said the ministers will also discuss Iran’s nuclear program, concerns over developments in Georgia and Moldova, and new sanctions on Russia. The EU is readying its 18th package of sanctions on Russia, with holdouts within the bloc arguing over the keystone policy of capping oil prices to cut into Moscow’s energy revenues.European nations like Ireland, the Netherlands and Spain have increasingly called for the EU’s ties with Israel to be reassessed in the wake of the war in Gaza. A report by the European Commission found “ indications ” that Israel’s actions in Gaza are violating human rights obligations in the agreement governing its ties with the EU — but the block is divided over what to do in response. That public pressure over Israel’s conduct in Gaza made the new humanitarian deal possible even before a ceasefire, said Caspar Veldkamp, the Dutch foreign minister. “That force of the 27 EU member states is what I want to maintain now,” he said.“The humanitarian deal announced last week shows that the Association Agreement review and use of EU leverage has worked,” said one European diplomat.Spain’s Foreign Minister José Manual Albares Bueno said details of the deal were still being discussed and that the EU would monitor results to see if Israel is complying with those.“We don’t know whether it we will know how it works,” he said. “It’s very clear that this agreement is not the end — we have to stop the war.”The war began after Hamas attacked Israel in 2023, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 others hostage, most of whom have been released in earlier ceasefires. Israel responded with an offensive that has killed more than 58,000 Palestinians, more than half of them women and children, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry.The ministry, which is under Gaza’s Hamas-run government, doesn’t differentiate between civilians and combatants. The U.N. and other international organizations see its figures as the most reliable statistics on war casualties.The EU has observed some aid trucks entering Gaza, but “not enough,” said Hajda Lahbib, the EU Commissioner for humanitarian air and crisis management.“The situation is still so dangerous, so violent, with strikes still continuing on the ground, that our humanitarian partners cannot operate. So, this is the reality we need to have a ceasefire,” she said. More