Markus Andrews

Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailWatch as Rishi Sunak faces Sir Keir Starmer at Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday 10 January.Much of the discussion was around the Post Office scandal, which has dominated headlines in recent days.The government is “very close” to announcing how it will clear the names of those wrongly convicted in the Horizon IT scandal, according to postal services minister Kevin Hollinrake.Mr Sunak came under pressure from MPs to set out how the government will exonerate hundreds of subpostmasters accused of swindling money as a result of the flawed computer system.The government says compensation has been paid to more than 2,700 claimants, but hundreds were also prosecuted over shortfalls in their branches caused by software errors.Another 130 people have come forward after an ITV show dramatised what has been described as the most widespread miscarriage of justice in British history.The Government is considering emergency legislation to overturn all convictions but there are concerns that it could be seen to be interfering with the independent courts process by quashing them “en bloc”, Mr Hollinrake said. More

Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailRishi Sunak faces a new threat over his flagship Rwanda bill, with around 30 right-wing Tory rebels planning to back amendments aimed at toughening up the legislation.The PM is under pressure from both sides of his party over the controversial legislation – aimed at overcoming the Supreme Court’s objections to the deportation flights plan.Led by former immigration minister Robert Jenrick, hardliners have tabled amendments designed to tackle last-minute injunctions by the European Court of Human Rights.Mr Jenrick said: “If we don’t fix this bill the country will be consigned to more illegal crossings, more farcical migrant hotels and billions more of wasted taxpayers’ money in the years to come.”Ms Braverman – supporting the changes put forward by Mr Jenrick – warned Mr Sunak that failure to toughen the bill would be “a betrayal of the British people”.Writing in the Daily Mail, she said: “As drafted, this bill will not stop the boats,” before adding that government lawyers had warned it would get “bogged down with individual legal challenges from migrants”.Mr Jenrick would not say whether he will vote against the Rwanda Bill at the crucial third reading stage if it is not amended.He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “I hope that we’ll win the argument first, so we’re not looking ahead to that.”Right-wingers Danny Kruger and Miriam Cates, leaders of the New Conservatives, said that the amendments were “proportionate, consistent with our international obligations, and have respectable legal arguments behind them”.Ms Cates told Times Radio that “the biggest threat” to the Tories is “looking daft” at the general election expected later in 2024 if they had not stopped the boats.Robert Jenrick, former immigration minister, poses major threat to Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda billAs well as trying to block any role for the European court in deportation cases, Mr Jenrick and the New Conservatives are also set to table amendments aimed at tightening the grounds on which illegal migrants can bring individual claims.At least nine former cabinet ministers – including former PM Liz Truss, former home secretary Suella Braverman, Sir Iain Duncan Smith and Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg – are understood to be ready to back the four amendments.It would take just 29 Tory MPs to overturn Mr Sunak’s 56-seat parliamentary majority and defeat the government – if enough right-wingers are angry about their amendments being ignored by the government.More than 20 Conservatives abstained at the initial reading before Christmas, but some threatened to vote against unless Mr Sunak agrees to changes. And some big names who did not abstain are ready to back the amendments set to be tabled next week.“This is the third piece of legislation in three years, it’s three strikes or you’re out, we’ve got to get this right,” Mr Jenrick told the Today programme. The right-winger claimed that the amendments were still in line with international law – though he argued that “vital national interests supersede very contested notions of international law”.Sunak said his Rwanda bill will help him deliver his ‘stop the boats’ pledgeCommons Leader Penny Mordaunt on Tuesday announced the bill’s committee stage will take place next week, on 16 and 17 January.Former deputy prime minister Damian Green, leader of the ‘One Nation’ group of Tory moderates, said on Tuesday that Mr Sunak had assured him the bill would not be strengthened.“The prime minister’s looked me in the eye and said that he doesn’t want to go any further” and potentially break international law by ignoring its human rights obligations, he told the New Statesman.Mr Sunak won a key Commons vote on his emergency draft law in December despite speculation about a major rebellion by Tory MPs. But it faces further dissent during the upcoming parliamentary stages and heavy scrutiny in the Lords.The Tory leader has said he would welcome “bright ideas” on how to improve the bill – but has previously insisted it strikes the right balance with only an “inch” between his rescue plan and more radical measures that would risk Rwanda pulling out of the scheme.The legislation seeks to enable parliament to deem Rwanda “safe” generally, but still makes limited allowances for personal claims against being sent to the east African nation under a clause disliked by Conservative hardliners.Meanwhile, Labour was defeated in its bid to force the government to release documents relating to the scheme. MPs voted 304 to 228, majority 76, to reject the proposal.The opposition motion asked for any documents that show the cost of relocating each individual asylum seeker to Rwanda as well as a list of all payments made or scheduled to be made to Rwanda’s government.It also asked for the government’s internal breakdown of the more than 35,000 asylum decisions made last year and an unredacted copy of the confidential memorandum of understanding ministers reached with the East African country. More

Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailTwo British nationals are being held hostage by Hamas, David Cameron confirmed in his first full questioning by MPs since returning to government late last year. The foreign secretary also said he had concerns that Israel may have acted in breach of international law in the Middle East conflict, but that it was not his job to make a “legal adjudication” about the country’s actions.During a tense exchange with SNP MP Brendan O’Hara, Lord Cameron said he had seen information in respect of the crisis that is “deeply concerning” but would not say whether he had received legal advice suggesting that laws had been breached.The former prime minister told the Commons foreign affairs select committee: “If you’re asking me am I worried that Israel has taken action that might be in breach of international law, because this particular premises has been bombed or whatever – yes, of course I’m worried about that, and that’s why I consult the Foreign Office lawyers when giving this advice on arms exports.”Lord Cameron also called on Israel to restore the water supply in Gaza, and confirmed that the two hostages were still being held along with others who are “very connected to Britain”.He said the government is doing “everything we can” to relieve suffering. An estimated 240 people were taken prisoner in Gaza after Hamas’s 7 October attacks against Israel. Some 105 were released during a ceasefire in November.Pressed on whether it is a breach of international law to turn water off in an occupied territory, Lord Cameron refused to answer. His permanent under secretary in the Foreign Office, Sir Philip Robert Barton, said it is a breach of international law.Foreign secretary David Cameron confirmed the number of British hostages still being held in Gaza Tory chair of the committee Alicia Kearns pressed Lord Cameron on whether he had received any advice saying that Israel is in breach of international law. “I can’t recall every single piece of paper put in front of me,” he said.But, in a bid for caution on the part of the Israeli government, he added that he “would have differences” with how Israel has responded to the Hamas attacks on 7 October.More than 22,000 people have been killed in Gaza since Israel launched its attack on the territory, with the vast majority of victims being women and children, according to the Hamas-run Palestinian health ministry.Speaking after the committee hearing, Ms Kearns said that she did not think Lord Cameron had provided clear answers to MPs on the issue of Israel and international law. She told BBC Radio 4’s PM programme that she believed Israel, as an occupying power in Gaza, had breached international humanitarian law.“The reality is that it is not always for courts to make determinations,” she said. “On issues such as international humanitarian law, and whether or not it has been broken or not, I made the point to him [that] he has previously made those determinations from the despatch box as prime minister.”Relatives of a man killed in the occupied West Bank on Tuesday prepare for his burial The foreign secretary also that said a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine is possible, as the conflict in Gaza rages on. “Out of a crisis should come some opportunity,” Lord Cameron said.Asked if the two-state solution, which would see Israel remain alongside an independent Palestinian state, is “remotely feasible” after the bitter war, he replied: “Yes, you’ve got to hope that it’s feasible.”Rishi Sunak’s spokesperson was asked whether the prime minister shares Lord Cameron’s concerns that Israel may be violating international law. He replied: “It’s an issue we continue to keep under review, and obviously we have made our views clear to the Israeli government at a number of levels on this.”It came as US secretary of state Antony Blinken urged Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his war cabinet to maintain a path towards the creation of a Palestinian state.Mr Blinken, who toured Israel’s Arab neighbours for talks on plans for the future governance of Gaza and integration in the Middle East, said earlier that he would be discussing the “way forward” for the war during the meetings.He met one-on-one with Mr Netanyahu at Tel Aviv’s Kirya military base, and then with the war cabinet that was formed in the wake of the attacks by Palestinian Hamas militants.Antony Blinken, left, meets with Israel’s foreign minister Israel Katz, second right, on TuesdayRepeating the Biden administration’s support for Israel’s right to prevent a repeat of the attacks, Mr Blinken “stressed the importance of avoiding further civilian harm and protecting civilian infrastructure in Gaza”, US state department spokesperson Matthew Miller said in a statement.As well as trying to damp down regional tensions, Mr Blinken has been discussing plans for the future governance of Gaza, which could involve Israel’s Muslim-majority neighbours.Mr Blinken earlier met with Israel’s president Isaac Herzog and foreign minister Israel Katz. He told Mr Katz there were opportunities for regional integration and connectivity “but we have to get through this very challenging moment”.In the meeting with Mr Netanyahu, Mr Blinken “reiterated the need to ensure lasting, sustainable peace for Israel and the region, including by the realisation of a Palestinian state”, Mr Miller said.Mr Blinken was also set to meet with families of hostages taken by Hamas, and discuss the “relentless efforts” to bring them back.Several dozen protesters gathered outside the hotel where Mr Blinken was having meetings and called for a ceasefire to secure the release of hostages. More