More stories

  • in

    US diplomats brace as Trump plans foreign policy shake-up in wider purge of government

    The US foreign policy establishment is set for one of the biggest shake-ups in years as Donald Trump has vowed to both revamp US policy abroad and to root out the so-called “deep state” by firing thousands of government workers – including those among the ranks of America’s diplomatic corps.Trump’s electoral victory is also likely to push the Biden administration to speed up efforts to support Ukraine before Trump can cut off military aid, hamper the already-modest efforts to restrain Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu in Gaza and Lebanon and lead to a fresh effort to slash and burn through major parts of US bureaucracy including the state department.Trump backers have said he will be more organised during his second term, often dubbed “Trump 2.0”, and on the day after election day US media reported that Trump had already chosen Brian Hook, a hawkish State Department official during the first Trump administration, to lead the transition for America’s diplomats.And yet analysts, serving and former US diplomats and foreign officials said that it remained difficult to separate Trump’s bluster from his actual plans when he takes power in January. What is clear is that his priority is to bin many of the policies put in place by his predecessor.“I’m skeptical that the transition process will be super-impactful since the natural instinct of the new team will be to toss all of Biden’s foreign policy in the dumpster,” one former senior diplomat said.“If you go back to 2016, Mexico didn’t pay for the wall. And, you know, it doesn’t look like there was a secret plan to defeat Isis,” said Richard Fontaine, the CEO of the Center for a New American Security thinktank. “Some of these things didn’t turn out the way that they were talked about on that campaign trail and we go into this without really knowing what the president’s proposal will be for all of this – and what he will do.”One clear priority, however, is to target many of those involved in crafting US foreign policy as part of a broader purge of the US government.Trump has vowed to revive Schedule F, a designation that would strip tens of thousands of federal employees of their protections as civil servants and define them instead as political appointees, giving Trump immense powers to fire “rogue bureaucrats”, as he called them in a campaign statement.Within the State Department, there are concerns that Trump could target the bureaus that focus specifically on issues that he has attacked during his reelection campaign such as immigration. In particular, he could slash entire bureaus of the State Department, including the bureau of population, refugees and migration (PRM, which resettled 125,000 refugees to the US in 2022 alone), as well as the bureau of democracy, human rights and labor, which has focused on the violation of the rights of Palestinians by Israel.Project 2025, a policy memo released by the conservative Heritage Foundation, suggested that Trump would merely reassign PRM to shift resources to “challenges stemming from the current immigration situation until the crisis can be contained” and said it would demand “indefinite curtailment of the number of USRAP [United States refugee admissions program] refugee admissions”.But the blueprint, authored by Kiron Skinner, a former director of policy planning at the State Department during the first Trump administration, went further, suggesting that Trump could simply freeze the agency’s work for a complete reevaluation of its earlier policy.“Before inauguration, the president-elect’s department transition team should assess every aspect of State Department negotiations and funding commitments,” a section of the memo said. After inauguration, Skinner wrote, the secretary of state should “order an immediate freeze on all efforts to implement unratified treaties and international agreements, allocation of resources, foreign assistance disbursements, domestic and international contracts and payments, hiring and recruiting decisions, etc” pending a review by a political appointee.“Everyone is bracing [themselves],” said one diplomat stationed abroad. “Some [diplomats] may choose to leave before he even arrives.”Trump has also vowed to “overhaul federal departments and agencies, firing all of the corrupt actors in our national security and intelligence apparatus”.As Joe Biden enters his lame duck period, the administration will focus on trying to push through $6bn in aid that has already been approved for Ukraine, as well as exerting whatever leverage remains in his administration to find an unlikely ceasefire in Gaza.At the same time, they will have to calm a nervous world waiting to see what Trump has planned for his second term.“I think they’re going to do everything they can to make the case that the United States needs to continue to aid Ukraine, and they’ll have to spend a lot of time, I’m sure, dealing with nervous Ukrainians and nervous Europeans,” said Fontaine. At an upcoming G20 summit in Rio, the current administration was “going to try to reassure the rest of the world that a lot of the things that they have done over the past four years are going to stick into the future rather than just be kind of undone”.“And,” he added, “we’ll see what the reaction to that is.” More

  • in

    US election briefing: Trump on track to win popular vote as millions of Biden voters desert Harris

    Republicans are on track to win the popular vote in a presidential election for the first time in 20 years, with Donald Trump leading Kamala Harris with 72.5m votes against nearly 68m on Wednesday night after winning the electoral college earlier in the day.Although the vote count is unfinished, Trump is expected to meet the 74m votes he won in 2020, while Harris is on track to far underperform the 81m votes garnered in 2020 by her predecessor, Joe Biden.Harris conceded on Wednesday afternoon, urging Americans devastated by the result to “not despair” but to stay engaged and remain vigilant in the fight to protect American democracy. You can read Harris’s concession speech in full here or watch it here.Harris had called Trump to congratulate him earlier on Wednesday, as did Biden, who also invited his former opponent to meet him in the White House. Barack and Michelle Obama issued a statement congratulating the Republicans and praising Harris and running mate Tim Walz as “extraordinary public servants who ran a remarkable campaign”.Here’s what else happened on Wednesday:US presidential election news and updates

    Special counsel prosecutors will shut down their criminal cases against Trump before he takes office, as his elevation to the presidency meant they would not proceed to trial. Other proceedings against him face uncertain futures.

    Trump spent his first day as president-elect out of the public eye after addressing supporters in Florida during the wee hours of Wednesday morning. He will select personnel to serve under his leadership in the days and weeks ahead, his campaign said. Take a look at some of the cabinet contenders here.

    A senior Republican in the House of Representatives has outlined plans for Trump’s first 100 days. In a letter, Steve Scalise said the federal government would “lock in the Trump tax cuts”, “unleash American energy” and “surge resources to the southern border” to fight illegal immigration. Scalise and Mike Johnson are running for re-election to their respective positions of House majority leader and House speaker.

    Control of the House remained unclear on Wednesday, with Republicans ahead but short of a 218 majority, according to the Associated Press. Republicans hoped to add to their majority in the Senate.

    More women voted for Harris, but by smaller margins than her Democratic predecessors, and Trump picked up a greater share of younger Americans than he did in 2020. Read more key exit poll takeaways here.

    Where specific policy proposals were on the ballot, “red” US states passed progressive laws such as minimum wage protections, while “blue” states voted for conservative measures such as tough-on-crime initiatives. Abortion access measures won in seven states but fell short in three.

    Wall Street and bitcoin rallied to fresh record highs and the dollar soared, while renewable energy stocks fell as experts warned Trump’s win would set back global climate action. Analysts continued to expect the US Federal Reserve to cut interest rates by a quarter point on Thursday, on the back of cooling inflation.

    Mexico’s president has reassured her country that “there’s nothing to worry about” despite Trump’s threats of punishing tariffs, mass migrant deportations and US military strikes on organised crime groups in Mexican territory.

    Leaders around the world have congratulated Trump, including from the United Kingdom, Australia and Europe, while global far-right figures celebrated.

    Harris’s supporters expressed shock, grief and disillusionment as they listened to her concede at Howard University campus in Washington DC, while Democrats across the country are reflecting on what went wrong. Around the world, Americans living in Britain and Australia have grieved and celebrated the results with their local friends and sympathisers.

    US pollsters came under fire for the third presidential election running after again underestimating Trump’s support and failing to foresee his emphatic ballot-box triumph.
    Read more of the Guardian’s 2024 US election coverage

    Democrats ask: ‘How do you spend $1bn and not win?’

    How Trump won the presidency – in maps

    Jon Stewart: ‘This is not the end’

    With Trump re-elected, this is what’s at stake More

  • in

    What will Trump do in power? – podcast

    Donald Trump won a decisive victory in the US presidential election on Tuesday night, becoming the first man in 150 years to have been voted out as president and then win office again.The Guardian’s Washington bureau chief, David Smith, explains to Lucy Hough how the night unfolded at Trump’s victory rally in Florida, and how the former president even managed to win the popular vote after months of polls predicting a knife-edge contest.Trump’s rhetoric on the campaign trail was radical and extreme, promising – for example – to deport millions of migrants. So what will he actually do in office, and who will he appoint to achieve his aims?And, with his long-held slogan of “America First”, what will Trump’s return to the White House mean for the world order?Support the Guardian today: theguardian.com/todayinfocuspod More

  • in

    ‘What have they done…Again?’: What the UK papers say after Trump’s momentous political comeback

    Donald Trump’s sweeping victory in the US presidential election saw the former president securing an unexpected majority in the popular vote, control of the Senate, and at least 295 electoral college votes – defeating vice-president Kamala Harris in a contest that dominated UK front pages on Thursday.The Guardian led with two words: “American Dread”, a play on the American dream, alongside a close up portrait of the president-elect.Americans awoke to a “transformed country and a rattled world” as the realisation of Trump’s stunning return to power started to sink in, wrote the Guardian’s Ed Pilkington, summing up the mood.The Mirror highlighted a question lingering on many minds around the world about what Trump 2.0 might bring, with the headline: “What have they done…Again?Trump’s victory, it said, had ushered in fears the Republican leader would be even “more divisive and brutal than in his first spell in the White House”.“A comeback to Trump all comebacks” ran the Daily Mail, noting that in the end “it wasn’t even close”.Trump’s electoral victory is unprecedented in many ways. For one, he is the first convicted felon to win the US presidency, a point highlighted by the front page of the Express, and one that did not stop Americans choosing him to lead once more.“He’s been shot, convicted of a crime and branded a fascist… but he’s still the people’s choice.”The Times opted for a different tone, choosing the headline: “Trump promises Golden Age after sweeping Harris aside.”Trump was returning to the White House more “powerful than ever” the Times said.The paper also included on its front page the headline of an opinion piece, titled: “Face it, liberals, this is what millions wanted.”The Sun riffed off one of Trump’s signature lines from his reality TV show The Apprentice, running with the snappy headline: “You’re Rehired”.“Trump’s back for Season 2”, the paper wrote, despite being “shot, sued, tried, insulted and written off”.“Trump is back”, echoed the Financial Times on its front page, adding that American democracy and alliances were “poised for turmoil”, with stocks opening at new highs despite fresh fears over tariffs.Featuring an arresting photo of a confident-looking Trump pointing his finger at the viewer, an image that mirrors the iconic Uncle Sam cartoon, the Telegraph said Trump had won with a powerful mandate, as he took control of the Senate, popular vote and “every swing state”.“Trump’s clean sweep”, its headline read.In Scotland, the Daily Record, featured a smirking Donald Trump alongside the line “The star-spangled spanner”.The paper summed up his forthcoming second term in a witty pun, dubbing it: “A Grave New Don”. More

  • in

    Why did so many Latino and Hispanic voters help return Donald Trump to power?

    Voters from Latino (immigrants from Latin America and their descendants) and Hispanic (people whose heritage is from Spanish-speaking countries) backgrounds contributed significantly to Donald Trump’s resounding victory over Kamala Harris in the US presidential election.

    Overall, Trump increased his share of the Latino vote to 45% nationwide, up substantially from 32% in his 2020 loss to Joe Biden.

    About 53% of the voters in this group supported Harris, down from the estimated 60% who voted for Biden in 2020. The shift is an outstanding political feat for the Republican candidate, especially considering Trump’s uneasy and frequently antagonistic relationship with Latino and Hispanic communities.

    So why did so many Latino and Hispanic voters back Trump?

    Nightmares and dreams

    It might seem illogical that Trump strengthened his backing among Latino and Hispanic voters, given his anti-immigrant rhetoric and policies, his threat to enact mass deportations of illegal immigrants, and his frequently blatant racist remarks.

    Politics, however, is not a realm of pure reason. Emotion and narrative play a role, too.

    Trump’s surge among Latino and Hispanic voters can be traced back to nightmares and dreams never far from voters’ minds.

    Many of these voters left the nightmare of poverty behind in their countries of origin. Their dreams are rooted in traditional (mainly masculine) stories about prosperity in the “land of the free”.

    President Donald Trump, front centre, participates in a roundtable with Latino leaders.
    AP Photo/Lynne Sladky

    ‘Love’, insults and slander

    Trump has boasted about how much he “loves” Latinos and Hispanics. His actions, however, mostly disprove his words.

    When Trump launched his first presidential campaign in 2015, he called Mexicans “rapists” who were “bringing drugs” and “crime” into the US.

    He claimed this problem was “coming from all over South and Latin America”.

    He also promised to build “a great, great wall” on the US southern border, for which Mexico was meant to pay, to stop undocumented immigrants.

    In the third and last 2016 presidential debate, he labelled Latino and Hispanic men, without any nuance or evidence, as “bad hombres” who constantly smuggle drugs into the US.

    During his first term in office, the Trump administration then implemented policies that specifically hurt Latino and Hispanic communities.

    These included a “zero tolerance” illegal immigration approach, which separated parents from their children.

    In November 2023, he argued this served as an effective deterrent, foreshadowing that this policy may return if he was re-elected.

    In his 2024 campaign, Trump claimed immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the US.

    He again vowed to crack down on immigration, promising mass deportations of some 11 million undocumented people.

    At a Trump rally a week ago, comedian Tony Hinchcliffe then likened Puerto Rico to a “floating island of garbage.” Trump told ABC News he had not heard the remark and stopped short of denouncing it.

    The rainbow of Latino and Hispanic pluralism

    Why would Latino and Hispanic voters support a candidate who so candidly has shown his contempt for them?

    A recent Siena poll for the New York Times provides some clues.

    Over 40% among these Latino and Hispanic voters supported both Trump’s pledge to continue building a wall along the Mexico border and his deportation plans.

    About 63% said they do not “feel like he is talking about me” when Trump discusses immigration.

    Many Latino and Hispanic voters do not ‘feel like he is talking about me’ when Trump discusses immigration.
    EPA/ALLISON DINNER

    Latino and Hispanic voters are frequently clustered as a distinct ethnic and cultural group in US political surveys.

    They are contrasted, for example, against “white”, “Black” or “Asian” voters.

    Latinos and Hispanics, however, are diverse in national origin, class, ethnic and gender characteristics. They are not a monolith, but rather a rainbow.

    There were 62.5 million Latinos and Hispanics living in the US in 2021, about 19% of the total population.

    An estimated 36.2 million were eligible to vote this year, representing 15% of potential voters.

    Latinos and Hispanics also make up a large share of voters in swing states such as Nevada, Arizona and Pennsylvania.

    Their wide variety of backgrounds, however, underscores why grouping them as a uniform bloc is flawed.

    In 2021, the five largest populations in the US by national origin were:

    Mexicans (37.2 million)
    Puerto Ricans (5.8 million)
    Salvadorans (2.5 million)
    Dominicans (2.4 million)
    Cubans (2.4 million).

    The experience of immigration and life in the US is different for each of these groups. Their response to the political campaigns would also be different.

    The myth of ‘Comrade Kamala’

    It’s too early to say for sure what drove voter patterns in each community. But we can venture a few hypotheses.

    Trump, for example, falsely portrayed Harris as a committed communist, such as in this post on X (which garnered over 81 million views):

    For Latino immigrants coming from countries under authoritarian regimes, such as Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua, this messaging recalls memories of the situation they fled.

    “I will deliver the best future for Puerto Ricans and Hispanic Americans. Kamala will deliver you poverty and crime,” Trump told his supporters at a recent rally.

    Playing on the fears of a “communist” system under Harris was likely a successful strategy. The leftist regimes in many Latinos’ countries of origin are seen as a threat to their economic security.

    Kamala, ‘evil woman’

    Gender also played a major role in Trump’s victory. Trump appealed to young men, who fear women’s gains in equality. Latino and Hispanic men were no exception.

    A viral campaign video showed Trump dancing to the famous salsa theme “Juliana”. The lyrics were modified though, simply describing Harris as “mala” (evil).

    A September NBC poll showed a vast gender gap between Trump and Harris voters. While women backed the Democrats 58% to 37%, men supported Republicans 52% to 40%.

    This played out specifically among Latinos in the election, too. According to exit polls by the Associated Press, 47% of Latino men supported Trump in the election, compared to 38% of Latino women.

    Trump tapped into ideals of masculinity and hierarchy that, while not exclusive to Latino and Hispanic men, uphold the promise of a return to traditional gender models.

    Many men are angry about losing their former privileges. They expressed their nostalgia for stereotypical male traits (and corresponding female submission) in the polls. More

  • in

    Harris voters mourn loss after sobering concession speech: ‘There’s nothing left’

    The mood was calm and sober on the Howard University campus as people waited to hear vice-president Kamala Harris’s concession speech on Wednesday afternoon. An area that is usually the central hub of campus life, the Yard, was mostly filled with Harris campaign staff, media and members of the public.Harris appeared about 25 minutes after her scheduled time and opened with a message on unity, building community and coalitions. “My heart is full today,” Harris said. “Full of heart for my country, and full of resolve.“Hear me when I say that the light of America’s promise will always burn bright. As long as we never give up and as long as we keep fighting.”Harris encouraged young people to acknowledge their power and to believe in the impossible. “At this time, it’s necessary that people not become complacent,” she added, “but to commit to organizing and mobilizing.” Harris encouraged her supporters to embrace “the light of optimism” and of service.“Hear me when I say that the light of America’s promise will always burn bright. As long as we never give up and as long as we keep fighting.”View image in fullscreenHarris’s supporters expressed shock, grief and disillusionment as they reflected upon the harrowing hours since the election was called for Republican candidate, Donald Trump. Instead of feeling galvanized to build resistance movements, voters said that they needed time to rest and reset before thinking of next steps after the election.“It revealed to me the heart of us as a nation,” 47-year-old Janeen Davis, a county government employee said. “It’s taking my pride away. Being an Indigenous person, it hits me hard. Our democracy is built upon our Indigenous ancestors … and so much has been torn from the Indigenous community, and so now that that’s at stake, it’s like there’s nothing left.” Davis said that she was in fear of political violence from Trump supporters if his opponents resist his presidency now. “My personal opinion is because of how the transition happened last election,” Davis said, “the best thing that we can do is be still right now.”Patricia McDougall, a 63-year-old staff member at Howard University, said that she felt sad. She believed that, had she won, Harris would have supported immigrants and helped fight for women’s reproductive rights. “As an immigrant myself [from Belize], I feel bad about the people who are going to be left behind,” McDougall said. “I thought that she was going to move the needle and help people.”As an ambassador for the United Nations, McDougall expressed anxiety about Trump’s foreign policy moves in the future, adding that his “mouth destroys him.“We are all on edge to see what he’s going to do and how he’s going to do.”Davis was similarly concerned that Trump’s presidency may spell disaster for foreign relations. Since exit polls revealed how divided the electorate is, Davis warned: “A divided nation can’t stand, so it’s going to make us more susceptible to outside threats.”View image in fullscreenDespite her defeat, voters said that they were proud of Harris and her campaign team for what they accomplished in the months since inheriting Joe Biden’s campaign after he dropped out of the race during the summer. Nadia Brown, a political science professor at Georgetown University and a fellow Howard University alumna, had watched the election results pour in from the campus on election night. Returning to the scene after Harris’s crushing defeat was sobering, but she was in a place of acceptance and didn’t feel sadness.For Brown, she said that the election results posed “larger questions to ask around what the Democratic party needs to do to maintain the core voting bloc”. She observed that the concerns of young people and progressives who opposed Israel’s war on Gaza where more than 41,000 Palestinians have been killed since last October were not taken seriously. Brown also called into question the Democratic party’s strategy, saying: “The base was not shored up before moving to swing voters, which were the Republicans who were never Trumpers.”Looking toward the future, Brown said that the Democratic party must reconsider its outreach strategy. “Black women in particular did a great job. I have no regrets or hard feelings about the way that Black women showed up,” she said. “But now it’s how [does the party] reach some of the other folks.”Read more of the Guardian’s 2024 US election coverage

    Harris urges supporters to ‘never give up’

    Democrats ask: ‘How do you spend $1bn and not win?’

    How Trump won the presidency – in maps

    Jon Stewart: ‘This is not the end’

    With Trump re-elected, this is what’s at stake More