More stories

  • in

    Snap polls give Joe Biden edge over Trump in final TV debate – US politics live

    Key events

    Show

    4.47am EDT04:47
    Pompeo to meet foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia in attempt to halt Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

    Live feed

    Show

    5.41am EDT05:41

    With the new rules on mic muting at the second presidential debate, the two candidates were able to, on the whole, advance more substantive arguments on a range of topics than the insult-slinging the first debate degenerated into. Here are some of the key things each man said on the main themes raised in the debate
    Coronavirus
    Trump: We’re fighting it and we’re fighting it hard… We’re rounding the corner. It’s going away. I caught it. I learned a lot. We have to recover. We can’t close up our nation. We’re learning to live with it. We have no choice. We have a vaccine that’s coming, it’s ready, it’s going to be announced within weeks.
    Biden: If you hear nothing else I say tonight hear this. Anyone who’s responsible for that many deaths should not remain as president of United States of America. This is the same fellow told you this is going to end by Easter last time. This is the same fellow who told you that, don’t worry, we’re going to end this by the summer. We’re about to go into a dark winter, a dark winter, and he has no clear plan.
    Environment
    Trump: If you look at what he wants to do — if you look at his plan, his environmental plan — you know who developed it? AOC plus three. We are energy-independent. I know more about wind than you do. It is extremely expensive, kills all the birds, it’s very intermittent. Basically what he is saying is he is going to destroy the oil industry. Will you remember that, Texas? Will you remember that, Pennsylvania, Oklahoma? Ohio?
    Biden: I would transition from the oil industry, because the oil industry pollutes, significantly. We can capture emissions from the factory and capture the emissions from gas, we can do that. And we can do that by investing money. He takes everything out of context. But the point of it is, look, we have to move toward net-zero emissions.
    Race and criminal justice
    Trump: Nobody has done more for the Black community than Donald Trump, with the exception of Abraham Lincoln – the possible exception – but the exception of Abraham Lincoln, nobody has done what I’ve done. The criminal justice reform bill, prison reform, opportunity zones, I took care of Black colleges and universities.
    Biden: I never had to tell my daughter, if she’s pulled over, make sure she puts — for a traffic stop — put both hands on top of the wheel and don’t reach for the glove box, because someone may shoot you. But a Black parent, no matter how wealthy or how poor they are, has to teach their child: When you are walking down the street, don’t have a hoodie on when you go across the street. Making sure that you in fact, if you get pulled over, just ‘Yes sir,’ ‘no sir,’ hands on top of the wheel. The fact of the matter is, there is institutional racism in America.
    Healthcare
    Trump: He wants socialized medicine. Bernie Sanders wants it. The Democrats want it. No matter how well you run the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare), it’s no good. What we’d like to do is terminate it.
    Biden: What I’m going to do is pass Obamacare with a public option. It will become Bidencare. If you qualify for Medicaid you and do not have the wherewithal in your state to get Medicaid, you automatically are enrolled, providing competition for insurance companies. Secondly, we’re going to make sure we reduce the premiums and reduce drug prices by making sure that there’s competition that does not exist now, by allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices with the insurance companies. He’s never come up with a plan.
    Two very different closing arguments
    Trump: I am cutting taxes, and he wants to raise everybody’s taxes, and he wants to put new regulations on everything. He will kill it. If he gets in, you will have a depression the likes of which you have never seen. Your 401(k)s will go to hell and it will be a very, very sad day for this country.
    Biden: I [will] represent all of you, whether you voted for me or against me. And I’m going to make sure that you’re represented. I’m going to give you hope. What is on the ballot here is the character of this country. Decency, honor, respect, treating people with dignity, making that sure that everyone has an even chance. And I’m going to make sure you get that. You have not been getting it the last four years.

    5.32am EDT05:32

    Ben Collins and Brandy Zadrozny have written for NBC News this morning about the vexed question for journalists on the extent to which they should be covering fringe conspiracy theories about the election.
    One factor in the decision is that, compared to 2016, the stories seem to have crept way more into the official Republican campaign and American consciousness than the most extreme conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton ever did four years ago. They write:

    Some of the same people who pushed a false conspiracy theory about Hillary Clinton that first emerged in 2016 are now targeting Hunter Biden, Joe Biden’s son, with similar falsehoods. Their online posts are garnering astronomical numbers of shares on social media.
    The fantastical rumors, which NBC News is declining to repeat verbatim, echo specific plot points central to “pizzagate,” a viral disinformation campaign that predates QAnon but also falsely alleges a vast conspiracy of child abuse.
    There is an important difference, however. The pizzagate-style rumors in 2016 were largely confined to far-right message boards like 4chan and parts of Reddit. But the Hunter Biden iteration of the same conspiracy theory took off last weekend with the help of speculation from conservative TV hosts and members of Congress. Their theorizing can be traced back to a new website that has been promoted by president Donald Trump and his surrogates.
    The path of the conspiracy theory highlights how once-obscure and fringe claims are now able to reach mainstream conservative media and even elected officials in the run-up to the 2020 election.
    The disinformation campaign appears to have been successful in its goal of generating a smear against the former vice president’s son. According to Google Trends, “human trafficking” is now the third-most common related search term for “Hunter Biden” in the last year, after “laptop” and “New York Post,” which point to search interest around the unconfirmed allegations that a laptop belonging to Hunter Biden contained evidence of crimes.

    Collins and Zadrozny go on to say that conspiracy theories about Hunter Biden “began swirling before the New York Post article and can be traced to associates of former White House aide Steve Bannon”.
    NBC News was moved yesterday to issue a strong statement of support for its reporter Brandy Zadrozny who herself was targeted in a segment on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson show. “Fox News has chosen to smear Brandy. In so doing they have shamefully encouraged harassment and worse,” the network said.

    Brandy Zadrozny
    (@BrandyZadrozny)
    I am so proud to be a reporter at NBC News, so grateful for the support I’ve received from colleagues and former employers (not including Fox News), so lucky to work with @oneunderscore__, and so very psyched to be logging off for the night. See y’all tomorrow.

    October 22, 2020

    Read more here: NBC News – Inside the campaign to ‘pizzagate’ Hunter Biden

    5.23am EDT05:23

    With a record amount of early and mail-in voting for a US presidential election already accounted for, it may have been too late for any debate performance to shift the dial. Amanda Holpuch in New York has been looking for us at one dial that – according to the polls, anyway – appears to have already shifted in Joe Biden’s favor. Nationally, the Democratic nominee has the largest lead among women in modern history.

    In Pennsylvania on 13 October, Trump asked: “Suburban women, will you please like me?” On 17 October in Michigan, he implored: “I saved your suburbs – women – suburban women, you’re supposed to love Trump.” And the next day in Nevada, Trump begged: “Suburban women, please vote for me. I’m saving your house. I’m saving your community. I’m keeping your crime way down.”
    These half-hearted pleas are about three years too late for voters like Becky, who lives in a suburb of Des Moines and asked for her last name not to be used because she was worried about being targeted for her opinions.
    It didn’t take the 63-year-old long to regret her vote for Donald Trump, who she wanted out of office within weeks of him becoming president.
    “I remember thinking, ‘Oh my God, what did I do? What did we all do? What would’ve been so bad about Hillary?’” Becky said. “He’s so good with his lies. He made you believe she was hiding her emails, doing all these things she shouldn’t be doing.”
    At this point, Becky can’t stand the president and laughed before calling him the antichrist. “That’s how badly I feel about him,” she said. “If we don’t get him out, we’re in a load of trouble here.”

    Read more of Holpuch’s report here: ‘What did we all do?’ – why women who voted for Trump could decide the 2020 election

    5.01am EDT05:01

    That is the the verdict of the New York Times fact-checkers on the deabte this morning.

    In their final debate, president Trump unleashed an unrelenting series of false, misleading and exaggerated statements as he sought to distort former vice president Biden’s record and positions and boost his own re-election hopes. The president once again relied heavily on well-worn talking points that have long been shown to be false.

    Among Trump’s claims they ranked as false or misleading were
    I was put through a phony witch hunt – false
    We are rounding the turn on coronavirus – false
    We have the best testing in the world by far — that is why we have so many cases – false
    We have a vaccine that’s coming, it’s ready, it’s going to be announced within weeks – this lacks evidence
    He wants to raise everybody’s taxes – false
    He doesn’t come from Scranton – false
    He called [the Black community] super predators, and he said it, super predators – false
    China is paying. They are paying billions and billions of dollars – false
    The [Trump Chinese] bank account was in 2013. That’s what it was. It was opened — it was closed in 2015, I believe – false
    They want to take buildings down because they want to make bigger windows into smaller windows – false
    We have the best carbon emission numbers that we’ve had in 35 years under this administration – misleading
    We’re rebuilding it, and we’re doing record numbers. 11.4 million jobs in a short period of time – misleading
    Look at China, how filthy it is. Look at Russia. Look at India. It is filthy. The air is filthy – misleading
    For Biden, they singled out these moments:
    He has caused the deficit with China to go up, not down – false
    Look at the states having a spike, they are the red states, the states in the Midwest, in the upper Midwest, that is where the spike is occurring significantly – exaggerated
    Read it in full here: New York Times – Fact-checking the final presidential debate

    4.47am EDT04:47

    Pompeo to meet foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia in attempt to halt Nagorno-Karabakh conflict

    Another day, another diplomatic grumble from China about US behaviour. Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian told a news briefing this morning that the US is bullying countries to pick sides over their ties to China, but such efforts will not succeed,
    The US is urging Sri Lanka to make “difficult but necessary choices” to secure its economic independence instead of choosing opaque practices, a senior state department official had said yesterday, in an apparent reference at China deepening its influence over the South Asian country.
    Secretary of state Mike Pompeo, meanwhile, is now scheduled to meet the foreign ministers of Azerbaijan and Armenia in a new attempt to end nearly a month of bloodshed in Nagorno-Karabakh, during which Russian president Vladimir Putin said 5,000 people may have been killed.

    4.12am EDT04:12

    NBC News had three experts grade the Trump and Biden performances last night, and to be honest it doesn’t make for comfortable reading for either camp. Biden got a higher grade than Trump from all three, but nobody was scored higher than a B+.
    Mitchell McKinney, director of the political communication institute at the University of Missouri, said:

    Biden was prepared for Trump’s attacks on him and his family and “didn’t get rattled,” McKinney said. Biden was able to project empathy, and he took an effective page out of the Obama playbook while declaring that he’d be a president of “not red states and blue states but the United States.” Most important, he was “able to avoid any major gaffes or blunders that would have had supporters wringing their hands,” McKinney said.

    Susan Millsap, and communications professor, said:

    It started better than the first one, but it slowly devolved a bit. The last 20 minutes or so, the interruptions were increasing again, and Trump was slowly turning it into a campaign speech. I was like, ‘Oh, no — don’t do it.’ Towards the end, Trump was back on his hyperbole and bombastic style.

    Read more here: NBC News – Who won the Trump-Biden debate? Experts grade the candidates

    4.03am EDT04:03

    Also published last night was a very strong op-ed from David Ignatius in the Washington Post, asking the blunt question of director of national intelligence John Ratcliffe: Can Trump’s spy chief be trusted?

    The mission statement for the director of national intelligence stresses nonpartisan values: excellence, courage, respect and integrity. Regrettably, the performance of current DNI John Ratcliffe has often seemed to emphasize another metric — serving the political interests of the man who appointed him, President Trump.
    Trump wants Ratcliffe’s help as Nov. 3 approaches. The president is desperately seeking a silver bullet to fire at former vice president Joe Biden — some nugget from the intelligence world that would justify Trump’s wild accusations of “hoaxes” and “criminals.” Sources tell me Trump has been raging inside the White House for Ratcliffe to deliver the goods.
    Ratcliffe, a former Republican congressman, is facing a moment of truth: Will he serve the intelligence community that he heads, protecting information that — in making a momentary splash for Trump — could disclose sources and methods and damage the country? Or will he join Trump in an assault on the very agencies he leads, treating them as part of an imaginary “deep state” that the president sees as his enemy?

    Ignatius goes on to claim:

    Intelligence officials have told me they fear Ratcliffe was appointed DNI for a simple reason: Trump wanted a loyal supporter in charge of the spy agencies as the country headed toward election day. That’s the kind of raw self-interest the country has come to expect from Trump, but we don’t often assess the consequences for the intelligence community.

    Read more here: Washington Post – Can Trump’s spy chief be trusted?

    3.59am EDT03:59

    Again, leaving the debate aside for a second, Molly O’Toole filed a report yesterday evening for the Los Angeles Times about the growing scandal of women at a Georgia immigration facility forced into “overly aggressive” or “medically unnecessary” surgery without their consent, including procedures that affect their ability to have children. A new report examines the cases of 19 women. She writes:

    The 19 women were all patients of Dr. Mahendra Amin, the primary gynecologist for the Irwin County Detention Center, the report says. The records, including pathology and radiology reports, prescriptions, surgical impressions and consent forms, sworn declarations and telephone interviews, detail and support the women’s allegations of medical abuse by the doctor, according to the report.
    The medical experts found an “alarming pattern” in which Amin allegedly subjected the women to unwarranted gynecological surgeries, in most cases performed without consent, according to the five-page report, which was submitted Thursday to members of Congress.
    “Both Dr. Amin and the referring detention facility took advantage of the vulnerability of women in detention to pressure them to agree to overly aggressive, inappropriate, and unconsented medical care,” the report states.

    One woman says she’s still not sure what Amin did in surgery, because she hasn’t subsequently been able to afford to go to the doctor to establish it. Dr. Amin strongly denies all of the allegations.
    Read more about this worrying case here: Los Angeles Times – 19 women allege medical abuse in Georgia immigration detention

    3.53am EDT03:53

    Politico this morning have a reaction piece to last night which is eye-catchingly headlined: “The debates, like everything else in 2020, were a dumpster fire”

    American voters only got two presidential debates in the 2020 general election, and in a normal year this one would have been hotly anticipated and carefully picked over, as Donald Trump and Joe Biden jabbed at each other over money, immigration, racial justice and their support for the oil industry. But as of the start time, close to 50 million Americans had already voted, and polls are locked in as they’ve ever been—so perhaps the biggest question is whether it was possible for this debate to change anything at all. And after this bizarre debate season—a meltdown, a cancellation, a rogue fly and this almost shockingly orthodox interaction, with a mute button—is it time to change what we really expect from debates?

    They’ve gone on to ask what they describe as ‘operatives, campaign analysts and other political insiders’ what they think about the whole debate process, and some of it is quite enlightening, including the observation that “Debates are supposed to be televised job interviews, not a form of reality TV” and just maybe “It’s fair to wonder whether debates have run their course”.
    Read more here: Politico – The debates, Like Everything Else in 2020, Were a Dumpster Fire

    3.43am EDT03:43

    Away from the debate a second, there’s a quick foreign policy snap here from Reuters. Russia’s deputy foreign minister has said today that Moscow and Washington were still not close to reaching an agreement over the New Start arms control treaty, the RIA news agency reported.
    The two countries’ positions on the nuclear pact, which expires in February, appeared to have moved closer when Washington this week welcomed a Russian proposal to extend it if they agreed to freeze their stocks of nuclear warheads. It is the last remaining nuclear treaty between the two nations.

    3.41am EDT03:41

    Richard Wolffe was very busy last night. As well as contributing to our podcast debate on the debate, he also had time to pen his own verdict.

    Normal presidents get their third debate right. They flunk their first in a fit of presidential pique about standing on stage with their upstart rivals. They over-correct their second after a frantic period of long-delayed rehearsals. By the time the third comes along, they usually remember what got them elected in the first place. Donald Trump is not a normal president.

    Wolffe goes on to observe:

    Not to put too a fine point on his presidency, this might just be the fatal flaw in the entire Trump project: the cosmic chasm between Donald’s self-regard and the way the rest of the sentient universe sees him. Donald apparently sincerely believes he is an elite political athlete, while the majority of American voters keep telling pollsters that his gameplan isn’t working.
    For some reason unknown to political strategists of all persuasions, Trump is closing this election by attacking 60 Minutes for being mean to him, and attacking Joe Biden’s son for business dealings with China. This in the week we all learned that Trump has a secret bank account in China, where he has paid more taxes to the People’s Republic than he has to his own country.

    Read more here: Richard Wolffe – Donald Trump reverts to type in debate – and it isn’t ‘magnificently brilliant’

    3.25am EDT03:25

    Post-debate polls and focus groups may have given Joe Biden the win, and plaudits may have gone to Kristen Welker, but there was only one winner as far as the Trump campaign was concerned. Trump’s comms chief Tim Murtaugh tweeted out a picture of the president “just before the debate victory” this morning.

    Tim Murtaugh
    (@TimMurtaugh)
    Just before the debate victory. pic.twitter.com/gcAjOlEgjT

    October 23, 2020

    Trump was also boasting about poll numbers handing victory to him, although in this case he was posting screenshots of self-selecting Twitter votes from conservative-leaning sources.

    Donald J. Trump
    (@realDonaldTrump)
    pic.twitter.com/4qwCKQOiOw

    October 23, 2020

    The little tick next to his name in the results on the screenshot suggests that the president had just voted for himself in the poll. Fair enough, he was hardly going to vote that the other guy had won, was he?

    3.18am EDT03:18

    If you’d like to get your ears around something this morning, as soon as last night’s debate was over, Guardian columnist Jonathan Freedland sat down with his trans-Atlantic counterpart Richard Wolffe to discuss what had just gone down. You can listen to it here.

    The Guardian UK: Politics Weekly
    A much calmer affair – so who won debate night?: Politics Weekly Extra

    Sorry your browser does not support audio – but you can download here and listen https://audio.guim.co.uk/2020/10/23-19392-gdn.pw.201023.ds.Final_Presidential_Debate.mp3

    00:00:00

    00:25:41

    3.14am EDT03:14

    Kristen Welker succeeded where Chris Wallace failed in the first debate, and came out widely praised for the way that she handled the debate. Max Benwell reports:

    Welker, 44, the only person of color chosen to moderate presidential debate this year, quickly earned plaudits as the event unfolded in a calmer and less chaotic manner than the first presidential debate in Cleveland. The winner of Thursday night’s debate was “obviously” Welker, tweeted New York Times opinion writer Jamelle Bouie.
    Wallace, whose own moderation was widely criticized after the first debate, was asked on air what he thought of the tenor of the final debate moderated by Welker. “First of all, I’m jealous,” he said.
    Trump, who is trying to appeal to female voters as he trails Biden in national polling, also praised Welker after spending the days before the debate criticizing her.
    “So far, I respect very much the way you’re handling this,” Trump said to Welker when she gave him time to respond to Biden at one point.
    The praise came after Trump attacked her on Twitter over the weekend. She has “always been terrible and unfair, just like most of the Fake News reporters”, he tweeted at the time.

    Read more here: The ‘obvious’ winner of the final debate: moderator Kristen Welker

    3.00am EDT03:00

    Racial injustice was another area where the two men clashed last night. Accusing Trump of being “one of the most racist presidents we’ve had in modern history”, Biden said that the president “pours fuel on every single racist fire. … This guy has a dog whistle about as big as a foghorn.”
    Trump asserted that “I am the least racist person in this room.”

    The debate between them on the topic wasn’t entirely well received.
    “Blackness and criminality are not the same,” Phillip Atiba Goff, a leading researcher on racial bias in policing, wrote on Twitter. “Would really love Black communities to be on the agenda outside of questions about punishment.”
    And Gene Demby, the co-host of Code Switch, National Public Radio’s podcast on race and identity, wrote: “This conversation about race in the US with two rich, powerful septuagenarians is going about as well as anyone could have anticipated.”

    2.57am EDT02:57

    Lois Beckett last night was keeping an eye for us on how viewers rated the performances of the two men in the debate. She writes:

    Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden was perceived as the winner of the final debate with Donald Trump on Thursday night, according to a CNN poll of debate viewers and a panel of undecided North Carolina voters.
    The CNN poll found it was perceived as a slightly weaker Biden performance compared to the first, chaotic presidential debate last month, when 60% of viewers perceived the Democratic nominee as the winner, compared to 53% on Thursday night.
    Participants in a CNN panel of undecided North Carolina voters said that Trump’s strength in the debate was his focus on the economy, while Biden’s strength was his emphasis on “unifying” Americans.

    But there were mixed reviews for Biden in a panel assembled by the Los Angeles Times:

    Words that the undecided voters in that panel used to describe Biden’s debate performance included: “vague”, “cognitively impaired”, “I don’t want to say senile, so I’ll say old”, “uncomfortable”, “grandfatherly”, “defensive”, and “ambiguous”.
    Trump was described by the same group as “controlled”, “constrained”, “petulant” “reserved”, “surprisingly presidential”, and a “con artist”.

    You can read more here: Biden the winner of final debate, TV viewers and undecided voters say

    2.49am EDT02:49

    With over 223,000 Americans dead to date from the coronavirus pandemic, it was a significant topic in last night’s debate. While Donald Trump promised a vaccine would be available within weeks, Joe Biden questioned the veracity of his claims, citing the president’s previous predictions the pandemic would end by Easter.

    2.45am EDT02:45

    Hello, and welcome to Friday’s live coverage of US politics. The debate is done, there’s 11 days to go. Will it have changed anybody’s minds?
    Trump and Biden sparred over the coronavirus pandemic, with the president defending his response to a pandemic that has already claimed 223,000 American lives. Trump said of the pandemic, “I take full responsibility. It’s not my fault that it came here. It’s China’s fault.”
    Biden criticized Trump as “one of the most racist presidents we’ve had in modern history”. Biden said, “He pours fuel on every single racist fire. … This guy has a dog whistle about as big as a foghorn.”
    Trump reiterated that he wanted the supreme court to dismantle Obamacare. Amy Coney Barrett’s nomination process was moved to the next stage by the judiciary committee yesterday despite a Democratic party boycott.
    Moderator Kristen Welker of NBC News was praised for her orderly management of tonight’s debate. Unlike the first debate, which devolved into chaos as Trump repeatedly interrupted Biden, Welker successfully kept the debate on task
    Overall, the debate seems unlikely to sway many voters, which is a victory for Biden. Snap polls taken after the debate showed viewers favored Biden’s performance by about 10-15 points. But victory wasn’t as clear-cut as the first debate, with an undecided voters panel characterising his performance as “vague”.
    You can have a scroll back through last night’s live coverage here: Biden slams Trump on coronavirus response, family separations and racism in final debate – as it happened
    Covid cases continue to increase across the US, as the upper midwest sees rapid rise.
    The US signed an anti-abortion declaration with a group of largely authoritarian governments.
    Legendary Watergate reporter Bob Woodward will discuss the Trump presidency at a Guardian Live online event on Tuesday 27 October. You can find our more details and book tickets here. More

  • in

    Trump and Biden clash on coronavirus during final presidential debate – video

    Donald Trump and Joe Biden have clashed over the handling of the coronavirus pandemic during the final presidential debate. While Trump says a vaccine will be available within weeks, Biden questioned the veracity of Trump’s claims after the president’s previous predictions the pandemic would end by Easter. The pandemic has killed more than 220,000 Americans and infected millions more, including the president
    Trump and Biden offer sharply different visions to tackle Covid in final TV debate
    Biden slams Trump on coronavirus response, family separations and racism in final debate – live More

  • in

    ‘What did we all do?’: why women who voted for Trump could decide the 2020 election

    When Sandy Orth reads 2 Timothy 3 in the Bible, which advises good Christians to steer clear of “lovers of themselves, lovers of money, [the] boastful, proud, abusive”, the first person she is reminded of is the US president.Orth, an evangelical Christian from the suburbs of Des Moines, Iowa, voted for Donald Trump in 2016 but will be voting for his Democratic challenger, Joe Biden, in 2020.“As a lifelong Republican I was willing to give him a chance and was hoping he would be humbled by the position, but that didn’t happen,” Orth told the Guardian.The 77-year-old could help fuel what is expected to be the largest gender gap in any presidential election in US history. White women in particular appear to be moving away from Trump, while men seem to be sticking by him.Orth’s vote will also have an outsized importance because she is in a state which Trump flipped in 2016 after it twice elected Barack Obama. It was assumed Trump would carry Iowa again this time around, but recent polls have showed a much closer race than anticipated.Trump is specifically struggling with Iowa’s women. In a CBS News/YouGov poll of 1,048 Iowa voters conducted on 6-9 October, Biden had an 11-percentage-point advantage among women compared with Trump. In a Quinnipiac University poll of 1,205 Iowa voters conducted on 1-5 October Biden had a 26-point advantage among women compared with Trump – one of the biggest differences found in any state.The president, meanwhile, has responded to the polls by both bullying and begging suburban women to support him.Nationally, CNN’s Harry Enten said Biden was up by 25 points among female voters based on an analysis last week of five live interview polls. That is the largest lead a candidate has ever had among women voters in the polling era.In Pennsylvania on 13 October, Trump asked: “Suburban women, will you please like me?” On 17 October in Michigan, he implored: “I saved your suburbs – women – suburban women, you’re supposed to love Trump.” And the next day in Nevada, Trump begged: “Suburban women, please vote for me. I’m saving your house. I’m saving your community. I’m keeping your crime way down.”These half-hearted pleas are about three years too late for voters like Becky, who lives in a suburb of Des Moines and asked for her last name not to be used because she was worried about being targeted for her opinions.It didn’t take the 63-year-old long to regret her vote for Donald Trump, who she wanted out of office within weeks of him becoming president.As a lifelong Republican I was willing to give him a chance and was hoping he would be humbled by the position, but that didn’t happen“I remember thinking, ‘Oh my God, what did I do? What did we all do? What would’ve been so bad about Hillary?’” Becky said. “He’s so good with his lies. He made you believe she was hiding her emails, doing all these things she shouldn’t be doing.”At this point, Becky can’t stand the president and laughed before calling him the antichrist.“That’s how badly I feel about him,” she said. “If we don’t get him out, we’re in a load of trouble here.”Becky, who is registered independent but usually votes Democrat, is not a huge Joe Biden fan either though she likes his vice-president nominee, Kamala Harris. A yard sign tucked away in her garage out of fear it will make her family the target of harassment or violence spells out her position for this election: “Anyone but Trump.”“Five years ago, you wouldn’t be afraid to say who you support,” she said. “It didn’t mean that you could get hurt or have your family hurt, but the divisiveness that he’s created, it’s crazy.”She has seen the divisiveness in her own family, where people have stopped speaking to each other because their support, or lack of, for Trump. Though one close female relative is also changing their vote from Trump to Biden.For Orth, it didn’t take long for her to make her decision about 2020. She reluctantly voted for Trump in 2016, deciding he was narrowly preferable to his Democratic challenger, Hillary Clinton.But Orth was soon upset with his behavior, which she said reminded her of a school bully. “It wasn’t just one thing that happened one day, it was kind of almost from the beginning that things weren’t looking good,” Orth said.Her list of problems with the president has since grown to include his disregard for the country’s relationship with its allies and the high number of his associates who are convicted criminals.A few months ago, she and a couple of friends tried to determine one good thing the president had done for the country – she still doesn’t have an answer.Her friends who do support Trump point to his unprecedented number of conservative judicial appointments, which could have the longest and most far-reaching impacts on people’s daily lives of any of his policies. “The fact that he appoints conservative judges doesn’t give him a pass in my mind for all the negative things,” Orth said.But Trump is not the only subject of Orth’s ire – she also feels betrayed by the Republican party she has supported for decades.“I am very upset and angry at how they have enabled Donald Trump to be such a bad president,” Orth said. “I blame them for a lot of things that are happening in this country too.”That’s another frustration she will be channeling at the ballot box. Orth plans to vote for the Democratic challenger in Iowa’s Senate race – one of the most closely contested Senate elections in the country in an election year that could see the chamber flip from red to blue.The incumbent Republican senator Joni Ernst’s run for re-election in Iowa is now considered a bellwether to see if Democrats can take the Senate despite Trump’s unpopularity. In the final weeks before the election, Republicans fearful of polling in Biden’s favor are trying to master the balance between keeping Trump supporters close while reeling back in the moderates drifting away.Ernst, the first woman Iowa sent to Congress, has largely stood by Trump through his first term and is in a closely contested race. Ernst polled one percentage point ahead of her Democratic challenger, Theresa Greenfield, in a New York Times/Siena College poll released on Wednesday. But in the month before, Ernst trailed Greenfield in every poll.As Ernst’s predicament shows, no matter the result of the presidential election, Trump’s unpopularity presents a bigger question for the future of the Republican party.Biotech consultant Leslie Dow usually votes Republican and travels in conservative circles but she is so frustrated with the party for enabling Trump that she is also now the Democratic precinct chair in LeClaire, a small town on the Mississippi River.I want solutions that have a chance of doing somethingDow, 63, has always been engaged with specific issues, as a teenager fighting for the Equal Rights Amendment, which would change the US constitution to ban discrimination on the basis of sex, and in support of Planned Parenthood. But it was the sexist treatment of Clinton in the 2016 election which galvanized her participation in electoral politics.“I don’t think I ever felt so alone as when I watched her go through that stuff,” Dow said. “I lost friends over it because they thought I was just being silly.”She doesn’t plan on sticking with the party, but is proud to support Biden.“I want solutions that have a chance of doing something,” Dow said. “And I feel like Biden has those because he’s a moderate and I am a moderate.”If the Democrats take the presidency and the Senate, Dow may remain involved with local party politics in the hopes of moderating some of their more liberal positions, but ultimately she hopes to be a part of rebuilding the Republican party.“I don’t think that’s the Republican party any more,” Dow said. “It’s the party of Trump.” More

  • in

    'Children brought here by coyotes': Trump squares off with Biden on immigration – video

    Donald Trump and Joe Biden have squared off over immigration policies, including the US government being unable to locate the parents of more than 500 immigrant children. ‘Children are brought here by coyotes and lots of bad people, cartels, and they’re brought here and they used to use them to get into our country. We now have as strong a border as we’ve ever had,’ Trump said. The president also criticised immigration under the previous Obama-Biden administration, including the catch and release policy, saying ‘those with the lowest IQ’ were the only ones who returned for an immigration hearing
    Biden the winner of final debate, TV viewers and undecided voters say
    Battle for the suburbs: can Joe Biden flip Texas? – video More

  • in

    The final Trump-Biden presidential debate: five key takeaways

    Trump tried to show he’s learned a few thingsIn the days leading up to the debate, Donald Trump’s advisers urged the president to stay calmer than he was at the first presidential debate in Cleveland last month, when he was widely criticized for repeatedly and aggressively interrupting his Democratic presidential rival, Joe Biden.The president, who trails his rival in national polls, accomplished that, though it was a low bar. He interrupted the former vice-president less and he didn’t feud with the moderator, the NBC journalist Kristen Welker, as much. He even followed the debate rules of letting Biden talk when it was Biden’s turn – for the most part.Much of the credit for that control went to Welker herself. Trump, who has been attempting to appeal to female voters who have been turning away from his campaign, praised Welker’s moderation (saying “thank you” and “I appreciate that”) despite spending the days leading up to the debate disparaging her.Trump also wanted to appeal to voters by applying his own experience contracting Covid-19 after the first debate, but with mixed results. He said he “learned a lot” about the disease when he contracted it, said – without evidence and contrary to the statements of public health experts – that a vaccine should be available in the coming weeks.“I take full responsibility. It’s not my fault that it came here, it’s China’s fault,” Trump said. More than 220,000 people have died in the US during the pandemic, and more than 8 million people have been affected – far more than any other country in the world.Foreign policy dominated the debateWhen Welker announced the debate topics, both Biden and Trump wanted to weigh in on foreign policy. But that’s where the common ground ended. Trump wanted to highlight unverified reports that Biden’s son Hunter was using his father’s influence to benefit himself and the Biden family. Biden was eager to talk about a secret bank account the president has kept in China.The attacks at moments mirrored each other.“You were getting a lot of money from Russia. They were paying you a lot of money and they probably still are,” Trump said at one point, without evidence.“What are you hiding? Why are you hiding?” Biden said at another point. “The foreign countries are paying you a lot.”Biden also wanted to frame Trump as a crony of strongmen dictators such as the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, and North Korea’s Kim Jong-un.BidencareFor most of the 2020 presidential campaign Biden has portrayed himself as a defender of his former boss’s signature legislation – Obamacare. But during Thursday night’s debate that changed. Biden advocated Obamacare “with a public option” – offering an expansion of existing public programs. “Call it ‘Bidencare’,” he said.Trump meanwhile refrained from offering what his own healthcare replacement plan would be, simply repeating that “Obamacare is no good”. Trump’s main argument on healthcare was to suggest – without evidence – that any alternative to gutting Obamacare, including anything Biden proposed, would “destroy” Medicare and social security, two wildly popular programs.Biden accuses Trump of fueling racismThe most heated exchanges of the night came when Welker steered the discussion toward racism in the US, which has become a key voting issue following the police killing of George Floyd, which sparked mass protests over the summer.Trump, as he often does, claimed that his record on race relations tops almost any other politician’s in American history, except for Abraham Lincoln. He ticked off his favorite points on how the Trump administration passed a criminal justice reform bill, increased funding for Historically Black Colleges and Universities, and how African American unemployment had dipped under his leadership.But he said all of that in response to a question from Welker on racism in America, without directly answering the question. He also conspicuously never used the phrase “institutional racism” or pulled back from his previous criticism of the Black Lives Matter movement.He was eager to attack Biden on the former vice-president’s support for a crime bill from two decades ago.Biden meanwhile went on the attack, mocking Trump by sarcastically calling him “Abraham Lincoln” before saying he’s “one of the most racist presidents in American history. He pours fuel on every single racist fire.”Family separationsTrump was most defensive when Welker asked both candidates about recent reports on family separations of undocumented immigrants. Specifically, Welker asked the candidates about more than 500 children who had been separated from their parents as part of the Trump administration’s push to deter immigration along the southern border. The United States has been unable to reunite those children with their parents.Trump didn’t offer a direct answer. Instead he claimed – wrongly – that many of the children were illegally brought into the country through cartels. He also said the Obama-Biden administration was to blame.“They built cages. They used to say I built the cages,” Trump said. He went on to say “we’re trying very hard” to reunite the children with their parents.Biden, on the other hand, called the practice “criminal” and said “they separated them at the border to make it a disincentive to come to begin with”.The former vice-president added: “It makes us a laughing stock and violates every notion of who we are as a nation.”Moving the dial?Trump’s response to the pandemic and its economic fallout has seen his poll numbers drop, and the president needed to reset his appeal with the coalition of supporters who propelled him to the White House in 2016. But, despite his slightly calmer demeanor, it’s unclear whether he achieved that.Biden was perceived as the winner of the final debate, according to a quick CNN poll of debate viewers and a panel of undecided North Carolina voters. More

  • in

    A much calmer affair – so who won US presidential debate night?: Politics Weekly Extra

    As the two US presidential candidates left the stage in Tennessee after the final debate of the campaign, Jonathan Freedland and Richard Wolffe talk through the biggest moments of the night

    How to listen to podcasts: everything you need to know

    Donald Trump and Joe Biden faced off for the final time before the US presidential election, in a debate where the mute button was very much the deciding factor. The stage was set in Nashville, Tennessee, and many wondered, hoped, and maybe prayed that we would see a kinder, more civilised approach to debating in comparison with the chaos-fest many of us endured first time around three weeks ago … but did we get it? With Jonathan Freedland to talk through it all, once again, is fellow Guardian columnist from across the Atlantic, Richard Wolffe. Let us know what you think of the podcast. Send your feedback to podcasts@theguardian.com Help support the Guardian by going to gu.com/supportpodcasts More

  • in

    'Abraham Lincoln over here': Trump and Biden clash on racism at presidential debate – video

    Donald Trump has defended his handling of race issues in the US, declaring three times during the final presidential debate he is ‘the least racist person in this room’. Trump was questioned on his handling of incidents such as describing the Black Lives Matter movement as a symbol of hate and saying protesting Black athletes should be fired. Presidential rival Joe Biden called Trump ‘one of the most racist presidents we’ve had in modern history. He pours fuel on every racist fire’, before adding ‘this guy has a dog whistle about as big as a foghorn’
    Biden mauls Trump’s record on coronavirus in final presidential debate
    Civil rights and QAnon candidates: the fight for facts in Georgia – video More

  • in

    Biden the winner of final debate, TV viewers and undecided voters say

    Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden was perceived as the winner of the final debate with Donald Trump on Thursday night, according to a CNN poll of debate viewers and a panel of undecided North Carolina voters.Though the groups are not representative of actual US voters, they offered a snapshot of the reaction to the debate, which came just two weeks before election day, as Trump trails his opponent in national polls and was seeking to reset his appeal with more moderate Republican supporters.The CNN poll found it was perceived as a slightly weaker performance compared to the first, chaotic presidential debate last month, when 60% of viewers perceived Biden as the winner, compared to 53% on Thursday night.Participants in a CNN panel of undecided North Carolina voters said that Trump’s strength in the debate was his focus on the economy, while Biden’s strength was his emphasis on “unifying” Americans.The CNN undecided voter panel praised the final debate as “more controlled” and “much better”. Almost all of the voters on that panel said that Biden won the debate.But the takeaways from a focus group of undecided voters assembled by the Los Angeles Times and pollster Frank Luntz was less positive for Biden.Words that the undecided voters in that panel used to describe Biden’s debate performance included: “vague”, “cognitively impaired”, “I don’t want to say senile, so I’ll say old”, “uncomfortable”, “grandfatherly”, “defensive”, and “ambiguous”, Associated Press reporter Jill Colvin tweeted.Trump was described by the same group as “controlled”, “constrained”, “petulant” “reserved”, “surprisingly presidential”, and a “con artist”, Colvin wrote.A small group of voters who watched the debate for PBS NewsHour and said the debate left them feeling “informed.” They praised moderator Kristen Welker, an NBC White House correspondent. A woman on CNN’s undecided panel also hailed the debate’s much-touted mute button. “That made a big difference,” she said.Even on a day when the United States saw the third-highest total number of new coronavirus cases, at more than 73,000, according to the Atlantic’s Covid Tracking Project, some undecided voters shared Trump’s emphasis on keeping businesses open, whatever the public health cost.“Like Donald Trump said, if we shut down the economy at the expense of the people, there’s not going to be a country to come back to,” one voter on CNN’s undecided panel said.As they did in the first debate, pro-Trump viewers spent a lot of time complaining about perceived bias of the debate moderator towards Biden, and claiming that Trump was cut off more often. More