in

Brexit: Farmers fear government might slash tariffs on food imports from US

Farmers have voiced concern over reports that the government is planning to slash tariffs on food imports from the US as part of a planned trade deal.

The Financial Times reports that international trade secretary Liz Truss is preparing a “big concession package” offer to Donald Trump’s administration as part of negotiations with Washington which began recently with both sides eager to do a deal before the presidential elections in November.

Prices of US foodstuffs are typically lower than in the UK, in part because of a less rigorous animal welfare regime, and American farmers have long complained of being excluded from European markets by high tariffs.


Download the new Independent Premium app

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

Any cuts are likely to be resisted by British farmers who fear their own produce could be undercut on price unless ministers insist on tough requirements for imports to meet current UK standards, which would exclude US products like chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-pumped beef.

National Farmers Union international trade director Nick von Westenholz told the FT the sector would be “very concerned” about the proposals.

“Any concessions UK negotiators give on market access – such as lower or zero tariffs on agricultural goods – must be accompanied by clear conditions on how those goods have been produced,” he said. “Anything else would represent a clear breach of the government’s own explicit red lines in trade negotiations.”

There was no immediate response from the Department for International Trade to the report, which said proposals had caused tension with George Eustice’s environment department.

The government last night defeated a backbench bid to guarantee post-Brexit food imports will match the UK’s high food and environmental standards.

Conservative MPs Simon Hoare and Neil Parish led the push for the new Agriculture Bill to require a level playing field between British farmers and those overseas in future trade agreements.

The amendment was defeated by a majority of 51 after environment minister Victoria Prentis told the Commons that all food coming into the country under post-Brexit trade deals “will be required to meet existing import requirements”.

Mr Parish, chairman of the Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee, told MPs Ms Truss “should actually spend her time going out and dealing with a trade deal that has equivalence and makes sure we actually export our very important animal and environmental welfare”.

He added: “I’d say to the Americans, why don’t you upgrade your production? Why don’t you reduce the density of population of your chicken? Why don’t you reduce the amount of antibiotics you’re using and then you can actually produce better chicken not only for America, it can also come into this country.”

A spokesman for the Department for International Trade said: “We have been clear that any future deal with the US must work for our consumers, farmers and companies.

“As the government made clear in its negotiating objectives, any agreement will not compromise on our high environmental protection, animal welfare and food standards.”


Source: UK Politics - www.independent.co.uk

Trump says Fauci lockdown easing warning 'surprising' – video

Struggling oil companies are taking advantage of US coronavirus aid