Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
Louise Thomas
Editor
Anas Sarwar has said the two child benefit cap implemented by the previous Conservative government was “wrong” and has urged Sir Keir Starmer’s government to scrap it.
The Scottish Labour leader said that ditching the cap, which has been described by campaigners as “cruel”, would depend on being able to grow the economy.
However, he insisted that his party would be “pushing at an open door” for abolition of the policy that was introduced by George Osborne in 2017 and restricts Child Tax Credit and Universal Credit to the first two children in most households.
Neither the Conservatives nor Labour committed to scrapping the cap in their general election manifestos. Sir Keir said it was a “tough decision” not to promise to scrap it but said he would not make “unfunded promises”.
Mr Sarwar told the Daily Record: “We will continue to push for it to happen and we want to make sure we’re part of helping create the economic conditions to make that happen.
“But I honestly believe we are pushing at an open door. This is a government that wants to do even more than it promised to do, but we’re going to do it in the right way.”
Asked to describe the two child benefit cap, he added: “Not right, wrong, needs to be reversed, and that’s why we are getting on with the work of changing our country.”
Research published prior to the general election by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said that the number of children affected by the two-child benefit cap will rise by a third over the next five years.
The limit currently affects two million children, with more hit each year because it applies to those born after April 5 2017.
Next year, 250,000 more children will be affected, rising to 670,000 before the end of the next parliament if the policy is not reformed, according to the think tank.
IFS research economist, Eduin Latimer, said: “The two-child limit is one of the most significant welfare cuts since 2010 and, unlike many of those cuts, it becomes more important each year as it is rolled out to more families.”
Labour’s refusal to drop the policy has irked anti-poverty campaigners, who say the cap is a significant driver of child poverty in the UK.
Former prime minister Gordon Brown also weighed in prior to the general election and said it “should be scrapped” as it was condemning children to live in poverty.
Mubin Haq, chief executive of the abrdn Financial Fairness Trust, which funded the IFS’s research, said: “The limit has been a significant contributor to child poverty amongst large families during a period when poverty for families with one or two children fell.
“If the next government is serious about tackling child poverty, it will need to review the two-child limit.
“There is an inherent unfairness in the policy as it affects only those children born after April 5 2017.
“The majority of families affected are in work or have caring responsibilities for disabled relatives or young children.”
Child Poverty Action Group chief executive Alison Garnham said: “Child poverty in the UK is a national disgrace and the biggest driver of it is the two-child limit. It makes life worse for kids up and down the country and limits their future chances.
“Children affected by child poverty don’t have a voice in this election but politicians from all parties have a responsibility to them to show leadership. Any government serious about making things better for the next generation will have to scrap the two-child limit, and do so quickly.”
