in

UK ‘massively vulnerable’ to threat of Russia after decades of military cuts, ex-Army chief warns

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it’s investigating the financials of Elon Musk’s pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, ‘The A Word’, which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Decades of Army cuts have left the UK “massively vulnerable” to Russian aggression, the former head of the British armed forces has said.

With Sir Keir Starmer under mounting pressure to boost the UK’s defence budget, General Sir Nick Carter said the Army had suffered a “process of neglect” over the last 30 years.

Gen Sir Nick, who served as chief of the defence staff between 2018 and 2021, warned the Army was “remarkably hollow” and would be unable to fend off an “onslaught” of Russian drones and missiles like those Ukraine has been subjected to.

Former chief of the defence staff General Sir Nick Carter said the Army had been ‘hollowed out’ (PA Wire)

He joined calls for Britain and other European countries to immediately ramp up defence spending ahead of separate meetings between French president Emmanuel Macron and Donald Trump and Sir Keir and the US president next week.

And, with the US under Mr Trump threatening to withdraw support for Europe, Gen Sir Nick said “whether we like it or not that means we’re going to have to start protecting ourselves”.

Sir Keir is the only major UK party leader not to have publicly backed calls to hike the defence budget to 2.5 per cent of Britain’s GDP by 2030, from a current level of 2.3 per cent.

He has promised a pathway to the 2.5 per cent benchmark, but the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and Reform UK have all called for the increase to be funded by the end of the decade.

On Thursday, Rachel Reeves hinted at cuts to fund a boost to the defence budget, warning that it would require “difficult choices”.

The chancellor told ITV: “Recognising the priority of defence spending in the world that we live in today means that we will have to make difficult choices so that we can spend that money that is needed to keep our country safe.

Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves could either raise taxes or cut spending elsewhere to fund defence (PA Wire)

“I am absolutely committed to spending 2.5 per cent of GDP on defence. I am really clear that a strong economy depends on strong defences and our national security being protected. So we will set out that pathway to 2.5 per cent of GDP.”

Ahead of Sir Keir’s meeting with Mr Trump, Gen Sir Nick said “fundamentally there has got to be some form of guarantee of Ukraine’s sovereignty in the future”.

Speaking on BBC Question Time, he said: “If the Americans are not prepared to do that then others are going to have to be prepared to step up to the plate to provide that.”

Sir Keir has said he is prepared to put British troops in harm’s way if necessary as part of a peacekeeping force in Ukraine. But he suffered a blow as the US ruled out playing a part in any ongoing operation in the country, despite Sir Keir’s calls for the Americans to provide a “backstop” to deter Russia from attacking again.

Sir Keir Starmer said Britain is prepared to put troops on the ground in Ukraine (PA)

Gen Sir Nick said if British troops were needed to “deter” Vladimir Putin from attacking again “then fundamentally we are not equipped or manned to be able to do that at the moment”.

He said: “And that, I’m afraid, means that 2.5 per cent of GDP needs to be spent now, not at the end of this parliament, it needs to be spent now.

“Difficult choices may have to be made. We are going to have to spend more money if we seriously believe that Putin is a threat to us in the future.”

One option said to be being looked at to fund a defence spending hike is freezing income tax thresholds beyond 2028 – a stealth tax that would drag taxpayers into higher tax bands due to inflation. Ms Reeves could justify the move on the grounds of an increasingly dangerous world, The Times reported.


Source: UK Politics - www.independent.co.uk


Tagcloud:

Mexico’s Sheinbaum wins plaudits for cool head in dealings with Trump

‘Safe House’ Review: Singing a Song of Loneliness