More stories

  • in

    Voices: ‘Who do they think they are?’ Readers clash over NHS doctor strikes

    As resident doctors prepare for another walkout, readers responded with a flurry of passionate – and polarised – opinions on the latest NHS pay dispute.Some voiced sympathy for doctors, arguing that pay should have kept pace with inflation since 2008. They warned that failing to restore salaries would fuel burnout, debt, and emigration, further weakening an NHS already short on staff and resources.Others pointed to the gruelling hours and training required, noting that doctors deserve better pay and respect. Several also criticised Health Secretary Wes Streeting for “reneging” on promises.But not all were supportive. Some readers described the 29 per cent pay demand as excessive and out of touch, especially after the 22 per cent uplift secured last year. Many were frustrated by long waits for appointments and poor patient outcomes, questioning whether increased pay alone would improve services.Here’s what you had to say:I have little sympathy for NHS staffTo be honest, over the last 15 years or so, I’ve noticed a significant shift in the attitude of GPs and doctors towards their patients. Often, my GP seems indifferent to my healthcare needs, and I find myself being passed from pillar to post when I need my injection for a specific condition. My GP blames the hospital, while the hospital points the finger back at the GP surgery for not administering it.I’ve also observed a marked change in the attitude of those who handle phone calls. When I need to see my GP, I’m frequently told to book a telephone appointment or given a mere 5 to 10 minutes to discuss my concerns. Often, my issues aren’t truly addressed; it feels more like I’m having a chat with my next-door neighbour rather than receiving proper medical attention. What frustrates me further is that the hospital and GP surgery I attend are often much less busy than they were 15 years ago. Yet, they still offer appointments at least four weeks later. It’s ridiculous! If the government has been playing games over the past 15 years, I believe NHS staff, including those in surgeries, have had a part in it. Therefore, I have little sympathy for NHS staff demanding pay rises that exceed the average UK rates.At present, the NHS seems to think it’s doing a great job, but that’s often not the case. Doctors from countries like Spain, Portugal, Turkey, Mexico, China, Thailand, and Vietnam are often well-trained and willing to work for less, without compromising healthcare services for patients. Meanwhile, our newly trained doctors often have aspirations to move to countries like Australia, the USA, and Canada, which sometimes gives the impression that they feel stuck in their jobs here in the UK.KatherineTateIsBackDo you support the walkout? Let us know your views in the comments.Everyone needs to join with the doctorsEveryone else needs to join with the doctors, stand alongside them and fight against the scourge of low wages that the people of the United Kingdom are expected to accept as recompense for the work they undertake.The doctors are leading the way – people need to get on board or get out of the way.IndythinksterPay and inflationEveryone deserves for their pay to have kept up with inflation since 2008. Everyone includes doctors and other NHS staff.Doctor Outcomes not up to standardIt wouldn’t be quite as bad if the NHS had a patient outcome half as good as most of our comparable European neighbours.Admittedly the NHS is underfunded compared with many Western European countries, but wasn’t Boris supposed to fix everything with his red bus?YetAnotherNameNow they want more?In 2024, junior doctors received an average pay increase of 22 per cent over two years, which translated to an annual increase of between £9,000 and £16,000. Now they want 29 per cent on top of this. Who do they think they are? The nation has finite resources and cannot divert money meant to provide better facilities and medicines for patients into their pockets.Pomerol95 The public will not forgive StreetingNo, Streeting, the public will not forgive you. Doctors were promised pay restoration. You have reneged on that.The English NHS has fewer doctors, nurses and beds per capita than the health services of comparable nations, including Scotland – a crucial factor in determining health outcomes and waiting lists.Not paying doctors adequately is not going to improve that situation. And if they aren’t paid adequately, they will never pay off the vast student debts they have accrued – or they may even leave the country, leaving the public purse to pick up the entire tab as well as losing their not insubstantial investment entirely.NorthwingDoes it make any sense to be a GP anymore?Does it make any sense to be a GP anymore, looking at their salary range? Clever people get paid more elsewhere, for less training (costly) and less work. I missed any plan for this issue in Streeting’s 10-year NHS plan.MpWhat a messWhat a mess, caused in part by the unfortunate fact that the more you pay anyone, the more valuable they think they are. It doesn’t help that the NHS requires doctors to do a five-year degree course and then a couple of years practising, only to be able to prescribe medicine if it’s on the NICE list and they have a blood test to justify it. No wonder doctors have decided to pursue money instead of a rewarding career.Why hasn’t this inept government rolled out computer technology for diagnosis?And freed up doctors to do more interesting and demanding work? What a mess, and not the slightest sign of improvement.MrBishiMy respect is wearing thinNot again. So, junior doctors who are learning and need supervision demand a 29 per cent pay rise. By what rationale did they decide to train as doctors? Students will have researched their potential earnings, but as soon as they qualify, they feel justified in demanding higher than other professional groups.Since Covid, getting to see a trained professional, a GP or specialist, has meant increasingly long waits, investigations delayed, diagnosis and treatments… how long is a piece of string? Many doctors these days only work part-time. If you want more pay, work longer hours. Like the rest of us. My respect for these hard-working professional carers and healers has worn very thin. They demand we respect them – where is the respect for those in need?ChuckiethebraveA huge shift in doctors’ attitudesThere has been a huge shift in attitude among many doctors and reception staff (trained by the GPs to be barriers to care). Out-of-hours care is lousy. A lot of the doctors just don’t care. And remember, the doctors get their medical qualification for peanuts – to become a doctor in the US requires a four-year bachelor’s degree followed by four years of medical training – that’s many hundreds of thousands of dollars of training that must be paid back. Perhaps junior doctors would feel better about their pay if they took a minute to understand the cost of their training to the British taxpayer.AnyoneAfter the pandemic, they deserved a reward — but…After the nightmare of the pandemic, NHS health workers deserved a reward for their dedication under awful circumstances. But doctors need to understand that they were given an unprecedented rise under Blair’s government, that they had a generous uplift last year, and that most other workers have not seen a real rise in their salaries for many years. As someone who has been waiting more than three years to get a diagnosis for mobility problems, I will certainly not be supporting the doctors.SlampsWant to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day’s top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click ‘log in’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here. More

  • in

    Which tax rises could the government introduce to fill the black hole in Britain’s finances?

    Last week’s embarrassing climbdown on welfare saw the government’s benefits reforms gutted almost entirely, while savings from the bill were slashed from £5bn to nothing. In the wake of the U-turn, there are now growing questions over how the government will raise the money to fill the black hole in the public finances.Ministers have already squeezed significant savings out of their departments in cuts that were unveiled at last month’s spending review, meaning there is now a mounting expectation that the chancellor will be forced to raise taxes instead. But Labour’s manifesto pledge not to raise taxes on “working people” leaves the chancellor with a limited number of workable options. A few possibilities were floated by deputy prime minister Angela Rayner in a leaked memo to Rachel Reeves ahead of the spring statement, which saw her urge the chancellor to raise taxes – suggestions which were ignored. But perhaps this week’s welfare climbdown will leave the chancellor with no option but to look again at Rayner’s suggestions. The chancellor is said to have warned her colleagues there are no longer any low-hanging fruit for her to raise billions, meaning any tax hikes in the autumn Budget are set to be painful for Labour.Here, The Independent takes a look at a number of tax rises that the government could rely on to raise funds and balance the books. Tax threshold freezes The Treasury’s most likely move would be to extend the freeze on income tax thresholds. This means that as wages rise with inflation, over the years workers are dragged into higher tax bands and end up paying more. A freeze on the threshold at which the higher 45 per cent tax rate is paid was one of the options suggested by Ms Rayner in her leaked memo. But there is growing speculation the government could extend the freeze across all tax brackets. At PMQs on Wednesday, Sir Keir left the door open for such a move, refusing to rule it out. While he gave an unequivocal answer ruling out increasing VAT, income tax or national insurance, he refused to do so when it came to tax threshold freezes. It’s a stealth tax, the impacts of which are not felt immediately, meaning it is normally better received among the general public compared with a direct hit to businesses or pay slips. But, if the freeze were extended to the end of the parliament, it could also bring in billions for the Treasury as earnings rise. The freeze, which is already planned to last until 2028, is expected to drag around two million workers into higher tax bands.Wealth tax There have been calls from Labour MPs on the left of the party to introduce a wealth tax, calls which have only grown in the wake of Tuesday’s welfare climbdown. Rachael Maskell, the architect of the rebellion which forced the government into shelving key pillars of the bill, demanded the government increase taxes on the very richest to pay for the £5bn climbdown. Polling conducted by YouGov on behalf of Oxfam on the eve of the spring statement found more than three-quarters of people (77 per cent) would rather the government increase taxes on the very richest to improve public finances than see cuts to public spending. However, such a tax – which could look like a 2 per cent tax on net assets worth more than £10m – is thought to be very hard to implement, and could also lead to some of Britain’s highest earners leaving the country. But Sir Keir Starmer’s Blairite policy chief, Liz Lloyd, has reportedly warned the PM against implementing a wealth tax, amid fears about an exodus of high net worth individuals from Britain. The PM is therefore expected to block the mounting calls. While Downing Street sources have suggested a wealth tax is not on the table, the prime minister failed to rule it out at PMQs on Wednesday. Capital gainsCampaigners on the left have long called for capital gains to be equalised with income tax, believing that workers should not pay a higher levy than those earning money through the appreciation in value of assets. The tax, paid on the increase in value of an asset such as a house when it is sold, is charged at 24 per cent on most things, while income tax can be as high as 45 per cent. “Those people go out to work every day to keep our public service going, work in our factories, drive our economy. Where is the equity there?” Labour MP Andy McDonald said on Times Radio.Ms Rayner also called for the lifetime pensions allowance to be reinstated. The allowance, which puts a cap on how much savers can put into their pension pot before a higher rate of tax is applied, was axed by the Tories. Labour had initially planned to reinstate the cap, but the plans were abandoned ahead of the election. However, amid the controversy over cutting winter fuel payments – and then later reversing the decision – the government may be hesitant to introduce any other policies which would upset pensioners. Corporation tax The chancellor could also look at increasing corporation tax for banks – one of the suggestions included in the deputy prime minister’s memo. Politically, its fairly easy to tax banks as there is limited direct impact on voters. But it’s important to note that banks in the UK are already highly taxed. They pay normal corporation tax of 25 per cent, plus a bank surcharge of 3 per cent. On top of this, they pay a bank levy of 0.1 per cent of their balance sheets. The deputy prime minister also proposed raising tax rates on dividends – a portion of a company’s earnings received by a shareholder – for higher earners. Currently, tax is not paid on dividend income that falls within your income tax Personal Allowance. There is also a £500 dividend allowance each year, meaning individuals only pay tax on any dividend income above this. Removing it altogether would be worth £325 million a year, HMRC data indicates. However, there are concerns that raising dividend tax rates could discourage people from investing in companies – which is likely to have a net negative impact on the economy. Ms Rayner also suggested ending inheritance tax relief on shares listed on the smaller Aim stock market. The Aim stock market is a sub-market of the London Stock Exchange. From April 2026, qualifying Aim shares held at the time of death will be eligible for 50 per cent relief from inheritance tax – but Ms Rayner has suggested ending this entirely. While these changes might make businesses uncomfortable, they’re actually unlikely to raise much money for the Treasury – meaning it’s a less likely option for the chancellor. More

  • in

    Infected blood victims facing ‘new layer of psychological pain’ amid compensation failings, damning report finds

    Government failings over the compensation offered to victims of the infected blood scandal has left them facing a “new and different layer of psychological pain”, a damning report has concluded. A report into the compensation of victims and others affected by the scandal found that they have been ignored, branding the British state’s apology meaningless unless they are given greater involvement. Sir Brian Langstaff, chairman of the official inquiry into the infected blood scandal, said: “Decisions have been made behind closed doors leading to obvious injustices.” Chairman of the Infected Blood Inquiry Sir Brian Langstaff said last year that people affected by the scandal should face no more delays (Big T Images/Infected Blood Inquiry/PA) More

  • in

    Meta opens Cambridge lab as part of AI glasses expansion

    Facebook owner Meta has opened a new audio research lab in Cambridge as part of the tech giant’s push into AI glasses.Bosses at Meta met Chancellor Rachel Reeves on Wednesday morning as they launched the £12 million facility.It came amid reports the Facebook and Instagram owner has purchased a minority stake in Oakley and Ray-Ban owner EssilorLuxottica SA, the world’s largest eyewear business.It is reported the company’s stake will be worth around three billion euros (£2.6 billion) and be worth just under 3% of the Paris-based business.Meta has outlined plans to rapidly grow its AI glasses business, with Ray-Ban Meta and recently announced Oakley Meta products.The Silicon Valley business said its expansion plans in this area have seen it invest in the new audio research lab in Cambridge, designed to “advance spatial audio and machine learning for Meta’s future AI glasses”.The facility includes “reverb rooms and ultra-quiet acoustic chambers” in order to hone the audio quality of its products under development.Meta employs more than 5,500 people across its UK operations.Joel Kaplan, chief global affairs officer for Meta, met Ms Reeves at the site and underlined the group’s commitment to investing in the UK.Mr Kaplan said: “Creating this world-class audio lab in Cambridge is a sign of our long-term commitment to the UK and our belief in the top engineering talent it produces.“We want the brightest minds to make sure our smart glasses have the smartest AI-powered audio so you can focus on what you’re listening to no matter what’s going on around you.“I can’t wait to experience the results of the work the lab produces.”Ms Reeves said: “Meta’s investment is a huge vote of confidence in the UK as a hub for world-leading research and innovation while helping to supercharge the potential in the Oxford to Cambridge growth corridor.“We want our high-tech industries to continue to lead the world in years to come which is why we’re backing our innovators, researchers and entrepreneurs with a record £22 billion in R&D (research and development) funding, creating the opportunity for good jobs and investment in Britain, and delivering on our plan for change.” More

  • in

    ‘Will you shut up’: Farage’s anti-Macron speech drowned out by hecklers

    Nigel Farage was drowned out by hecklers as he criticised Emmanuel Macron during Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, 9 July.As the Reform UK leader stood up, jeers rang out across the House of Commons.He went on to say that the reason the UK voted for Brexit was because “we wanted to take back control of our borders”.Mr Farage told Sir Keir Starmer that the country demands “that you are not dictated to by an increasingly arrogant, anti-Brexit French president.”The prime minister responded by insisting that Labour are “fixing the mess that we inherited.” More

  • in

    HS2 should be ‘largely completed’ by now but project is just over halfway there, boss admits

    The construction of HS2’s physical structures should have been “largely completed” by now under the project’s initial timeline – but it is actually just over halfway there, the project’s chief executive has admitted.HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Wild blamed major delays in the execution of the project on “inefficiency of work” as a result of the decision to start construction work before the finalised design or consents were in place. Giving evidence in front of the Commons Transport Select Committee, HS2 Ltd chief executive Mark Wild admitted: “The construction of the civil engineering should have been largely completed by now.“The reality is we’re about 60 per cent complete.”The Department for Transport regards estimates that HS2 could cost up to £80 billion in current prices as ‘unreliable’ (Jonathan Brady/PA) More

  • in

    Will Macron help Starmer to tackle the small boats issue? The prime minister shouldn’t get his hopes up

    The loan of the Bayeux Tapestry to the British Museum is meant to symbolise the “close and deepening” relationship between the UK and France.But it is also an uncomfortable reminder that small boats crossing the Channel is not a new problem, and it can end up leaving one in the eye for the leader in England.Leaders coming from France have their own agenda, even if the entente is a great deal more cordial now than in the days of William the Conqueror.The impressive speech by President Emmanuel Macron in his second language for more than half an hour to a joint sitting of the Houses of Parliament on Tuesday was full of warm words and a desire, in particular, to unpick Brexit.The Princess of Wales looks on as King Charles and Emmanuel Macron toast at the state banquet More

  • in

    Starmer and Macron to hold Downing Street talks amid push for French help on small boats

    Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron will hold Downing Street talks on Wednesday amid growing pressure on the prime minister to strike a deal to bring down the number of small boat crossings. The French president arrived on Tuesday for the first state visit by an EU head of state since Brexit.It comes as the UK has been pressing for tougher action from the French authorities on the beaches along the Channel coast.The prime ministeris facing a fight to salvage his much-vaunted “one in, one out” deal with France to return illegal migrants and halt the increasing crossings of small boats across the English Channel.Downing Street has credited Sir Keir Starmer’s ‘reset’ with Europe for bringing about a change in French tactics on small boats More