More stories

  • in

    Back to school: Boris Johnson contradicts education minister on Covid testing

    Downing Street has contradicted an education minister by saying that children who test positive for coronavirus in a lateral flow test can be cleared to go to school if they later test negative in the more reliable PCR test.Children’s minister Vicky Ford sparked alarm among parents by saying that schools should not take the risk of having a child in the classroom after testing negative in a rapid-turnaround test carried out at home – even if they are later shown by a laboratory test not to have the virus. But Boris Johnson’s official spokesman later insisted that the opposite was true, telling reporters that a pupil can come out of self-isolation and return to school if the lab test comes back negative.He told a regular Westminster media briefing: “If a PCR test is negative following a positive lateral flow, children can go back to school.”The spokesman said that the aim would be to get PCR tests out “as quickly as possible” after the positive lateral flow test performed at home.Back-up PCR tests are not needed after rapid tests performed at school, because they are done “under supervision in a controlled environment”, he said.The contradictory messages fuelled confusion on the day when schools across England began welcoming millions of children back in the first major step in easing the national lockdown after more than two months. Inside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayInside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayUpon returning, students in secondary schools and colleges will have to take three lateral flow tests onsite under supervision, before being asked to perform the rapid tests twice a week at home.Questioned on the new testing system, Ms Ford told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “If they test positive then they shouldn’t be in school. “The lateral flow test – as we heard yesterday from Public Health England – have got less than one in 1,000 chance of having a false positive. So if they test positive they should stay out of school.”Presented with the situation of a child testing positive using a self-administered lateral flow device (LFD) test at home, who then received a negative result after using a laboratory test — known as a PCR test — Ms Ford suggested they would still have to complete their 10-day self-isolation period.“The first priority is to make sure we keep the Covid out of the classrooms, with these regular tests,” she stressed.“The chance of a lateral flow test giving a false positive are actually very low. There will obviously be discussions with the pupils and their families if they then have the negative test later.”“The really important thing here is to make sure we can keep schools open and minimise the risk of having Covid in the classrooms and that is why people who’ve had the test that shows they have got Covid through the lateral flow test, we should not take the risk of having the child in the classroom.Quizzed on whether a laboratory test could override the lateral flow test, the minister went on: “They should not take the risk. We all want to make sure that we can keep Covid out of the classrooms here.”Shadow schools minister Wes Streeting criticised the Government for confused messaging.“What hope is there for schools, parents and pupils when ministers in the Department For Education can’t get their basic facts right?” he asked.“Is there a single day or a single announcement or a single initiative that Gavin Williamson’s bungling team have managed to get through unscathed? Worse than useless.” More

  • in

    ‘We never sulk’: Brussels shrugs off Frost claim of ill-will in Brexit row

    The EU has rejected the claim by Boris Johnson’s Brexit minister that its approach to talks on Northern Ireland was driven by “ill-will” towards the UK, insisting: “We never sulk”. David Frost made the incendiary charge in a newspaper article on Sunday, in which he claimed that London’s second threat to breach the terms of the Brexit deal which Mr Johnson signed with Brussels was “lawful”.As Brussels threatened legal action over the UK’s plan unilaterally to delay agreed checks on supermarket goods and parcels, Lord Frost accused the EU of undermining cross-confidence in the deal’s Northern Ireland Protocol and called for it to “shake off any remaining ill-will towards us for leaving, and instead build a friendly relationship, between sovereign equals”.But Mr Johnson’s government was today accused by Theresa May’s former chief of staff Gavin Barwell of “dishonesty” in its approach to the protocol, which created a customs border down the Irish Sea.Lord Barwell said that the problems which had led to products missing from supermarket shelves and lorries returning empty to Northern Ireland were caused by the deal agreed by Mr Johnson which was “very different from the one Theresa negotiated”. Mr Johnson “gave in to what the EU originally wanted – a Northern Ireland-only arrangement,” said Lord Barwell, adding: “That’s why we have the problems we do now.”And the former civil service head of the Department for Exiting the EU said the Johnson administration was “burning” trust and goodwill with Brussels by “playing games around Brexit” for domestic political reasons.Inside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayInside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayEuropean Commission spokesman Eric Mamer shrugged off Lord Frost’s accusations, telling a Brussels press conference: “We never sulk. We don’t have moods. We are an institution, so we try to work on a day-to-day basis with a very, very even temper.”But former DExEU chief Philip Rycroft told BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour: “It is deeply worrying and frankly deeply depressing that with the ink barely dry on the protocol and on the Trade and Co-operation Agreement, we’re already running into these sorts of problems. Brexit, far from being done, is going to be with us for a long time to come.”Mr Rycroft said that problems in Northern Ireland were caused in part by the government misleading local traders about the likely impact of Mr Johnson’s deal, which requires time-consuming checks on goods moving from mainland Britain to Northern Ireland.“There are undoubtedly issues about the protocol,” he said. “Traders simply aren’t ready to do the things that are required on the protocol, not leastbecause the government spent the best part of last year saying to them they wouldn’t have to do anything, despite knowing full well that all of these checks would have to come in. “Extending those grace periods is not an unreasonable thing to ask for, butthe way that David Frost has gone about this, to tell the Commission he was unilaterally extending without doing his opposite number in the Commission the courtesy of picking up the phone, suggests that they’re still playing games around Brexit.“It’s all about the politically attractive ploy of playing hardball with the EU, rather than accepting their responsibilities for the deal that he and the prime minister negotiated.” Mr Rycroft said: “This is a complicated deal, the Northern Ireland Protocol, it’s the least worst option, it’s there to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland. “It is so important to the peace process in Northern Ireland that this protocol is able to work and that’s going to require a huge amount of goodwill and trust on both sides, I’m afraid that trust is being burnt at the moment.”Lord Barwell said that Lord Frost was “adding insult to injury” for the people of Northern Ireland by refusing to acknowledge the barriers to trade that are the consequence of the Brexit deal which he negotiated, which “explicitly created barriers when goods move from GB to NI”.The former 10 Downing Street chief of staff said it was “dishonest” to pretend that Brexit bureaucracy was not having a harmful impact on trade.“The deal which David Frost negotiated does not keep ‘open and free trade’ between the UK and EU – it introduces significant barriers to trade,” said Lord Barwell. “Dismissing the difficulties he has caused for many businesses as ‘the details of customs and form-filling’ adds insult to injury“His argument that setting your own laws in every area of national life is ‘vital to economic success’ will come as news to countries like Ireland that have grown strongly whilst members of the EU and music to the ears of the SNP.“No-one is suggesting that bureaucracy prevents trade altogether, but introducing it clearly has a cost and it’s dishonest to pretend otherwise. If you think other benefits outweigh those costs make that case, but don’t pretend trade with the EU is as free today as it was in 2020.“Why do you expect open and free trade within the UK? Our government signed a treaty that explicitly created barriers when goods move from GB to NI.” More

  • in

    Scottish Tories condemn Nicola Sturgeon’s power over ministerial code, despite loophole clearing Priti Patel

    Scottish Tories are demanding an end to political leaders ruling on allegations against ministers – despite Boris Johnson using the power to rescue Priti Patel after she was found guilty of bullying.“The scandal has shown that the Scottish government is accountable only to itself,” Douglas Ross protested“It’s left to the first minister to uphold the ministerial code and take decisions on the scrutiny of ministerial behaviour.“So, to make this process independent, we will propose that responsibility for scrutiny of ministerial behaviour be given to the standards committee – just as they report on the behaviour of opposition and backbench MSPs.“There should be no separate process for government ministers,” he told an event hosted by the Tory think-tank Onward.Inside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayInside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayIt allowed him to overturn his own ethics adviser’s ruling that the home secretary’s shouting and swearing had bullied her staff and breached the code, by deciding her behaviour had been unintentional.Alex Allen quit in disgust as independent adviser on the code, as the Cabinet Secretary also admitted there is no requirement to ever release the findings of such investigations.During a question-and-answer session, Mr Ross also repeated his call for Scottish Labour to form what a questioner called “a grand coalition” to stop the SNP, if necessary.Anas Sarwar, the party’s new leader, has already ruled out any such deal – as did his predecessor Richard Leonard – knowing any hint of cooperation would further damage Labour, ahead of May’s elections.Mr Ross also insisted Mr Johnson’s premiership had a “positive effect” on the Tories in Scotland, pointing to the success of the vaccination programme and ‘levelling up’ funding.However, amid suggestions the prime minister is a recruiting serjeant for independence, he said: “I’m leading the party in Scotland, I’m on the ballot.” Mr Ross also defended his decision to stage a no-confidence vote in Ms Sturgeon this week, even before the conclusions of separate investigations.The Conservatives had “no choice but to continue with our plans” after the deputy first minister – John Swinney, who also faces such a vote – delayed release of legal advice.The motions have been brought forward after the SNP’s botched handling of sexual harassment allegations made against Mr Salmond, a former first minister“The other parties need to show that they have the stomach stand up to this SNP government like we do,” Mr Ross said, “to hold the first minister to the same standards that she has held others to”. More

  • in

    Students with positive result from rapid test should still self-isolate if second laboratory test is negative, minister suggests

    Secondary school children who receive a positive result after taking a rapid Covid test will have to self-isolate even if a second follow-up laboratory test produces a negative result, a government minister has confirmed.As schools across England begin welcoming millions of children back to classrooms — the first major step in easing the national lockdown — a new testing regime will come into force in an attempt to curb the spread of coronavirus.Upon returning, students in secondary schools and colleges will have to take three quick turnaround tests onsite under supervision, before being asked to perform twice-weekly rapid tests at home.Questioned on the new testing system, Vicky Ford, the children’s minister, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “If they test positive then they shouldn’t be in school. “The lateral flow test as we heard yesterday from Public Health England — they’ve got less 1 in 1,000 chance of having a false positive. So if they test positive they should stay out of school.”Presented with the situation of a child testing positive using a self-administered rapid lateral flow device (LFD) test at home, who then received a negative result after using a laboratory test — known as a PCR test — Ms Ford suggested they would still have to complete their 10-day self-isolation period.“The first priority is to make sure we keep the Covid out of the classrooms, with these regular tests,” she stressed.Inside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayInside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekday“The chance of a lateral flow test giving a false positive are actually very low. There will obviously be discussions with the pupils and their families if they then have the negative test later.”“The really important thing here is to make sure we can keep schools open and minimise the risk of having Covid in the classrooms and that is why people who’ve had the test that shows they have got Covid through the lateral flow test, we should not take the risk of having the child in the classroom.Quizzed on whether a laboratory test could override the lateral flow test, the minister went on: “They should not take the risk. We all want to make sure that we can keep Covid out of the classrooms here.”Public Health England’s Covid-19 strategic response director Dr Susan Hopkins reiterated on BBC’s Andrew Marr programme that the risk of false positives was “extremely low, less than in a thousand”, adding: “We would expect that that would be the same risk with PRC tests. No test is perfect.”However, speaking at the weekend professor Sheila Bird, a member of the Royal Statistical Society, suggested every positive quick-result test of a school pupils should be checked with a PCR test to ensure it was accurate.“In the present circumstances when infection incidence is low, the false positive rate with lateral flow tests remains to be absolutely determined in the context of schools but may be between one and three per 1,000 children. So to differentiate a false positive from a true positive is to do that PCR confirmation.”As children begin heading back to classrooms across the country, professor Calum Semple, a member of the government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), added it was “inevitable that we will see a rise in cases”, but it was not so important if the reproduction number rose slightly.The advice for teachers “is going to be wearing face masks, being careful in the common room – their colleagues are more of a risk to them than the children,” he told BBC Breakfast.Labour is also urging the government to introduce catch-up breakfast clubs before school to help students recover from 109 days of face-to-face learning they missed due to the pandemic.“The Government’s catch-up plans fall woefully short of the support needed to help children recover from the pandemic, condemning the life chances of a generation of young people,” claimed the shadow education secretary Kate Green.She added: “Ministers should listen to Labour‘s call for breakfast clubs to give every child a healthy breakfast, more time to play with their friends and extra time for teachers to provide targeted catch-up support. The government must be more ambitious for children’s recovery.” More

  • in

    Police to be given £30m to help tackle ‘underlying causes’ of violent crime

    Police are to be given an extra £30m to target violent crime “hotspots” in a bid to crack down on murder, knife attacks and other serious offences.Home secretary Priti Patel said the funding would help forces “tackle underlying causes” after senior police officers warned they had seen violent crime continue even during lockdown.Some of the money will finance programmes which try to intervene in significant moments in the lives of young people, such as when they enter police custody or hospital.“We are investing in new early intervention programmes to stop young people committing these crimes in the first place,” Ms Patel said.Part of the funding will be targeted in the worst-affected areas of England and Wales, where police have seized more than 100,000 weapons in the last two years.  The funding comes ahead of the introduction of a new major criminal justice bill, which will give police new stop and search powers to tackle known carriers of knives and other weapons.It will also place a duty on public sector bodies, including the police and NHS agencies, to take a joined-up approach to reducing serious violence.Inside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayInside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayMs Patel said she was “determined to cut crime” and make the country’s streets safer.Assistant Chief Constable Jackie Sebire, who leads the National Police Chiefs’ Council’s work on serious violent crime, welcomed the new funding and said tackling the problem was a priority for forces.She added: “Even during the pandemic we have seen serious street-based violence continue and particularly violence involving young people as both victims and perpetrators.”The forces to receive a share of the £30m funding are London’s Metropolitan Police, West Midlands, Greater Manchester, Merseyside, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Northumbria, Thames Valley, Lancashire, Essex, Avon and Somerset, Kent, Nottinghamshire, Leicestershire, Bedfordshire, Sussex, Hampshire, and South Wales. More

  • in

    Government to spend £9m on White House-style ‘Situation Room’ for Whitehall

    Boris Johnson has given the thumbs-up to building the command room – or The Situation Centre (dubbed SitCen) – for use during such emergencies as terrorist strikes and crisis’ including pandemics.Due to open this summer, it will be next door to the Cobra meeting rooms in the basement of the Cabinet Office where ministers currently deal with emergencies.In the reportedly high-tech set-up, Mr Johnson will be able to watch drone strikes and military engagements on huge interactive display screens, allowing the PM to track events in real-time.The SitCen project is part of the government’s review of defence, security and foreign policy due to be unveiled on 16 March. The huge overhaul seeks to modernise and evolve the armed forces, intelligence and diplomacy.The room will reportedly be staffed around the clock by “watchkeeper” staff from the National Security Secretariat who will use data analysis for “horizon scanning” in order to identify threats. A conference table for the PM, ministers and intelligence chiefs will take centre place in the room, used to brief government officials and monitor risks up to six months ahead.Inside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayInside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayInformation will be supplied by the Joint Intelligence Committee, Joint Terrorism Assessment Centre and other Whitehall experts.In the US, presidents use the White House’s Situation Room for coordinating emergency responses and tackling security threats. Barack Obama used the command room when US special forces killed Osama bin Laden in 2011.One official told The Sunday Times: “It will have hi-tech stuff – heatmaps, geostationary visualisations, interactive dashboards. At key moments we still get analogue government with no maps and PowerPoint presentations.“Coronavirus has shown that we need this. It will support a greater speed of decision-making”, they added.Another source said: “The time taken to collate data, brief ministers, understand situations and act on them will be reduced from weeks to minutes.”The room demonstrates the emphasis on science, technology and data in the upcoming 100-age document titled Global Britain in a Competitive Age.Also among the advances are a new RAF Space Command set to launch a rocket from Scotland in 2022, a National Cyber Force and artificial intelligence research facilities.These technological upgrades will lead to a dramatic reduction in army personal with 12,500 troops set to be lost.Speaking recently at the Munich security conference, Mr Johnson said:  “We will focus our investment on the new technologies that will revolutionise warfare – artificial intelligence, unmanned aircraft, directed-energy weapons and many others.”Extensive refurbishments began in Downing Street last year reportedly so the PM could hold White-House style televised press briefings.It was revealed through a Freedom of Information request by the PA news agency that more than £2.6m has been spent on the upgrade, which the Cabinet Office said “reflects” that No 9 is a Grade-I listed building. More

  • in

    Police to be given £30m to help crack down on violent crime

    Police are to be given an extra £30m to target “hotspots” in a bid to crack down on murder, knife crime and other serious offences.Senior police officers have warned that they have seen violent crimes continue even during lockdown.Home secretary Priti Patel said that when it came to gangs and serious violence “we must … tackle underlying causes. That is why we are investing in new early intervention programmes to stop young people committing these crimes in the first place.”This will include programmes which try to intervene in significant moments in the lives of young people, such as when they enter police custody or hospital.Some of the money will also be spent in parts of England and Wales most affected, and where police have seized over 100,000 weapons in the last two years.  The funding comes ahead of the introduction of a new major criminal justice bill, which will, among other things, give police new stop and search powers to tackle known carriers of knives and other weapons.It will also place a duty on public sector bodies, including the police and NHS agencies, to take a joined-up approach to reducing serious violence.Inside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayInside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayMs Patel said she was “determined to cut crime” and make the country’s streets safer.Assistant Chief Constable Jackie Sebire, who leads the National Police Chiefs’ Council’s work on serious violent crime, welcomed the money and said tackling the problem was a priority for forces.She added: “Even during the pandemic we have seen serious street-based violence continue and particularly violence involving young people as both victims and perpetrators.”The forces to receive a share of the £30m funding are made up of the Metropolitan Police, West Midlands, Greater Manchester, Merseyside, West Yorkshire, South Yorkshire, Northumbria, Thames Valley, Lancashire, Essex, Avon and Somerset, Kent, Nottinghamshire, Leicestershire, Bedfordshire, Sussex, Hampshire, and South Wales. More

  • in

    Vast majority of those affected by controversial NHS pay offer are women, Labour warns

    The party said they would make up three out of four of those hit, as it accused the government of “turning its back” on women during the pandemic. Boris Johnson has defended the offer to “heroic” NHS staff, suggesting his government had given “as much as we can”.But he appeared to hint towards a possible route for a U-turn, pointing out that the issue would now be considered by an independent review body.Nursing leaders and unions expressed outrage last week when it emerged that ministers had recommended a 1 per cent pay rise.Speaking on a visit to a vaccination centre in north London, the prime minister, who was hospitalised with Covid-19 last year, said he was “massively grateful” to NHS staff.They had been “heroic” throughout the pandemic, he said.Inside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayInside Politics newsletterThe latest news on Brexit, politics and beyond direct to your inbox every weekdayBut he suggested that the nation’s finances could not afford to pay them more than what critics say is a real-terms cut in salary.Mr Johnson said: “What we have done is try to give them as much as we can at the present time.” He added: “The independent pay review body will obviously look at what we’ve proposed and come back.”But he said: “Don’t forget that there has been a public sector pay freeze, we’re in pretty tough times.“We’ve tried to give the NHS as much as we possibly can and that means, in addition to the £140bn of annual money, we’ve got another £62bn we’ve found to help support the NHS throughout the crisis.“My gratitude is overwhelming and I’m so grateful particularly to the nurses, and thankfully we are seeing more nurses now in our amazing NHS – there are 10,000 more nurses this year than there were last year.”Labour said women made up the majority of jobs in professions including nursing, midwives, health visitors and support roles that will be affected.The party has said staff should receive at least a 2.1 per cent pay rise this year as a “bare minimum” denouncing the government’s offer of less than half that as “reprehensible”.NHS leaders have pointed out that ministers budgeted for the higher amount last year, as part of a long-term plan for the health service.A government spokesman said: “Over 1 million NHS staff continue to benefit from multi-year pay deals agreed with trade unions, which have delivered a pay rise of over 12 per cent for newly qualified nurses and will increase junior doctors’ pay scales by 8.2 per cent.” He added: “The independent pay review bodies will report in late spring and we will consider their recommendations carefully when we receive them.” More