More stories

  • in

    Boris Johnson news – live: UK risks EU talks failure if it tears up Protocol, Starmer says

    Boris Johnson admits he signed Northern Ireland Protocol hoping EU would not ‘apply it’Keir Starmer said on Monday that the government’s plan to override elements of the Northern Ireland protocol will reduce the chances of an agreement with the EU.The Labour leader said that issues with Brussels could be resolved “around the negotiating table with statecraft” and not with legislation that “breaches international law” and will impede negotiations.Meanwhile, Boris Johnson insisted the plan to effectively override parts of the Brexit deal with the EU was “not a big deal”.The legislation to amend the protocol unilaterally will be introduced in Parliament on Monday amid controversy over whether the legislation will break international law.“What it does is create unnecessary barriers on east-west trade – what we can do is fix that. It’s not a big deal,” the prime minister said on a visit to Cornwall.Ireland’s Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Coveney said the plan would “ratchet up” tension and breach the UK’s international commitments and that the charges marked a particular “low point” in Brexit talks. But Mr Johnson insisted the legislation would introduce “relatively simple” bureaucratic changes and warned it would be a “gross overreaction” if Brussels sought to retaliate by triggering a trade war.Show latest update

    1655131834ICYMI: Rwanda scheme: George Eustice says deporting migrants is ‘right thing to do’Rwanda scheme: George Eustice says deporting migrants is ‘right thing to do’Joe Middleton13 June 2022 15:501655130139Majority of MLAs oppose amendment to NI protocolA majority of Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) in Stormont have signed a joint letter to Boris Johnson stating their opposition to proposed legislation to amend the Northern Ireland Protocol.The letter has been signed by 52 of the 90 MLAs. They represent Sinn Fein, the SDLP and the Alliance Party.The letter to Mr Johnson states that the signatories “reject in the strongest possible terms your Government’s reckless new protocol legislation, which flies in the face of the expressed wishes of not just most businesses, but most people in Northern Ireland”.It continues that “whilst not ideal, the protocol currently represents the only available”.Joe Middleton13 June 2022 15:221655128665Economy shrinking in April was due to end of mass Covid-19 testing, says No 10Downing Street said the latest figures showing the economy shrinking in April were “significantly impacted” by the end of mass Covid-19 testing and “when we exclude the falling numbers of Covid tests, the rest of the economy saw positive growth of 0.1% in April”.“So we are focused on growing the economy to reduce the cost of living and we will continue to work to create the conditions for economic growth,” the spokesman said.“We think we have strong foundations within our economy which will help it to grow. We recognise there are strong headwinds as we emerge from this pandemic and with war in Europe. That is challenging not just for the UK but for countries across the world.”The spokesman said it was “too early to pass judgment” on the impact of Brexit, particularly given the effects of the pandemic,But “we are confident that the opportunities Brexit provides will be a boon to the UK economy in the long term”.Joe Middleton13 June 2022 14:571655127922Labour leader is ‘confident’ he has done nothing wrong amid parliamentary investigationLabour leader is ‘confident’ he has done nothing wrong amid parliamentary investigationJoe Middleton13 June 2022 14:451655127310Changes to NI protocol will be ‘damaging to mutual trust & a formula for uncertainty’, says ŠefčovičMaroš Šefčovič, the European Commission vice president, said he spoke to Liz Truss this morning about the government’s planned changes to the NI protocol. He said it will be “damaging to mutual trust & a formula for uncertainty.”Joe Middleton13 June 2022 14:351655126667Fuel prices investigated by watchdog as petrol hits new record highFuel prices are to be investigated by Britain’s competition watchdog as pump prices hit another record high despite Rishi Sunak’s 5p per litre tax cut.The average cost of a litre of petrol at forecourts climbed to 185p on Sunday, according to the AA – an increase of 7.1p in just one week.The RAC described the “speed and scale” of the rises as “staggering.”The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) announced on Monday it will conduct a “short and focused review” of prices at the request of Kwasi Kwarteng.Joe Middleton13 June 2022 14:241655125240NI protocol bill will make agreement with EU harder, says StarmerKeir Starmer said that the NI protocol bill being published today will reduce the chances of an agreement with the EU and the government is “going down the wrong track here”The Labour leader said: “I think the answer to this is to accept there are some problems in the way the protocol works but they can be resolved around the negotiating table with statecraft, with guile, with trust. “Unfortunately, we don’t have those in the current Prime Minister.“They won’t be resolved with legislation that breaches international law and that, frankly, will impede the negotiations that, in the end, will be needed to settle this.“So the Government is going down the wrong track here.”Joe Middleton13 June 2022 14:001655124271Boris Johnson says plan to break Brexit treaty is ‘not a big deal’Boris Johnson has insisted a plan to break parts of the Northern Ireland Brexit deal is “not a big deal”.The prime minister was warned by Dublin this morning that the move would “deeply damage” relations between Britain and Europe if it went ahead.But the prime minister insisted that the legislation amounted to “a relatively trivial set of adjustments” to deal with problems caused by the agreement he negotiated.Jon Stone reports.Joe Middleton13 June 2022 13:441655123598‘No plans’ to cut fuel duty, say No 10Downing Street said there were “no plans” for a further cut in fuel duty despite prices at the pumps continuing to rise.“We know this is challenging for families up and down the country and indeed in other countries which are all suffering from high oil and gas prices globally,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesman said.But there were no plans for a further cut in duty, with the spokesman pointing to a £37 billion package of measures already announced to address the cost-of-living crisis, including the 5p duty cut introduced in March.Downing Street also denied that the Exchequer was benefiting from a VAT windfall as a result of high pump prices.“There is no VAT windfall, in fact the OBR forecast lower VAT receipts for this year than they did in the autumn,” the spokesman said.“Increases in VAT from fuel are likely to be largely offset by reductions from VAT from other areas.”Joe Middleton13 June 2022 13:331655121624Boris Johnson has ‘nothing but respect and admiration’ for Prince Charles amid Rwanda criticismBoris Johnson has “nothing but respect and admiration” for the Prince of Wales after he reportedly criticised the Rwanda policy, Downing Street said on Monday.The prime minister’s official spokesman said: “The Prime Minister has nothing but respect and admiration for the Prince of Wales, who’s spoken out on a number of issues, not least the environment.”Mr Johnson’s response comes after reports that the heir to the throne said the policy was “appalling” and that he was uncomfortable with the scheme as he believed it would overshadow his upcoming visit to the country.Joe Middleton13 June 2022 13:00 More

  • in

    Only eight asylum seekers set to be on Rwanda deportation flight after dozens of successful appeals

    The first Rwanda deportation flight appears to be in doubt after a series of legal challenges have pushed the number of asylum seekers booked to be onboard close to single figures.The Care4Calais group said only eight people were approved for removal on Tuesday’s flight after sucessful individual challenges in recent days.Up to 130 people were told they could be sent to Rwanda under home secretary Priti Patel’s highly-controversial scheme. But the Home Office said last week that 31 people were due to leave on the first flight.It is understood that the number facing deportation is now rapidly dwindling, with Home Office sources saying there was a “real prospect” of the number falling to zero – thus preventing the flight.Care4Calais founder Claire Mosely said: “We’ll have to fight every single case individually. We’re very hopeful all of them will be removed from the flight list by tomorrow.”Detention Action, another group campaigning to stop the flight, said it expected more sucessful individual legal challenges on Monday. “It’s very possible the number will drop lower before Tuesday,” said a spokesperson.Home Office sources said the department would operate the flight even if there is just one person on it. One source told The Independent: “The flight would go ahead [if one person was on board]. Legal challenges are still coming in, so we’ll have to wait and see if it goes ahead.”On Monday Boris Johnson defended the controversial Rwanda plan ahead of fresh legal challenges – insisting that the scheme was always going to have “teething problems”.Asked whether the flight would still take off it only one person was allowed to leave, the PM told LBC that the government had anticipated that “very active lawyers” would try to stop the flight.“We’ve always said that we knew this policy would attract the attacks from those who want to have a completely open doors approach to immigration,” the prime minister said.It comes as the courts will hear two last-minute legal challenges on Monday aimed at blocking the government’s policy to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda before the first removal flight.The Court of Appeal will hear arguments from Care4Calais, Detention Action and the PCS trade union on Monday after a judge refused their request for an injunction blocking the flight taking off. More

  • in

    Rwanda migrants — latest: Torture victim to be deported as passengers ‘cut to 8’

    ‘No Rwanda’ protests staged at immigration removal centre ahead of first deportation flightA victim of torture is still scheduled to be deported to Rwanda tomorrow despite the number of passengers being slimmed down by successful appeals, a barrister told the Court of Appeal today. Raza Hussain QC, representing two people at risk of removal and three organisations challenging the policy, read out a Home Office communique to court which said that his client’s deportation should still go ahead because “Rwanda has a functioning healthcare system.”“I have just received the news that his removal is going to be maintained… it appears that torture has been considered but the removal hasn’t been deferred,” he added. The number of people on Tuesday’s flight has now been cut down to eight, according to campaign group Care4Calais. The Home Office’s plan is facing two legal challenges today. The PCS union, which represents Border Force staff, is appealing a decision made on Friday for the flight to go ahead tomorrow. The charity Asylum Aid is also mounting another attempt to stop the flight. Judges at the Court of Appeal heard today that the UNHCR, the UN’s refugee agency, was concerned about “deficiencies” in Rwanda’s immigration process and warned the government not to pursue the plan.Show latest update

    1655131630Injunction sought against Rwanda flight to give more time to assess it’s legality in court A charity is appealing to the High Court for an injunction on the Home Office’s deportation flight to Rwanda so that more time can be given for the asylum seekers to access justice. Barrister Charlotte Kilroy QC, who led the charity Asylum Aid’s legal team, asked Mr Justice Swift to impose an “urgent interim” injunction – to give time for the charity’s claim to be fully argued.“The claimant is applying for an urgent interim order that the defendant be prohibited from enforcing the removal of any asylum-seeker to Rwanda pursuant to ‘safe third country’ decisions taken under the new arrangements the defendant has adopted … pending the outcome of this claim,” she said in a written case outline.Ms Kilroy added: “Without interim relief there is … a real risk that individuals will be unlawfully removed to Rwanda without access to court and may suffer irreparable damage as a result.“Given the nature of the decisions taken, in a context where only the highest standards of fairness will suffice and fundamental rights … are in issue, the Claimant submits that the balance of convenience lies strongly in favour of the grant of the interim relief it seeks.”Holly Bancroft13 June 2022 15:471655130549Demonstration planned outside the Home Office at 5:30pmProtesters are expected to gather outside the Home Office at 5pm today to call on the government to halt their deportation flight to Rwanda. Ali Jones, an organiser of the demonstration from SOAS Detainee Support, said: “Immigration detention and deportations are always cruel and unjust, but forcibly and permanently deporting people to a country they have never been to – away from their families and communities – is plain torturous.”Zrinka Bralo, chief executive director of Migrants Organise, said: “We have had enough. The Rwanda sham is the latest cruel expansion of Britain’s Hostile Environment immigration system.”Holly Bancroft13 June 2022 15:291655129774‘Errors’ in Home Office letters to asylum seekers ‘mischaracterised’ the UN’s role in RwandaErrors made by the Home Office in letters to asylum seekers “mischaracterised” the UN refugee agency’s role in Rwanda, lawyers have told the Court of Appeal. Raza Husain QC told the court that UNHCR’s position had been “erroneously understood” by the government. With regards to claims that UNHCR can oversee Rwanda’s asylum process, the secretary of state Priti Patel had said: “The UNHCR is closely involved with the NEDP, and will provide oversight of individuals relocated from the UK.”However Mr Husain said “well with great respect, no they won’t”. He told the court that this has now been accepted as incorrect and the Home Office have issued an apology. The Home Office said “this was an error of a misreading of the [UN] report”.Mr Husain added that the UNHCR’s own evidence said that they could not “monitor the quality of decision making” of the Rwandan authorities. “Over the past years UNHCR has not been permitted to observe the refugee status determination committee and information on the asylum case is not shared systematically by the UNHCR by the Rwandan authorities” they said. Holly Bancroft13 June 2022 15:161655127944Campaigners ‘hopeful’ flight will be scrapped – as passenger numbers cut to eightCare4Calais saying they are “very hopeful” that the Rwanda flight will have to be cancelled through a series of individual challenges.The campaign group told The Independent that only eight people were still on flight list after more successful challenges. Activists are hoping to get a lawyer for the last person without legal representation this afternoon.Care4Calais founder Claire Mosely said: “We’ll have to fight every single case individually. We’re very hopeful all of them will be removed from the flight list by tomorrow.”She added: “We don’t want the Home Office to be able to deport anyone to Rwanda until the full court case in July – how can they deport people before it’s been determined if the policy is unlawful?”Adam Forrest13 June 2022 14:451655127583Two more Rwanda flight passengers have their tickets cancelledTwo more people who were scheduled to be on the deportation flight to Rwanda have had their tickets cancelled, according to campaign group Care4Calais. They shared the news on Twitter, saying: “Two more Rwanda deportees have had their tickets cancelled. Twenty three people have now had their Rwanda tickets cancelled. Eight still have live tickets for tomorrow.”Holly Bancroft13 June 2022 14:391655127383Second challenge to Home Office Rwanda deportation begins A charity has begun another legal challenge to a Government plan to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda.Asylum Aid have asked a High Court judge to temporarily block ministers from enforcing the removal of “any asylum seeker” to Rwanda.Lawyers for the charity argued the procedure adopted by the Government was unfair.Mr Justice Swift is considering the challenge at a High Court hearing in London.Lawyers representing Home Secretary Priti Patel say Asylum Aid’s application should be dismissed.Press Association13 June 2022 14:361655124582Number of passengers on Rwanda flight ‘cut down to 10’The number of people scheduled to be on the flight to Rwanda tomorrow has been cut down to 10, according to campaign group Care4Calais. They tweeted the news saying: “Another Rwanda deportee has had his ticket cancelled. Twenty-one people have now had their Rwanda tickets cancelled, but ten still have live tickets for tomorrow. “Holly Bancroft13 June 2022 13:491655123895Torture victim recalls ‘shock’ of finding out he could be sent to RwandaA young Sudanese man has spoken to campaign group Care4Calais about the shock he felt when he found out he is scheduled to be sent to Rwanda. “They showed me the letter saying I would be sent to Rwanda. I felt.. it’s just total shock,” he said. He had travelled to the UK from Calais and said he was there “for 9 months trying to get on lorries.”“People were talking about Rwanda [in Calais],” he said, “but I never thought it would be true, and you know as we don’t have TV there, and I wasn’t really familiar with the internet, we don’t really have proper news.”The 23-year-old spoke about how he had to run away from Sudan as a teenager after he fell in love with a girl and got her pregnant to the anger of her family. As she was from a different tribe, which was seen as higher to his, her family were outraged at what had happened and “came after me to attack me,” he said. He moved from Sudan to Chad and then to Libya. “I was seized and held three months by a militia, being beaten and tortured with electricity and fire, morning to night,” he said. “It left marks all over my body. They demanded that my family send money, but I told them, my family didn’t have that sort of money. So instead they just made me work for them.”Eventually he managed to escape and to cross in a boat to Malta. After nine months in detention in Malta, he got in a lorry to Genoa, and then on to Marseille and then to Calais. Speaking about potentially being sent to Rwanda, he said: “My feeling is shock that after all the time I had spent travelling, just hoping to find somewhere safe I could have a normal life, and thinking I would find a safe place, that they would just send me back again.”Holly Bancroft13 June 2022 13:381655122330Rwanda flight challenges are just ‘teething problems’, says Johnson Boris Johnson has said that his government’s policy to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is experiencing “teething problems”. Mr Johnson was responding to questions to a number of legal challenges to stop the Home Office’s deportation flight to Rwanda tomorrow. He said: “When we announced the policy, I always said that it would begin with a lot of teething problems and you have a lot of legal action against it. And they will try and delay it, that’s inevitable.”He added: “What we’re trying to do is stop the business model of criminal gangs who are preying on people, moving them across the Channel in unseaworthy vessels, risking their lives and sometimes costing their lives. But it’s worse than that, what they’re doing is undermining people’s confidence in legal migration and people’s support for legal migration.” More

  • in

    Boris Johnson says plan to break Brexit treaty is ‘not a big deal’

    Boris Johnson has insisted a plan to break parts of the Northern IrelandBrexit deal is “not a big deal”.The prime minister was warned by Dublin this morning that the move would “deeply damage” relations between Britain and Europe if it went ahead.But the prime minister insisted that the legislation amounted to “a relatively trivial set of adjustments” to deal with problems caused by the agreement he negotiated.The legislation will give the UK government powers to override elements of the Northern Ireland protocol at the behest of the Northern Ireland loyalist community.The existing arrangement was jointly agreed by Mr Johnson’s Government and the EU as part of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement to keep the Irish land border open, in line with the Good Friday Agreement.But unionists are annoyed that the set-up requires regulatory checks and customs declarations on goods moving between Great Britain and Northern Ireland instead.The government rejects the claim that the plan breaches international law, but has refused to release its own legal advice on the matter and is at odds with settled legal opinion.Ireland’s Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Coveney had said the plan to breach the treaty would ultimately “ratchet up” tension and breach the UK’s international commitments.A spokesman for Ireland’s Department of Foreign Affairs said Mr Coveney told the Foreign Secretary that “publishing legislation that would breach the UK’s commitments under international law, the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement and Northern Ireland Protocol is deeply damaging to relationships on these islands and between the UK and EU”.The spokesperson added that the plan marked a “particular low point in the UK’s approach to Brexit, especially as Ms Truss has not engaged with negotiations with the EU in any meaningful way since February”.Mr Johnson told Sky News: “What it does is it creates unnecessary barriers on trade east-west. What we can do is fix that – it’s not a big deal.”Speaking separately on LBC Radio he added: “We have to understand there are two traditions in Northern Ireland, broadly two ways of looking at the border issues. One community at the moment feels very, very estranged from the way things are operating and very alienated.”We have just got to fix that. It is relatively simple to do it, it’s a bureaucratic change that needs to be made.”Frankly, it’s a relatively trivial set of adjustments in the grand scheme of things.” He added that it would be an overreaction by Brussels to respond with sanctions.The prime minister’s legislation is expected to face opposition in both Houses of Parliament, including from some within the Tory ranks.His move comes as the government tries to reset the news agenda in the wake of the partygate scandal and the prime minister’s own lawbreaking. More

  • in

    Brexit: ‘Grandstanding’ over protocol is hurting investment in UK, warns CBI

    Britain’s top business lobby group has criticised Boris Johnson’s government over Brexit “grandstanding” – warning that its plan to override the Northern Ireland Protocol is damaging investment.The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) called on the government to resume talks with the EU, as ministers prepare to set out legislation to make unilateral changes to the protocol.“I don’t think it’s time for grandstanding; I think it’s time to do a deal,” said CBI director general Tony Danker.The business chief added: “I’m firmly of the view the Europeans are being inflexible. At the same time, our measures … to take unilateral action in response are unhelpful.”Mr Danker warned that the row was already leading many countries to rethink investment. “We do see global firms shorting on the UK right now,” he said.The CBI boss warned: “They look at the UK and think [there is a] combination of a bit of Brexit worry again, some of these figures from the OECD, and we see global companies thinking: ‘Maybe not the UK to invest in right now.’”A bill put forward by foreign secretary Liz Truss to unilaterally amend the protocol will be introduced in parliament on Monday amid controversy over whether the legislation will break international law.Mr Johnson has dismissed the furore over the plan to take unilateral action to ditch protocol checks on Monday – saying it was “not a big deal”.“We have just got to fix that. It is relatively simple to do it, it’s a bureaucratic change that needs to be made,” the PM told LBC. “It is a relatively trivial set of adjustments in the grand scheme of things.”Environment secretary George Eustice said protocol arrangements were a “serious threat” to the Good Friday Agreement, before claiming it was up to the UK government to “interpret” the protocol how it sees fit.“We have to basically give clarity about what the protocol means, how it should be interpreted – only the UK can do that,” he told Sky News on Monday.There is likely to be some opposition from within Tory ranks, with a number of MPs believed to be unhappy with the legislation.The Financial Times reported that an internal note had been circulating among those against the Bill, which said: “Breaking international law to rip up the prime minister’s own treaty is damaging to everything the UK and Conservatives stand for.”The legislation will give ministers powers to override elements of the protocol, which was jointly with the EU as part of the Brexit withdrawal agreement to avoid a hard border in Ireland.The arrangements instead require regulatory checks and customs declarations on goods moving between GB and NI. It could also see businesses in NI given the ability to choose whether to follow UK or EU regulations, depending on who they are trading with.The EU has made clear that such steps would represent a breach of international law and could prompt retaliatory action from the bloc.But shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said “it does look like the government plans to break international law”, adding: “This government seems to be developing a record for law-breaking.”Downing Street has said it will share only “a summary” of the legal advice it received with the public, which has led to accusations of a “cover-up”.Liberal Democrat Northern Ireland spokesman Alistair Carmichael said the public deserves “full transparency” over the plan’s legal basis, warning that he suspects a “cover-up”. More

  • in

    Brexit: Your questions on the protocol bill and ‘bonfire’ of EU rules answered live

    Boris Johnson is said to be ready to turn into “King Kong” by unleashing a series of chest-thumping right-wing moves – including a “foolhardy charge” at the EU over the Northern Ireland Protocol.The Irish government and EU officials fear the wounded beast inside No 10 is willing to tear up parts of his own Brexit withdrawal agreement to keep his shrinking political base onside.Post your questions in the comments below this article to take part in the ‘Ask Me Anything’His foreign secretary Liz Truss is set to introduce its unilateral plan for a “dual regulatory regime”, giving ministers the power to let goods produced in Great Britain move into Northern Ireland (and vice versa) without checks.Despite concerns from the EU (and the US) about the breaking of an international treaty, could the radical manoeuvre ease Mr Johnson’s political problems? Will a new crisis may keep Tory MPs in line? Or will a few wavering backbenchers feel it’s a crisis too far?Northern Ireland remains in a state of impasse over the protocol issue. The DUP have not given any indication they will resume powersharing arrangements at Stormont simply because the government has introduced a bill in parliament. What would it take to make the unionists happy?Meanwhile, Brexit opportunities ministers Jacob Rees-Mogg is still hunting for those longed-desired Brexit benefits. He is said to want to bring in “expiry dates” for up to 1,500 pieces of retained EU legislation as part of a bonfire of Brussels rules and regulations with his Brexit freedoms bill.Legislative “freedoms” aside, the economic costs of Brexit are becoming clear. The Centre for European Reform has estimated that by the end of last year, Britain’s economy was 5.2 per cent (or £31bn) smaller than it would have been without Brexit and the Covid pandemic – with Brexit “largely to blame”.Keir Starmer has promised to oppose the protocol bill, even vowing to repeal it if it becomes law and he ever gets into No 10. But is it time for politicians to start acknowledging the damaging impact of Brexit on the economy?I’ll be here to answer your questions live at 3pm on Wednesday 15 June. All you have to do is register to submit your question in the comments below. If you’re not already a member, click “sign up” in the comments box to leave your question. More

  • in

    Keir Starmer investigated over potential Commons earnings and gift rule breaches

    Keir Starmer has been put under investigation by the parliamentary standards commissioner for potentially breaching the rules on earnings and gifts.The Labour leader is being investigated under paragraph 14 of the parliamentary code of conduct, which covers the registration of their interests and being “open and frank” in declarations.The commissioner’s webpage, which announced the investigations on Monday, lists two matters under investigation in relation to Sir Keir’s conduct.The first refers to “the registration of interests under Category 1 of the Guide to the Rules”, which refers to MPs’ outside employment and earnings.The second refers to “registration of interests under Category 3 of the Guide to the Rules”, which refers to gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources collected by MPs.The Labour leader is one of three MPs currently under investigation by the standards commissioner. The other two are Andrew Bridgen, a Tory MP who is under investigation for alleged paid advocacy – or lobbying – as well as matters relating to his declaration of interests.Another Conservative MP. Chris Philp is also being probed by the watchdog for improper use of his parliamentary email address.It is unclear at this stage what Sir Keir’s standards investigation exactly relates to. He has previously registered significant outside earnings for legal work before becoming party leader.Asked to respond to the news during a broadcast interview, Sir Keir said: “That’s an investigation that we’ll be responding to in due course.”When he was asked what the investigation was about, he replied: “I’ll need to talk to my office about that, but we’ll be responding in due course.”The Labour leader was asked whether the news had taken him by surprise, and responded: “No.”Asked when he was made aware of the investigation, he replied: “All MPs are made aware of there any any concerns and my office is dealing with it and we’ll be replying in due course.”He added that he was “Absolutely confident. There’s no problem here.”Parliament’s register of interests appears to show that Sir Keir has logged some of his outside earnings and hospitality later than the 28-day deadline all MPs must stick to.These six late entries include royalties from his books and tickets to football games, and have a total value of £3,303.01.The opposition leader has in recent months strongly criticised Boris Johnson for rule-breaking during lockdown, gaining political ground over the issue.Labour colleagues told the media that their boss was, in contrast to the prime minister, “Mr Rules” and highlighted that he was previously director of public prosecutions.But the opposition leader last month received a questionnaire from Durham police over allegations he too broke lockdown laws while on the campaign trail there last year. Both that police investigation and the one launched by the parliamentary standards commissioner are yet to conclude.Mr Johnson was meanwhile handed a £50 fixed penalty notice for breaching rules at Downing Street. He refused to resign, and also survived a no-confidence vote from his own MPs. Sir Keir has promised to resign if he is fined for any breach. More

  • in

    What is the Good Friday Agreement?

    The Belfast Agreement, more commonly known as the Good Friday Agreement, was signed in Northern Ireland on 10 April 1998. It effectively brought an end to the Troubles, which had raged in the region for 30 years, and established a cross-community consensus for peace and the future direction of the region.As Brexit again puts the Northern Ireland protocol under the spotlight and Sinn Fein basks in its May local elections victory, we look at the history of the hugely significant deal 24 years on. The TroublesFrom the late 1960s, Northern Ireland was plunged into a brutal conflict between republicans who wanted the province to become part of a united Ireland and unionists who wanted to remain within the UK. Republicans and the wider nationalist community are mostly Catholic while unionists are mostly Protestant.Violence was largely perpetrated by paramilitary groups on both sides, such as the IRA and the UVF, while others were killed by the British security forces after the army were deployed in the summer of 1969. Of the 3,532 people who died, the majority were civilians, many of whom were killed in random tit-for-tat attacks across the sectarian divide. More