More stories

  • in

    ‘They look down on us like we’re the dirt we clean’: Protesters outside No 10 call for respect for cleaners

    Cleaners delivered a stinging rebuke to Boris Johnson’s government at a Downing Street protest on Friday evening, accusing the cabinet of looking “down on us like we’re the dirt that we clean”.The protest was called after Sue Gray’s report into illegal parties at Downing Street found that No 10 staff had treated cleaning and security staff “unacceptably” on several occasions.Workers told The Independent that the problems with respect went beyond No 10 and raised issues relating to insecure, outsourced contracts and low pay. More

  • in

    Tiverton and Honiton by-election: Ex-Labour minister appears to suggest voters go Lib Dem

    A former Labour minister has appeared to suggest that voters in the Tiverton and Honiton by-election should consider going Liberal Democrat in a bid to oust the Conservatives.Ben Bradshaw – who was culture secretary between 2009 and 2010 – said his party should fight for every vote in the seat. But, in what some will regard as a coded message, he added: “What some Labour members and activists don’t always appreciate is that a lot of Conservative voters, if they want to give the government a kicking will vote Liberal Democrat but they wouldn’t vote Labour…“So if we have a joint purpose of wanting to send the prime minister a message and ultimately defeat this government in a general election then I think there are very good prospects of a Lib Dem victory there.”The race for Tiverton and Honiton – a sprawling, largely rural Devon constituency – prompted by the resignation of Neil Parish who admitted watching porn in the House of Commons, is being widely touted as a two-horse race. The Tories currently enjoy a 24,239 majority and have held the seat since it was created in 1997 but the Lib Dems believe they could steal it on the back of anger about Partygate and rising living costs.Suggestions have been made that Labour will fight only a bare minimum campaign here to allow yellow candidate Richard Foord a clear run, with the Lib Dems returning the favour in Wakefield where another by-election is being held the same day.Both parties have denied such a pact.But Mr Bradshaw’s comments – initially made on Radio 4’s The Week In Westminster – will be seen as a tacit endorsement of voting tactically. More

  • in

    Cost of living: More than 120,000 of Britain’s poorest families set to miss out on help due to benefits cap

    Tens of thousands of Britain’s poorest families stand to miss out on a huge boost to their incomes next year in Rishi Sunak’s £15 billion package to ease the cost of living crisis thanks to the benefits cap.Benefits payments are set to soar by as much as 10 per cent from April, the chancellor has confirmed, but more than 120,000 households will lose out unless ministers raise the cap on how much they can receive from the state.Experts warned that unless the government acts more families, many of whom have children under five, will hit the ceiling on payments. Carl Emmerson, the deputy director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) think tank, said that if ministers planned to make benefits more generous, to keep up with spiralling inflation, “the benefit cap should almost certainly increase to reflect that”. More

  • in

    Partygate: Boris Johnson in ‘yellow card territory’ after Sue Gray report, minister says

    Boris Johnson is in “yellow card territory” after the publication of the long awaited Sue Gray report into the Partygate scandal, a government minister has said.The comments from John Glen come amid a drip-feed of no confidence letters being submitted in the prime minister’s leadership, with one former Tory cabinet minister warning that discontent was spreading in the party.Last night, Conservative MP Bob Neill became the latest to call on Mr Johnson to resign, insisting the report by the senior civil servant Ms Gray had uncovered “wholly unacceptable” behaviour in No 10 and undermined trust. More

  • in

    Attorney general says schools do not have to accommodate transgender pupils

    Schools do not have to accommodate transgender pupils by addressing them by their prefered pronouns or allowing them to use gender-appropriate toilets, the attorney general has said.In an interview with The Times, cabinet minister Suella Braverman said that schools are under no legal obligation to allow transgender children to wear their prefered school uniform. She also criticised schools for their “unquestioning approach” to gender reassignment, saying they should take a “much firmer line” when it came to making provisions for transgender students. Ms Braverman also hailed Harry Potter author J K Rowling as her “heroine”, calling her “very brave, very courageous.”Ms Braverman told The Times that, because under-18s can’t legally change gender, schools are entitled to continue to treat transgender children by the gender of their birth. “A male child who says in a school that they are a trans girl, that they want to be female, is legally still a boy or a male. And schools have a right to treat them as such under the law. They don’t have to say OK, we’re going to let you change your pronoun or let you wear a skirt or call yourself a girl’s name,” she said. Ms Braverman said that same should apply to nonbinary children. She also said that girls’ toilets are protected spaces under the equalities act and schools should not allow transchildren to use them. Currently only people who are 18 or over can apply for a gender recognition certificate, which legally recognises your change of gender. The applicant also has to have lived as a transwoman or man for at least two years before applying. More

  • in

    Son of British MP in Ukraine ‘filmed destroying Russian armoured vehicle’

    The son of a Conservative MP has been filmed helping to blow up a Russian armoured vehicle in an operation in Ukraine, according to footage obtained by the i. Ben Grant can reportedly be heard shouting “shoot it now” and “mind the back blast” before an anti-tank missile is launched on a Russian BTR in a woodland in northeast Ukraine.Mr Grant, 30, son of of former minister Helen Grant, Conservative MP for Maidstone and The Weald, is among group of Western volunteer fighters supporting Ukraine in the wake of the Russian invasion.The footage captures one member of his platoon, made up of special forces, emerge from the trees and aim a Matador missle at a vehicle about 100 metres away, the i reported.The 15-hour US-British operation, supported by a further 14 Ukrainian troops, reportedly succeeded in blowing up the armoured vehicle.About eight Russian soldiers were allegedly killed in the attack.It follows a second round of footage, obtained by The Daily Telegraph, which shows Mr Grant and his comrades helping to save a fellow British fighter injured by a landmine in a Kharkiv forest.Battling relentless machine gun fire, the Tory MP’s son can be heard shouting “we’ve got to move now or we’re gonna die” as he helps drag ex-Grenadier Guardsman Dean Arthur to safety, the newspaper reported.After treating the barely-conscious Mr Arthur’s leg, Mr Grant can allegedly be heard saying: “You’ve got to try and walk or we’re going to die mate.”The fomer Royal Marine told The Telegraph that his platoon – made up 15 foreign fighters – had been ambushed by Russia after their whereabouts had been determined by drones ahead of their operation.As they headed to a key Russia-held target near Kharkiv, the group got caught up in a “mass firefight”, Mr Grant said.He also claims a remote-controlled mine went off near Mr Arthur, blowing “half of his leg off.”“My God it was unreal,” he said, adding: “I’ve never experienced anything like that in my life. We extracted him for 5km through dense woodblock and awful terrain and then get him medevac-ed out of there.”Mr Grant spent more than five years as a commando in the Royal Marines. He was part of group of seven ex-servicemen who arrived in Ukraine in early March to fight invading Moscow forces.Speaking to media following his arrival in Lviv, he said he chose to head to the eastern European country after watching a video of Russian forces bombing a house where a child could be heard screaming. He said at the time: “I thought, I am a father of three, and if that was my kids I know what I would do, I would go and fight. Then I thought I would want another load of people who might be skilled enough to help me come and help me, come and help me, save my family.” More

  • in

    Rishi Sunak told to scrap £200m ‘cobbled together loophole’ giving second home owners multiple energy rebates

    Rishi Sunak should scrap an estimated £200m “loophole” that allows wealthy owners of second homes to receive multiple energy rebates, the shadow chancellor has said.In an interview with The Independent, Rachel Reeves claimed the system’s design was a result of the chancellor’s support package being “cobbled together at the last minute” and amid damaging Partygate headlines.After the extraordinary U-turn to impose a windfall tax, Ms Reeves also hit out at the inclusion of a tax relief measure for energy companies investing further in fossil fuel extraction – describing it as a “get out of jail card”.The remarks come after ministers bowed to pressure and unveiled a multibillion-pound package aimed at alleviating the cost of living crisis, ditching a £200 loan scheme in favour of a universal £400 rebate on energy bills.But questions have been raised after it emerged individuals who own more than one home will receive multiple payments – one for each property.Labour’s own analysis shows there are just short of half a million second homes (499,763) in England, Wales, and Scotland combined that could be in line for extra support.If all of these properties were to receive a second £400 payment, Ms Reeves said the party’s estimate was that “£200m of money [announced] yesterday will go to people with multiple properties”.She said: “First of all this is borrowing, so all this money the government are borrowing, £10m, that all has to be paid back by future generations, so you could have just not had that in the package. It seems to me this money should be better targeted at those people who need it.“I think the point is, the government were forced into this U-turn, they decided they didn’t need to do anything until the very last minute, and as a result you’ve got a plan that is not as well-thought-through if I would have been designing it and has got these loopholes in it.”Asked whether the government should scrap this element of support, the shadow chancellor told The Independent: “Yeah. You shouldn’t design a system that sees people who are fortunate enough to own multiple properties get multiple payments.“This is about trying to help people, families that are struggling will bills, not putting more money into the pockets of the wealthiest.”Defending the plans on Friday, Mr Sunak said those with second homes receiving multiple grants of £400 will only account for a small proportion of payments across the country. More

  • in

    Two more Tory MPs declare no confidence in Boris Johnson’s leadership

    Former minister Sir Bob Neill has become the 12th Conservative MP to submit a letter of no confidence in Boris Johnson’s leadership, declaring that he did not find the prime minister’s explanations over lockdown-breaching parties “credible”. The Bromley and Chislehurst MP said that this week’s Partygate report by senior civil servant Sue Gray had uncovered “wholly unacceptable” behaviour within 10 Downing Street which had undermined trust in government.And he said: “Trust is the most important commodity in politics, but these events have undermined trust in not just the office of the prime minister, but in the political process itself. To rebuild that trust and move on, a change in leadership is required.”Within an hour Alicia Kearns, the MP for Melton, rumoured to be a key member of the ‘pork pie’ plot against the prime minister over partygate earlier this year, also said she did not have confidence in the prime minister.She hit out at the “shameful lengths” she said some would pursue to preserve Mr Johnson’s premiership and attacked his call for the public to move on.“To say we just need to ‘move on’ is to treat with contempt and disregard the sacrifices of the people of Rutland and Melton, and our entire country.”The chair of the backbench 1922 Committee Sir Graham Brady must call a vote on Mr Johnson’s leadership if he receives 54 no-confidence letters, with the PM then needing the support of half his MPs – some 180 votes – to hold onto his job.The latest interventions came hot on the heels of the resignation of Eastleigh MP Paul Holmes as ministerial aide in the Home Office.Mr Holmes, who was the first member of the government to quit since Wednesday’s publication of the full Gray report, said that “a toxic culture seemed to have permeated No 10.” But he did not make clear whether he wanted Mr Johnson to go or had written a letter to Sir Graham.Another four MPs – Julian Sturdy, John Baron, David Simmonds and Stephen Hammond – have called for the PM’s resignation since the report’s publication, while another, Guildford’s Angela Richardson, has said that she would resign if she faced similar criticism.Sir Bob, a barrister who currently chairs the Commons justice committee, said: “We cannot have one rule for those working in government and a different one for everyone else. Those of us who set the rules have a particular responsibility to stick to them ourselves.“Sue Gray’s report has highlighted a pattern of wholly unacceptable behaviour, spread over a number of months, by some working in 10 Downing Street, including breaking rules that caused real pain and hardship for many, and which the government, and we as parliamentarians, were telling others to live by.“I have listened carefully to the explanations the prime minister has given, in parliament and elsewhere, and, regrettably, do not find his assertions to be credible. “That is why, with a heavy heart, I submitted a letter of no confidence to Sir Graham Brady on Wednesday afternoon.“Trust is the most important commodity in politics, but these events have undermined trust in not just the office of the Prime Minister, but in the political process itself. To rebuild that trust and move on, a change in leadership is required.” More