More stories

  • in

    ‘We watched in disbelief’: No 10 insiders describe being baffled at Boris Johnson’s denial of parties

    Downing Street insiders have claimed they looked at each other in “disbelief” as Boris Johnson told the House of Commons that all rules were followed in No 10.Speaking to BBC Panorama three individuals described chaotic mid-lockdown parties they felt were condoned by the prime minister as he was “grabbing a glass for himself”.The current and former staffers said the culture was set by Mr Johnson himself, claiming he “wanted to be liked” and for staff to be able to “let their hair down”.They also claim “people made fun” of a Downing Street security guard who attempted to stop an event. “He was so worked up that this party was happening and shouldn’t be happening,” one said.The damaging details follow the publication of a leaked photograph showing Mr Johnson raising a glass at a leaving drinks event for his former spin doctor – at the height of England’s second lockdown.The Metropolitan Police, who closed their Partygate investigation last week, investigated 12 separate events in total, and issued 126 fixed penalty notices for breaches of Covid regulations, including one to Mr Johnson.Asked about the prime minister’s early claim that all guidance and rules was followed in No 10, one staffer told the BBC: “We were watching it all live and we just sort of looked at each other in disbelief, like why? “Why is he denying it? When we’ve been with him this entire time, we knew the rules had been broken, we knew these parties happened.”When one insider was asked whether they felt they had the permission from Mr Johnson to have these events, they told the BBC: “He was there.“He may have just been popping through on the way to his flat because that’s what would happen,” they added. “You know, he wasn’t there saying this shouldn’t be happening.“He wasn’t saying, ‘Can everyone break up and go home? Can everyone socially distance? Can everyone put masks on?’ No, he wasn’t telling anybody that. He was grabbing a glass for himself.”Party debris was left overnight for people arriving at work the next day to discover after staff crowded together and sat on each other’s laps at parties, according to the attendees.Describing a leaving event for Mr Johnson’s former director of communications, Lee Cain, after a photograph of the gathering was published last night, one attendee told the programme there were around 30 people in a room “stood shoulder to shoulder, some people on each other’s laps… one or two people”.No 10 declined to comment to the BBC, pointing to the imminent publication of senior civil servant Sue Gray’s report into rule-busting events in Downing Street and government buildings. More

  • in

    Public sector workers facing pay restraint as ministers warn of ‘inflationary spiral’

    Public sector workers look set for below-inflation pay rises after Boris Johnson warned a meeting of cabinet that generous settlements could trigger an inflationary spiral.“Limited” pay restraint was likely to be less damaging to the real value of take-home pay and less likely to drive up household costs such as mortgages, ministers told the meeting.Recommendations on rises for groups like police, teachers, NHS workers and the armed forces are expected from independent pay bodies before the summer.But they can be overruled by ministers in relevant departments, who are facing the prospect of hikes of 9 per cent or more if pay is to keep pace with inflation and ease the pressure of the cost-of-living crisis.Addressing the regular weekly meeting of cabinet 10 Downing Street, Mr Johnson backed a warning from Treasury minister Simon Clarke that awards of this size would risk fuelling inflation further.The warning came as the head of energy regulator Ofgem said that the cap on combined gas and electricity prices is expected to jump by £800 in October to an annual total of around £2,800 for the average household – up from around £1,300 12 months earlier.The PM’s official spokesperson refused to say whether ministers will act to rein in recommended rises which are perceived to be too large.But he said: “The government has already pledged to increase public sector spending and is awaiting decisions by public sector review bodies.Cost of living: how to get helpThe cost of living crisis has touched every corner of the UK, pushing families to the brink with rising food and fuel prices. The Independent has asked experts to explain small ways you can stretch your money, including managing debt and obtaining items for free.- If you need to access a food bank, find your local council’s website and then use the local authority’s site to locate your nearest centre. – The Trussell Trust, which runs many foodbanks, has a similar tool. – Citizens Advice provides free help to people in need. The organisation can help you find grants or benefits, or advise on rent, debt and budgeting. – If you are experiencing feelings of distress and isolation, or are struggling to cope, The Samaritans offers support; you can speak to someone for free over the phone, in confidence, on 116 123 (UK and ROI), email jo@samaritans.org, or visit the Samaritans website to find details of your nearest branch.“However ministers made clear the risk of triggering higher inflation must be part of considerations when deciding pay awards this year.”The spokesperson did not rule out ministers overriding the decisions of the review bodies.“That wasn’t the suggestion the prime minister said and I don’t want to jump ahead of the independent process,” said the spokesperson. “You’ll know the government has the capability to do that in the purely hypothetical sense.“The point that ministers were emphasising is that a spiralling inflation will do more to damage people’s take-home pay than limited pay restraint.”Mr Johnson’s spokesperson denied that the PM was trying to send a signal to the pay review bodies, who arrive at their recommendations independently of government. More

  • in

    Downing Street denies Boris Johnson told Sue Gray to drop Partygate inquiry

    Downing Street has denied that Boris Johnson asked Sue Gray to drop her investigation into Partygate in a secret meeting with the senior civil servant earlier this month.An unnamed Whitehall source was today quoted in The Times as saying that the prime minister suggested to Ms Gray that she could ditch plans for publication – expected on Wednesday – asking “Is there much point in doing it now that it’s all out there?”But Mr Johnson’s official spokesperson today said he “did not recognise” the claim.“The prime minister did not ask her to drop the report or not proceed with the report,” said the spokesperson. “It was the prime minister who commissioned the report and he wants the report to be published.”Asked whether Mr Johnson suggested that withholding the finished report from publication was an option, the spokesperson replied: “I don’t believe that is correct.”But he did not specifically deny that the PM may have suggested that there was no need for the report to be released, as details were “already out there”, saying only: “I’m not going to get into line-by-line what may or may not have been said.”Mr Johnson has repeatedly promised that the Whitehall mandarin’s findings will be made public in as near as possible to the form in which she hands them over to Downing Street. Aides have said it may be necessary to redact some details for data protection reasons.The row over the meeting came as pressure intensified on Mr Johnson over new photographs showing him toasting a member of staff with wine at a leaving do at No 10 during the Covid-19 lockdown of November 2020.At Westminster, disgruntled Tory MPs said that the picture, which showed at least seven other people drinking without observing social distancing rules and a table littered with alcohol bottles, was likely to trigger further letters of no confidence in Mr Johnson’s leadership.One MP who is considering submitting a letter to the chair of the backbench 1922 Committee told The Independent: “The whole thing is rotten. He’s got to go”.Downing Street was forced to admit on Monday that Mr Johnson’s meeting with Ms Gray was instigated by No 10 officials, after incorrect briefing over the weekend that the Whitehall mandarin asked to speak with him.The PM’s spokesperson confirmed that notes were taken of their discussion, but insisted that in line with standard practice they will not be published. He said that the timing and logistics of publication were discussed but not the content of the long-awaited report, which was delayed until the conclusion of the Metropolitan Police inquiry into lockdown-busting parties at No 10 in 2020 and 2021. More

  • in

    Partygate: Boris Johnson ‘suggested Sue Gray shouldn’t publish report’ at secret meeting

    Boris Johnson is facing claims that he suggested to Sue Gray she should drop plans to publish her long-awaited report into the Partygate scandal during a “secret meeting” last month.The incendiary allegation comes just hours after the publication of leaked photographs showing the prime minister drinking wine with No 10 staff in the depths of England’s second Covid lockdown.Following a furious row over the weekend, Downing Street admitted on Monday that a meeting between Mr Johnson and the senior civil servant Ms Gray was instigated by a No 10 official in early May to discuss the “timings and publication process” of the report.But according to fresh reports in The Times, the prime minister suggested at the face-to-face meeting that Ms Gray did not need to publish her report — despite public commitments to do so – after the Met police probe.A source told the newspaper: “He asked her is there much point in doing it now that it’s all out there. He was inferring that she didn’t need to publish the report.”Another added: “They were exploring this idea of not having any report. It was being talked about [in Downing Street]. But politically they realised they couldn’t do it”.Grant Shapps, the transport secretary, did not deny the reports as he appeared on Sky News on Tuesday morning, saying: “I wasn’t at the meeting, but I know there were officials there.“The meeting was actually arranged by officials to sort the timings and logistics of the report, so beyond that, I’m afraid I don’t have any useful information.”The cabinet minister added: “I wasn’t in the room, so I don’t know whether that’s the case… exactly what was discussed I don’t know”.“Occasionally things get reported that are not entirely accurate, the civil service were there to make sure that all the correct processes were followed so I have no particular reason for concern about the two of them meeting.”The Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said: “Boris Johnson lied to Parliament and the public. Now we learn he apparently put pressure on Sue Gray to scrap her report.“If these stories are true, how can any Conservative MP look their constituents in the eye and tell them Boris Johnson is fit to govern? More

  • in

    More turn to UK food banks as food and fuel bills soar

    For many struggling families, older people and the homeless, Michelle Donnelly’s food hub in east London has been a lifeline. Since the COVID-19 pandemic hit Britain, she has been collecting surplus groceries from supermarkets and distributing them to people who can’t afford to buy food.While the virus threat has faded, the need for food banks in Britain has soared. Skyrocketing energy and food bills are pushing millions deeper into financial hardship, and food banks and community groups like Donnelly’s across the United Kingdom say they don’t have enough to feed the growing numbers of desperate people knocking at their doors.“We are struggling as it is, but right now we’re in a bubbling pot. You’re getting people panicking,” Donnelly said, dishing up turkey curry and onion bhajis to serve people recently. “We used to be able to run to 4 p.m., but now by 2:30, all the food’s gone.”Donnelly offers groceries and free hot meals every week to several dozen regulars in Hackney, an inner London borough with high rates of inequality: almost half of all children there are in poverty. Since the winter, at least 30 to 40 new people have been referred to her, she says.The cost of food and fuel in the U.K. has risen sharply, with inflation reaching 9% in April — the highest in 40 years. The same month, millions of families saw their annual energy bills jump by 54%, amounting to an extra 700 pounds ($863) a year on average for each household. Another energy price hike is expected in October, as Russia’s war in Ukraine and rebounding demand after the pandemic push oil and natural gas prices higher.Food businesses have had to pass on higher costs to shoppers, who already have less in their pockets because pay is failing to keep up with price increases. Those on low incomes and dependent on state welfare have been hit hardest. In October, Britain’s government stopped paying an extra 20-pound ($25) per week benefit payment that was introduced during the pandemic.Other parts of the world are struggling, too, as inflation bites. Europe has seen surging consumer prices, causing sticker shock at the grocery store. In the U.S., food banks say rising food and gas prices and overall inflation are intensifying demand for their support, while their labor and distribution costs are climbing and donations are slowing.“I suppose it’s the way life is going. But it shouldn’t be going so drastically,” said Dave Anderson, one of Donnelly’s regulars.The 62-year-old hasn’t been able to work or take care of himself since he had heart surgery and was left with no electricity or gas at home until volunteers found him. The 118 pounds ($145) of benefits he gets every two weeks don’t go far.“Me, I’ve not even looked at my bills because I think I’d want to sit there and cry,” Donnelly said. “I don’t understand why the politicians are allowing this to happen.”Things are expected to worsen in coming months. The Bank of England predicts inflation could hit 10% by the fall, and its governor, Andrew Bailey, has warned of a “very real income shock” caused by energy prices and an “apocalyptic” rise in food prices due to the war in Ukraine.A recent report from the International Monetary Fund said the U.K. is expected to be the slowest-growing economy out of the Group of Seven leading democracies in 2023 as the war sets back the global economic recovery from the pandemic.“All of our organizations are reaching out to us saying, ‘We need more food,’ more families are approaching us. The people we’re seeing have got even less to make ends meet,” said Rachel Ledwith, head of community engagement at the Felix Project, a charity that redistributes surplus groceries from the food industry to about 1,000 charities and schools across London. It delivered enough parcels to make 30 million meals last year, and its kitchen produces thousands of meals — like broccoli soup made from the stems — every day. But that’s nowhere near enough.“I think we’re seeing between 25% to 50% increase in demand — so if an organization was supporting 50 people, they’re now seeing closer to 75,” Ledwith said. “It’s a real pressure — there’s still a huge amount of need out there in London. We still have a wait list of several hundred organizations that have asked for food that we haven’t yet got the ability to take on.”The picture is similar across Britain. The Trussell Trust, which runs more than half of all U.K. food banks, said last winter was its busiest outside of 2020 — the height of the pandemic. The charity said its food banks provided more than 2.1 million food parcels in the U.K. in the past year, 14% more than the same period in 2019. Of those, 830,000 were for children. The Food Foundation, another charity, said a recent survey showed that around one in seven adults said they or someone they live with have skipped meals, eaten smaller portions or gone hungry all day because they couldn’t afford food. “The situation is rapidly turning from an economic crisis to a health crisis,” said Anne Taylor, the charity’s director. “The government needs to realize the boat is sinking for many families, and it needs to be fixed. Bailing out with emergency food parcels is not going to work.”Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s Conservative government has been heavily criticized for not doing enough. Despite the cost-of-living crisis dominating political debates and recent local elections, the government didn’t feature any new support measures in its annual legislative agenda.Donnelly fears the crisis will really start to bite when children can’t access free meals during the summer break and later when it gets cold.“What happens in the summer holidays, when you’ve got five screaming children at home? You couldn’t afford to feed them anyway, so what are you going to do when the gas and electric runs out and you have no food?” she said. “That’s when I think we’re going to see the spike.” More

  • in

    Sue Gray report – live: Boris Johnson denies party at No 10 despite photos of drinking

    Moment PM denies No 10 party took place on day he was photographed drinkingBoris Johnson told MPs that there was no lockdown party at Downing Street – a claim since discredited by the emergence of new photos showing him drinking at a gathering.In December 2021 in the House of Commons, Labour MP Catherine West asked the prime minister to say “whether there was a party in Downing Street on 13 November [2020]?”In the brief exchange, Mr Johnson replied – to the jeers of opposition MPs: “No, but I am sure that whatever happened, the guidance was followed and the rules were followed at all times.”Almost 18 months later, his denial has been contradicted by four photos, obtained by ITV News and published today, that show the prime minister raising a toast at a party for his then director of communications Lee Cain on 13 November 2020.In the pictures, a number of people can be seen standing together around a table of party food and booze, despite – at the time – the rest of the country being banned from socialising during the height of the pandemic.Show latest update

    1653281370Minister refuses to say if No 10 called ‘secret meeting’ with Sue GrayA cabinet minister evaded multiple questions about whether No 10 had a “secret meeting” with Sue Gray over her Partygate investigation.Nadhim Zahawi, the education secretary, refused to divulge any details and ducked several questions by reporters about who requested the talks.Read the full story here:Maroosha Muzaffar23 May 2022 05:491653281727Boris Johnson ‘must urgently explain’ why he met Sue Gray to discuss her Partygate reportBoris Johnson is under pressure to explain why he met with Sue Gray to discuss her report into the Partygate scandal, which is due within days.Labour warned the “secret meeting” could further damage confidence in the investigation of the scandal, while the Liberal Democrats raised fears of “a stitch up”.Read the full story by Independent’s deputy political editor, Rob Merrick here:Maroosha Muzaffar23 May 2022 05:551653282195Partygate is a reminder that the government must work with the civil service – not against itWhether or not the meeting between the prime minister and Sue Gray was appropriate, the whole episode is an indication of a wider dysfunctional relationship.Read the Independent editorial here:Maroosha Muzaffar23 May 2022 06:031653282739Simon Case to face ‘stinging criticism in Sue Gray report’Top civil servant Simon Case is expected to be hard-hit by the long-awaited Sue Gray Partygate report despite not being fined over the scandal, it has been reported.Reports have also suggested the document, expected to be published in the coming days, will feature photographs of illegal gatherings.Read the full story here:Maroosha Muzaffar23 May 2022 06:121653284034 Boris Johnson ‘backs former Met Police chief to take charge of National Crime Agency’According to reports, Boris Johnson is set to back the former head of the Metropolitan Police to take charge of the National Crime Agency (NCA).Lord Hogan-Howe could become the director-general of NCA, the Sunday Times reported — despite failing to make it into the final round of candidates.Following interviews with home secretary Priti Patel, two highly qualified police chiefs have already been rejected for the role. Now, the newspaper reported, Mr Johnson wants the 64-year-old Hogan-Howe to lead the agency.Hogan-Howe was chief of the Met Police from 2011 to 2017.Maroosha Muzaffar23 May 2022 06:331653284727Sue Gray denies calling meeting with No 10Sue Gray has denied requesting a meeting with No 10 to discuss her report into the Partygate scandal.A spokesperson for Ms Gray was quoted by Sky News as saying that she “did not initiate the meeting” and rubbished reports claiming that the Partygate photos were discussed during the talks.However, a No 10 source told the Evening Standard that “the PM did not request the meeting and hasn’t tried to influence the outcome in anyway. It’s rightly for Sue to decide and it’s all done independently.”Maroosha Muzaffar23 May 2022 06:451653285108Prince William to appear on £5 coin to mark his 40th birthdayPrince William’s 40th birthday will be celebrated with a £5 coin featuring his portrait, it was reported.The Royal Mint said that the UK’s official coin producer has unveiled the coin ahead of William’s birthday on 21 June.It is the first time the duke — who is second in line to the throne — will appear alone on an official coin.The coin features his portrait set amid his royal cypher – his initial W – and the number 40.Maroosha Muzaffar23 May 2022 06:511653285663Local Conservative candidate’s tweet causes outrageOn Saturday a post on the Twitter account of Jonty Campbell — a Conservative local election candidate from Preston — said: “Here’s the thing with girls 22 or under, they smell massively different to a girl of 28. Girls aged 16 to, say 23, have this buttery, creamy, slightly sweet smell that is unbelievably magnetic.”The post received massive criticism online and led to a number of expressions of outrage against Mr Campbell.Dr Shola Mos-Shogbamimu, an author and women’s rights activist, responded: “What did I just FREAKING read? Where do you begin to deconstruct this evil. It’s the mindset of misogyny/violence against women personified. What a sick disgusting perversion about young women. Jonty Campbell is who @Conservatives have as candidate? What a pervert! @CmdrJonty”Mr Campbell’s account was later set to private after the outrage.Maroosha Muzaffar23 May 2022 07:011653286623Anticipation over Sue Gray report heightens amid clamour over ‘secret meeting’Sue Gray’s report into the Partygate scandal is finally set to be published this week, as the prime minister faces mounting calls to explain his “secret meeting” with the senior civil servant.It has been reported that top civil servant Simon Case will be hit hard by the damning report expected to be published in the next few days.The Sue Gray report is said to feature photographs of the illegal parties in Downing Street, including those attended by Boris Johnson, during the lockdown.Maroosha Muzaffar23 May 2022 07:171653288551Sue Gray Partygate report ‘contains photos’Sue Gray’s long-awaited report into illegal Downing Street parties held during the coronavirus lockdown will reportedly contain images from the events.ITV News political editor Robert Peston wrote on Twitter: “For the first time I can remember, a report by a Cabinet office official will contain photos. The Sue Gray report, when published this week, will – I understand – contain photos of the Downing St [parties]. The stakes for PM and Cabinet Sec Case very high indeed.”Chiara Giordano23 May 2022 07:49 More

  • in

    Home Office warned protest banning orders backed by Priti Patel would not work

    The Home Office warned that protest banning orders now backed by Priti Patel would not work, MPs have been told.The new orders would empower police to put electronic tags on disruptive demonstrators and restrict where they go, who they meet and what they do in person or online, even if they have not committed a crime.“Serious disruption prevention orders” are among a raft of controversial police powers in the new Public Order Bill, which are being brought to parliament for a second time after being defeated by the House of Lords in January.Other proposed measures include making “locking-on” – where campaigners lock themselves to parts of buildings – a criminal offence and allowing the suspicionless stop and search of protesters for items that could be used for that purpose.The bill would create offences of interfering with key national infrastructure or obstructing major transport works, punishable by imprisonment.But opposition MPs said the prime minister would fall foul of the proposed law himself if he fulfilled his vow to “lie down in front of the bulldozers” to prevent a new runway being constructed at Heathrow Airport.Backing the bill in the House of Commons on Monday, the home secretary said it would combat a “rise in criminal, disruptive and self-defeating tactics from a supremely selfish minority”.Ms Patel said the orders were to target protesters who were “determined to repeatedly inflict disruption on the public”, citing groups including Extinction Rebellion and Insulate Britain.Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, pointed to a HM Inspectorate of Constabulary report commissioned by Ms Patel on protest powers.She said that the Home Office itself had argued against the creation of protest banning orders and was quoted by the watchdog saying they were “unlikely to work as hoped”.The report, published in March 2021, included a Home Office response saying that persistent environmental activists who influence others to commit crimes were “undeterred by the threat of arrest” and fines.“This proposal [of protest banning orders] essentially takes away a person’s right to protest and we believe banning people from attending peaceful protests would very likely to lead to a legal challenge,” the Home Office continued.“It appears unlikely that a court would issue a high penalty to someone who is peacefully protesting. Consequently, we believe it unlikely the measure would work as hoped.”Priti Patel grilled by police officers over payMs Cooper also told MPs that police officers were quoted in the same report as being divided on the prospect of new powers, with some saying existing laws were sufficient but “the ability to implement them is the challenge due to lack of resources”.The home secretary said that HM Inspectorate of Constabulary “argued that stop and search powers would be an effective tool for police in this case”.But the watchdog’s report said: “Arguing against the proposal for a new stop and search power, an officer stated that ‘a little inconvenience is more acceptable than a police state’. We agree with this sentiment.”Ms Cooper told MPs that existing laws and powers, such as court injunctions, could already be used to limit disruptive protests.“This bill won’t make it easier to prevent serious disruption,” the Labour MP added.“It will instead target peaceful protesters and passers-by who aren’t disrupting anyone or anything at all … the government is extending powers normally made available for serious violence and terrorism to peaceful protests.”Ms Cooper questioned why the government had not waited for another raft of controversial protest powers brought in by the previous Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act to be implemented before “coming back for more”.The shadow home secretary proposed an amendment against the second reading of the Public Order Bill, saying it will not prevent serious disruption to essential services and “includes instead measures that replicate existing powers, includes powers that are too widely drawn and which erode historic freedoms of peaceful protest”.Ms Patel said the measures “are not about clamping down on freedom of speech”, adding: “The protesters involved in these types of examples that I have presented have better routes, alternative routes to make their voices heard and they know that.”The bill was expected to pass its second reading in the House of Commons and go into committee scrutiny. More

  • in

    Half of UK MPs’ staff have clinical levels of psychological distress, study claims

    Half of all MPs’ staff are suffering from clinical levels of psychological distress and are at “breaking point” due to years of crisis in Westminster, according to a new study.A combination of factors such as a lack of support, abuse from the public and multiple upheavals such as Covid and Brexit have negatively impacted parliamentary aides, as reported by The Guardian.The survey of nearly 200 members of MPs’ staff found that 72.2 per cent found the job “emotionally draining” and 64.4 per cent found it “difficult”.More than a third (34.9 per cent) felt they were undersupported and 1 in five (22.6 per cent) said the job was “harrowing”.The most alarming part of the study, which was the first of its kind, revealed that 49.5 per cent of respondents met the medical threshold for psychological distress, which is more than twice the general population.The survey was carried out by occupational psycologist Dr Ashley Weinberg who used a screening tool called the General Health Questionnaire-12. This is often used to measure levels of psycological distress in patients.The survey also revealed that one-fifth of workers felt unsafe and many said they were struggling to cope with an increased workload from constituents in difficult or emergency situations.Some staff said they were dealing with bullying or harassment. One staff member said: “I enjoy working with colleagues as a result of solidarity from the bullying many in the team face from the MP.”The wellness working group, a cross-party group of MPs’ staff, said the problems highlighted by the report were “very concerning” and called for cultural change at Wesminster. Thomas Fairweather, an executive member of the working group, said the cost of living crisis had left staff fearing that workloads will increase even further.He said: “Staff are too used to the horrible, sickening feeling that coming down the line there will be another huge influx of people in desperate situations, needing help in ways that teams are not trained for. “With more suitable training, resources and changes to fix the wellbeing problem, we could do so much more.”The study comes just days before Sue Gray’s Partygate report is expected to criticise the senior figures at No 10 for multiple gatherings while Covid regulations were in force. More