More stories

  • in

    UK needs to shift to renewables to protect from energy crises, MPs and experts say

    The UK needs to shift to renewables to protect itself from energy crises such as the current one, politicians and experts have said.The country has been urged to move to this “incredibly cheap” and green source of energy as household bills are set to rocket yet again.The current energy crisis behind the rising cost of living has been sparked by surging gas prices, shining a light on the UK’s reliance on this fossil fuel. MPs and experts have said renewables are the answer to making the UK less vulnerable to this volatile market.Adam Corlett, the principal economist at the Resolution Foundation think-tank, told The Independent the current energy crisis “puts up in lights both our over-reliance on fossil fuels, and how we should have done more to ensure that everyone’s home is well-insulated”.He said: “Britain’s energy bills crisis is far from over – and should serve as a warning to quicken our transition towards a net zero economy”.A further increase to the energy price cap was confirmed on Thursday, paving the way for millions to see household bills rise by more than 50 per cent. Following this, Sam Hall, the chair of the  Conservative Environment Network, said: “We’ll be exposed to similar crises for as long as we are so reliant on gas”.He added: “The government must now deliver its net zero strategy to make UK households less exposed to global gas markets.”A Telegraph report has suggested that Cabinet ministers are questioning whether the move to net zero emissions – which the government has committed to by 2050 – was the right thing to do amid the energy crisis and soaring bills.But Ed Miliband, the shadow climate change and net zero secretary, told The Independent a “failure to transition to zero carbon” has made the UK “more vulnerable as a country”. “Climate delay will make us more dependent on fossil fuels, leaving us more exposed to unstable global gas prices, meaning higher bills, and undermining our energy security,” he said. Jamie Peters from environmental campaign group Friends of the Earth told The Independent: “Renewable energy is incredibly cheap and there’s an abundance of it at our fingertips. Knowing this, every effort should be made to increase our supply, and attempts to discredit the net zero agenda shouldn’t be taken seriously.”On the same day the UK’s energy price cap increased, Rishi Sunak said he wanted to encourage more investment in oil and gas drilling in the North Sea. But Green Party MP Caroline Lucas said the UK would not emerge from the energy crisis through a “rapid U-turn to the fossil fuel era”. Writing inThe Independent, she said the solution was through “rapidly speeding up the transition to energy efficiency and renewables so we address the climate emergency and make ourselves less vulnerable to global price rises”. Greg Hands, the energy minister, also said the UK needs to generate “more clean, secure and affordable power” in order to protect itself from volatile gas prices, as he “debunked” some “myths” around energy. Experts have previously told The Independent the current energy crisis has been fuelled by the government dragging its feel on renewable energy – which faced a blow when a previous Tory government removed subsidies for onshore wind farms for several years. A Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy spokesperson said: “Since 2010 we have delivered a 500 per cent increase in the amount of renewable energy capacity connected to the grid – more than any other government in British history.“We remain committed to go even further and faster to build a homegrown renewables sector and reduce our reliance on volatile fossil fuels, and just last month we launched the biggest renewable energy auction to accelerate deployment.” More

  • in

    Ex-Tory MEP on his Islamophobia claim: ‘It was a political exercise to use my religion to undermine me’

    After Sajjad Karim first raised an allegation of Islamophobia against a serving minister he says he was told by Tory HQ that he would be contacted by the party inquiry to share his evidence. More than two years later, he is still waiting for a call.The former ConservativeMEP – who spent 15 years in Brussels representing north-west England – spoke out in September 2019 amid a series of Islamophobia claims piling up against the party.The 51-year-old recalled overhearing a conversation between two Conservative Parliamentarians with Islamophobic content directly about him. “I was able to hear these conversations directly with not just an Islamophobic base, but a very clear expression of very prejudiced views and positions which were clearly Islamophobic,” he told the BBC.Today, as he calls for the Conservative party to finally investigate his allegation, Karim has given The Independent his fullest account to date of the alleged 2013 incident. Though he is not publicly identifying the individuals – one of whom he says went on to become a minister and is presently serving in government – he has confirmed he will name names to an investigation.It comes in the wake of a separate claim last month by Tory MP Nusrat Ghani that her Muslim faith was given as a reason for her being sacked as a minister, prompting Boris Johnson to order a Cabinet Office inquiry.Referencing the alleged 2013 incident, Karim – the first British Muslim elected to the European Parliament – said: “It was entirely a political exercise to try and undermine me, to use my religion as a means to undermine me.” He added: “I don’t know Nus Ghani’s case, or situation… all I know is in my case the discussion was about how my religious and cultural background could be engineered politically and used against me.”As Karim pointed out, anyone “fair-minded” ought to be “horrified”. And yet, to this day, there has been no investigation by the party. Though he was contacted by the chairman’s office following the BBC interview, he says he was refused a meeting with the then chairman, James Cleverly.“I was… contacted by the chairman’s office and told that there is a central address to which I could… make a report of Islamophobia on,” he said. “A complaint, a complaints email address which would go to central office and a staffer would pick it up and deal with it.“I made it clear that, actually, that is not an appropriate way because my complaint is one in relation to two very senior members of the Conservative Parliamentary party and this was not an appropriate format either for me or for them, or for the party for that matter, for this to be dealt with. But a more appropriate way would be for the chairman to see me, and I’d be happy to come down to London face-to-face – James Cleverly was the chairman at the time – and that I would provide him with all of the details of my complaint and this needs to be led by him at a senior level because of the very of nature of the allegations and the people involved. This is not appropriate for a junior member of staff to be dealing with.”However, he says, he was told Cleverly was too busy and that he should use the normal process. “I responded, and said, no I’m not going to use the standard process, this is not appropriate. And then I was emailed back saying that, actually, the… inquiry was going to be taking place… and that the inquiry would contact me and that I should give my evidence to the… inquiry and I said, fine.”When the call never came and the inquiry published its findings more than a year and a half later without his input, Karim labelled the report a “whitewash”. The “independent investigation into alleged discrimination” in the Tory party, chaired by Professor Sarwan Singh, said allegations of institutional islamophobia “were not borne out by the evidence available to the Investigation”. However, the report stated “anti-Muslim sentiment remains a problem within the Party”. Boris Johnson’s comments comparing women wearing the burqa to letterboxes were also criticised and the May 2021 report found evidence that the party’s complaints system was in need of an overhaul.Singh’s report noted that the Conservative party’s central database recorded 1,418 complaints between 2015 to 2020 concerning 727 incidents of alleged discrimination. Two-thirds of all incidents related to claims of anti-Muslim discrimination.The report concluded: “We discovered some examples of discrimination and anti-Muslim sentiment, most of which were at local association level. We did not, however, find evidence of a Party which systematically discriminated against any particular group…”Does Karim think that the Conservative party is institutionally Islamophobic? He pauses, before replying:  “I don’t think it is but I think what is happening is there are a small minority of people who either are or who are willing to use Islamophobia as a political tool even though they might not necessarily ascribe to those views. And the prime minister himself has actually been accused of that. But the overall workings of the party in the political context that we are currently in means that those people feel emboldened enough to be able to do these things in the belief that they’ll get away with it.”He added: “Now, that’s very different to being institutionally Islamophobic or anti-Semitic, or racist. This is opportunism at play in a context that allows them to get away with it.”Karim’s parents moved to Britain from Pakistan in the mid-1960s. His father worked for the Muslim Commercial Bank, first as a clerk before rising to become a manager; his mother a housewife. One of six children, Karim grew up in Brierfield, Lancashire. Though he handed out leaflets for the Conservatives as a seven-year-old, he stopped supporting the Tories after arriving in London to study in 1989 and realising, in his words, “we’ve been done over” when he compared what he saw in the capital to the economically depressed situation in the community at home. He later joined the Liberal Democrats. More

  • in

    Iain Duncan Smith warns cabinet ministers to ‘temper ambition’ against Boris Johnson

    Sir Iain Duncan Smith has warned cabinet ministers and others planning to challenge Boris Johnson to “temper” their ambition, as the former Conservative leader backed the prime minister to sort out the Partygate scandal.The senior Tory figure appeared to aim his message at chancellor Rishi Sunak, whose team is reportedly planning for a leadership contest in the months ahead.“If there are certain individuals who think they have a right to have a claim on that title of prime minister, well, fine – ambition is a thing which exists in all of us,” Sir Iain told the BBC on Sunday.Sir Iain added: “But it’s ambition at the right time. And I would say to people, temper your ambition.”Cabinet ministers appear to be squabbling over loyalty to the prime minister after Mr Sunak and health secretary Sajid Javid distanced themselves from his Jimmy Savile smear.One cabinet member called for Mr Johnson to sack Mr Sunak, according to The Times, which also reported that two other ministers have accused him of being “on manoeuvres” for party leadership.Senior backbencher Tom Tugendhat, chair of the foreign affairs select committee, has already revealed he will “go for it” if Mr Johnson is forced out of No 10.Sir Iain was scathing about government parties during the Covid pandemic – but warned against “internecine warfare” in the party at a time the public wanted ministers to get on top of the cost of living crisis.The former leader said Mr Johnson’s scandal “damages the reputation” of the Conservatives and said the electorate’s trust had been lost – saying the PM bears the “overall responsibility” for mistakes.Asked if the Tories could recover with Johnson at No 10? “None of us know the answer. When you lose [trust] it’s a very difficult task to get it back across the board.”But the former leader said Mr Johnson should remain in place to try to “sort” out the mess. “He was the man who oversaw what was wrong.”Asked if thought Mr Johnson would lead the party into the next general election, he said: “I do at the moment. The prime minister is the one who has to sort this out. The public will expect that of him.”He added: “I am not particularly in favour of plunging us into the mess of votes of no-confidence followed by leadership elections.”Members of the prime minister’s shadow whipping operation believe that at least 35 letters have already been submitted to the chair of the Conservatives’ 1922 Committee Sir Graham Brady, according to the Sunday Times.It comes as senior Tory MP Sir Charles Walker – previously one of Mr Johnson’s most loyal supporters – said it was now “inevitable” that he would be ousted over Downing Street parties.Business secretary Kwasi Kwarteng said on Sunday it was not at all inevitable that Boris Johnson would have to stand down, saying “I don’t see what he’s seeing” about Sir Charles’ remarks.Mr Kwarteng dismissed talk of dozens of submitted no-confidence letters as “feverish speculation” and denied the prime minister had lost the confidence of the party.“I don’t think so at all,” he told the BBC. “A few people have said they are not happy, they’ve expressed their views publicly.”The cabinet minister also defended Mr Johnson over his Jimmy Savile smear against Sir Keir Starmer, saying it was “perfectly reasonable” for the PM to have claimed the Labour leader had failed to prosecute Savile as part of the “cut and thrust” of debate.Tory peer Lord Gavin Barwell said he disagreed with Mr Kwarteng’s assertion, telling Sky’s Trevor Phillips On Sunday the untrue allegation made in parliament “a stupid thing” for Mr Johnson to have done.Lord Barwell said there was a “strong case for change” when asked if Mr Johnson should resign – but he added that he does not think there is “a chance in hell” that the PM will voluntarily step down. More

  • in

    Boris Johnson close to no-confidence vote, No 10 fears as loyalist MP says end now ‘inevitable’

    Downing Street is bracing itself for a no-confidence vote in Boris Johnson’s leadership soon, as his team fight to save his premiership over the Partygate scandal.Members of the prime minister’s shadow whipping operation believe that at least 35 letters have already been submitted to the chair of the Conservatives’ 1922 Committee Sir Graham Brady, according to the Sunday Times.Allies trying to save Mr Johnson are said to suspect the number could be as high as 45, as the prime minister enters the “danger zone” close to the 54 letters required to trigger a vote.It comes as senior Tory MP Sir Charles Walker – previously one of Mr Johnson’s most loyal supporters – said it was now “inevitable” that he would be ousted over Downing Street parties.Urging him to go before he is pushed, Sir Charles told The Observer: “It is an inevitable tragedy. It is going to end in him going, so I just want him to have some agency in that. It is just not going to get better.”Tory party rules mean that a majority of the party’s MPs – 180 of them – would have to vote against Mr Johnson in a confidence challenge in order to spark a contest to find his replacement. If the prime minister survives, he is protected from facing another vote for a year.Tories now keen to see an end to Mr Johnson’s premiership include some red wall MPs from the 2019 intake, some former ministers, the One Nation caucus of MPs opposed to Brexit, and some Brexiteers who have lost faith in his leadership.Some Tory rebels fear a confidence vote in Mr Johnson could be triggered “accidentally” as anger over Partygate builds, coming too quickly to oust the prime minister – telling The Independent it would be better to wait until the Metropolitan Police investigation concludes.Some opposed to Mr Johnson are steeling themselves for the strong possibility that he will win a confidence vote if one is held soon, but still think the process would be worthwhile.If anything close to 180 MPs were to vote against his leadership, it would leave Mr Johnson badly damaged, and it would be far more likely that he would be urged to quit by his cabinet colleagues.“It’s just a matter of time – different ships move at different speeds,” one former cabinet minister told The Independent in regard to the end of Mr Johnson’s time at No 10.However, Mr Johnson’s allies say he is determined to stay in No 10, even if the pressure builds. “He’s making very clear that they’ll have to send a Panzer division to get him out of there,” one adviser told the Sunday Times.Mr Johnson attempted to convince doubtful MPs that a major shake-up would “strengthen” operations at No 10, as he announced the appointments of Cabinet Office minister Steve Barclay as his new chief of staff and former City Hall spin doctor Guto Harri as new director of communications.David Canzini, another protege of strategist Sir Lynton Crosby, is reportedly set to join No 10 as an aide in charge of liaising with MPs in the coming days, and the PM is said to be considering replacing Mark Spencer as chief whip. More

  • in

    Tory MP ‘so p****d’ he couldn’t remember phone call with Boris Johnson, wife says

    A Tory MP was “so p****d” following an afternoon watching sport he “couldn’t remember what was said” when Boris Johnson called him on the phone, according to his wife.Felicity Cornelius-Mercer shared a photo on social media on Saturday of her husband, Plymouth Moor View MP Johnny Mercer, sitting on a sofa with his head thrown back, apparently in a deep sleep.She said the prime minister had called Mr Mercer after he had spent the day following his local side Plymouth Argyle’s narrow defeat to Premier League side Chelsea and England’s rugby team loss to Scotland in the Six Nations.“So..funny story…the Prime Minister rang tonight directly after an afternoon of FA Cup football and England rugby..and @JohnnyMercerUK was so p****d he can’t remember what was said,” Ms Cornelius-Mercer wrote.She joked that she was thinking of “winding him up” the next day, and asked her Twitter followers for suggestions of what to tell him he had discussed with the PM.Some people suggested that she should tell her husband he had agreed to do an early-morning round of media interviews.Tell him he agreed to do the media round tomorrrow— Martin🇪🇺 (@mb230616) February 5, 2022 Others suggested she say that Mr Johnson offered him a new job, whether in Downing Street or his Cabinet.He starts his new job in No 10 tomorrow.— Nicholas Jackson EU citizen 🔶⬛ (@npjackson123) February 5, 2022 Tell him he accepted the position of temporary Chief of Staff and he’s got to meet Nadine Dorries at a Toby Carvery for lunch to ask her nicely not to do any more media appearances.— Ali Hughes (@AliAliAfro) February 5, 2022 Earlier in the evening, Mr Mercer quote-tweeted Plymouth Argyle’s tweet about the match and wrote: “Heartbreak. So proud – of fans and team.”A number of crises have embroiled the prime minister recently, but Mr Mercer has not said whether he would submit a letter of no confidence in Mr Johnson or not, according to PlymouthLive.When asked by the local news outlet if he had plans to submit a letter of no confidence, Mr Mercer said he would not comment– and when asked why he would not comment, he replied: “Ha Ha.” More

  • in

    Tory rebels fear ‘accidental’ no-confidence vote could keep Boris Johnson in power for a year

    Conservative Party rebels fear a confidence vote in Boris Johnson could be triggered “accidentally” as anger over Partygate builds, coming too quickly to oust the prime minister and leaving him in power for another 12 months.Several Tory MPs opposed to Mr Johnson told The Independent they were worried that he would still have enough support to win a vote of confidence if the number of no-confidence letters sent to the 1922 Committee chair Sir Graham Brady reached the threshold of 54 in the days ahead.Some backbenchers are urging colleagues to be “patient” with letters, and to wait until the Metropolitan Police investigation concludes and the full Sue Gray report is revealed – predicting that to be the moment at which many wavering MPs will turn against him.It comes as Mr Johnson attempted to convince doubtful MPs that a major shake-up would “strengthen” operations at No 10, as he announced the appointments of Cabinet Office minister Steve Barclay as his new chief of staff and former City Hall spin doctor Guto Harri as new director of communications.Culture secretary Nadine Dorries said only a “handful” of anti-Brexit Tories were plotting against Mr Johnson, claiming on Saturday that “around 97 per cent” of MPs were still behind the PM.But senior backbencher Stephen Hammond dismissed Ms Dorries’ claims as “predictable rubbish”, and suggested that a large number of MPs from all sides of the party were considering submitting letters of no confidence.Asked whether it was now “the beginning of the end” for Mr Johnson, the former minister and Remain campaigner said: “It certainly looks like that at the moment.”Tory party rules mean that a majority of the party’s MPs – 180 of them – would have to vote against Mr Johnson in a confidence challenge in order to spark a contest to find his replacement. If the prime minister survives, he is protected from facing another vote for a year.One senior Tory figure opposed to Mr Johnson’s continued leadership told The Independent: “A quick reaching of 54 letters might allow him to survive the no-confidence vote. But the longer it goes on, the number of people against him will grow.”One backbench MP, who is ready to submit a letter once the Gray report is released, said: “Some have obviously lost their patience and are doing it now. But without seeing Sue Gray’s full conclusions I don’t think you get to 180 MPs – he would almost certainly win. It would be better to be patient.”Another Tory backbencher said they thought it would be better to wait for the updated report before sending a letter to the 1922 Committee chair – saying more MPs would “go for it” when the full details of Partygate were revealed.Tories now keen to see an end to Mr Johnson’s premiership include some red wall MPs from the 2019 intake, some former ministers, the One Nation caucus of MPs opposed to Brexit, and some Brexiteers who have lost faith in his leadership.Conservative MPs from across the spectrum told The Independent that there was no clear plan to get rid of Mr Johnson, and that the submission of no-confidence letters was not being coordinated.“There’s a possibility of reaching 54 accidentally because there’s no organising between factions at the moment,” said a senior backbencher.Nick Gibb and Aaron Bell are the latest Tory MPs to reveal they have submitted no-confidence letters, among 14 who have explicitly called for Mr Johnson to quit.Mr Hammond said on Radio 4’s The Week at Westminster that he was thinking “very carefully” about joining the letter-writers, adding: “I think all Conservative colleagues … will be wrestling with their conscience this weekend.”The former transport minister said that many wavering MPs would make their minds up based on what Mr Johnson had “explained so far” on No 10 parties, as well as “looking at knowledge of his personality”. But Mr Hammond also said that a no-confidence vote should not be “rushed”.However, some Tory rebels are keen for colleagues angry about Partygate to make up their minds on Mr Johnson’s leadership and submit letters as soon as possible.Scotland Yard has pledged to carry out its investigation into parties “promptly”, but there are fears it could still take months before the investigation is announced and that momentum against Mr Johnson could slow.Veteran backbencher Sir Roger Gale, who declared in December that he had submitted his no-confidence letter, told The Independent: “We need to get on with it. We can’t control the timing of Sue Gray or the police, and we can’t go on like this. So we have to deal with it now.”Some opposed to Mr Johnson are steeling themselves for the strong possibility that he will win a confidence vote if one is held soon, but still think the process would be worthwhile.If anything close to 180 MPs were to vote against his leadership, it would leave Mr Johnson badly damaged, and it would be far more likely that he would be urged to quit by his cabinet colleagues.“It’s just a matter of time – different ships move at different speeds,” one former cabinet minister told The Independent in regard to the end of Mr Johnson’s time at No 10.Mr Johnson’s cabinet appears to have descended into squabbling over the question of loyalty to the prime minister after both the chancellor, Rishi Sunak, and the health secretary, Sajid Javid, distanced themselves from his Savile slur against Sir Keir Starmer.One cabinet member thinks Mr Johnson should sack Mr Sunak, according to The Times, and two other ministers are said to have accused the chancellor of being “on manoeuvres” for the leadership.Mr Sunak’s team is understood to have built a draft version of a leadership campaign website, as The Independent reported last week. But there is no indication that he is ready to move against Mr Johnson.The prime minister has attempted to placate angry Tory backbenchers with a shake-up at Downing Street along with a promise to give them a greater role in policy-making with a “direct line” to No 10.But Tory rebels do not think the moves will convince many wavering MPs. “No 10 appears to be in meltdown,” said Sir Roger. “It may be presented as a shake-up. If replacements had been announced in an orderly fashion it might have been convincing. But it wasn’t orderly. It was a shambles.” More

  • in

    Are we headed for a Brexit trade war after the DUP mess?

    Understanding the politics of Northern Ireland is not easy. The Democratic Unionist Party’s weird manoeuvres and internal machinations can make Tory party plots look as tame as a Sunday-school picnic.The DUP staged a strange piece of political theatre this week by announcing that the party’s agriculture minister, Edwin Poots, would halt checks on goods moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland. Simultaneously, DUP first minister Paul Givan quit in protest at the UK government’s failure to bring the legal checks agreed with the EU to an end.What is the DUP playing at? How badly has it messed up the Northern Ireland protocol arrangements forged in the Brexit deal? Could the latest developments even spark a trade war between the UK and the EU?It’s hard to say exactly how London and Brussels will respond in the days ahead, given that we still don’t know how the DUP’s radical move will play out.But we do know that the party’s actions have raised the stakes, as UK foreign secretary Liz Truss and her EU Commission counterpart Maros Sefcovic wrestle with a potential compromise deal over the protocol, which would ease the rules on checks.Civil servants have continued to carry out agri-foods checks this weekend amid legal uncertainty, while Mr Poots’s order for border officials to stop the checks is being challenged in the courts.It remains unclear whether the checks will be halted next week – or whether the order will be stuck in legal limbo for many weeks to come. Trade bodies are advising companies to carry on as normal, for now.Sinn Fein, not unfairly, have described the DUP’s moves as “stunts” purely aimed at improving the party’s chances at the forthcoming May elections. But the radical electioneering has intense and potentially catastrophic real-world consequences.The Republic of Ireland’s foreign affairs minister, Simon Coveney, has said that the ending of the checks required by the protocol would be a “breach of international law”, and would violate the terms of the Brexit deal.Top EU officials are keeping calm for now, but are deeply unimpressed that Ms Truss and other ministers are refusing to condemn the DUP or otherwise get involved, with the UK government taking the line that the mess is a “matter for the executive” in Belfast.Mr Sefcovic has said that the UK government has a “responsibility” for the checks agreed in the protocol, and can’t blame the failure to meet these obligations on the naughty children running the show in Northern Ireland.But Ms Truss and Team UK will try to argue that the facts on the ground show exactly why the EU needs to give way and ease up on the checks.It’s unlikely that the EU would look at the end of agri-food checks as amounting to the triggering of Article 16 – the means by which Downing Street has threatened to suspend parts of the protocol – by default.But the ending of checks would put considerable pressure on the UK to agree to a deal with the EU quickly. And in the absence of an agreed London-Brussels compromise, the DUP’s incendiary move could light the fuse on the dispute, hastening a breakdown in talks and pushing Boris Johnson’s government into triggering Article 16.This takes us into trade-war territory, in which the EU takes a series of retaliatory measures for the suspension of protocol arrangements.Brussels chiefs have previously been said to have a “nuclear” option of terminating the Brexit Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA), forcing the UK to trade with the EU on World Trade Organisation terms – essentially a “no-deal” Brexit scenario.But Brussels experts think it’s more likely they would consider retaliating through a lesser-known part of the TCA: Article 506. The moves could range from stopping fishing in EU waters to tariffs on UK fish going into the EU, and then move on to tariffs on other goods.Alternatively, the two sides could see sense and do a deal that would ease much of the red tape on agri-food products through an agreed list of certain goods that would still require stricter checks.Sam Lowe, a trade expert at the Centre for European Reform, said that there is another scenario in which the whole rotten mess rumbles on indefinitely – one in which the UK “continues to engage in low-level non-compliance” while “negotiations begin, stall, and begin again”.What about Mr Johnson? What does he want to do now? It’s hard to say if the embattled prime minister, fighting to stave off a Tory rebellion over Partygate, has given the problem much thought in recent days.Sir Jeffrey Donaldson, the DUP leader (yes, there is actually someone in charge), has claimed Mr Johnson told him privately that there was only a “20 to 30 per cent chance” of negotiating a new protocol deal with the EU in the next few weeks.Make of that what you will. Mr Johnson makes a lot of promises that turn out to mean very little. So we are left hoping there are still enough grown-ups around to sort the whole thing out. For a while, at least. More

  • in

    Boris Johnson: Ex-Brexit minister made new No 10 chief of staff as PM reveals more changes

    Former Brexit minister Steve Barclay is to become Boris Johnson’s chief of staff as the prime minister battles to save his premiership with further changes at No 10.Mr Barclay – currently the Cabinet Office minister – will combines his ministerial duties with a new job of overseeing the running of Downing Street amid the turmoil over the Partygate scandal.Downing Street also announced that Mr Johnson’s former spin doctor Guto Harri will become director of communications after Jack Doyle resigned at the end of last week.Mr Johnson claimed the shake-up of his “senior team” would “strengthen the role of my cabinet and backbench colleagues and accelerate our defining mission to level up the country”.No 10 said Mr Barclay new dual role would help would “integrate” the soon-to-be-revamped Office of the Prime Minister with the Cabinet Office.Labour deputy leader Angela Rayner said Boris Johnson was “panicking as he frantically rearranges deckchairs” – criticising the idea of Mr Barclay working for both No 10 and the Cabinet Office.“This is a farce. Being No10 chief of staff is a 24/7 job so if Steve Barclay is taking it on as his third job then Tory MPs and the public can have no confidence that the dysfunction in Downing Street will come to an end,” said Ms Rayner. Mr Harri takes on the spin doctor role after resigning from the right-wing channel GB News last year. He had been suspended for taking the knee live on air during a debate about racism and the stance taken by England’s footballers.The PR man, Mr Johnson’s spokesman and chief of staff during his first term as London mayor, recently defended Mr Johnson over his handling of the Partygate scandal – but said the PM had to “cover his weaknesses”.Mr Harri criticised Mr Johnson’s failure to get good people advising him in an interview with BBC Newscast. “Boris has always underestimated how critical it is to have a fantastic team around him,” said the new No 10 spin doctor.He also told Laura Kuenssberg on the podcast that some working in politics at Westminster had told him they were not interested in helping Mr Johnson by going to work at Downing Street as the scandal rages on.Mr Harri said he had spoken to someone who told him: “‘I’m not interested in going in to walk into the gallows’ … He said, ‘The danger is that [Mr Johnson] will leave it to the last moment and then all he is asking him to do is to join him in the gallows’.”Asked about Mr Johnson’s grilling by Beth Rigby on Sky News early in mid-January, during which the PM appeared badly shaken, Mr Harri said: “He was in a really bad place at that – bad because it was bad for him. Bad because he’s exhausted and he’s got two young kids.”The changes come after Mr Johnson lost five aides in the space of 24 hours. Mr Johnson also attempted to put a positive spin on the exodus of senior officials on as part of reset, but policy chief Munira Mirza quit in protest over his Savile smear against Sir Keir Starmer.The PM’s official spokesperson said that the resignations of principal private secretary Martin Reynolds, chief of staff Dan Rosenfield and Mr Doyle had been “mutually agreed”.In a desperate bid to win over wavering MPs considering no-confidence letters, Mr Johnson has promised them a greater role in policy-making with a “direct line” into No 10.More announcements are expected in the coming days with what No 10 said would be a “particular focus on improving engagement and liaison with MPs”. More