More stories

  • in

    UK government in High Court challenge over selling fighter jet parts to Israel

    The UK’s right to sell F-35 fighter jet parts to the Israeli military will this week be the subject of a High Court case brought against the British government.In a long-running legal challenge, human rights’ groups and lawyers have argued that the UK’s sale of arms to Israel – despite the government’s own assessment that Israel is not committed to complying with international humanitarian law in its destructive Gaza campaign – is unlawful.A four-day judicial review brought by Palestinian rights group Al-Haq will start in the High Court on Tuesday. If successful, it could force the government to quash a previous decision to not include F-35 fighter jet parts in the suspension of 30 arms licences to Israel.The government argues that suspending licences for F-35 parts would have damaging consequences for international peace and security.The case is backed by major rights organisations including Oxfam, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the Global Legal Action Network (GLAN), which is representing Al-Haq in court. A number of left-wing MPs have also added their support.( More

  • in

    Robert Jenrick reveals he has received death threats and says abuse aimed at MPs is ‘not unusual’

    Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick says he has received death threats and that it is “not unusual” for politicians to receive abuse. Mr Jenrick’s comments come following an arrest after fires at sites linked to Sir Keir Starmer.Speaking to Sky News on Tuesday (13 May), he said: “It’s important that the prime minister and anyone in public life has their family, their homes, protected.“We have robust disagreements in politics but I want to ensure anyone who chooses to go in to public life feels that they’ll be properly protected and that we have civility in our debate.“ More

  • in

    Passports cannot be used to check biological sex says peer as Lords stands off with Government

    The House of Lords continues to stand off with the Government in light of the recent Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman, with one peer arguing that passports can no longer be relied upon to verify someone’s sex.On Monday, peers voted on measures to demand public authorities record sex data based on biological sex. An amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill was backed by 200 to 183, majority 17, a Tory change which aims to ensure collection of relevant information is based on “sex at birth”, “natal sex” or “biological sex”.The Labour defeat came after a similar amendment was rejected by MPs and means a continuation of the tussle at Westminster, known as parliamentary ping-pong, where legislation is batted between the two Houses until agreement is reached.Last month, top judges unanimously ruled the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex.Sir Patrick Vallance said: ““We need to work through the effects of this ruling” (Lucy North/PA) More

  • in

    Counter-terror police probe suspected arson attacks on homes linked to Keir Starmer

    Counter-terror police have launched an urgent probe after two properties linked to Sir Keir Starmer were damaged in suspected arson attacks.Fires broke out at the doors of two residences in north London within 24 hours of one another, prompting emergency services. The Metropolitan Police csaid it is investigating whether the fires were linked and said counter-terror police are involved. Scotland Yard is also looking into a vehicle fire as part of the probe.The London Fire Brigade attended one of the properties after reports of a fire shortly after 1.30am. The door to the property was damaged, but nobody was hurt.The home has been targeted repeatedly by protesters, including pro-Palestinian activists who have staged demonstrations outside the property. Forensics officers seen investigating the fire at the north London home More

  • in

    Groans as Lee Anderson suggests Jeremy Corbyn should be deported with Channel migrants

    Lee Anderson’s call for Jeremy Corbyn to be deported alongside migrants who cross the Channel to reach the UK prompted groans in the House of Commons on Monday (12 May).The Reform UK MP’s comments came during a debate about the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill.Mr Anderson asked Dame Angela Eagle: “Does she agree with me that these young men crossing the Channel should be immediately detained and deported along with the member for Islington?”Mr Anderson was condemned for his comments, with the Home Office minister replying: “I’m quite shocked that the honorable gentleman thinks that that’s an appropriate thing to say in this place.” More

  • in

    In numbers: New immigration rules could make UK citizenship harder to attain than US or Australian

    The government has unveiled a slate of new requirements and restrictions around migration to the UK, from a higher level of English language proficiency to eliminating the careworker visa pathway entirely. “If you want to live in the UK, you should speak English. That’s common sense,” said Sir Keir Starmer on X (formerly Twitter).The changes could make British citizenship among the hardest to achieve in the anglophone world, with a decade-long wait to apply.“Extending the standard route to settlement to 10 years risks making it harder for people to contribute and settle into their communities,” said Marley Morris, associate director at the Institute for Public Policy Research.Here, The Independent looks at how some of Labour’s new rules compare to immigration systems in the US, Australia and New Zealand. Migration still at high levelsThe most recent figure for net migration to the UK stands at 728,000 people in the year to June 2024. Some 1.2 million people entered the country during that period, while 479,000 left the UK. “A one-nation experiment in open borders conducted on a country that voted for control. Well, no more,” Sir Keir said on Monday. “The experiment is over. We will deliver what you have asked for – time and again – and we will take back control of our borders.”The figure was down overall by 20 per cent from the previous year, when net migration hit a record-high level of 906,000 in the year to June 2023.Net migration to the UK remains far above its pre-Brexit level, when it stood at around 200,000 to 250,000. New migration figures are set to be released next week, revealing the first full migration numbers since Sir Keir’s Labour government came to power. The figures, showing net migration up to December last year, will provide an insight into the effectiveness of the government’s immigration strategy so far. Decade-long barrier to citizenshipThe new route to settlement, which doubles the time a person is required to have lived in the UK from five years to 10, will mean British citizenship is among the hardest to acquire in the world. This decade-long requirement is over twice as high as in comparable countries, and is perhaps the most significant change made in this white paper.Mr Morris added: “Visa holders will spend lengthy periods on an insecure status, increasing their risk of poverty and losing status altogether. This could inhibit integration while doing little to bring down numbers.”Even in the United States, which is considered to have one of the toughest immigration systems, migrants only have to have lived in the country for five years on a visa before they can begin to apply for citizenship. The same requirement exists in New Zealand, and it’s even lower – four years – in Australia.“The UK will become a relative outlier on the global stage, where 10 years to gain settlement is rare,” explained Jonathan Beech, managing partner at immigration law specialists Migrate UK.“[This brings into question] how attractive the UK will be to those with the skills and expertise the UK requires to be an economic powerhouse.” Language requirementsThe government has placed a new emphasis on English language requirements for incoming migrants. Skilled workers and those looking to settle in the UK will see the language requirement rise from B1 to B2 in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, along with other changes.This is a higher stage of the “independent user” level of proficiency in English. However, the UK is not necessarily unusual in imposing this requirement. For skilled workers and students, New Zealand requires a minimum 6.5 score on the International English Language Testing System (IELTS), which is equivalent to the upper end of a B2 score in the European framework. The new B2 language requirement is broadly equivalent to a 5.5 – 6.5 score on the IELTS scale used by other countries More

  • in

    Despair at Starmer’s ‘divisive’ language as he clamps down on immigration

    Sir Keir Starmer has warned that the UK risks becoming “an island of strangers” as he laid out some of the toughest rules in recent history to crack down on immigration.Sir Keir also said that the number of people entering the country is causing “incalculable damage” – remarks that have provoked a furious backlash, with his own MPs joining trade unions and charities in comparing the language with that of the far right and Enoch Powell.In a dramatic early morning press conference on Monday aimed at seizing the political agenda, Sir Keir insisted his new immigration plans were being unveiled “because they are the right thing to do”.Among the measures announced were a ban on the recruitment of care workers from overseas, increased English language requirements for immigrants and the tightening of access to skilled worker visas. But while Sir Keir denied his government’s white paper was a “reaction to a political party” following the success of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK at the local elections, critics condemned his attempts to “pander” to Mr Farage.Starmer unveils his white paper on immigration in Downing Street on Monday More

  • in

    Voices: ‘This will be disastrous’: Independent readers fear social care collapse after visa ban

    Yvette Cooper’s announcement of sweeping new restrictions on overseas care worker visas has sparked fierce backlash, with many readers warning the move risks pushing the UK’s fragile care system to the brink of collapse.Under the changes, care homes will no longer be allowed to recruit staff from abroad, a sector that has long relied on foreign workers to plug chronic staff shortages. Applications for the health and care worker visa have already plunged by 70 per cent in a year, from 129,000 to just 26,000, while more than 100,000 vacancies remain across England’s care sector.The home secretary defended the crackdown as necessary to reduce net migration to “significantly” below half a million, arguing that high levels of overseas recruitment had distorted both the economy and the immigration system without addressing deep-rooted problems in social care.But charities such as Age UK warned that foreign workers have been “keeping many services afloat” and that care home closures could pile further strain on NHS hospitals already stretched to breaking point.Independent readers are divided. Some say the UK must continue attracting overseas carers to meet urgent needs, while others call for better pay and training to encourage British workers into the sector.Here’s what you had to say:Punishing workers while ignoring non-workers?There are indeed people who are entering the country illegally who have no intention of working or integrating with British society. So the Labour government’s solution is to directly target the people who come to this country to work and contribute? Am I missing something? It’s like when they put mandatory “don’t steal DVDs” videos on DVDs you just purchased with your own money in HMV.W0ngC0ughHome care will be hit hard tooAgain, care homes. How this will affect home care is ignored. The company that our county council uses, almost exclusively, sources its staff from Africa. It is owned and run by Ghanaians, I believe. This is going to be disastrous for the care sector. But what do politicians care about the most vulnerable in society anyway?Drone1970This is political suicideLabour are now officially over. This is a disaster of a policy and a disgrace. Everything that is wrong with politics in a nutshell – party first, country last. This will set the NHS back decades. I did like Starmer and was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. He has been put on the spot and failed on several occasions. Jumped the wrong way too many times for it to be a coincidence. Alas, it will always fail – no matter what Labour do, it will never be enough. This is the death knell for progressive politics. When it comes to actually voting, I vote SNP, so it does not bother me too much in that matter. However, watching my country die because of strutting little Englanders is heartbreaking.Jim987Chasing Reform votersLabour’s chasing of the Reform vote is proving not only to be a moral disaster but could politically keep them out of office for years. But if the aim is to continue to assist the rich in staying rich (as all three main parties do – it’s their job), then it doesn’t matter to the rich who rules as long as they rule in their favour. In fact, across the West as a whole, this is the aim – keep things the same whilst the real world is changing. It won’t last because it can’t last. If you want to grow an economy, whether it’s in Trumpland or Starmerland, you have to invest in infrastructure and services. The big problem is that ALL the essential services are in private hands. Until you renationalise them, you can’t move or have any plans at all. It’s a very poor form of capitalism that can’t or won’t exploit labour from anywhere. And we are now overseen by people who have no idea how capitalism works but magically think that growth will just emerge, because just saying it will make it happen.rishirichBrexit made the fields rotIn the immediate aftermath of Brexit, the hostile environment forced out all the Eastern European migrant agricultural workers. The consequence was that all those previously complaining that “they’re stealing our jobs” failed to take up the vacancies created, and food was left to rot in the fields. This wheeze from the Tory B team will, in my opinion, have a similar effect – except that it won’t be turnips left to rot, it’ll be your granny.PinkoRadicalPay more and invest in workers We need to make blue-collar jobs more attractive by increasing wages and providing CPD and other incentives. The days of relying on cheap foreign workers must end. The damage being done to our country through mass immigration will take decades to heal.saghiaWe need foreign workersI think the problem is that we don’t have enough foreign care home workers. British people would prefer to be on the dole than look after granny. This policy makes no sense. I suppose the assisted dying bill is aimed at lessening the numbers we need. Shame on Labour.VillagelifeonedayBrexit ruined careWe NEED care workers. Brexit decimated our good care workers, and they are now being replaced by many who can hardly speak English. Stopping care workers from abroad is MADNESS. Paying them more just puts the cost up for those who need care. Labour is not the socialist party anymore.Pete135Democracy is collapsing under stupid populismThis just highlights the problem with an awful lot of Western democracies at the moment. Labour is mimicking Reform because they see Reform as “what the people want”. The obvious problem though, is that Reform’s “policies” will benefit absolutely nobody, things will get loads worse, and Labour or anyone else promoting any sensible policies (not that Labour are at the moment) will not get voted for. Reform or the Tories (who are essentially the same) will win, and things will continue to get worse. So the problem, in case you couldn’t work it out, is that the electorate are far, far too dim to even recognise what is in their own interests – let alone vote for it. Democracy is dying because we live in a world where the majority live outside of reality on most topics and cannot be convinced to vote in their own interests. The bad end of the Dunning–Kruger effect has been deliberately exacerbated to garner votes (for Conservatives, because with a well-educated, well-informed public, they would get barely any votes other than from those who are rich or bigoted and can only think short-term). I am not optimistic anything will change in my lifetime, it only seems to get worse, and society is regressing at an increasing rate. Only some massive catastrophe seems likely to snap us out of it. And even then, we will inevitably cycle back to being dumber than dirt as a collective, if we manage to come out the other side anyway.TrevSmith82Care is big businessThe issue is that care has become big business, run for maximising profit rather than giving staff and care receivers the best conditions. Of course, they go abroad to recruit – cheaper labour supplied by agencies – rather than training and making skilled caregivers more rewarded for their work.MintmanThe British people have to wake up and smell the coffee. British industry, farming, healthcare and social services cannot operate without immigrants. Until 2016, the UK was part of the EU, which allowed a reciprocal, structured and controlled movement of workers between member states. But Farage and the Tories did not like that and replaced it with a points system which wasn’t reciprocal and actually increased immigration, not from Europe but from all corners of the globe. And people who come here from Africa and India bring all their families with them.Pomerol95Nobody’s coming off benefits to do this workDid the job for four years. At that time, the only one of us from outside the UK was a lovely lady from Colombia – all the rest of us were local. Now it seems to be 99 per cent overseas workers. To be honest, you would be hard pressed to find a white British person doing the job here in Cornwall. No one is going to come off benefits to do the job – that’s a fact the government has to face up to. To be honest, the country has to face up to that as well.gtvv6Who will care for people?A ban on overseas recruitment in care homes? Who do the government think is going to do the hard work of providing care? Overseas staff have always been critical to both the NHS and social care sectors. It’s time the government stopped rule by Mail headlines and addressed some real issues.rEUjoinToo many not working while jobs are thereWe have 1 million NEETs and millions of people either unemployed or working part-time/low hours and claiming UC/housing benefit. Many of these people don’t want to be care workers (or work much in general) but still want other taxpayers’ money to support them… This has to end. It will take a tough government to do this, but we can’t have so many working-age people not contributing taxes when the jobs are out there and their labour is needed. This country is far too soft.ChrisMatthewsPR is the way to stop ReformThe way to stop Reform is to introduce proportional representation. True, under PR Reform would have more seats in Parliament – BUT so would the Greens and Lib Dems too. This would force the sensible parties to work together for the good of the UK. Farage has no answers to any of the real problems. People voted for his snake oil once before, but it would seem they have forgotten the disaster of Brexit!PateleyladHospitals and care homes rely on overseas staffGo to any hospital or any care home and you will see how important overseas staff are to the health and care sector. The Brits don’t want to work in it, and certainly not for the wages that are paid or the respect that the jobs attract. So, within six months of the new restrictions coming into force, the NHS will be on the brink of collapse because it cannot discharge its patients into residential care homes. And many of those homes will close because they cannot get the staff to operate day to day safely. Unless the government takes powers to force people to work in the sector, there will be a major problem of their own creation… And they had better hope that there are no elections when it happens. The one straw they can grasp is that neither the Tories nor Reform have policies that offer any solution yet.sweepydogBrexiteers must be delighted with their care home dreamWell, fair enough. The Brexiteers always claimed that thousands upon thousands of homegrown talent were simply unable to find employment in the one area they have been looking for for decades: elderly care. So, here it is – an influx of eager, highly skilled and top-motivated – and most importantly of all, Bri’ish! – people have finally been given the chance they have hungered for since we joined the EU. The older Brexiteers, for years having to suffer the indignity of being cared for by people who were born abroad, must be delighted! Best of luck!SeanFTime for social care to have its own cabinet postMaybe it is time that social care had its own cabinet post – it is perhaps now too important to ignore. Under successive governments, always the bridesmaid, never the bride. It needs to have a professional structure with qualifications backed by statutory recognition. Perhaps, if not already the case, some employer NI concessions to help with costs.SteinTraining locals is necessaryIt’s all very well tightening immigration and restricting care workers from abroad. The government should work towards training UK citizens so that locals can fill the jobs where recruitment is a problem. Tinkering with the current laws is not going to work.AHJA simple answer to a complex problemI was a Labour Party member until about three months ago, and I’m beginning to despise them. They’re obsessed with beating Reform but don’t seem to understand why people are voting for Farage. Labour are considering voting for Reform as a cause when in reality, voting for Reform is a symptom. It’s a symptom of people having terrible jobs, no security, decaying towns with crime increasing, the poor and vulnerable getting worse off, waiting nine weeks to see a GP, then all you get is a phone call. These are the root causes of people’s unhappiness, and Reform has a simple reason for those problems – it’s the immigrants. Get rid of the immigrants, and we get rid of the problem. This, of course, is nonsense – a simple answer to a complex problem. Labour’s mistake is to follow Reform in the hope of winning the next election, and that’s why they stay silent on Gaza and find themselves blaming immigrants. If Labour address the root causes of the problems outlined above, they would transform people’s lives and support for Reform would melt away. Instead, they’re going to squander the next four years trying to ape Reform and being scared of the Daily Mail. Starmer is Britain’s Joe Biden – he’ll be an irrelevant footnote in history, the timid man who allowed Farage into Number 10.manatadeskTo fill vacancies, wages must riseIf you want to fill 500,000 vacancies, you’re going to have to put up the wages. Difficult, seeing how most of these care homes are owned by foreign concerns who milk the system and keep costs as low as they can. Most of them, with foreign and British owners, get away with very low wages to boost their profits!tommy2topsFamilies need more support Families need to receive more in the way of government support, encouragement and financial help because, when possible, this is the very best form of care. Care homes should try to offer hostel-type accommodation for nurses, even if just willing locals with a room to let (there could be a tax bonus) – then there would be no shortage of nurses. The aged are the local community and need support at the local level. Volunteers, training made easier for local older workers. And a big shake-up in the way these places are run.AgnesBCare workers are highly skilled, just badly paidCooper is mixing up “low paid” with “low skilled”. Care workers are highly skilled, just badly paid. I’d love for her to do a week (without cameras) working in a care home looking after people with dementia. I bet she wouldn’t make it through a single shift. The reason care homes have to recruit from overseas is because people can make more money working at Tesco or Starbucks. If you’re someone just looking for a job, rather than someone with a vocation for it, why would you work gruelling shifts on your feet for 12 hours at a time with no breaks and risk getting physically assaulted (which does happen regularly to my sibling, who is a carer) at close to minimum wage – when you can work somewhere else for better pay with fewer hours that’s much less physically and mentally demanding? Want to prevent care homes from having to recruit from overseas? Force care homes to pay their staff what they’re worth. Social care is amongst the most expensive in Europe, yet the staff who work in social care in the UK have amongst the lowest wages. The money isn’t going to staff – it’s rolling into the accounts of massive corporations. Time to peg social care staff wages to those of the equivalent staff in the NHS, on AfC pay scales.WellActuallyThe care system must be integral to the NHSUntil the “care system” is seen as an integral part of the NHS, the system will never work. I am old enough to remember convalescent homes, geriatric wards and local “cottage” hospitals that took in those discharged from the acute hospitals. There, they got physio and occupational therapy to prepare them to go home, and before they were released, anything they needed at home – e.g., rails or other safety devices – were fitted. Visits from district nurses and GPs etc. were arranged so they did not need to keep going back and forwards to A&E. All this may cost but it will save in the long run, and any extra money can be found by charging national insurance on people who get their income from shares, bankers’ bonuses etc., and by scrapping the Upper Earnings Limit on NI contributions. This means that the rich pay more, but as they are the cause of so many of the problems we face today, that seems reasonable to me.ListenVeryCarefullyCare homes should pay a living wageCare homes should certainly pay a living wage. Unlike the agricultural sector, these jobs are available, I reckon, in most towns where there are many unemployed. Perhaps the long-term unemployed could or should be encouraged to apply until something better comes along.BritElsewhereLabour scrapped care reforms with nothing to replace themOne of the first things Labour did when they gained power was to scrap the plan the Tories had in place for social care reform. While the social care policy of the Tories was not perfect, at least it was a policy that would have helped many in the UK. Instead, Labour scrapped the social care reforms and didn’t replace them with anything, so we have a terrible system in place, which is a lottery for those unfortunate to get dementia, Alzheimer’s or other illnesses which require ongoing care that cannot be provided at home. This can easily obliterate a lifetime of savings and hard work for ordinary working people.Now, despite the fact that we have a major shortage of care workers, Labour is now going to ban the recruitment of overseas workers who are willing and want to do this work. I’m not sure what Labour is aiming for here. It seems they are intent on losing the next election. I can’t imagine too many pensioners voting for Labour, and pensioners can well determine the outcome of a general election in the UK.RichardtheLionheartIt’s simple: fund social care properlyI always find it amazing just how clueless politicians are. Most of them are well educated but still clueless. Care homes, in most cases, are paid x by the state and need to keep their expenses below x to make a profit or they go bust. It’s why the bulk of care work is minimum wage and usually regarded as a last resort job for a lot of folks. The state can’t afford to pay the rates needed to attract and keep British staff, which is why care homes import labour from countries where wage rates are a lot lower. It’s not rocket science – in fact, the problem is quite simple to solve. Those in work pay more tax, and the state uses it to pay care homes a proper rate. Who wants to work in a care home all hours on minimum wage when you get the same money sweeping the street?NoomieFuelling the rise of Reform‘Policies’ such as this are a disgrace, especially coming from a supposedly Labour government. These attitudes will lead to the true weakening of Labour and will fuel the rise of Reform. Work in care homes is undervalued and underpaid. Many overseas workers come from cultures where the old are respected; we could learn a lot from them. Where exactly does this government think the extra British care home staff will come from? Telling the unemployed to work in care homes is ridiculous – these are jobs that need skill and compassion, not employees who are ‘forced’ to take such positions. Starmer and his cohorts are not the Labour Party that many voted for, as is becoming obvious. Centre-left is fine, but this government is rapidly becoming marginally left of the Conservatives. “To each according to his need, from each according to his ability.”SuneySome of the comments have been edited for this article for brevity and clarity.Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day’s top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click ‘log in’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here. More