More stories

  • in

    Sunak takes aim at Starmer: ‘We expel antisemites, he makes them MPs’

    Rishi Sunak took aim at Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer claiming the Conservative party “expels anti-semites, while he makes them Labour candidates” in a heated Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday (28 February).The prime minister appeared to be referring to the Rochdale by-election candidate Azhar Ali, following his comments on the Israeli-Palestine conflict.Mr Ali told a meeting of activists that Israel deliberately allowed the 7 October attacks by Hamas to take place in order to give it the “green light” to invade Gaza.Addressing Sir Keir, Mr Sunak said: “The truth is, his party is so mired in hate that despite three ex-Labour candidates standing, [Starmer] can’t back a single one of them.” More

  • in

    Watch: Sunak faces Starmer at PMQs as Lee Anderson launches fresh attack

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailWatch as Rishi Sunak faces Sir Keir Starmer in Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday 28 February.The pair go head-to-head for the first time since Lee Anderson was suspended from the Conservative Party for refusing to apologise over comments made about Sadiq Khan.Senior Tories have faced mounting pressure in recent days to describe the former deputy chairman’s attack on the Mayor of London as “Islamophobic” as the row over his comments entered its sixth day.The prime minister and others have condemned Mr Anderson’s comments, but have so far shied away from calling them “Islamophobic”.Their reluctance to use the term has been criticised by Labour as “weak”, with one frontbencher saying the prime minister was “in hock” to “a strange coalition of MPs”.Mr Sunak will also take questions from MPs for the first time since the House of Commons descended into chaos last week over a vote about a ceasefire in Gaza – leading to more than 80 MPs calling for speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle to resign. More

  • in

    Tories are ‘political wing of Flat Earth Society’, taunts Starmer

    Sir Keir Starmer taunted Rishi Sunak during Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday, 28 February, by referring to the Conservative party as the “political wing of the Flat Earth Society.”The Labour leader said the Tories have been “claiming that Britain is run by a shadowy cabal made up of activists, the deep state, and most chillingly of all the Financial Times,” referring to Liz Truss’s comments at CPAC in the US.The former prime minister blamed the “deep state” for “sabotaging” her controversial tax-cutting plans from Kwasi Kwarteng’s disastrous mini-budget. More

  • in

    Sunak refuses to confirm if he would welcome Nigel Farage to Tory party

    Rishi Sunak refused to reveal whether Nigel Farage would be joining the Conservative party after he was questioned by Sir Keir Starmer during Prime Minister’s Questions on Wednesday (28 February).Speaking in the Commons, the Labour leader said: “(Liz Truss) also claimed that Nigel Farage is the man to restore the Tory party, can the prime minister confirm whether he too would welcome Mr Farage back into the Tory fold?”Mr Sunak replied: “In our party we have a proud tradition of diversity and accepting everyone from every background, it is a proud record that puts Labour to shame.” More

  • in

    Liz Truss ‘did nothing wrong’ over Tommy Robinson ‘hero’ comment, Tory minister says

    Liz Truss should not have the Conservative whip removed as she “did nothing wrong”, policing minister Chris Philp told Sky News on Wednesday (28 February).Labour called for the former prime minister to lose the whip for her media appearances that caused anger within Tory ranks.Ms Truss claimed her efforts to cut taxes were “sabotaged” by the “administrative state and the deep state” during a talk at CPAC in the US.She also took part in an interview with Steve Bannon and remained silent as he described far-right figure Tommy Robinson as a “hero.” More

  • in

    Gen Z ushering in ‘post-truth media age’, says former No 10 communications chief

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailMembers of Generation Z are shunning traditional news outlets in favour of social media, despite saying they trust its content less, according to a study on the UK’s media habits.The research also found 18-24 year olds were twice as likely to get their news from TikTok than the BBC.Lee Cain, the former No 10 communications director and founding partner at Charlesbye, the communications firm which commissioned the study, said the findings indicated so-called Gen Z was ushering in a “post-truth media age”.The report, Talking to the Nation: How To Speak To Modern Britain, saw Research Interactive, acting on Charlesbye’s behalf, conduct polling and focus groups with more than 8,000 people.The study, said to be one of the largest of its kinds in the UK, asked people to rank their most trusted media outlet.Among Gen Z participants — traditionally defined as those born between 1997 and 2012 — television news channels scored highest with 31%, newspapers topped a fifth of lists and dedicated news websites scored highly with 13% of respondents.All three ranked above commentators on social media, which was most trusted among 11% of so-called Zoomers.Despite that, more than a third of people surveyed aged between 18-24 and who said they followed the news stated that social media feeds were their primary news source, compared to almost a fifth who said television, 13% who said newspapers and 12% who said news websites.Traditional media was found to still dominate among older people.According to the report published on Wednesday, nearly half of 45-54 year olds who follow news said they received at least 40% of their news from TV, 16% from newspapers and a fifth from news websites.This generation is ushering in a post-truth media age where they prioritise content over truthOnly 12% in that age bracket said their primary news source was social media.Mr Cain said: “Gen Z is overwhelmingly turning to social media for news, despite trusting it far less than traditional news sources.“This generation is ushering in a post-truth media age where they prioritise content over truth.“This trust deficit could have huge implications in a year of elections across the world and geopolitical uncertainty — preparing the ground for an explosion of deep fakes and disinformation campaigns.”Mr Cain is a former journalist who was part of the Vote Leave campaign during the Brexit referendum.He later served as director of communications under Boris Johnson’s premiership and was involved in the decision to unlawfully prorogue Parliament in 2019 during the row around exiting the European Union.His Downing Street leaving do in November 2020 was among the events investigated as part of a probe by former senior civil servant Sue Gray into the coronavirus partygate scandal.The report commissioned by Mr Cain’s firm also found that young people are twice as likely to get their news from TikTok than the BBC.More than 40% of 18-24 year olds receive news from the Chinese-owned social media giant once a day or more, compared to 19% for the BBC, the study found.Instagram (44%), Facebook (33%) and Elon Musk’s X (24%), formerly known as Twitter, were also more frequented than the national broadcaster by those in Gen Z, the study found.The report says that 18-24 year olds are the least engaged in current affairs, with only a third specifically reading, listening or watching news outlets to keep in touch with what is going on.Elsewhere, Britons were found to still be avid consumers of news, with three-quarters of the population consuming news on a daily basis, while more than two-thirds said they read a newspaper at least on a monthly basis.Older generations are significantly more likely to stay on top of current affairs, with nearly 90% of over-55s doing so on a daily basis.Television was found by the survey to be Britain’s most trusted source of news. More

  • in

    Post Office boss under investigation as top brass squabble over compensation and blame

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailThe head of the Post Office is the subject of an internal investigation, a former chair of the organisation told a Commons committee on Tuesday, highlighting the disarray at the top of the group.During an extraordinary hearing in parliament, Henry Staunton also reignited a furious row with the business secretary Kemi Badenoch, saying he had been the victim of a “smear campaign” after he said he was told to delay payments to subpostmasters. But lead campaigner Alan Bates, a former subpostmaster, told MPs the government should just “get on and pay people”. He also described the Post Office as a “dead duck” and said it should be sold off for £1 to Amazon.More than 700 subpostmasters were prosecuted by the Post Office between 1999 and 2015 because of Fujitsu’s faulty Horizon system made it appear money was missing from their branches.Hundreds, including Mr Bates, whose story was told in the ITV drama Mr Bates vs the Post Office, are still awaiting compensation.Henry Staunton told MPs he stood by his claim a top Whitehall official told him to stall on compensation payoutsIn a sometimes explosive evidence session, Mr Staunton told MPs on the business and trade committee that he stood by his claim a top Whitehall official told him to stall on compensation payouts. That was disputed by Post Office CEO Nick Read, who told MPs he did not believe anyone at the company was told by the government to slow down payments. Mr Staunton, who was sacked by Ms Badenoch last month, has said the move would help the Tories “hobble” into the election.In response, Ms Badenoch accused him of a “blatant attempt to seek revenge following dismissal”.But Mr Staunton told the committee: “Why does everything remain so slow? I’ve spoken up on matters of genuine public concern, have been fired, and am now subject to a smear campaign.” He also said that Mr Read had threatened to quit because he was “unhappy with his pay”.He also rejcted Ms Badenoch’s claims he was under investigation, saying: “This is an investigation, not into me, this is an investigation… into the chief executive Nick Read.”He said that an 80-page report, prepared by the company’s human resources director about Mr Read, contained just one paragraph on his behaviour, claiming “politically incorrect comments attributed to me which I strenuously deny”.Alan Bates in London yesterday ater giving evidence The report was written after Mr Read “fell out” with the HR director, Mr Staunton said. He also told MPs that Mr Read had threatened to resign on a number of occassions – just an hour after Mr Read denied he had ever tried to quit.Their testimony left MPs scratching thier heads, with committee chair Liam Byrne saying Mr Staunton gave “bombshell revelations about a boardroom that is in disarray, a chief executive [Nick Read] that is under investigation and a chief executive who has sought to resign, even though he told us on oath that he has not”.In another twist, a director at the Post Office, Ben Tidswell, told staff after the hearing: “To my knowledge he has never tendered his resignation.”Mr Staunton said the 80-page document “alleges… that Nick was going to resign because he was unhappy with this pay”.He added that he himself “must have had four conversations when he said he was going to chuck it in”.One MP on the committee, Tory Jonathan Gullis, called the admission a “shambles” and said: “There may be another drama: Mr Read and Mr Staunton vs the Post Office.” The department for Business and Trade later confirmed that Mr Read was under investigation, but said it would await the outcome “before making any further judgement”. In his evidence, Mr Read also warned correct legislation must be put in place if “mass exoneration is the right thing” in relation to convicted subpostmasters – adding that the process “may well” result in guilty people being absolved.Mr Bates also told MPs he had considered getting all the former subpostmasters involved in the initial High Court case to “stand as MPs when the next election comes”, adding: “Then we’ll sort it out once and for all.”Meanwhile, Mr Bates told the committee that the government should “pay” the subpostmasters affected. “We keep coming back to this time after time after time – pay people.“There’s a lot of distractions, a lot of other things brought up, thrown up all the time – but just get on and pay people.”He said: “My personal view about [the] Post Office is it’s a dead duck and it has been for years, and it’s going to be a moneypit for the taxpayer in the years to come.”He added: “You should sell it to someone like Amazon for £1, get really good contracts for all the serving sub-postmasters and within a few years you’ll have one of the best networks around Britain.”Mr Bates also said he could see no end to the scandal: “It’s very disappointing and this has been going on for years, as you well know, and I can’t see any end to it.” More

  • in

    More guidance needed on AI in schools, report says

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailA quarter of all children are now using generative AI tools to help with schoolwork, according to a new study.Research from online safety charity Internet Matters found that over half of 13-to-14-year-olds were actively engaging with AI chatbots, and that 41% of children believe AI tools will be beneficial to their education.But parents are more sceptical, with only 29% agreeing the technology was helpful.With just a few prompts, an entire essay can be crafted, or an image can be generated, fundamentally changing the way we produce and share content, and how children learnCaroline Bunting, Internet Matters co-chief executiveThe charity has called on the Department for Education (DfE) to provide more advice and support to schools to help teachers, parents and pupils benefit from AI tools and understand the potential benefits and limitations, while also using the technology safely.Generative AI tools, such as ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini have become increasingly prominent in daily life over the last year, with the technology seen by many as being an innovation that could rival the creation of the internet in its impact.Social media platforms including Meta, Snapchat and Elon Musk’s X have also entered the AI space with their own chatbots.Internet Matters co-chief executive, Carolyn Bunting, said: “Generative AI is here to stay and tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Snap’s My AI are increasingly a part of children’s lives.“Already a quarter of children are using AI for schoolwork and nearly half of 13-14-year-olds are using AI tools regularly.“With just a few prompts, an entire essay can be crafted, or an image can be generated, fundamentally changing the way we produce and share content, and how children learn.“However, our survey shows that both parents and children are unprepared for the AI revolution and most have many unanswered questions about the impact of AI on their daily lives, their children’s safety and wellbeing online, their education, and their futures.“Many are being left in the dark by the lack of guidance for schools, and it is clear more support, guidance and training is needed urgently.“The Department for Education’s recent work on AI policy and regulation in schools is welcome, but too narrow.“Fundamental questions about how children can and should interact with generative AI need to be considered.“Not least of which is how AI will impact the nature of their education, exams, teaching and homework – these are no longer talking points for the future – rapid change is happening now.“Government must provide more advice and support in the immediate term to schools to support teachers, parents, and children to benefit safety from the worthwhile applications of AI tools.”A poll distributed by the International Baccalaureate (IB) also found that 43% of young people said they had used artificial intelligence to help with their schoolwork.The poll, which ran in November and December 2023, received more than 2,000 responses from students in UK schools that offer the IB.More than half of the respondents were in state schools.It found that 72% of students said they had used an AI Chatbot before while 13% of students who responded to the poll believed it is still possible for their education system to avoid the influence of AI.IB director general Olli-Pekka Heinonen said: “As educational leaders, we can’t attempt to hold back the inevitable tide and so must make sure that AI is used and developed for the purposes of teaching and learning.“We need to be intentional about how we approach students’ use of AI and how we moderate it.“School is the right place to learn how AI can be used ethically and sustainably and to understand its strengths and weaknesses.” More