More stories

  • in

    Voices: Should there be more incentives to purchase electric vehicles? Join The Independent Debate

    Sign up to the Independent Climate email for the latest advice on saving the planetGet our free Climate emailChancellor Jeremy Hunt ‘missed a massive opportunity’ to boost flagging electric vehicle (EV) sales in the spring Budget this month, critics have said.The chancellor ignored industry calls to introduce more incentives for private EV buyers, including halving VAT on new EV sales; cutting VAT on public charging to 5 per cent and scrapping new bands that would see EV owners pay Vehicle Excise Duty from 2025.Manufacturers say the lack of incentives for private buyers will make it increasingly hard for car makers to hit strict targets set out in the Government’s Zero EV (ZEV) Mandate, with a spokesperson for Fiat UK calling the budget “hugely disappointing”.James Taylor, Vauxhall UK’s managing director, called for the chancellor to set up purchase incentives to “stimulate the electric vehicle market”, adding: “Whilst there are strong incentives for company car drivers to make the switch to electric – including for those choosing luxury vehicles – the private buyer who wants a more attainable small or family car receives nothing.”We want to know what kind of incentives on private EV purchases would encourage you to make the switch. Would a VAT cut on public charging or a new EV purchase be attractive propositions? On the other end of the scale, does the introduction of car tax for EVs put you off taking the plunge? And if you already own an EV, what incentives could the government introduce to make it cheaper to run?Share your thoughts by adding them in the comments – we’ll highlight the most insightful ones as they come in.All you have to do is sign up and register your details – then you can then take part in the discussion. You can also sign up by clicking ‘log in’ on the top right-hand corner of the screen.Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here.Join the conversation with other Independent readers below. More

  • in

    Post-Brexit subsidy scheme leaves UK farmers ‘hugely frustrated’

    Sign up to our free Brexit and beyond email for the latest headlines on what Brexit is meaning for the UKSign up to our Brexit email for the latest insightFarmers remain “hugely frustrated” with Rishi Sunak’s government over post-Brexit subsidy payments, as ministers set out the long-awaited replacement for the EU’s agricultural support scheme.Environment secretary Steve Barclay promised it would be “easier” for farmers to get help as he revealed the structure of payments – including hundreds of pounds per hectare for maintaining habitats.But the National Farmers Union (NFU) said there were still “more questions than answers”, long after the post-Brexit consultation launched in 2018.NFU vice-president David Exwood said: “It remains hugely frustrating that nearly six years on [from the consultation] … government is still a long way behind on its commitments.”It comes as Mr Barclay also insisted that coming changes to the labelling of food products will not lead to consumers having to pay more at the supermarket tills.The government has been under pressure to finally set out its agricultural support schemes to replace EU funding since the UK left the bloc in 2020.Mr Barclay said on Thursday that premium payments will be offered to British farmers helping the environment, such as £765 per hectare for lapwing nesting plots, or £1,242 per hectare for connecting river and floodplain habitat.Environment secretary Steve Barclay says post-Brexit payments will make life ‘easier’ for farmers Farmers already carrying out work to protect nature will be offered higher payments, with the amount for maintaining grasslands, wetlands and scrub rising from £182 per hectare to £646.Applications to receive support will be open from the summer of 2024 and are designed to promote British producers while encouraging them to protect nature.Mr Barclay said: “We have listened to farmers’ feedback and set out the biggest upgrades to our farming schemes since leaving the EU, with more money, more choice and more trust to support domestic food production whilst also protecting the environment.”The cabinet minister added: “We’re also making it easier for farmers of every farm type and size to enter the schemes, and I encourage everyone to take a look at how you can join.”The NFU has been highly critical of the government over slow progress in meeting promises to boost environmental land management schemes (ELMs) aimed at replacing EU subsidies.While welcoming the increased payments and new options for support, the union said firms were still facing a minimum of 50 per cent reduction in the direct payments due in 2024.The NFU’s vice-president said the tapering of payments planned up to 2027 “continues to be very concerning”. Mr Exwood added: “We urgently need business-critical detail on how farmers and growers will smoothly transition from existing agreements to the new offer.”Changes include a 10 per cent increase in the average agreements in the sustainable farming incentive and countryside stewardship, and about 50 new actions for which farmers can be paid, such as developing robotic mechanical weeding.The government has previously said it is offering £45m for those creating new technology to make farming more efficient. There will also be different payment options, with shorter agreements of up to three years available for tenant farmers.Mr Barclay also announced government plans to change food labelling so that consumers can see if imported food does not meet UK welfare standards. The government wants people to buy more domestically produced food and would like supermarkets to have a “buy British button” on their websites.Speaking to journalists at the Oxford Farming Conference on Thursday, Mr Barclay said the changes are intended to avoid shoppers confusing imports for their British counterparts.He said: “It’s about recognising that there will be some consumers that want to pay for quality that do care about animal welfare … so it’s about empowering the consumer.”Mr Barclay added: “It’s not about closing off options for others, it’s about ensuring that someone who thinks when they see the union jack flag that the thing on the shelf is British, just making sure … that quite often that is not the case.”Ministers are hoping to have 60 per cent of the food eaten in the UK produced here, while also meeting a commitment to restore at least 30 per cent of the UK’s natural environment by 2030.Conservation groups have largely welcomed the payments for protecting habitats but said much more needs to be done to hit the 2030 target.Richard Benwell, chief executive of Wildlife and Countryside Link, said it was “very good to see Defra offer higher premium payments for nature-friendly farming choices” – but said more needed to be done to promote sustainable farming.He warned: “With six years until the legal target to halt nature’s decline, it’s impossible to imagine that we’re on track to reverse long-term decline in farmland wildlife, restore protected habitats to good condition, or stop the pollution pouring into our waterways.” More

  • in

    UK climate minister leaves Cop28 summit as talks reach critical point: ‘A slap in the face’

    Sign up to the Independent Climate email for the latest advice on saving the planetGet our free Climate emailThe UK climate minister Graham Stuart has left the Cop28 climate negotiations at a critical moment to fly thousands of miles back to parliament for a crunch vote on the government’s controversial plan to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda.A spokesperson for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said that Mr Stuart would return to Dubai after the vote, a round-trip of more than 6,000 miles.Mr Stuart was the ministerial head of delegation at the Dubai summit, where nations are in a stand off over the future of fossil fuels. Climate groups called the decision a “slap in the face” as countries try and agree a final deal.Richard Benyon, the minister of state for overseas territories, is currently the leading presence on the ground, a representative at the UK delegation offices inside the Dubai Expo venue told The Independent. In the wake of the news, Mr Benyonposted on social media that Britain is at “the heart of negotiations giving real leadership” as the negotiations reach their final “vital” stage.Asked about the carbon emissions from the flights Mr Stuart would take, the prime minister’s spokesman said: “This government is not anti-flying. We don’t lecture the public to that regard. The most important thing is the outcomes of Cop, which minister Stuart is obviously leading for the UK on.”Ministers have a number of roles, the negotiations continue and he will return to Cop.”A government spokesperson said that would still be “full official representation on the ground” at the summit, including by Lord Benyon. “Minister Stuart will continue to be the lead UK minister for negotiations and remains in constant contact with the UK lead climate negotiator and Lord Benyon, with any final decisions agreed with him,” they added.Climate advocates slammed the decision to send Mr Stuart back to the UK.“As world leaders are locked in intense negotiations to discuss the existential threat posed by climate disaster, the departure of Minister Stuart is yet a further slap in the face to countries urging major polluters like the UK to act, said Hannah Bond, co-director of policy advocacy at ActionAid UK. In a shocking betrayal of trust as COP wraps up, the Prime Minister seems happier to fight the culture wars and not climate change”Ed Miliband, Labour shadow secretary of state for energy security and net zero said this is the latest episode in Mr Sunak “tanking Britain’s reputation on the world stage” and that it is a “sad truth” that “many countries simply won’t even notice that his minister has disappeared.”“Graham Stuart flying home in the middle of negotiations tells you everything you need to know about the Tories,” he added.Calling time on the fossil-fuel era, the root cause of the climate crisis, has emerged as the central fight of the Dubai negotiations – as nations scramble to keep the goal of limiting average global heating to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels within reach and with 2023 set to be the hottest year humans have ever experienced. The latest draft text put out on Monday had removed the words “phase out” and “phase down” of fossil fuels from the options for delegates to agree upon, calling instead for “reducing both consumption and production of fossil fuels, in a just, orderly and equitable manner” while framing such cuts in output as optionalThat sparked a fierce reaction from some of the nations most vulnerable to the impact of the climate crisis, saying they had not come to “sign our death certificate” while a representative for the EU called the draft “unacceptable” and warned that the bloc could walk away from discussions. The US said that the wording of the draft text, including about fossil fuels, needed to be “substantially strengthened”.The UK has also hit at at the latest draft, with a government spokesperson saying: “This draft is disappointing and does not go far enough. The UK position is clear – there must be a phase out of unabated fossil fuels to meet our climate goals.”The UK is working with all parties and will continue to push for an ambitious outcome at COP28 that keeps 1.5 degrees in reach.”Climate groups have questioned the UK’s committment to the climate, pointing to plans for a new round of oil and gas licences in the North Sea. Mr Sunak attended Cop28 briefly in the opening days of the summit, but was criticised for staying for less time talking to other leaders than he spent on the private jet that took him to Dubai and back.Chiara Liguori, Oxfam’s senior climate change policy advisor, said: “There can be no more tragic outcome for UK climate diplomacy than this – flying home from talks to avert a climate catastrophe at the most critical moment in an attempt to salvage a cruel and impractical policy,” said.Claire Coutinho, the secretary of state for energy security and net zero, also attended for at the beginning of the talks, but Mr Stuart has been in charge for the crunch negotiations over the summit agreement. More

  • in

    Sunak defends watering down climate policies at Cop28 – but says planet close to ‘breaking point’

    Sign up to the Independent Climate email for the latest advice on saving the planetGet our free Climate emailRishi Sunak defended watering down his zero policy policies, as he insisted that the UK is still “leading the charge” in tackling climate change at the Cop28 summit in Dubai.Mr Sunak told the crucial global conference that “climate politics is close to breaking point” – but also claimed he would only cut emissions in a way that “benefits the British people”.The Tory leader claimed it was “entirely sensible” to worry about taxpayers’ money when trying to meet targets. Yet he was forced to defend his decision to fly on a private jet to the summit for only one day.Mr Sunak was grilled by reporters on whether he was really taking Cop28 “seriously” – given he would be spending more time on travelling to and from the UAE than at the summit itself.The PM – spending less than 24 hours in Dubai – fired back at the “hugely simplistic” idea. “I wouldn’t measure our impact it by hours spent – I would measure in by the actually things we are doing to make a difference.”Flying back on Friday, Mr Sunak insisted that the UK government can still “stand tall” at Cop28 and remains a “leader” on climate change – despite his own rollback of net zero ambitions at home.Insisting he would not be “in hock to ideological zealots”, the PM has scaled back a host of net zero targets and vowed to “max out” UK oil and gas reserves by granting new North Sea drilling licences.Mr Sunak promised “hand on heart” that no global figure had raised his recent moves to scale back targets in Britain. “Not a single leader I’ve met today has spoken about that. Do you know why? Most of their targets are less ambitious that the UK.”Rishi Sunak (right) speaks to King Charles at Cop28 summit “Any which way I look at it, we are a leader on this issue,” the PM he told reporters. “So I will walk around very proudly tomorrow championing the UK’s achievements in this space.”The Tory leader has announced £1.6bn for international climate finance – including to support projects to halt deforestation and accelerate the transition to renewable energy.But ActionAid UK said Mr Sunak’s £1.6bn pledge was simply a “smoke and mirrors accounting trick” based on “reheated pledges from years gone by”.Zahra Hdidou, the charity’s senior climate adviser, said the sum was “neither new nor additional”. The campaigner said the PM was “refusing to act meaningfully on climate action”.Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is also at the UAE event to position himself as a PM-in-waiting and stress that Britain would be open to major green investment if he wins power.Mr Sunak accused Sir Keir of “just trying to catch up”, as he claimed the Tories have a “fantastic track record” on tackling climate change. He used his Cop28 appearance to announce a deal between Masdar and RWE to invest up to £11bn in the UK’s new wind farm at Dogger Bank.But Mr Starmer hit back by saying a Labour government would “turbocharge” sluggish growth in green tech, and lead a “clean power alliance” to cut energy prices with international partners.Rishi Sunak speaking to media at the climate change summit The new row comes as King Charles III has warned that the world remains “dreadfully far off track” in key climate targets in the opening speech at Cop28.The monarch warned of the “vast, frightening experiment” in rising temperatures. And he said he prayed for “transformation action” from global leaders – arguing that “our own survivability will be imperilled” unless carbon emissions are cut.On Friday world leaders agreed a new declaration aimed at transforming the global food system – with new pledges on sustainable agriculture and more resilient food chains. It follows a commitment to a £340m fund for nations suffering the most from the effects of climate change.Cop28 president Sultan al-Jaber, who is also chief executive of state oil giant Abu Dhabi National Oil Company, has been accused of seeking to use the conference to strike oil and gas deals – which he has denied.Mr Sunak denied the allegations undermine the UAE’s position leading the negotiations, Mr Sunak saying he “commended” the host nation’s leadership. The UAE’s president Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan has announced a £23.7bn fund for “global climate solutions”.Zac Goldsmith – who quit as an environment minister accusing Mr Sunak of being “uninterested” in the issue – told Sky News that the UK was no longer seen as “a reliable or serious partner” on climate change.Senior Tory MP Chris Skidmore – the former government net zero tsar – said the country could not wait for the “technologies of tomorrow” to decarbonise its industries.Mr Skidmore said UK industrial emissions could be more than halved using technology available “today, right at our fingertips” as he launched a series of proposals – including greater investment hydrogen and carbon capture and storage technology. More

  • in

    As climate crisis reaches pivotal moment, what on earth are world leaders waiting for?

    Sign up to the Independent Climate email for the latest advice on saving the planetGet our free Climate emailAs world leaders meet for the Cop28 climate conference, The Independent reports that the world has only a handful of years left to rein in emissions before we exhaust the planet’s ability to cope.The two-week summit in Dubai opened to a “deafening cacophony of broken records”, the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) said on Thursday.With King Charles set to use his opening address today to call for a “critical turning point towards genuine transformational action”:UN secretary general Antonio Guterres warned unprecedented global heat “should send shivers down the spines of world leaders”Hosts UAE insisted no issue would be left off the table during talksLatest projections showed there was just a 14 per cent chance of limiting warming to the 1.5C targetA landmark deal was finalised to support vulnerable nations already suffering irrevocable loss from the climate crisisRishi Sunak said he was “proud” of his record on tackling climate change – despite fierce criticism from UK campaigners over his net zero U-turnsUS climate envoy John Kerry said Washington would target reductions of the potent but lesser-mentioned greenhouse gas, methaneThe King is expected to tell leaders and climate delegates that the “hope of the world” rests on their decisions, and argue that, despite some progress, repeated warning signs of climate change are being ignored.It is understood he will outline five key questions he hopes the summit will address, adding: “The Earth does not belong to us, we belong to the Earth.”The summit began yesterday with the WMO’s announcement that 2023 will be the hottest year in recorded history, while sea level rise is also at a record high, extreme weather is spiralling, and Antarctic sea ice is disappearing at alarming rates.“We are living through climate collapse in real time,” said Mr Guterres, calling for the spiralling crisis to be a “trigger” for world leaders to act.Yet even in the face of a mountain of findings from the WMO, and dozens of other scientific bodies, progress has been far, far too slow; the UN Environment Programme has predicted that, rather than staying within the bounds of a somewhat safe 1.5C temperature rise, we are on track for a three-degree world this century.“Science tells us we have around six years before we exhaust the planet’s ability to cope with our emissions,” Simon Stiell, executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, said yesterday.But instead of trending downwards, fossil fuel emissions rose 1.2 per cent in 2023. Oil companies made $200bn in 2022, and many more billions this year, helped along by government subsidies to the tune of $7 trillion in 2022.Key absencesUS president Joe Biden, Chinese president Xi Jinping and Russian president Vladimir Putin, leaders of the world’s biggest carbon-polluting nations, are all giving the summit a miss amid ongoing geopolitical tensions.However, the US is sending its vice president, Kamala Harris, to make a brief visit. Mr Sunak and Indian prime minister Narendra Modi will be in Dubai.John Kerry, US special presidential envoy for climate, at the Cop28 venue on ThursdayAs he prepared to fly to Cop28, Mr Sunak, criticised for watering down net zero measures on cars and boilers and making a renewed push to drill for North Sea oil and gas, denied Britain had abandoned its flagship pledges.“I’m not in hock to ideological zealots on this topic. Of course we’re going to get to net zero, of course it’s important, but we can do that in a sensible way that saves people money,” said the Tory leader.Foreign secretary David Cameron is also in Dubai for several events; the government has faced criticism for all three men flying to the conference on separate private jets.Meanwhile, Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer prepared to meet financiers in Dubai to discuss his plans to “turbo-charge” growth by making London the world’s green finance capital.‘No issue left off the table’Getting a grip on the situation is one of “heavy responsibility”, the UN’s Simon Stiell remarked, particularly for the Emirati hosts.Oil-dependent UAE is tasked with shepherding through a meaningful agreement in two weeks’ time, which vulnerable countries and their allies say must include a call to phase out all fossil fuels for the first time.There was some early momentum yesterday when a fund to help the poorest and most impacted places cope with the irrevocable losses of climate change was finalised.That deal was met with a standing ovation by delegates in the plenary hall, although experts warned that the fund must be closely monitored to ensure the most vulnerable can easily access it.The announcement was accompanied by substantial financial pledges including  $100m (£79m) apiece from the UAE and Germany and $76m from the UK. The US pledged $17.5m.Cop28 president Sultan al-Jaber at the opening session in Dubai on Thursday While the sums were welcomed, it remains a drop in the ocean to tackle to scale of climate disasters – some estimates say vulnerable countries need $400bn annually to cover their losses.The summit was convened by Sultan al-Jaber – a controversial choice because of his job as CEO of the UAE national oil company, Adnoc. And this was before the BBC and the investigative Centre for Climate Reporting revealed that the UAE planned to use its role as Cop28 host to strike oil and gas deals. (“The documents referred to in the BBC article are inaccurate and were not used by Cop28 in meetings. It is extremely disappointing to see the BBC use unverified documents in their reporting,” a summit spokesperson told The Independent.)During his opening remarks, Jaber acknowledged there were “strong views” about the idea of including language on fossil fuels and renewables in the final Cop communique. “It is essential that no issue is left off the table. And yes, as I have been saying, we must look for ways and ensure the inclusion of the role of fossil fuels,” he said. More

  • in

    Voices: Should private jets be banned? Join The Independent Debate as Rishi Sunak and David Cameron spark controversy

    Sign up to the Independent Climate email for the latest advice on saving the planetGet our free Climate emailClimate campaigners are outraged after it emerged prime minister Rishi Sunak, King Charles, and foreign secretary David Cameron all took separate private jets to the Cop28 conference in Dubai.No 10 defended the decision to have Mr Sunak and Lord Cameron travel separately – as it was confirmed junior ministers and officials would fly out on commercial flights rather than travel with the PM’s entourage.But opposition parties and activists accused Mr Sunak of climate hypocrisy – criticising the use of separate jets as “setting an awful example” and being a “waste of taxpayers’ cash”.Todd Smith, an Extinction Rebellion (XR) spokesperson, said Mr Sunak and Lord Cameron were “setting an awful example” and “protecting the interests of their rich mates”.The activist said three in four Britons would not need to change their flying habits to achieve net zero. “It is only a small minority of private jet users, frequent flyers and first-class travellers that are ruining it for the rest of us.”We want to know if you think private jets should be totally banned in an effort to reach net zero. Do you think politicians should use commercial flights, or is there a place for private air travel amid the climate crisis?Do the actions of Mr Sunak, Lord Cameron and King Charles undermine the purpose of Cop28? And would you change your flying habits to ease the impact on the climate?If you want to share your opinion then add it in the comments and we’ll highlight the most insightful ones as they come in.All you have to do is sign up and register your details – then you can then take part in the discussion. You can also sign up by clicking ‘log in’ on the top right-hand corner of the screen.Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here.Join the conversation with other Independent readers below or by clicking here. More

  • in

    Voices: Independent readers give their verdict on electric vehicles – from ‘not the answer’ to ‘the best option’

    Sign up to our free Brexit and beyond email for the latest headlines on what Brexit is meaning for the UK Sign up to our Brexit email for the latest insight This week industry bosses told The Independent electric cars could cost British motorists an extra £6,000. The anticipated hike all comes down to whether […] More