As fires burn the west, top Democrats stay quiet on the climate crisis
Democrats
Nancy Pelosi has been notably tepid on green legislation – so are the Democrats serious about fighting climate change? More
Subterms
163 Shares99 Views
in ElectionsDemocrats
Nancy Pelosi has been notably tepid on green legislation – so are the Democrats serious about fighting climate change? More
225 Shares109 Views
in UK PoliticsThe citizens’ assembly on the climate crisis has urged Boris Johnson’s government to use the coronavirus pandemic to fundamentally reshape the economy so its commitment to cut carbon emissions to net zero by 2050 can be met.Publishing its final report on Thursday, the Climate Assembly UK expressed support for homeworking and radical changes in transport policy — saying the “tough and sad time” brought on by lockdown restrictions presented an opportunity for a huge shift. Despite concerns over the sizeable hit suffered by the aviation industry during 2020, the assembly called on the government to bring in new taxes on flights to cut the long-term rise in air passenger numbers.The panel of more than 100 ordinary citizens — set up by six House of Commons select committees last year to give the public a bigger say — suggested the aviation taxes could “increase as people fly more often and as they fly further”.Their report called for a complete ban on the sale of new petrol, diesel and hybrid cars at some point between 2030 and 2035, asking the government to consider bringing forward the current deadline of 2035.Watch moreThe very highest-polluting vehicles should be phased out even sooner, the assembly said, calling for more grants for electric cars and more government investment in low-carbon buses and trains.A large majority of assembly members — 79 per cent — agreed steps taken by the government to help the economy recover “should be designed to help achieve net zero”.An even larger majority, 93 per cent, agreed government and employers “should take steps to encourage lifestyles to change to be more compatible with reaching net zero”. One panel member, 56-year-old Sue from Bath, said: “Even in a year like this, with the country and economy still reeling from the coronavirus pandemic, it’s clear that the majority of us feel prioritising net zero policy is not only important but achievable, too.”
Climate change protests around the worldShow all 25 More
250 Shares169 Views
in UK PoliticsAlmost 60 per cent of people in England are living in areas where levels of toxic air pollution exceeded legal limits last year, analysis of official figures has revealed.Legal limits for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) – a toxic gas that inflames airways in the human respiratory system – were broken in 142 local authorities in 2019, potentially affecting as many as 33 million people in total. This includes groups particularly vulnerable to the effects of air pollution, including 7 million children and 5.5 million people over 65 years old. The latter group is now at additional risk because of the coronavirus.
As the government grapples with the economic devastation caused by the pandemic, the prime minister has presented public infrastructure investment as one of the most important components of his post-Covid-19 economic recovery plan. “Build back better; build back greener; build back faster,” Boris Johnson said at the end of June. However, as well as £2bn allocated for cycling and walking – a figure that has been criticised as being inadequate – the government’s plans include £27bn for roads. The vast majority of NO2 comes from road travel, according to the UK’s Air Pollution Information System. In total, about 2.2 million tonnes of NO2 is generated in the UK each year. Of this, about half is from motor vehicles, a quarter is from power stations, and the rest is attributable to other industrial and domestic sources.Read morePrevious studies have found that those most affected by poor air quality are disproportionately people living in deprived areas – potentially leading to a disproportionate impact on people from minority ethnic groups, which in turn could be a factor in the higher rates of coronavirus deaths among those from black, Asian and minority ethnic backgrounds.
Currently, legal limits on air pollution are set by the EU, but Labour, which carried out the analysis, is now calling for the government’s environment bill to include legally binding targets to reduce air pollution to World Health Organisation (WHO) limits. Luke Pollard, the shadow environment secretary, told The Independent: “It is essential after the Brexit transition period that we have a robust legal framework in place to ensure government action is taken to clean up our dirty air. “It’s simply unacceptable that nearly 60 per cent of England’s population – including more than half our children and millions of over-65s – suffer illegally high air pollution. We know that sustained filthy air corresponds to a higher Covid death rate.
“People have a right to breathe good quality, clean air regardless of where they live. Ministers could and should act now to achieve this by putting the World Health Organisation air-quality limits into law.”
He added: “Public Health England must also urgently review the combined impact of air pollution and Covid on black, Asian and minority ethnic communities who live in some of the worst polluted areas in England.”The figures represent a longstanding failure for successive governments to get to grips with air pollution. In 2017, 85 per cent of the UK’s designated “air quality zones” exceeded legal pollution limits eight years after they were supposed to meet them.
The 2019 local authority breaches now highlight serious concerns that despite a fall in emissions in recent years the government has not done enough to comply with EU regulations concerning air quality, with Brexit leaving many of the most vulnerable people at risk.
Air pollution is responsible for tens of thousands of deaths every year, and the Royal College of Physicians estimates the health impacts of air pollution cost the country over £20bn a year.
Many of the areas where NO2 has soared over legal limits are in London, including Greenwich, Hackney, Islington, Brent, Hammersmith and Fulham, Haringey, Lambeth and the City of London. The mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, has also called for WHO limits to be enshrined in law.
A spokesperson for the mayor said: “Sadiq is doing everything in his power to stop Londoners breathing air so filthy that it damages children’s lungs and causes thousands of premature deaths. The ultra-low emission zone has already cut toxic air by a third and led to reductions in roadside nitrogen dioxide in central London that are five times greater than the national average.
“We know there is still more to do. Pollution isn’t just a central London problem, which is why Sadiq has consistently demanded that the government match his ambition and improve the environment bill to include legally binding WHO recommended limits to be achieved by 2030, and to give cities the powers they need to eradicate air pollution.”
Read moreAs well as London, illegal levels of pollution were recorded across the country, from Gateshead in the northeast, to Bournemouth on the south coast, and also in more rural areas including the New Forest and east Hampshire.
The prevalence of illegal levels of pollution across the country “makes for quite a frightening story”, according to Professor Stephen Holgate, the Royal College of Physicians’ special adviser on air quality.
He told The Independent that the research “really shines a spotlight on the extent of this problem”.“There’s been a lot of focus on London, but this is a large number of local authorities, and a number of these aren’t in the big cities, but other areas of England,” he said.“It shows that this is a problem across the whole of England and it’s not just a city issue. People living in these places need to know that their local area is affected by pollution.”
He criticised the current response to the epidemic and said the government is “not really thinking long term”.
“If we want this virus to disappear or have less of an impact on the community, then what do we need to do to increase the resilience of the community? Reducing air pollution is one of those factors.”
He added: “It needs to be taken thoroughly seriously – whether it’s impacting the susceptible population or not, it’s something we can do something about.”
Air pollution in the UK has markedly improved in recent decades – largely thanks to changes in fuels used to heat homes and power industry. But greater understanding of how pollutants affect our bodies has led to more detailed monitoring, while the climate crisis has also revealed the urgency with which we must curtail toxic emissions.
Dr Suzanne Bartington, clinical research fellow in environmental health at the University of Birmingham, said: “This is 142 local authorities – a very substantial area – and it does reflect a policy failure in terms of implementation of these legal limits. “We know there have been ongoing exceedances for a number of years. We know this issue is affecting those areas of higher socioeconomic deprivation, with poorer housing and air quality very much a part of that.”
She said: “It’s not surprising really, but we would like to see a more health-based approach, which isn’t so focused on compliance, but on health outcomes.”
She also warned against the view that changing the type of fuel vehicles run on would solve the problems posed by air pollution.
She said: “Electric vehicles are not a panacea because of non-exhaust emissions from brake and tyre wear, which we know contribute to other pollutants. “We’re very good at building ourselves into new problems with air quality.”
Rosamund Kissi-Debrah, an advocate for clean air for the World Health Organisation and whose daughter Ella’s death from asthma became the first to be officially linked to illegal levels of air pollution, said she was “stunned” by the figures.
“A lot of children are living in areas with illegal air pollution and it’s affecting their lungs,” she told The Independent.
“There are families up and down the country that are being heavily impacted by air pollution, and it shouldn’t be that way. It shows that we as a family were not unique.”
She called on the government to bring the scrappage of diesel forward, and for further clampdowns on woodburning stoves. “These things can be done immediately,” Ms Kissi-Debrah said.
“Can you imagine if our water was that filthy? People would be out marching in the streets.”
A spokesperson for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: “Air pollution has reduced significantly since 2010 – emissions of nitrogen oxides have fallen by 33 per cent and are at their lowest level since records began. “We are continuing to take urgent action to curb the impact air pollution has on communities across England through the delivery of our £3.8bn plan to clean up transport and tackle NO2 pollution.
“This includes providing £880m in funding and expert support to local authorities to improve air quality, and introduce clean air zones.” More
213 Shares179 Views
in US PoliticsI have always worked with facts. I have sifted them for relevance, assembled them to make sense of things, and used them to construct an argument or to disagree with another point of view. Facts are, for journalists, the essential ingredient, like flour for bakers or clay for sculptors. So I recall very clearly how disconcerted I felt when I first sensed they were turning to liquid and sliding through my hands.It was during Tony Abbott’s campaign against the Labor government’s carbon pricing scheme – the policy he dubbed a “great big tax on everything”. There were, for sure, some factual arguments that could have been deployed against that policy, or alternative ideas that could have been raised. The then opposition leader opted for neither of these methods. Instead, he travelled the country saying things that were patently nonsensical. But most news outlets reported them uncritically, and this firehose of nonsense proved impossible to mop up. More
150 Shares139 Views
in US PoliticsGuardian US reporter Emily Holden looks at the Trump administration’s impact on the environment, and the consequences if he wins another term
How to listen to podcasts: everything you need to know
The United States is one of the most polluting nations in the world – its factories, power plants, homes, cars and farms pump billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year. By the end of this century, the earth’s temperature will rise by several degrees, many scientists say, if highly polluting countries such as the US don’t control their output now. The Guardian’s US environment reporter, Emily Holden, tells Anushka Asthana about Donald Trump’s environmental policies over the past four years, which have included reversing many of the pledges made by Barack Obama – most notably dropping out of the Paris climate agreement. She also looks at the proposals from the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, which include putting Americans back to work installing millions of solar panels and tens of thousands of wind turbines, making the steel for those projects, manufacturing electric vehicles for the world and shipping them from US ports. What the American people decide in November, Emily believes, is critical for the future of the planet. More
138 Shares119 Views
in US PoliticsThis land is your land
Trump administration
List comes after Trump order in June directed agencies to use emergency authority to speed projects amid economic downturn More
200 Shares139 Views
in US PoliticsI watched the Republican National Convention last week. It’s becoming harder to put into words the dread that many of us feel.What’s really happening? Toxic levels of corruption and collusion are devouring the US. Christian extremists want to turn the country into a religious state straight out of The Handmaid’s Tale.After bombarding us with media campaigns pressuring us not to wear masks in March and April, the US now accounts for 22% of all Covid-19 deaths worldwide. I personally know three New Yorkers who died in April, I believe as a result of this official guidance.Trump has stoked racist police violence in the US to even more atrocious heights. Scaring voters with fake tales of impending anarchy and “dark shadows”, he then promises that if re-elected he will crush BLM protesters and “restore law and order”. Is he getting this stuff from Steve Bannon or Mein Kampf? Probably both.Trump is hosting federal executions in the countdown to the election as another prong of his racist, fake “law and order” platform. Last Thursday, the US government defied Navajo tribal sovereignty and executed Lezmond Mitchell, injecting him with a massive quantity of pentobarbital in a death chamber in Indiana.Behind this curtain of carefully orchestrated chaos, the network of corporate lobbyists that form the core of the GOP pillage the US Treasury and dismantle scores of environmental regulations, driving the country and the world even more hopelessly into global boiling and mass extinction.Australian-born Rupert Murdoch blares his obscene propaganda into American homes, hypnotising viewers with lies, rage and fear-mongering. Meanwhile, 40,000 square miles of Australian wilderness burned last summer, killing over a billion animals. More than half of the Great Barrier Reef has collapsed in the last five years due to rapidly increasing ocean temperatures. The same kinds of awful, permanent losses are engulfing nature on every continent.For many people, economic suffering looms while Amazon, Facebook, Google, Tesla, Apple and others expand their global footprints, sucking dry local economies. Some of the CEOs pour the wealth of the world into colonial space programs. They fantasise that they might finally shed their dependence upon Mother Earth and become the heroic creators and patent-holders of life on Mars.Unlike the Koch brothers, who paid for the malevolent spread of climate change denial, today’s tech billionaires scent themselves with a pheromone of liberal philanthropy while monetising the dismantling of checks and balances that once helped to protect us. They take meetings with Trump, provide him with the viral platforms he needs to retain the presidency, advertise themselves as having done the opposite, and then hedge their bets in private. Huge swaths of California’s ancient redwood forests continue to burn around the perimeter of Silicon Valley.Incessant, nihilistic assaults on truth, empathy and the biosphere ensure that life on earth will become much, much worse.On the campaign trail in 2016, Trump’s team described him as the first presidential candidate since Harry Truman with “the guts” to “drop the bomb”. Trump stood there, grinning with pride, and a wave of nausea spread through me. I had the same feeling a few months ago, when I heard Trump utter the words “the Chinese virus”.What waits for us on the other side of this is a world undone by endless cataclysm and aching with senseless loss.The sound of this track, RNC 2020, is pretty rough. The loop is from a concert I did at a club in New York City in my early 20s. So that’s me screaming in the past … for the present.Can you visualize a different path forward? We all have to focus on this now, with everything we’ve got. More
150 Shares159 Views
in ElectionsUS politics
Green activists say 74-year-old’s primary victory over Joe Kennedy in Massachusetts shows putting the crisis first can succeed More
This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.