More stories

  • in

    DeSantis to face trial for suspension of prosecutor who defied abortion ban law

    DeSantis to face trial for suspension of prosecutor who defied abortion ban lawAndrew Warren, a Democrat, sued Florida governor for suspension after saying he would not enforce new 15-week abortion law A Florida prosecutor suspended by Ron DeSantis for defying a new 15-week abortion law says a federal judge’s decision to send his reinstatement appeal to trial means a reckoning is coming for the state’s Republican governor.Andrew Warren, a Democrat, was removed as Hillsborough county state attorney on 4 August after saying he would not enforce the abortion ban or prosecute providers of gender transition treatment for young people.DeSantis cited Warren’s alleged “woke agenda” in reasons for his decision.At a hearing in Tallahassee on Monday, Judge Robert Hinkle denied motions from DeSantis to dismiss Warren’s lawsuit, and another by Warren seeking an immediate return to office, instead requesting their differences be settled at a trial in the coming weeks.“The governor now has to answer it to a court of law where facts matter and where you have to tell the truth,” Warren said in an interview with the Guardian.“It’s a victory for the truth. A federal judge has ruled that the governor has to come into court to explain the reasons behind my suspension, to show that it wasn’t political, to show that it wasn’t in violation of my free speech rights, to show that it wasn’t in violation of the voters’ rights to have the state attorney of their choice.”The closely watched case is expected to give clarity to DeSantis’s power to purge elected officials who disagree with him. In recent weeks, the governor has also removed four members of a school board in Broward county that defied him over Covid-19 mask mandates.“The governor is entrusted by the people of Florida to utilize his constitutional powers and may suspend elected officials in Florida who refuse to enforce the law,” DeSantis’s office said in a statement following Monday’s hearing.Critics, however, have accused the governor of selective application of the principle. The Orlando Sentinel noted that DeSantis has taken no action against so-called “constitutional” sheriffs who say they won’t enforce certain gun laws.But he did act in 2019, suspending the Broward county sheriff, Scott Israel, a Democrat, for “neglect of duty”.Warren said he believed a trial, which could begin as early as next month, would cut through any political posturing.“This has always been a fight for democracy, and rule of law, and for elections,” he said.“This is our fight for the truth. And now the people will get the truth because the governor is being forced to explain himself.“Ultimately, he may be called to testify in court. The court was pretty clear that it wants to hear from the governor in terms of the explanations about the suspension to make sure that the reasons why I was suspended are consistent with Florida law, and with federal law.”Warren said his reinstatement was not the sole objective of his lawsuit.“I would have liked to be back in office already but there’s more at stake than just my job,” he said.“Regardless of what party you belong to, or who you vote for, yours always matters. No elected official has the right to throw out anyone’s vote. And the governor here has tried to throw out the votes of hundreds of thousands of Floridians and overturn an election.“If he gets away with it, what’s left of our democracy? What’s the point of having elections?”Warren ran as a progressive when he unseated long-term incumbent Republican Mark Ober as Hillsborough county state attorney in 2016, and was re-elected with 53% of the vote four years later.He immediately set about enacting policies that upset conservatives, the Tampa Bay Times reported, including a pledge to introduce programs to rehabilitate convicts and prevent recidivism.According to Tampa’s Fox13, Susan Lopez, whom DeSantis appointed in Warren’s place, has already reversed several of his policies, including the reinstatement of a controversial law enforcement “bike-stop” measure that critics say unfairly targets minorities.TopicsRon DeSantisFloridaUS politicsnewsReuse this content More

  • in

    Criminal investigation launched into DeSantis asylum seeker flights

    Criminal investigation launched into DeSantis asylum seeker flightsTexas county sheriff says it seems evident that asylum seekers had been ‘lured’ to travel to Martha’s Vineyard ‘under false pretenses’ A criminal investigation has been launched in Texas into whether dozens of asylum seekers were illegally flown from the state to Martha’s Vineyard, as new evidence continues to emerge suggesting they were misled.Attorneys for ‘duped’ migrants flown to Martha’s Vineyard call for criminal investigationRead moreThe Bexar county sheriff, Javier Salazar, said on Monday that his office was investigating the flights, chartered on behalf of the Florida governor, Ron DeSantis, which brought dozens of migrants to the island in Massachusetts.While Salazar did not name possible subjects in the inquiry, he said: “Everybody on this call knows who those names are already,” according to NBC News.Salazar did not discuss what specific laws might have been broken, but said it seemed evident that asylum seekers had been “lured under false pretenses”, with a recruiter given a “bird dog fee” to gather dozens of people who were outside a San Antonio migrant resource center.“They were promised work,” said Salazar. “They were promised the solution to several of their problems.”Many of the asylum seekers were given pamphlets advertising cash assistance, help with housing, job training and other resources if they came to Massachusetts.But the promised benefits are only available for refugees, a specific categorization under US immigration law that the asylum seekers do not currently fall under.Lawyers for Civil Rights, a Boston-based group representing 30 of the recent arrivals, shared links and images of the brochures on Twitter.“This is additional evidence that shows in writing that those false representations were made in order to induce our clients to travel,” said Oren Sellstrom, the group’s litigation director, to NBC News.The group has also called for a federal and state criminal investigation into the chartered flights.A spokesperson from DeSantis’s office defended the flights and the brochures, saying that migrants were sent to “greener pastures” and to places that had more resources than Bexar county.The flights are just one instance of a broader pattern of Republican officials sending thousands of asylum seekers to predominantly Democratic-voting areas, a stunt that Democrats have slammed as illegal and wrong.“There is a process that is in place. And what they are doing is an illegal stunt, is a political stunt,” said the White House press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre.TopicsUS immigrationRon DeSantisFloridaMassachusettsUS politicsnewsReuse this content More

  • in

    Judge proposed by Trump named special master in Mar-a-Lago records case

    Judge proposed by Trump named special master in Mar-a-Lago records caseJudge Cannon appointed Judge Raymond Dearie to vet documents and denied the DoJ’s plea to continue reviewing the seized records A federal judge has named Raymond Dearie, a senior US district judge with experience handling US national security matters, as an independent arbiter to vet records seized by the FBI from Donald Trump’s Florida estate in an ongoing criminal investigation.Mar-a-Lago documents: Trump delaying tactics causing ‘irreparable harm’ – DoJRead moreFlorida-based US district judge Aileen Cannon on Thursday appointed Dearie to serve as a special master in the legal fight between Trump and the Department of Justice over government documents the former president kept at his Florida resort.Dearie was one of two candidates for the post proposed by the former president, and the US justice department had said it would not oppose his appointment.In her order, Cannon also rejected the justice department’s demand that prosecutors would be allowed to continue their review of the seized records while the dispute is ongoing, and their assertion that the investigation is urgent due to the highly classified and sensitive material in the records.“The court does not find it appropriate to accept the government’s conclusions on these important and disputed issues without further review by a neutral third party in an expedited and orderly fashion,” Cannon said in the ruling.Dearie, who is 78 and based in Brooklyn, is tasked with deciding whether any of the documents seized by the FBI during the August search are privileged – either due to attorney-client confidentiality or through a legal principle called executive privilege – and should be off limits to federal investigators.Dearie has until 30 November – after the midterms – to finish the review. Trump will be required to pay costs associated with the special master.Earlier this month, Cannon had granted a request by Trump’s lawyers to name a special master to vet the seized records. Mar-a-Lago a magnet for spies, officials warn after nuclear file reportedly foundRead moreTrump is under investigation by the justice department for retaining government records – some of which were marked as highly classified, including “Top Secret” – at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach after leaving office in January 2021. During a search of the property, FBI agents seized more than 11,000 records and 48 empty folders marked classified.The justice department also is looking into possible obstruction of the investigation after it found evidence that records may have been removed or concealed from the FBI when it sent agents to the property in June to try to recover all classified documents.Dearie served as US attorney in Brooklyn before being appointed to the federal bench there by Republican president Ronald Reagan in 1986, and was chief judge of that court from 2007 to 2011. He assumed what is called senior status – a sort of semi-retirement with a reduced case load – in 2011, a role in which he continues to serve.The justice department had said in a court filing on Monday that Dearie’s experience as a judge qualified him for the special master role, but opposed the other candidate proposed by Trump’s team, private attorney Paul Huck. Trump’s lawyers opposed the two retired federal judges proposed by the department.On the bench, Dearie was one of multiple judges presiding over cases against several men accused in 2009 of plotting to bomb New York City’s subway system at the direction of al-Qaida leaders.Dearie was appointed in 2011 to the foreign intelligence surveillance court, which reviews warrant applications from the US government on matters of national security, where he served until 2019.In 2017, he was one of four federal judges who approved warrants used to surveil former Trump campaign aide Carter Page amid concern about Trump campaign contacts with Russians, according to papers released to media outlets that sued for the records. The justice department had opposed Trump’s request for a special master to review the seized documents to see if any should be withheld from investigators as privileged. In ruling in favor of Trump’s request for a special master, Cannon rejected the department’s arguments that the records belong to the government and that because Trump is no longer president he cannot claim executive privilege. Cannon was appointed to the bench by Trump in 2020.The documents probe is one of several federal and state investigations Trump is facing from his time in office and in private business as he considers another run for the presidency in 2024.TopicsDonald TrumpMar-a-LagoFloridaFBIUS politicsnewsReuse this content More

  • in

    Two 25-Year-Olds Could Be Elected to Congress, a Historical Rarity

    Generation Z has been pushing for more political power since its first members came of age in 2015. This year, it has its first opportunity to enter the halls of Congress — and, as the dust clears from a long primary season, two candidates are poised to take advantage.Karoline Leavitt won the Republican primary in New Hampshire’s First Congressional District on Tuesday, less than a month after turning 25, the constitutional minimum age to serve in the House. She is an underdog in the general election, facing a Democratic incumbent, Representative Chris Pappas. But the district is roughly evenly divided between the parties and the race is competitive.Even if Ms. Leavitt loses in November, the next Congress is virtually guaranteed to include a member of Generation Z: Maxwell Alejandro Frost, also 25, who won the Democratic primary last month for an open House seat in Florida’s solidly blue 10th Congressional District.Either of them, if elected, would be the youngest sitting member of Congress. If both are elected, the distinction will go to Ms. Leavitt, who is about seven months younger.But neither would be the youngest person ever elected to Congress.That record, unlikely ever to be broken, belongs to William C.C. Claiborne, who was 22 when he was elected to the House from Tennessee in 1797, according to congressional records. (There is some dispute in other sources about his exact age, but no dispute that he was younger than 25.) The age requirement was no different then: The Constitution said House members had to be at least 25, and Mr. Claiborne wasn’t. But the House chose to seat Mr. Claiborne anyway.A handful of 24-year-olds were seated in the 1800s, too, according to congressional records, as were some people who turned 25 less than a month before being sworn in.In modern times, however, it is rare for a 25-year-old to be elected to the House.Representative Madison Cawthorn, Republican of North Carolina, managed it in 2020; if elected this year, Ms. Leavitt would be less than a month younger than Mr. Cawthorn was when he was elected. Before Mr. Cawthorn, the last 25-year-old to serve in the House was Thomas Downey, a New York Democrat elected in 1974.Generation Z leans strongly toward Democrats, but its members are not an ideological monolith, as evidenced by the political leanings of Ms. Leavitt and Mr. Frost.Mr. Frost is a progressive Democrat who supports Medicare for all, abortion rights and stricter gun laws. “I come from a generation that has gone through more mass-shooting drills than fire drills,” he told The New York Times in an interview after his primary victory, adding that he believed his generation had “a natural sense of seeing the world through the eyes of the most vulnerable.”Ms. Leavitt, whose campaign did not respond to an interview request, is a right-wing Republican who worked as a press aide for former President Donald J. Trump. She supports a “zero tolerance” policy against illegal immigration and opposes abortion and gun control. More

  • in

    Is Ron DeSantis the Future of the Republican Party?

    Listen to This ArticleAudio Recording by AudmTo hear more audio stories from publications like The New York Times, download Audm for iPhone or Android.For most of the last year, Ron DeSantis would not indulge the speculation. Yes, he made clear to donors, he might seek the presidency. But pressed with the obvious follow-up — would he still run in 2024 if Donald Trump does? — DeSantis, the governor of Florida, begged off. “He’ll be completely, completely open about whatever, but then the Trump stuff — he suddenly starts to act like he’s being recorded,” Dan Eberhart, a prominent Republican donor and a DeSantis ally, told me in March.By the summer, though, the governor seemed to be testing the beginnings of a pivot in private settings. He would praise Trump’s record — “You think Ukraine would have been invaded if Donald Trump were president?” — suggesting the former president would win a rematch with President Biden decisively on the policy merits. “But it’s not going to be just the record,” DeSantis has added, according to a person present, performatively ruing this fate. “And that’s a shame.”Left unspoken is the figure DeSantis believes is best suited to carry the party’s banner without the former president’s baggage. Across the Republican factions unsure if they are approaching an eventual Trump-free future or still living in an interminable Trump present, DeSantis has been permitted to subsist as a kind of Schrödinger’s candidate, both Trump and Not Trump. He can present as an iron-fisted imitation, touring the country in August with a slate of Trump endorsees who lie about the 2020 election. He can cosplay as the post-Trump choice for those desperate for a post-Trump party — a Yale- and Harvard-educated man of letters just winking at the party’s extremes. He can pitch himself, especially, as the “Trump, but …” candidate — an Evolutionary Trump, the 2.0 — defined most vividly by what DeSantis has learned by watching: Here is Trump, but more strategic about his targets; Trump, but restrained enough to keep his Twitter accounts from suspension; Trump, but not under federal investigation.“It’s like going to the races and watching a race, but you don’t have to make your bet until your horses are coming around the turn,” John Morgan, a Florida Democratic megadonor who has praised DeSantis’s savvy and appeared at an event with him early in his tenure, told me. “That’s how he does it. He watches Trump like a hawk.”In an extensive examination of his life and record — across more than 100 interviews with aides, allies, antagonists and peers who detailed several previously unreported episodes spanning his decade in elected office — the most consistent appraisal was that DeSantis, who turns 44 this month, believes his raw instincts are unrivaled and that he may well be correct. He has for years merrily shunned the perspectives of moderating influences and gentle dissenters and found himself validated at every turn, his recent history a whir of nominally risky choices — expert-snubbing Covid policies, an uppercut at one of his state’s largest private employers, a long-shot bid for the office he holds — transmogrified to pure political upside as he seeks to position himself as his party’s rightful heir.“You have a moment,” Casey DeSantis, his wife and closest adviser, has said privately in recent months, nodding at past would-be candidates who failed to seize their chance. The person speaking to her interpreted the remark unambiguously: The DeSantis family thinks this moment is theirs.Before the F.B.I.’s search and document seizure at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago residence, DeSantis allies expected the governor to run for president no matter what Trump decided. While the episode at least initially rallied the party to Trump’s defense, with DeSantis joining the chorus of Republicans scorning “the raid” as the stuff of banana republics, there is little to suggest that the governor’s plans have changed. He still appears poised to capitalize on perceptible shifts inside Republican power centers that Trump often frustrated but generally tamed while in office. From the cable airwaves to the New York Post editorial page, Murdoch media properties have betrayed an interest in moving beyond the former president, at one point in July posting an indiscreet Fox News Digital montage of erstwhile Trump voters defecting to DeSantis. “I had a guy here in Utah who just came up to me and said, ‘DeSantis 2024,’” Jason Chaffetz, a Republican former congressman and a Fox News contributor, told me. “That doesn’t happen in Utah.”Republican donors, a reliable party weather vane, have likewise turned his way. Some, leery of missing their chance to ingratiate themselves early, have offered the ultimate good-will gesture: submitting to a midsummer day in North Florida. “National donors are wanting 15 minutes in front of DeSantis more and more, and people are willing to fly to Tallahassee to do that,” Eberhart told me. “It almost feels a bit like the period right before Trump won the nomination in 2016. There was a moment when the donor class was like, ‘Oh, wow, the train is leaving the station.’”DeSantis, who was never considered a leading culture warrior as a young congressman — once privately dismissing the party’s old-guard preoccupation with sexuality — has steered his state to the vanguard of right-wing social causes, responding nimbly to political market forces and enlisting a small conservative college in Michigan to help guide Florida classroom standards. He has proved willing to stir the far-right fringe, raising conspiracy theories about the F.B.I.’s “orchestrating” the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol and saying of the federal medical official Anthony Fauci, whom he has suggested belongs in jail, “Someone needs to grab that little elf and chuck him across the Potomac.” Matt Gaetz, the trollish Florida congressman, was a friend and a close adviser, but DeSantis has kept a public distance amid a sex-trafficking probe into the legislator. (Gaetz has denied wrongdoing.)On and off camera, DeSantis has forged relationships not only with Fox, where a producer once gushed to a member of the governor’s staff that he could host a show, but with edgelord media types who have flocked to his state and boosted him online. (A former aide told me DeSantis regularly read his Twitter mentions.) In January, invitees to a dinner at the governor’s mansion included Dave Rubin, a popular right-wing web talk-show host, and Benny Johnson, a Newsmax host. Fellow DeSantis-heads from the Extremely Online right include Alex Jones — who in August declared him “way better than Trump” before begging the former president for forgiveness — and Elon Musk, with whom the governor has dined.DeSantis’s canniest feat as a shadow candidate has been dazzling this sphere of Republican influence while heartening party elites who see him as one of their own, celebrated by throwback organs like The National Review and the Club for Growth, where one of his former top congressional aides now works. “There’s a lot riding on trying to make Ron DeSantis happen,” Sarah Longwell, a Republican operative and publisher of the anti-Trump conservative site The Bulwark, told me. “They see him as somebody who gets them out of having to defend Trump.”DeSantis is already beloved in right-wing legal circles. He recently told the radio host Hugh Hewitt that he had moved Florida’s courts to the right in part with out-of-state help from “pretty big legal conservative heavyweights.” DeSantis’s general counsel is a former clerk for Justice Samuel Alito. His chief of staff is a former Trump Commerce Department counsel and an alumnus of Jones Day, a firm with deep ties to Republican power. Justice Clarence Thomas has communicated a number of times with DeSantis, according to an email to the governor’s staff from Thomas’s wife, Ginni Thomas, obtained by the watchdog group American Oversight. Her message, sent in June 2021, invited DeSantis to address a “cone of silence coalition” of “conservative patriots.” She noted that her husband had contacted DeSantis “on various things of late.” Introducing Thomas at a Federalist Society event in Florida in 2020, DeSantis called him “our greatest living justice.”Yet what distinguishes DeSantis, elevating him for now above the Cruzes and Cottons and Mikes Pompeo and Pence, is a central insight into where the party is and where it is headed. If a DeSantis campaign would be a referendum on which parts of Trumpism voters value most — the burn-it-all fury at elites? The perpetual grievances? The blunt-force magnetism of Trump himself? — DeSantis’s read is that the signal trait worth emulating, and then heightening, is more elemental. It is about projecting the political fearlessness to crush adversaries with administrative precision.Perhaps no current officeholder has been more single-minded about turning the gears of state against specific targets. Trump groused about local Democrats who defied him; DeSantis dug up a 1930s precedent in suspending an elected prosecutor who, amid the overturning of Roe v. Wade and a state crackdown on providing gender-affirming treatment to minors, vowed not to criminalize abortion or transgender care. Other governors denounced Covid-vaccine mandates; DeSantis’s administration threatened the Special Olympics, hosting a competition in Orlando, with tens of millions in fines if the organization refused to lift a requirement for athletes and staff. (The group backed down.) Conservatives have long condemned creeping progressivism in classrooms and boardrooms; DeSantis last spring signed the “Stop W.O.K.E. Act” (short for “Stop the Wrongs to Our Kids and Employees”) aimed at race-conscious teachings. “For years, many conservatives understood culture war as lamentation: They believed that complaining about progressive ideology and hypocrisy was a victory in itself,” Christopher Rufo, a conservative activist who by invitation advised DeSantis’s policy team on “Stop W.O.K.E.” and appeared with the governor to promote it, told me. “Governor DeSantis understands culture war as public policy.”That DeSantis has made enemies in these endeavors is clearly part of the point. He has become Democrats’ favorite governor to despise — nothing less than an aspiring authoritarian, many say, their criticisms only further galvanizing his fans. His persistent conflict with reporters is so ingrained in his public identity that he cast himself in a recent ad as Maverick of “Top Gun,” “dogfighting” the “corporate media” in shades and a bomber jacket. He has made useful foils of academics; a Roman Catholic archbishop; the state of California; purveyors of “woke math”; a trans collegiate swimmer; a professional baseball team, the Tampa Bay Rays, after its official account tweeted about gun violence. “People say it’s that Ron DeSantis hates the right people,” says Longwell, who has conducted focus groups gauging his 2024 appeal and sees a path for him. “It’s the opposite: The right people hate Ron DeSantis.”Wherever he appears lately, DeSantis generally takes the stage to customized walk-up music produced by two grateful constituents: Johnny Van Zant of Lynyrd Skynyrd and his brother Donnie. “Down in swee-eeet Florida,” the chorus goes, greeting DeSantis as he stepped into a cavernous hotel ballroom in Pittsburgh on Aug. 19. “Our governor is red, white and blue. Down in swee-eeet Florida. He’s shootin’ us straight, tellin’ us the truth.”He had imported this re-election anthem to a campaign appearance with Doug Mastriano, the far-right Trump endorsee for Pennsylvania governor. Approaching the microphone, DeSantis held a small collection of autographed hats printed with his name and flung them into a crowd dotted with red Trump gear. “Hello, Western Pennsylvania!” DeSantis said, sounding every bit the national candidate. He ticked through a slide show as he narrated life highlights: taking his youth baseball team from Dunedin, Fla., to the Little League World Series; joining the military; scolding a television reporter during the pandemic. The final image showed DeSantis, whose father is from the area, decked in Pittsburgh Steelers garb as a child.DeSantis has few analogues as a public performer. He is by turns blustering and kvetchy, better at reading rooms than electrifying them. Some of his observations seem to be culled from hate-scrolling. “People would put in their Twitter profile a mask and a syringe, and that was, like, their identity,” he fumed at a recent news conference. In Pittsburgh, DeSantis’s denouncement of “gender-affirming care for minors,” which he introduced with scare quotes, was accompanied by air-slicing hand gestures as he accused doctors of “chopping off private parts” with impunity. He unfurled a Biden impression: staring at a phantom teleprompter, mouth open and mind blank. “Honestly, it’s sad,” he said to howls.Though DeSantis has been more reserved on matters of “election integrity” than Mastriano, a leading proponent of Trump’s 2020 election lies, the Pennsylvania event seemed designed in part to have it all ways: By standing with the candidate at all, DeSantis could prove himself one of the guys, darkly recounting Pennsylvania’s pace of ballot-counting in 2020 and talking up Florida’s first-of-its-kind election-crime police without saying outright that Trump was robbed. But mostly, the event gave DeSantis a swing-state venue for playing the hits, with a special emphasis on one. “There was a company that people may have heard of in Orlando,” he said, inviting a rush of knowing cheers.Of all DeSantis’s chosen skirmishes, his collision with Disney stands apart. For those seeking to understand the de facto governor of Red America in his latest form, this is the skeleton key — the full realization of his bid to fuse cultural clashes and executive vengeance-seeking as his national signature. Not long ago, DeSantis did not seem deeply invested in the feud’s origin text, Florida House Bill 1557, named the Parental Rights in Education Act. As the bill wended through the Legislature early this year — proposing to ban instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity in early grades — he has said he did not follow its particulars closely.Little in his record suggested strong personal feelings about L.G.B.T.Q. issues. “I don’t care if somebody’s gay,” he told a counterpart several years ago as a 30-something congressman, according to a person present, who — like some others interviewed — requested anonymity to avoid provoking a famously retaliatory governor. “I don’t know why people get caught up in that.” But soon the Florida legislation acquired the right enemies, and DeSantis’s attention. Critics labeled it the “Don’t Say Gay” bill, a phrase echoed often in media accounts. Activists pressed businesses to object, reprising a template from Georgia a year earlier, when outrage over a restrictive voting law prompted rebukes from several corporations.But in Florida, Disney was so cozy with the Tallahassee power structure that it employed more than three dozen local lobbyists. Its chief executive, Bob Chapek, had shown little appetite for partisan politics before he and DeSantis discussed the bill in March, a reluctance the governor seemed to encourage. “I told them, ‘You shouldn’t get involved,’” DeSantis recalled in an interview with Rubin, the right-wing talk-show host, months later. “ ‘It’s not going to work out well for you.’”Though Disney appeared most concerned with appeasing disenchanted workers and partners — eventually issuing a forcefully toothless statement calling for the law’s repeal after its final passage — DeSantis was not content to declare victory and move on. Publicly, he has positioned himself as a latter-day Winston Churchill, fighting on the beaches that never should have been closed, standing firm against a “Burbank, California-based company” that does business with the Chinese Communist Party. “We must fight the woke in our schools, we must fight the woke in our businesses,” DeSantis thundered in Pittsburgh, echoing Churchill’s stirring 1940 speech to the war-weary Brits. “We can never, ever surrender to woke ideology.”Privately, he can sound less furious than bemused at having gained such a bumbling foe, repurposing an oft-repeated Michael Jordan quotation about Republicans and sneaker sales in an aside to one associate: Conservatives go to Disney, too. When Rufo, the conservative activist, published video last spring of an internal Disney meeting — during which a producer spoke of injecting “queerness” into programming and proclaimed her “not-at-all-secret gay agenda” — DeSantis cited the footage as grounds to revoke Disney World’s 55-year-old designation as a special tax district. The company’s tumbling market capitalization became an applause line in his speeches. “You don’t have a right to force me or my citizens to subsidize your woke activism,” DeSantis said in Pittsburgh, looking down at his lectern with practiced stoicism through extended applause.Back home, DeSantis-friendly lobbyists have welcomed a growing cottage industry: advising clients who fear becoming the next Disney. “Companies that have otherwise taken big stands on cultural issues are now worried,” Nick Iarossi, a lobbyist and a DeSantis fund-raiser, told me. “You know: ‘Florida’s a big state. This guy could be president one day. How do we stay off the shit list?’” He added, “If you want to make a point, you make a point by punching the biggest guy in the room.”The local ramifications are both unsettled and largely immaterial to DeSantis’s prospects. The finer details around the company’s tax status are expected to be sorted out after his probable re-election in November. To the extent that he has antagonized voters in counties that might be adversely affected, those areas are generally blue anyway. But it can be said that some 400 miles away in West Palm Beach, the episode registered with Florida’s most famous resident.“What happened to Disney?” Trump asked an associate recently, struck by the company’s misfortunes.The thing that happens when Ron DeSantis believes you are in his way.DeSantis is surely not the first elected official who told friends from his youth he would be president one day — the son of a Nielsen-rating box installer and a nurse outside Tampa, imagining a path to high prominence through politics. But he might be the only Gen X-er who paired such ambitions with impressions of a disgraced forebear. “He would always do Richard Nixon,” Brady Williams, a childhood friend and baseball teammate who now manages the AAA Durham Bulls (a Rays affiliate), told me. “He would put up the two fingers on both hands and act like he was the president. If he won a card game or something, he would do it.”When DeSantis first sought office in 2012, eyeing a redrawn congressional district in northeast Florida, supporters called him “the résumé”: Yale baseball captain, Harvard Law, Navy man who deployed to Iraq as an adviser to a SEAL commander. “He was thinking about this for years,” Williams said. “He knew the steps that he had to take to get a résumé that was good enough to be in politics, to become a president.” DeSantis’s initial pitch to voters registers now as a time capsule of pre-Trump Republicanism, with references to the Federalist Papers, Tea Party-pleasing diatribes against the Affordable Care Act and warm allusions to John Bolton.“There’s a lot riding on trying to make Ron DeSantis happen,” Sarah Longwell, a Republican operative and publisher of the anti-Trump conservative site The Bulwark, said. “They see him as somebody who gets them out of having to defend Trump.”Photo illustration by Jamie Chung for The New York Times. Source photographs: Allison Joyce/Getty Images (Trump); Joe Raedle/Getty Images (DeSantis).After he won, DeSantis could appear almost ostentatiously ill at ease in Washington: lawyerly, tetchy, averse to eye contact, it seemed, as if avoiding an eclipse. He spent nights on a couch in his office — “I slept on worse in Iraq,” he told staff members — and made few friends. “I don’t think he intended to stay in the House very long,” Carlos Curbelo, a former Republican congressman from Florida, told me. Though DeSantis was a founding member of the hard-line Freedom Caucus, he was rarely its public face. A veteran of the group told me DeSantis had a way of “dipping out and disappearing” from meetings if a leadership fight or funding battle was not playing well. Neither did DeSantis, who is Catholic, distinguish himself as a social crusader. Asked about bathrooms and “the transgender issue” at a 2018 candidate forum, he said, “getting into the bathroom wars, I don’t think that’s a good use of our time.” “It’s not what I wanted to hear,” John Stemberger, president of the Florida Family Policy Council, told me. When pressed further at the event, DeSantis pledged to veto any bill that would allow a transgender person to use the bathroom of their choice.DeSantis’s low profile inside the Capitol belied grander designs statewide. For a time, friends talked him up as a possible Florida attorney general, plugging his stint with the Judge Advocate General’s Corps at Guantánamo Bay. He entered the 2016 Senate primary to succeed Marco Rubio, who initially vowed to become president or retire trying, before stepping aside when Rubio reconsidered. “He kind of understood,” Rubio told me, describing DeSantis as “very gracious, very low maintenance about it.” But that rare flash of deference — or, at least, recognizing that the math would be prohibitive — briefly obscured an upside: DeSantis would soon have a cleaner shot at a better job, even if many Republicans did not like his chances. His 2018 primary opponent to be the Republican nominee for governor, Adam Putnam, Florida’s agriculture commissioner, carried statewide name recognition and an early fund-raising edge. “We were patting him on the back saying, ‘Good luck,’” Chaffetz, the former congressman, told me of DeSantis. Jeb Bush, a two-term Florida governor, asked him how he planned to win. “He goes, ‘I’m going to nationalize the primary and localize the general,’” Bush recalled at a Wall Street Journal event after the election. “Pretty smart strategy, it turns out.”DeSantis would essentially shrink that nationalized primary to an electorate of one. “Trump’s going to endorse me,” he told skeptical Republicans flatly, according to someone who heard it, “and I’m going to win.” DeSantis established himself as one of the president’s most visible cable-news defenders, a role Trump seemed to value more than most cabinet posts, the congressman’s face unmissable across Fox News segments on the unfairness of the Mueller probe or the wisdom of the commander in chief. Putnam, his opponent, called him “the ‘Seinfeld’ candidate,” ducking Florida voters from a TV studio in a campaign about nothing. But DeSantis recognized that in the Trump era, all politics were national anyway. The voters he needed were likelier to watch “Hannity” than WBBH Fort Myers — and far likelier to warm to DeSantis because Trump told them to than through any town-to-town glad-handing.Among DeSantis’s most trusted advisers was Gaetz, a fellow young Florida congressman and Fox super-regular who had Trump’s ear. They could make an unlikely pair, the temperate candidate of humble origin and the hard-living rogue whose father once ran the Florida Senate. A former DeSantis aide recalled Gaetz’s showing up to a campaign office one morning in shorts and sunglasses with Joel Greenberg — the friend with whom he is now enmeshed in the sex-trafficking investigation — leaving staff to wonder if they had slept the night before. A Gaetz spokesman said that DeSantis and the congressman maintain a “productive working relationship,” adding that Gaetz had conducted a 2018 DeSantis campaign staff audit in “an acceptable Florida Man political uniform” of flip-flops and shorts. “The little brother I never wanted,” Casey DeSantis has said of Gaetz, according to a person present.But Ron DeSantis respected Gaetz’s political antenna, particularly when it came to negotiating Trump. In December 2017, the two congressmen flew on Air Force One with Trump to a rally in Pensacola, where the president endorsed Roy Moore, the Alabama Republican Senate candidate accused of sexual misconduct with minors. (Moore has denied wrongdoing.) Trump tweeted favorably about DeSantis’s campaign later that month after watching one of his Fox appearances. Vice President Mike Pence was among the Putnam allies who later worked to prevent Trump from formalizing his support. But in DeSantis, Trump had identified the kind of “central casting” candidate he preferred: Ivy League, military, manifest fealty.When Trump visited House Republicans on Capitol Hill months later, he strained to find DeSantis in the room. “Where’s Ron?” he asked. “How’s the campaign going?” A voice called back from the crowd. “It would be a lot better,” DeSantis said, according to a person who was there, “if I could get another tweet.” Trump obliged, posting an unequivocal endorsement two months before the primary about a “top student at Yale and Harvard Law School” now seeking the governorship.Cutting the race’s defining ad, the campaign saw little value in subtlety. DeSantis’s wife, a former local news anchor he met at a driving range, would narrate. Their children — Madison, not yet 2, and Mason, a few months old — would participate. But the real star was off camera. “People say Ron’s all-Trump,” Casey DeSantis said dryly, between scenes of her husband in the delights of fatherhood: “building the wall” out of blocks with Madison, reading from “The Art of the Deal” at story time, putting Mason to bed in a MAGA onesie. “But he is so much more.” One ally recalled DeSantis’s rolling his eyes, dismissing the ad as a necessary gag, when they discussed it a short while later. “I don’t think you’ll ever see that again,” the person told me.DeSantis’s party on primary night, when he enjoyed a 20-point victory, was a celebration of a strategy vindicated. “A lot of Matt Gaetz and DeSantis hugging it out,” Eberhart, the donor, told me. The next day, DeSantis opened the general election — the first (and still only) test of his political mettle in a nationally watched fall campaign — by warning voters not to “monkey this up” by supporting his opponent, Andrew Gillum, a Black Democrat who was then mayor of Tallahassee. Democrats heard a racist dog whistle. Some advisers urged DeSantis to make a qualified apology, a terse acknowledgment that his word choice had given the left ammunition to distract from his planned general-election pivot to local priorities like ocean red tide mitigation. DeSantis viewed any admission of fault as unacceptable. “This is exactly what they want,” he told his team, according to someone with knowledge of the conversation. “This is what they do to conservatives.”Ron and Casey DeSantis with Donald Trump in Estero, Fla., in October 2018, while DeSantis was campaigning for governor.Photo illustration by Jamie Chung for The New York Times. Source photograph: Joe Raedle/Getty Images.Casey DeSantis volunteered a way out of the controversy during a debate prep session weeks later, according to a person present: “She said something like, ‘Would it be helpful for people to know that that was on the top of his mind because he was reading a children’s book to one of the kids the night before and it said, ‘Don’t monkey it up?’” The group was uniformly unpersuaded, the person told me. “Everyone said no.”DeSantis’s ultimate triumph in November — by some 30,000 votes, less than half of a percentage point — was not especially impressive in what was becoming a right-leaning state, against a rival who, as DeSantis pointed out regularly, was already connected to an F.B.I. investigation into Tallahassee corruption. (This June, Gillum surrendered to federal authorities on fraud and conspiracy charges; he has pleaded not guilty.) But a win was a win and, to DeSantis, an answer to every argument. “Even today, the political and media class seem eager to write our obituary,” he said in a score-settling victory speech. Now he had the power to set about writing theirs.Early in the Tallahassee transition, DeSantis burrowed into some essential reading material: a binder enumerating the powers of the office. “He was soaking that up,” Scott Parkinson, the transition’s deputy executive director, told me. DeSantis’s aim, he has said, was to understand all the “pressure points” within the system: what required legislative cooperation, what he could do unilaterally, which appointments needed which approvals. Precisely what kind of governor he might like to be was less certain.Some initial pursuits seemed to feint at center-rightism — Everglades restoration, a bump in new teachers’ pay, the appointment of a Democrat to lead the Division of Emergency Management — helping to lift early approval ratings into the 60s. One of DeSantis’s first events as governor featured John Morgan, the Democratic donor who bankrolled a successful ballot measure on medical marijuana in 2016 and was tangled in litigation with state Republicans who sought to restrict access to the drug in smokable forms. “I get a call from Matt Gaetz, and he goes, ‘The governor is interested in getting rid of this lawsuit,’” Morgan told me. “ ‘Would you be willing to do a press conference with him?’ I said, ‘Hell, yeah.’”DeSantis kept his circle small in the executive suite; his wife maintained an office not far from his. Some senior officials had barely interacted with him months into his tenure. A running joke took hold among lawmakers, sizing up the two names on his list of trusted advisers: Casey DeSantis and Jesus Christ. Some visitors to his office told me he did not bother adjusting the volume on Fox News programming to accommodate live conversation. One Tallahassee veteran summarized a typical hourlong session with the governor as a 50-minute DeSantis monologue. “All good?” he would ask in closing. Hearing no objection quickly enough, he would leave.Covid represented the purest possible stress test for DeSantis and his political instincts: a go-it-alone thinker suspicious of expert consensus; a leader uncomfortable with empathy, dealing with a pitiless killer; a Republican disinclined, at least initially, to buck the president who made him. DeSantis, who has since suggested he regrets not pushing back forcefully on federal lockdown guidance, issued a stay-at-home order in April 2020 like so many peers, a bit of history now elided in the governor’s retelling. His preferred account, true in several respects, is that his state was caricatured as a heedless death cult, its beaches and bars brimming with good cheer and infection, as liberal critics waited for him to fail. “You got a lot of people in your profession who waxed poetically for weeks and weeks about how Florida was going to be just like New York,” DeSantis told reporters in May 2020. “Well, hell, we’re eight weeks away from that, and it hasn’t happened.”That a vicious outbreak soon followed — and eventually several more, with Florida for some time leading the country in per-capita hospitalizations — proved politically irrelevant for DeSantis. The people he needed were with him, reveling in what he now grandly calls the “free state of Florida”: the Republican base that elected him and the blue-state expats bristling at Covid restrictions elsewhere; the parents of children demoralized by remote learning and the right-wing personalities thrilling to DeSantis’s instinct for confrontation. Florida Republicans would overtake Democrats in active voter registrations in 2021 for the first time on record. After being largely absent on Fox News in 2019, the governor returned to the network’s airwaves in force, encouraged by Casey DeSantis, a careful student of the conservative media. “Casey would say, ‘We have to get him on Mark Levin and “Hannity” once a week,’” an aide told me. “ ‘Frequency is very important.’”This imperative was, of course, platform-dependent. DeSantis seemed to emerge from the early months of Covid wholly persuaded that even gesturing at bygone norms of politician-reporter relations was a misread of the Republican moment. DeSantis’s team did not make him available for an interview for this article and declined to answer written questions. He has not spoken extensively to a major nonconservative publication since summer 2020, remarking this February that the best federal officials “can put hit pieces from The New York Times on their wall like wallpaper.” “Republicans have to understand,” DeSantis said in an interview last November with Ben Shapiro, the popular conservative commentator, in the governor’s office. “Don’t try to get these people to like you.”When the governor interacts with the Tallahassee press corps, it is almost exclusively at news conferences for which he sometimes gives little notice, often flanked by state officials or supportive locals who applaud his answers. His most ferocious and ubiquitous public defender, Christina Pushaw, a re-election campaign aide who was the governor’s public-salaried press secretary until August, was hired last year after writing a lacerating article for a conservative publication about the credibility of Rebekah Jones, a former Florida health official who accused the DeSantis administration of hiding Covid data (and is now the Democratic nominee opposing Gaetz).Pushaw has sometimes distressed people in DeSantis’s orbit, once suggesting that a Covid policy in Georgia (the country; she previously worked for the former president Mikheil Saakashvili) was influenced by the Rothschild family, a target of longtime anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. She later apologized. When an Associated Press article placed the governor’s support for a monoclonal antibody treatment in the context of a donor’s ties to the drugmaker, Pushaw urged followers to “drag them,” sending a flood of threats the reporter’s way. Some allies backchanneled with DeSantis, hoping he might be willing to intervene on the reporter’s behalf. “She’s doing her job,” he said of Pushaw, according to a person with direct knowledge of the discussions.DeSantis’s disdain for journalists feels authentic and visceral, distinguishing him from Trump, who has spent a lifetime courting reporters, and even Republican contemporaries like Rubio and Ted Cruz, whose 2016 campaigns were generally happy to play ball. It also has clear advantages. While flattering articles can be useful enough, the governor benefits far more, in reputation and fund-raising possibilities, from a perceived hit, a sort of heads-I-win-tails-fake-news construction for which his supporters have been conditioned. In April, he celebrated the anniversary of a widely criticized “60 Minutes” segment, which suggested corruption in the state’s vaccine rollout, with a tweet promising to “always punch back” against the media.With his early bet on reopening and his concede-nothing posture, DeSantis has plainly won the political argument on Covid. The economic advantages and day-to-day freedoms of his hands-off approach were undeniable, and state-to-state virus statistics are rarely as clean as his opponents would like. While DeSantis has said he is more cleareyed about the Covid science than his detractors, his inputs have been heavily curated — and often opposed or debunked by the “medical establishment” he has derided with air quotes. He has conferred with Scott W. Atlas, a radiologist and Trump White House health adviser who embraced a “herd immunity” theory of Covid, and Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford health-policy professor critical of lockdowns and mask mandates.Some health authorities do offer qualified praise for key DeSantis decisions. Unlike New York, Florida refused to send discharged Covid patients to long-term care facilities. Federal officials pointed approvingly to the state’s walk-up testing sites. Schools reopened with single-minded drive. But many scientists still hold the governor responsible for a large fraction of Florida’s more than 80,000 Covid deaths, especially as he progressed from lockdown-lifter to apparent vaccine skeptic, aligning himself with a segment of the Republican base that jeered even Trump late last year when he told a crowd in Dallas about getting a booster.DeSantis initially promoted vaccine availability, joking that he might give reporters a biceps “gun show” by getting the shot publicly. Then he did so privately. In September 2021, he stood by without objection at a news conference where a featured speaker said the vaccine “changes your RNA.” Days later, he installed a new surgeon general, Joseph A. Ladapo, who declined to say whether he was vaccinated. In January, an Orange County health official was placed on leave after emailing employees to criticize internal vaccination rates, prompting a state investigation into whether he violated Florida’s anti-mandate law. In March, Florida became the first state to recommend against the vaccine for healthy children.The governor, who has still not said whether he received a booster, is not unaware of his high esteem in the vocal and politically potent anti-vaccine community. “Does he know that? Of course,” Iarossi, the lobbyist and DeSantis ally, told me, before insisting, “He’s not courting the anti-vax crowd.” And if DeSantis has lost support recently among some early-term fans outside the traditional Republican coalition, some of these Floridians had grown alarmed by the political company they were keeping anyway. “I’ve decided that America is full of people with oppositional defiance disorder that you find in some unruly children,” Morgan told me. “DeSantis’s base has a lot of it: Don’t. Tell. Me. What. To. Do.”DeSantis’s relationship with Larry Arnn began around 2014 with an unsolicited gift: “Dreams From Our Founding Fathers,” the congressman’s censorious book about Barack Obama. As the president of Hillsdale College in Michigan, a small school influential in modern conservative thought, Arnn had grown accustomed to books and letters from Republican strivers. This one — “James Madison was a freedom man,” read one characteristic line in the book. “Barack Obama is a government man” — impressed him more than most. “I went, ‘Wow, this is pretty good,’” Arnn said in February, introducing DeSantis as “one of the most important people living” at a Hillsdale event in Naples, Fla. Arnn said he took further notice of DeSantis’s focus on “school reform” in the 2018 campaign, which included an emphasis on constitutional teachings.Since then, Florida has consulted with Hillsdale as part of an overhaul of the state’s civics education standards. Some educators have attacked the new rubric as a slavery-sanitizing jumble of Christian-infused teachings; according to reporting by The Miami Herald and The Tampa Bay Times, several training slides emphasized the “misconception” that the founders “desired strict separation of church and state.” (“They need to understand,” DeSantis has said of students, “that our rights come from God, not from the government.”) While Hillsdale has been a “prime influence” on education in several states, Arnn noted, Florida was an especially “competent” partner. “They said, ‘We want to use your deal,’” he recalled. “And I replied, ‘Good.’”The governor’s affiliation with Hillsdale reflects a tenet of his rise: diligently cultivating the right allies in conservative politics and figuring out which policies they might collaborate on as they came. If he has proved himself a true believer, it is in himself more than any cause. “I think he stumbled into this,” Curbelo, the former Florida congressman, told me of DeSantis’s forays into culture warfare, crediting the governor for his political dexterity in making conservative red meat sound like common sense. “He’s picked issues that are safe in the sense that the majority of people are on his side. Most parents would agree that children in grades K through three should not be exposed to conversations about sex or sexuality in the classroom. And then he uses aggressive rhetoric to keep that Trump base, those Republican primary voters, excited and motivated.”For all his eager enemy-making, DeSantis’s state approval rating is around 50 percent — no small thing in a hyperpolarized climate where many national figures, including Biden and Trump, are underwater with American voters. And over the past year especially, two data points seemed to reinforce for DeSantis the power of clashes over the classroom: school-board-level passions around his Covid policies and the 2021 governor’s race in Virginia, where Glenn Youngkin won an upset victory for Republicans after consistently invoking “parents’ rights.”In Florida, DeSantis has aligned closely with Moms for Liberty, a nonprofit formed last year “to stand up for parental rights,” joining DeSantis to oppose school mask and vaccine mandates and “woke” incursions into the classroom. Appearing in July at the group’s national summit in Tampa, where signs read, “STOP WOKE” and “We do NOT CO-PARENT with the GOVERNMENT,” DeSantis was presented with a Roman-inspired sword. “It is what the gladiators were awarded with after they had fought a long hard battle for freedom,” Tina Descovich, a Moms for Liberty founder, told DeSantis, who swung his gift with a half-chop that resembled a baseball check-swing.Speaking over the gentle clang of breakfast consumption in a second-floor Marriott ballroom, with dozens of cellphones raised to record him, DeSantis saluted his own foresight in resisting school closures. (“ ‘Oh, my God, the devastating effect of school closures, who could have predicted it would be this bad?’” he said, affecting a pseudo-newscaster’s voice, before dropping the act: “Yeah, we predicted.”) He suggested that Stephen Douglas had been “doing the C.R.T.” in his wrongheaded slavery debates against Abraham Lincoln. He railed against “baby Covid vaxes,” whose mention produced “noooooo”s from the room, and shared that Florida’s many seniors were agog at the left’s “woke gender ideology.” “They don’t know what the heck any of this is,” he said. “They’re like, ‘This is crazy.’”DeSantis with the activist Christopher Rufo, right, in Hialeah Gardens, Fla., on April 22, before publicly signing the Stop W.O.K.E. Act.Photo illustration by Jamie Chung for The New York Times. Source photograph: Daniel A. Varela/Miami Herald, via Associated Press.The governor’s high interest in transgender issues is both relatively recent and entirely consistent with trendlines in the party, drawing in traditional religious conservatives and a newer breed of online brawlers attuned to viral snippets of perceived liberal excess. The subject has become a proxy for what DeSantis has called a “mind virus” sending Democrats of all gender identities well beyond the cultural mainstream. His team has been known to track Libs of TikTok, a popular social-media clearinghouse for clips and commentary depicting liberals (and often L.G.B.T.Q. people and their allies) as dangers to society. Pushaw, his campaign aide and former press secretary, suggested in March that opponents of the Parental Rights in Education bill condoned “grooming” young kids, tweeting weeks later that Libs of TikTok “truly opened my eyes” to the number of educators readily discussing sex, sexuality and gender identity with students. After footage shared by Libs of TikTok showed a child in Miami beside a drag performer in lingerie, the state filed a complaint in July against the proprietor, citing in part a 1947 Florida Supreme Court finding that “men impersonating women” in “suggestive and indecent” performances constituted a public nuisance.The governor’s expanded focus on transgender issues has included calls for doctors who “disfigure” kids with gender-affirming care to be sued. His administration has urged schools to ignore federal guidance aimed at buttressing Title IX protections for transgender students. The state’s medical board voted in August to move toward banning gender-affirming treatment for minors. A new state rule would bar Florida Medicaid coverage of gender dysphoria treatment for adults.DeSantis’s war on “woke math” has followed a similar trajectory. After his administration rejected 28 textbooks in April for trafficking in “prohibited topics,” a Miami Herald and Tampa Bay Times investigation found that a vast majority of state reviewers reported no evidence of such issues. But two of the handful who objected came from Hillsdale, including a sophomore student listed as the secretary of the Hillsdale College Republicans. It is unclear how such reviewers were selected. “We have unqualified people given access to determine what textbooks are permissible,” Anna Eskamani, a Democrat in the Florida House, told me. “It’s about instilling a hyperconservative, Christian-nationalistic generation. That’s 100 percent what their goal is.”Eskamani is among a large segment of Democrats who now call DeSantis “borderline fascist,” as she put it, a selective protector of freedoms more interested in pummeling opposition than shrinking government. He is a defender of “parents’ rights” who has floated sending child protective services after people who take their kids to drag shows. He has pushed an “anti-riot” measure, passed after the George Floyd protests, that could expose peaceful demonstrators or bystanders to punishment if a gathering turns violent. A blizzard of court challenges and some legal setbacks for DeSantis have heightened the uncertainty around what some policies might ultimately look like in practice and done little to assuage opponents who feel targeted. “He’s at war with a subset of people who happen to live in his quote-unquote ‘free state,’” Shevrin Jones, a Democratic state senator, told me.The governor’s approach to voting issues is especially instructive. Shortly after taking office, he moved to restrict the recently restored voting rights of people with felony convictions, enshrined in a 2018 ballot measure, by requiring those with serious criminal histories to fully pay court fines and fees before re-enfranchisement. His emphasis on scattered episodes of possible fraud has appeared to be situational, highlighted by the creation of an Office of Election Crimes and Security and an announcement in August that more than a dozen former felons were being arrested for illegally voting. (In media interviews and court filings, some of the offenders have claimed they were effectively entrapped, encountering no issue when they sought to determine if they could vote and learning of an eligibility problem only upon their arrest.) When several people from the Villages, the vast Central Florida retirement community that skews Republican, were arrested for trying to cast multiple ballots in the 2020 election, DeSantis did not convene a news conference.As a matter of national signaling, the voting effort stands as another argument to Republicans that Florida is supplanting even Texas as the consensus capital of American conservatism. Lawmakers expect the profile of future down-ballot Republicans to closely resemble the governor’s, reflecting his endorsements in legislative and especially school-board races and allowing him to shape the state’s agenda effectively unchecked. (His school board endorsees, including some connected to Moms for Liberty, were broadly successful in their August primaries.) The governor’s grip on the Legislature is already firm. Signing the state budget in June, DeSantis sounded almost taunting while congratulating himself for vetoing line items prized by the Republicans standing behind him. “They may not be clapping about that,” DeSantis said, “but that’s just the way it goes.”A short time later, Wilton Simpson, the Senate president who had hundreds of millions in spending on his own priorities slashed by the man introducing him, had his turn to speak. “How about Ron DeSantis?” Simpson began, clapping in his direction. “America’s governor.”Robert T. Bigelow, a Nevada space entrepreneur with little history of prolific donations to Republican causes, decided earlier this year to make what appears to be the largest single political contribution from an individual in Florida history: $10 million. (The state places no limit on donations to a political committee.) Bigelow was not steeped in Florida politics. Though he liked what he had seen of DeSantis on the news, singling out his Disney fight, Bigelow said he did not realize the governor was up for re-election until a friend informed him earlier this year. “I thought, Gee, what an excellent time to, early on, contribute to the man and pay him that respect,” Bigelow told me, in his first extended public remarks on the matter.A short time later, on July 7, according to Bigelow, the governor was on a plane to meet him in North Las Vegas. DeSantis stayed for “at least three hours,” Bigelow said, touring his aerospace facility and settling in a conference room for sandwiches. “I told him, ‘You know, if you run for president, you’re going to be the people’s president,’” Bigelow told me. “He says, ‘I like that.’”For years, DeSantis was an acquired taste for donors. Contributors used to observe to one another that his clothes never quite fit, wondering aloud if he had a house account at Men’s Wearhouse. More recently, some party operatives have grumbled about the DeSantis family’s affinity for the perks of power, zeroing in on media reports about Mori Hosseini, a Florida developer and longtime Republican donor, who was said to have helped arrange a round of golf for DeSantis in 2018 at Augusta National, home of the Masters. In 2019, Politico reported that Casey DeSantis used Hosseini’s private plane to travel to a state function. (The governor’s net worth, as of late last year, is a little over $300,000, according to a recent financial disclosure, though a rumored book deal would increase the figure considerably. The disclosure said he was still working to pay off some $20,000 in student loans.)Now, amid his growing celebrity and fatigue with Trump among moneyed Republicans, DeSantis will not lack for financial resources ahead of 2024. His operation had hoped to raise $150 million by the end of this cycle and is on pace to surpass that handily. DeSantis is not expected to spend more than $100 million on a re-election in which he is favored against Charlie Crist, the state’s onetime Republican governor and, more recently, a Democratic congressman. “It’s like he cares more about Iowa voters than Florida people,” Crist told me earlier this year, acknowledging he’d used the line before: “It’s not the first time. It probably won’t be the last.” (Trump has privately amused some friends by talking up Crist’s chances and talents, ignoring polls that show DeSantis ahead.)A recent F.E.C. case involving a political ally could set a precedent clearing the way for any remaining money raised by DeSantis to aid a potential presidential campaign. In the interim, his re-election race offers donors a useful pretense: They can give to him under the guise of the midterms to avoid antagonizing Trump (in theory) while still hoping the governor recognizes the gesture ahead of 2024. “No one even talks about his re-election,” Eberhart said of donors. “It’s all about Trump and DeSantis.”Some of the governor’s biggest backers have ruled out supporting another Trump run, including Ken Griffin, a DeSantis megadonor who has given at least $5 million this cycle. (Griffin announced in June that he was moving the global headquarters of his hedge-fund firm, Citadel, from Chicago to Miami.) But neither has DeSantis shied from Trump’s own supporters, scheduling high-dollar events from San Francisco to Nantucket and making clear from his earliest days in office that he intended to be a fund-raising juggernaut. “It is the governor’s desire to fund-raise and maintain a high political profile at all times — inside and outside of Florida,” an adviser, Susie Wiles, wrote in a January 2019 memo, reported later that year by The Tampa Bay Times.According to records kept by DeSantis’s political committee, he has raised millions from some of the former president’s friends and benefactors, including Steven Witkoff, a New York developer whose son’s wedding was attended by both Trump and DeSantis at Mar-a-Lago in May; Thomas Peterffy, a billionaire trader who has called DeSantis his “favorite man”; and the Midwestern megadonors Richard and Elizabeth Uihlein. After once dismissing the idea that DeSantis might run against Trump, many Republicans are bracing for an uncomfortable choice. Mica Mosbacher, a longtime party fund-raiser who told me late last year that a DeSantis bid would be “possible suicide” for him, laughed recently when reminded of the comment. “There’s been a lot of change,” she allowed.Mike Shields, a veteran party official who worked on the 2018 campaign, told me DeSantis’s Florida had taken almost “mythological” hold of the wider Republican imagination. CPAC moved there. Trump lives there. “He’s now the governor of the home of where all these conservatives feel like the center of gravity moved, and it’s his place, and he helped create that,” Shields said. “How many times has that happened in politics?”DeSantis’s swaggering reputation can create the impression that he is more battle-tested than he is. As a congressman from a safe Republican district and a celebrated conservative governor, he has almost never taken meaningful political heat from the right, let alone the relentless onslaught that has historically visited any Trump opponent. “Not sure he’s ready for prime time,” Trump has said privately, according to a person who heard it. Kellyanne Conway, the longtime Trump adviser, told me that while DeSantis had been successful, he was still “new and undefined enough to allow people to project onto him what they want.” Others in Trump’s orbit have been more openly condescending. “He’ll be terrific,” Newt Gingrich told me of DeSantis, “in 2028.”There would be perhaps no greater divide in a Trump-DeSantis primary than prospective press relations. Trump still speaks semi-regularly with mainstream reporters, often to repeat his election fictions. A symbiosis with traditional outlets helped deliver him the presidency in 2016, his rallies airing widely without context or interruption. While DeSantis’s restrictive approach could be a gamble in a national campaign, many Republicans seem to envy not only his refusal to engage with journalists on their terms but also his ability to get away with it. “I work in the Capitol,” Rubio told me, sighing that reporters he regularly encounters in the building are liable to press him on the party squabble du jour. “Someone just asked me in the hallway, ‘Do you think Trump and DeSantis hate each other?’”The perceived inevitability of a 2024 clash can almost cloud the remarkable risk that DeSantis would be taking. While Trump habitually overstates his importance to endorsees, his role in DeSantis’s arc is undisputed, leaving the governor vulnerable to credible claims of disloyalty. Trump has called him ungrateful in private, while publicly swiping at “gutless” politicians (like, say, Ron DeSantis) who refuse to discuss their Covid booster status. (A Trump spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.) DeSantis’s strongest electability argument against Trump — that renominating the only person who has demonstrated he can lose to Biden might be unwise — is also difficult to deliver in today’s G.O.P. Privately, DeSantis has cited strategic mistakes, and not any election-thieving plot, as the reason Trump lost in 2020. But making this case publicly would mean affirming the legitimacy of that election. In a run of August appearances organized by Turning Point Action, the conservative youth group led by the far-right figure Charlie Kirk, DeSantis stood not just with Mastriano but other Trump-backed Republicans — including J.D. Vance, the Senate nominee in Ohio, and Kari Lake, running for Arizona governor — who have called the last presidential election stolen.Not long ago, Trump was flirting with announcing another White House bid before the midterms, hoping to discourage challengers by consolidating support early. His more pressing concern now is his multifront legal jeopardy, particularly the inquiry into his handling of classified materials at Mar-a-Lago. Conway insisted that Trump and DeSantis remain “allies, not scorpions in a bottle,” taking care to place the governor among the Republican masses who expressed outrage at Trump’s treatment from federal authorities. But no one, including the would-be primary competitors, knows exactly what the investigations might yield — or what political shape Trump might be in on the other side.Trump has said privately that DeSantis previously told him he would not run if Trump did, a version of events that people who know DeSantis refuse to believe. While the governor is surely young enough to take multiple cracks at the White House, there is a case that he almost has to run now as proof of political branding. So much of his appeal is rooted in being the man unafraid to go where his peers won’t, to do what his enemies fear. At their event in Phoenix, Lake hailed the governor’s “B.D.E.” — for “Big DeSantis Energy,” she added implausibly. His campaign store sells a two-golf-ball set in a box reading, “FLORIDA’S GOVERNOR HAS A PAIR.”Do those with Big DeSantis Energy really wait their turn, forever appeasing the former president to avoid becoming the next Liddle Marco or Low-Energy Jeb? His 2024 bet, should he go through with it, amounts to an educated guess that the rules of contemporary American political history need not apply anymore. He is not the candidate to charm the fine people of Dubuque one on one. He would be building state-by-state campaign infrastructure with a diminutive inner circle. (Among other departures, DeSantis has fallen out with Wiles, a veteran Florida operative, in part because he suspected her of leaking to the press. Wiles, who also worked on both Trump campaigns, is now considered the former president’s top political adviser.) DeSantis has little in common with the last half-dozen presidents — he is not an electric speaker, or a veteran statesman, or a dynastic heir. “He’s just Richard Nixon, and I mean that as a compliment,” a person who has known him for years told me. “He’s smart. He’s detail-oriented. He’s motivated by resentment toward the people in charge, and he understands the system that he wants to run.”At the Pittsburgh rally, attendees seemed divided on whether they were looking at the next president. There could be no debate that DeSantis, the youngest governor in the union, with three small kids and a telegenic wife who just faced down breast cancer, represented a new generation. John and Holly Lawson, in their mid-60s, told me they had traveled more than five hours from Allentown to see DeSantis. “There’s so much baggage that the Democrats have put on Trump,” Holly Lawson said, declaring her preference for DeSantis. “If he doesn’t get in,” John Lawson told me, sliding his finger from the first name on his “Trump-DeSantis 2024” shirt to the second, “I’d like to see him.”From the stage moments earlier, DeSantis suggested that the times demanded a little daring. Threats were everywhere. Bold offensives were necessary. The hour had come, he said, pulling from scripture, to “put on the full armor of God.” He gazed out on a crowd full of MAGA red, specked with more than a few rally-worn encouragements if he looked closely enough: “Can’t Miss DeSantis” (with a caricatured governor playing beer pong beneath palm trees); “My Pronouns Are UNVACCINATED”; “DeSantis 2024: Make America Florida.”“Stand your ground, stand firm, don’t back down,” DeSantis said as he closed, nodding a little at his own words. “We can do this.” More

  • in

    Trump’s increasing tirade against FBI and DoJ endangering lives of officials

    Trump’s increasing tirade against FBI and DoJ endangering lives of officialsThe ex-president’s cries of a witch hunt by law enforcement, echoed by his allies, have imperiled officers’ physical safety Donald Trump’s non-stop drive to paint the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago to recover classified documents as a political witch hunt is drawing rebukes from ex-justice department and FBI officials who warn such attacks can spur violence and pose a real threat to the physical safety of law enforcement.But the concerns have not deterred Republican House minority leader Kevin McCarthy and other Trump allies from making inflammatory remarks echoing the former US president.Mar-a-Lago a magnet for spies, officials warn after nuclear file reportedly foundRead moreThe unrelenting attacks by Trump and loyalists such as McCarthy, senator Lindsey Graham, Steve Bannon and false conspiracy theorist Alex Jones against law enforcement have continued despite strong evidence that Trump kept hundreds of classified documents illegally.Before the 8 August raid, Trump and his attorneys stonewalled FBI and US National Archives requests for the return of all classified documents and did not fully comply with a grand jury subpoena in a criminal probe of Trump’s hoarding of government documents.The FBI search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home and club recovered 33 boxes with over 100 classified documents, adding to the 200 classified records Trump had earlier returned in response to multiple federal requests.Trump’s high decibel attacks on law enforcement officials for trying to recover large quantities of classified documents including some that reportedly had foreign nuclear secrets was palpable in Pennsylvania recently when Trump at a political rally branded the FBI and justice department “political monsters” and labelled president Joe Biden “an enemy of the state”.The day before in Pennsylvania, to coincide with a major Biden speech about threats to democracy posed by Trump and some of his allies, McCarthy mimicked Trump’s high decibel attacks on the court-approved FBI raid by calling it an “assault on democracy”.Former law enforcement officials and scholars warn that using such conspiratorial rhetoric impugning the motives and actions of justice department and the FBI runs the risk of inciting threats of violence and actual attacks, fears that have already been proven warranted.Consider Trump supporter Ricky Shiffer, who posted angry messages about the Mar-a-Lago raid on Trump Social, and then on 12 August armed himself with an assault rifle and attacked an FBI office in Cincinnati. After fleeing the scene he was hunted down and killed by police.In another sign of potential violence, federal judge Bruce Reinhart in Florida, who had approved the FBI warrant to search Mar-a-Lago, reportedly received death threats after his name was cited in press accounts.“I have been dealing with law enforcement and the criminal justice system for close to 40 years. I have never seen the type or virulence of attacks being made every day against the FBI, DoJ lawyers, and judges,” former justice department inspector general Michael Bromwich told the Guardian. “It’s a chorus led by Trump but that includes elected officials at every level. It is dangerous and unacceptable.”Bromwich added: “It’s one thing for professional rabble rousers, liars, and nihilists – such as Bannon and Jones – to attack law enforcement and DoJ in the way that they have since the search; it’s quite another for so-called respectable political figures such as McCarthy and Graham to do so. Their recent actions and words reflect that theirs is a politics detached from facts and principle.”Similarly, Chuck Rosenberg, a former US attorney for the sastern district of Virginia and ex-chief of staff to former FBI director James Comey, told the Guardian: “The attacks on federal law enforcement are sickening and reckless.”To historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat, who has studied authoritarian leaders and wrote the book Strongmen, Trump’s attacks on the FBI and justice department and his retention of classified documents are consistent with his “authoritarian” leadership style“It’s very typical of authoritarians to claim that they’re the victims and that there are witch hunts against them,” Ben-Ghiat told the Guardian.Trump’s furious assaults on law enforcement also targeted the National Archives and Records Administration, causing a notable uptick in threats against the agency, according to sources quoted by the Washington Post.“No NARA official involved in negotiating the return of presidential records from Mar-a-Lago would have acted with any motive other than to ensure the safe return of all of the presidential records back into the custody of the government,” said Jason R Baron, the former director of litigation at the US National Archives. “It is unfortunate that some would impugn the motives of NARA staff in simply doing their job.”The frenzied attacks on law enforcement began almost immediately after the raid and included some especially rabid Trump supporters.Former White House adviser Bannon, who has been convicted on two counts of criminal contempt of Congress for defying a subpoena from the House January 6 panel, made unsupported claims to conspiracy monger Jones on Infowars that the FBI planted evidence against Trump during the Mar-a-Lago raid, and that the “deep state” is planning to kill Trump.“I do not think it’s beyond this administrative state and their deep state apparatus to actually try to work on the assassination of President Trump,” said Bannon, who on 8 September was charged by New York prosecutors with fraud, money laundering and conspiracy involving his role in a private fundraising scheme to fund constructing the US-Mexico border wall.Right before he left office, Trump pardoned Bannon who had been indicted on similar federal charges involving fraud and the border wall.Graham provoked heavy criticism for making the suggestion in a Fox News interview that the FBI raid and investigation would lead to “riots in the street”, if charges were filed against Trump.After critics noted Graham’s comments could fuel violence, Graham doubled down a week later saying he was just trying to “state the obvious”.In a twist, some veteran justice department prosecutors point out that predictions of violence can potentially be criminal.“The risk is that predictions of violence can easily become threats of violence bordering on extortion,” former justice department prosecutor Paul Rosenzweig told the Guardian. “Explicitly calling for violence against the government can, in context, become criminal. When Trump loyalists like Bannon and Graham seem to cross that line, they are risking criminal prosecution.”On another front, even some former close allies of Trump say that his shifting and hard edged attacks on law enforcement look desperate and don’t pass the smell test.William Barr, Trump’s former attorney general who formerly was a close ally, told Fox News on 2 September he didn’t see any reason why classified documents were at Mar-a-Lago once Trump left office.“People say this was unprecedented,” Barr told Fox News “But it’s also unprecedented for a president to take all this classified information and put them in a country club, okay?”To historian Ben-Ghiat, the fact that “Trump had those classified documents and they were mixed in with golf balls and family photos is very typical of authoritarian type leaders who don’t recognize any divides between public and private. Everything is theirs to trade, to sell and to use as leverage.”For Bromwich, the attacks on law enforcement by Trump and his ardent allies is unprecedented and very dangerous.“For those of us who have spent time with federal law enforcement personnel, the idea that they are members of the deep state or doing the bidding of the radical left is ridiculous. In my experience, the majority are conservative and Republican. Whatever their politics, they don’t let their political views affect their work.”“The search of Mar-a-Lago was indeed unprecedented. It was preceded by an unprecedented and colossal theft of government property by the former president.”TopicsUS newsDonald TrumpMar-a-LagoFBILaw (US)RepublicansUS politicsfeaturesReuse this content More

  • in

    In Voter Fraud, Penalties Often Depend on Who’s Voting

    WASHINGTON — After 15 years of scrapes with the police, the last thing that 33-year-old Therris L. Conney needed was another run-in with the law. He got one anyway two years ago, after election officials held a presentation on voting rights for inmates of the county jail in Gainesville, Fla.Apparently satisfied that he could vote, Mr. Conney registered after the session, and cast a ballot in 2020. In May, he was arrested for breaking a state law banning voting by people serving felony sentences — and he was sentenced to almost another full year in jail.That show-no-mercy approach to voter fraud is what Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, has encouraged this year during his re-election campaign. “That was against the law,” he said last month about charges against 20 other felons who voted in Florida, “and they’re going to pay a price for it.”But many of those cases seem to already be falling apart, because, like Mr. Conney, the former felons did not intend to vote illegally. And the more typical kind of voter-fraud case in Florida has long exacted punishment at a steep discount.Last winter, four residents of the Republican-leaning retirement community The Villages were arrested for voting twice — once in Florida, and again in other states where they had also lived.Despite being charged with third-degree felonies, the same as Mr. Conney, two of the Villages residents who pleaded guilty escaped having a criminal record entirely by taking a 24-hour civics class. Trials are pending for the other two.Florida is an exaggerated version of America as a whole. A review by The New York Times of some 400 voting-fraud charges filed nationwide since 2017 underscores what critics of fraud crackdowns have long said: Actual prosecutions are blue-moon events, and often netted people who didn’t realize they were breaking the law.Punishment can be wildly inconsistent: Most violations draw wrist-slaps, while a few high-profile prosecutions produce draconian sentences. Penalties often fall heaviest on those least able to mount a defense. Those who are poor and Black are more likely to be sent to jail than comfortable retirees facing similar charges.The high-decibel political rhetoric behind fraud prosecutions drowns out how infrequent — and sometimes how unfair — those prosecutions are, said Richard L. Hasen, an expert on election law and democracy issues at the U.C.L.A. School of Law.“It’s hard to see felons in Gainesville getting jail terms, and then look at people in The Villages getting no time at all, and see this as a rational system,” he said.The Times searched newspapers in all 50 states, internet accounts of fraud and online databases of cases, including one maintained by the conservative Heritage Foundation, to compile a list of prosecutions in the last five years. But there is no comprehensive list of voter fraud cases, and The Times’ list is undoubtedly incomplete.Election workers in Riviera Beach, Fla., prepared ballots to be counted by machine after the November 2020 general election.Saul Martinez for The New York TimesThe number of individuals charged — roughly one and one-half per state per year — is infinitesimal in a country where more than 159.7 million votes were cast in the 2020 general election alone.For all the fevered rhetoric about crackdowns on illegal voting, what’s most striking about voter fraud prosecutions is how modest the penalties for convictions tend to be.Most fraud cases fall into one of four categories: falsely filling out absentee ballots, usually to vote in the name of a relative; voting twice, usually in two states; votes cast illegally by felons; or votes cast by noncitizens.Edward Snodgrass, a trustee in Porter Township, Ohio, said he was trying to “execute a dying man’s wishes” when he filled out and mailed in his deceased father’s ballot in the 2020 election. He was fined $800 and sentenced to three days in jail.Charles Eugene Cartier, 81, of Madison, N.H. and Attleboro, Mass., pleaded guilty in New Hampshire to voting in more than one state, a Class B felony, in the 2016 election. He was fined $1,000 plus a penalty assessment of $240, and had his 60-day prison sentence suspended on condition of good behavior.At least four Oregonians cast votes in two states in 2016; none were fined more than $1,000, and felony charges were reduced to violations, akin to traffic tickets.Two federal prosecutors in North Carolina, Matthew G.T. Martin and Robert J. Higdon, made national headlines in 2018 with a campaign to prosecute noncitizens who voted illegally. In the end, around 30 charges were brought, out of some 4.7 million votes cast in 2016. But prison sentences in those cases were few, and usually measured in months; fines, usually in the hundreds of dollars or less.Still, there are exceptions, often apparently meant to send a message in states where politicians have tried to elevate fraud to a major issue.Foremost is Texas, where convictions that would merit probation or fines elsewhere have drawn crushing prison sentences. Rosa Maria Ortega, a green-card holder who cast illegal votes in 2012 and 2014, was sentenced to eight years in prison for a crime she says she unknowingly committed. Crystal Mason, who cast a ballot in 2016 while on federal probation for a tax felony, drew five years for violating felon voting laws. The court has been ordered to reconsider her case.Both prosecutions were the work of the state attorney general, Ken Paxton, perhaps the nation’s most zealous enforcer of voter-fraud laws. Mr. Paxton runs a $2.2 million-a-year election integrity squad that claims a 15-year record of prosecutions, though some of its high-profile cases, like a lengthy one against a South Texas mayor, ended in acquittals.Many of the squad’s cases have turned out to be decidedly small-bore affairs. Mr. Paxton’s integrity sleuths recorded 16 prosecutions in 2020, all of them Houston-area residents who put wrong addresses on registration applications, The Houston Chronicle has reported. None resulted in jail time. A handful of states have followed Texas’s lead. In Tennessee, Pamela Moses, a Black activist who violated a ban on voting by felons — mistakenly, she said — drew a six-year prison sentence in 2021. Prosecutors abandoned the charge after she won a new trial.In Florida, Kelvin Bolton, 56 and homeless, attended the same presentation that Mr. Conney did, and also voted in 2020. He has been awaiting trial in the Gainesville jail for five months, unable to make the $30,000 bond slapped on him by a county judge.“I said, ‘Kelvin, why did you vote?’” his sister, Derbra Bolton Owete, said in an interview. “And he said, ‘Well, they told me I could vote, so I voted.’ ”An amendment to the Florida Constitution that voters approved in 2018 restored voting rights to Mr. Bolton and other former felons who had completed their sentences. But the Republican legislature passed a law requiring full payment of fines and court fees to complete a sentence. The state has no central record of what former felons owe, adding another hurdle to their efforts to regain voting rights.Because Mr. Bolton owes fines or court costs, he faces felony charges of perjury and casting illegal votes.People of means usually fare better.In Kansas, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, Steve Watkins, railed during his 2020 re-election campaign against a “corrupt” prosecutor after Mr. Watkins was charged with illegally misstating his residence for voting and with lying to law enforcement officers, both felonies. Mr. Watkins later quietly accepted a diversion plea, escaping a criminal record in return for paying court costs and hewing to requirements like staying out of legal trouble. (Mr. Watkins lost his re-election bid.)Steve Watkins, a Kansas state legislator, faced felony voting fraud charges in 2020 and lost his bid for re-election. He spoke at a rally in Topeka with President Donald Trump in 2018.Scott Olson/Getty ImagesIn North Carolina, prosecutors have yet to decide after six months of scrutiny the seemingly straightforward question of whether Mark Meadows, the former chief of staff to President Donald J. Trump and a former North Carolina congressman, essentially did the same thing.Mr. Meadows stated on a 2020 voter registration form that his residence for voting purposes was a mobile home in the western part of the state, although there is no public evidence that he ever actually lived there. A few prosecutions have approached the sort of broader allegations of fraud that are common in political messaging, though all were local affairs.A convoluted tale of election shenanigans in the Canton, Miss., city government produced charges against at least nine people in 2019, though punishment was minimal, and one woman was cleared. An absentee-ballot scheme that forced a rerun of the 2018 Ninth Congressional District race in North Carolina led to seven fraud indictments. The alleged ringleader, Leslie McCrae Dowless, a Republican operative, died before he could stand trial.In Florida, where attacks on voter fraud have been a staple of Mr. DeSantis’s term as governor, prosecutors have adjudicated at least 25 voting law cases since 2017. Until recently, penalties have been mild — probation, small fines, jail time served concurrent with other sentences.The 20 cases of voting by felons announced last month nearly double that total. But those prosecutions appear endangered, because the state itself approved the felons’ applications to vote and even issued them registration cards. The Republican who sponsored the state law requiring felons to pay court costs, State Senator Jeff Brandes, told The Miami Herald that he believed those who were charged had no intent to break the law.Asked about that, a spokesman for Mr. DeSantis noted that the governor said that local election officials vet registration applications, not the state. That contradicts what his own former secretary of state, Laurel Lee, told journalists in 2020, The Herald reported.“When people sign up” to vote, “they check a box saying they’re eligible,” Mr. DeSantis said at a news conference last week. “If they’re not eligible and they’re lying, then they can be held accountable.”Critics of Mr. DeSantis say his goal is less to stop fraud than to make political hay from Republican voters’ obsession with the subject, something the party has relentlessly stoked for years.“This is political grandstanding,” said Daniel Smith, an expert on elections and voting at the University of Florida. “Individuals are registering, being told they can vote, handed registration cards and then told they’ve committed a felony. It’s tragic.”Sometimes the focus on voter fraud can become self-fulfilling.An Iowa woman, Terri Lynn Rote, said she cast two ballots for Mr. Trump in 2016 because she believed her first vote would be switched to favor Hillary Clinton. “I wasn’t planning on doing it twice — it was spur of the moment,” she later told The Waterloo-Cedar Falls Courier. “The polls are rigged.”A judge fined her $750 and sentenced her to two years’ probation.Kitty Bennett, Isabella Grullón Paz and Heather Bushman contributed research. More

  • in

    Is the Democratic Midterm Surge Overrated? Why Republicans Can Still Win the House and Senate.

    Ross Douthat, a Times Opinion columnist, hosted an online conversation with Kristen Soltis Anderson, a Republican pollster, and the conservative writer and radio host Erick Erickson, to discuss whether Republicans are blowing the fall campaign — or whether a red wave is still possible.Ross Douthat: Kristen, Erick, thanks so much for joining me. Let’s start with the big picture. From early 2022 through the middle of the summer, Republicans consistently led the generic ballot for Congress, by around two and a half points. Today, the same generic ballot is either tied or gives Democrats a slight edge. Kristen, what changed?Kristen Soltis Anderson: The biggest thing that I’ve seen shift is enthusiasm on the Democratic side. During the winter and spring, Republicans had an advantage when voters were asked how motivated they were to vote. Key parts of the Democratic coalition were just not as tuned in or interested in participating.That’s a relatively normal dynamic in a midterm year, but the last two or three months have seen Democrats close that enthusiasm gap.Erick Erickson: I underappreciated how much the Dobbs decision would play a role in that.But the RealClearPolitics polling averages go back about two decades. For midterm elections where Republicans have done well, at this time of year, the polling has narrowed. Tom Bevan of RealClearPolitics had a good piece on it last week. I actually told my radio listeners that we should expect a tying of the generic ballot in August, and here it is. I would wait to really assess the direction of the race until late September.Douthat: If we assume Dobbs has boosted Democratic enthusiasm, Kristen, how heavily should we weight that effect relative to, say, falling gas prices?Anderson: The Dobbs decision was the big turning point. It has been less about changing voters’ minds from Republican to Democratic and more about activating voters who might have been tuned out and less engaged. It has also given Democrats a message to run on that changes the topic from inflation and gas prices. I still see the economy as a huge driver of this midterm, which is why I still think at this point Republicans are in an OK position. But there’s a reason Democratic candidates have been running ads about abortion.Douthat: Erick, you just said you might have underestimated the Dobbs effect. Do you think G.O.P. politicians were actually prepared to have abortion back in democratic debate?Erickson: I have been more than a bit perplexed at the G.O.P.’s surprise over the Dobbs decision, considering it leaked weeks before it was official. They had time to prepare for it and find some common ground and never seemed to get on the same page. By not being prepared, they allowed more aggressive voices on the issue to spook voters. When you have loud voices in the G.O.P. start talking about making abortion a criminal offense after Dobbs, that tends to spook people.Still, I do continue to think the economy is going to be disproportionately at play in the election. As Kristen said, more Democrats will turn out than otherwise would have pre-Dobbs, but the G.O.P. should be OK if the party focuses on the economy and inflation.Douthat: Well, unless inflation continues to diminish, right? It seems like Republicans have pushed a lot of chips onto that issue. Do you both think the G.O.P. needs a highly inflationary economy or a potential recession to win Congress this fall?Anderson: I’m certainly not rooting for a bad economy. But there is typically a link between people’s perceptions of the economy and their willingness to stick with the party in power. It is worth noting that inflation and rising gas prices were an issue where even Democrats were expressing concerns before Dobbs. Republicans rightly saw it as an issue on which their party had two key things going for them: Independents thought it was a top issue, and voters trusted Republicans more on it.Erickson: We are not going to see deflation, so reduced inflation is still inflation.Anderson: It’s also worth noting that even though the chatter in Washington seems to be that inflation is fading fast as an issue for voters, I’m not necessarily buying that that’s the case.Erickson: Yeah, as a dad who does a lot of the grocery shopping and cooking, milk and meat are still expensive, even if not as expensive as they were a few months ago, and wage increases for Americans have not offset the costs of many consumer goods.Douthat: Have Republicans focused too much on the economy at the expense of other issues that might have worked for them — crime, immigration, even education?Anderson: Crime and immigration are areas where Republicans have an advantage with voters, but those issues just haven’t been as salient with them.Erickson: Republicans have a comprehensive story to tell about the deterioration of the quality of life in America.Douthat: Let’s talk about the candidates who are trying to tell that story. Erick, you’re in Georgia, where Herschel Walker is the G.O.P. nominee for Senate and not exactly impressing on the campaign trail. Popular Republican governors in swing states passed up Senate races, presumably because they didn’t want to deal with the demands of Trumpism, and now you’ve got G.O.P. candidates trailing in the polls everywhere from Arizona to Pennsylvania to Wisconsin.How bad is the candidate problem, and can a Walker or a Dr. Oz still win?Erickson: I’ll take the last part first. The G.O.P. has managed to nominate some clunkers of candidates. But yes, Republicans can still win. This is actually why I am a bit hesitant now to embrace the national narrative of this election.Walker is a flawed candidate, but the national narrative has the race worse than it actually is. Walker has actually been ahead in some recent polls. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee chair recently mentioned races he expected to do well in, and Georgia was not on the list. On the ground in Georgia, Walker has retooled his campaign, brought in new people, and the crowds are growing as his air war likely intensifies.Oz and Blake Masters are not great. But the political environment can get some of these flawed candidates elected. Remember, in 1980, a bunch of Republicans got elected as “accidental” senators; they were swept into office by Ronald Reagan’s landslide victory and because the national mood was so dour. Also, it is worth noting that in 2020, the G.O.P. exceeded expectations, and pollsters still do not have good answers for why they missed that. We could be experiencing part of that again.Douthat: Let me pitch that point to you, Kristen: Not only Republicans but a lot of liberals are very hesitant to trust polls showing big Democratic advantages in Senate races, especially in Midwestern states, given the record Erick mentions. How doubtful should we be about polling in this cycle?Anderson: I’m far from a poll truther or unskewer or what have you. But I am keenly aware of the ways in which public polling can miss the mark. And it is notable that in some of the last few election cycles, we’ve had public polls that told a very rosy story about Democratic Senate candidates that did not pan out and lost to incumbent Republicans. Lindsey Graham and Susan Collins, anyone? I’m also thinking of 2018, where states like Indiana and Missouri were considered tossup or close races in a blue-wave year and yet Republicans won.At the same time, those 2018 examples show that it is possible for candidates to outperform expectations even in the face of a wave that is supposed to be crashing the other direction.Douthat: Do you think the polling industry has substantially adjusted since 2020? Are the polls we’re seeing of, say, Pennsylvania or Wisconsin more trustworthy than past polling, in your view?Anderson: I’ll use a recent example to highlight my concerns. In Florida we just had a big primary election, and one of the major polls that got released before the primary showed in the governor’s race, the more progressive candidate, Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried, ahead of the more centrist Democrat and former Republican, Charlie Crist. The poll was very transparent in its methodology, but the underlying data had a large number of college-educated voters. Even if you do the appropriate things with data weighting, that underlying data is skewing quite progressive. Crist actually defeated Fried by a wide margin.I don’t say this to criticize those pollsters, as they were transparent about their data, but if Democrats are extra fired up to vote right now, there’s a chance they’re also extra fired up to take polls.Douthat: But we do have a few actual results, from the abortion referendum in Kansas to the recent special election in New York, where liberal causes and Democratic candidates have done well in real voting, not just in polls.How much do you read into those kinds of election results?Anderson: The Kansas result was a wake-up call for Republicans. It showed Democrats making real strides in speaking to voters in the center about abortion using language those voters might use and tapping into values those centrist voters might hold. But I’m reluctant to say that special election results are transferable to other races in other states on other issues.Erickson: I’m doubtful we can really extrapolate Kansas to the rest of the nation.Douthat: Erick, let’s talk about Donald Trump, because the other big change from the summer is that the former president is back in the headlines. Assuming, as seems likely, that the classified-documents scandal is somewhat frozen from here till Election Day, how long a shadow does Trump cast over the midterms?Erickson: Democrats have said for some time they wanted Trump to be an aspect of their 2022 argument. He, of course, wants to be part of it as well. Republicans have been terrible about taking the bait and talking about Trump. To the extent the G.O.P. is willing to ignore their reflexive “stand by your man” impulse and instead focus on the economy, education, crime, etc., they can move past his shadow quickly.I’m just not optimistic Republicans can do that, given their prior behavior on the matter.Douthat: And Kristen, as Erick says, from the Democratic side and especially the Biden White House, there seems to be a clear desire to make the midterms about Trumpism. That didn’t work particularly well for Terry McAuliffe in the Virginia governor’s race last year. Is it a better strategy now?Anderson: In a midterm, the party out of power always wants it to be a referendum, while the party in power wants it to be a choice.The problem with Trump becoming more in the news is that it helps Democrats try to make it a choice. It gives them a prominent foil. But simply saying, “Don’t vote for candidate X because of Trump” isn’t foolproof.Douthat: If a bunch of Trump-picked candidates lose their Senate or governor races, does it weaken him for 2024 at all?Erickson: I have resigned myself to Trump’s core supporters insisting the G.O.P. establishment undermined those candidates in order to stop Trump and the only way to chart a better course is to double down on Trump. They will blame Mitch McConnell and others before Trump gets blame.Anderson: It is notable that when my firm asked Republican voters if they thought Trump was helping or hurting Republican candidates in the midterms, 61 percent said he was helping, and only 27 percent said hurting. This was from a survey we did in August.Even among Republicans who don’t think of themselves as “Trump first,” putting him before their party, a majority view him as helping. Granted, some of this may be Republican respondents circling the wagons in response to the question. But I doubt a poor showing in the midterms will lead to blaming Trump.Erickson: If Democrats really do want Trump to go away, they should just ignore him. Before the F.B.I. going to Mar-a-Lago, Republicans were doing their slow walk away from Trump. I somewhat suspect Democrats really want to keep Trump’s position in the G.O.P. elevated because independent voters just do not seem to care for the guy, and that gives Democrats an edge while making a 2024 Republican primary messy.The bigger issue for Trump is major donor support. Those people will see a need to move on. Trump will be less able to rely on larger dollar donors to build out 2024 than he did in 2020, though he won’t need them as much, since he can raise a lot from small-dollar donors. If they, however, consolidated behind someone else, it could cause problems for Trump.Douthat: OK, time to ask for predictions. Out of the competitive Senate races where G.O.P. candidates are seen as struggling or the race is just close — let’s say Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Nevada, because I think J.D. Vance will win Ohio — which ones do you think are the most likely G.O.P. wins, and which the most likely Democratic victories?Erickson: The G.O.P. takes Georgia. The Democrats take Pennsylvania and hold Arizona. The G.O.P. takes Nevada. I continue to think Ron Johnson wins his re-election in Wisconsin, too. I agree on Vance and think the national narrative there is out of sync with Ohio voters, who’ve moved more Republican.Anderson: I have the same choices as Erick: Republicans taking Georgia and Democrats taking Pennsylvania. That’s not to say I think those are rock solid, and the Pennsylvania race is just strange in general.Douthat: And if the economy worsens and the possibility of a red wave returns, what could be the most unexpected G.O.P. pickup?Anderson: I keep hearing buzz around this Washington Senate race. Republicans are very happy with their candidate there, Tiffany Smiley, who is a former triage nurse. A female candidate with a health care background could be powerful in this cycle.Erickson: I would keep my eye on the Colorado Senate race and the Oregon gubernatorial race. Also, New Hampshire remains in play, though the G.O.P. needs to settle on a candidate.Douthat: Final predictions — give me House and Senate numbers for Republicans.Erickson: I’m going with 51 in the Senate and 235 in the House.Anderson: I’ll say 230 seats in the House and 51 in the Senate. But I would also like to note that we are two months away.Douthat: Your sensible humility is duly noted, Kristen. Thanks to you both for a terrific discussion.Ross Douthat is a Times columnist. Kristen Soltis Anderson, the author of “The Selfie Vote,” is a Republican pollster and a co-founder of the polling firm Echelon Insights. Erick Erickson, the host of the “Erick Erickson Show,” writes the newsletter Confessions of a Political Junkie.The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram. More