More stories

  • in

    Is It Harris’ or Harris’s? Add a Walz, and It’s Even Trickier.

    With Vice President Kamala Harris and Gov. Tim Walz running on the same ticket, grammar geeks are in overdrive.When Vice President Kamala Harris chose Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota as her running mate, she put to rest weeks of speculation over the future of the Democratic ticket. But the battle over apostrophes was just getting started.Where were voters (and journalists) supposed to place the possessive squiggle?It all felt a bit, as some social media users described, like apostrophe hell: Would it be Ms. Harris’s and Mr. Walz’s or Ms. Harris’ and Mr. Walz’s? The Harrises and the Walzes? The Harrises’ family home and the Walzes’ family dog? It was enough to see double, made worse by the fact that stylebooks, large news organizations and grammar geeks were all split or contradicted one another.“Anyone who tells you there are universal rules to how to add an apostrophe ending in S is either wrong or lying,” Jeffrey Barg, a grammar columnist, said. “You can’t be wrong as long as you’re consistent.”The Associated Press Stylebook, widely considered to be the gold standard among news organizations, is clear on its rule for the possessive of singular proper names ending in S — only an apostrophe is needed (Harris’), though there are always exceptions. The New York Times, The Washington Post and The Wall Street Journal all do the opposite, opting for ’s to mark a singular possessive and a simple apostrophe for plural possessive (Harrises’ and Walzes’).Merriam-Webster, the oldest dictionary publisher in America, splits the difference: For names ending in an S or Z sound, you can add ’s or just an apostrophe, though the dictionary says ’s is the more common choice.“People want to know what the rules are because they want to do this correctly,” said Mr. Barg, who was raised on The A.P. stylebook. But at the same time, “you can’t impose language from the top down — it’s a bottom-up thing,” he said. “I think it’s going to be a learning experience for us as a country.”We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Harris Must Persuade Gaza Protesters, Not Dismiss Them

    At a campaign rally in the Detroit area on Wednesday, Kamala Harris was speaking about the threat of Project 2025 and the Trump agenda when a small group of protesters interrupted her. I couldn’t make out their words, but it was reported that they were shouting something about Gaza. Harris reacted with her trademark “I am speaking now.” The protesters persisted. Harris’s tone grew stern. “You know what?” she said. “If you want Donald Trump to win, then say that. Otherwise, I’m speaking.” She continued, to cheers from the crowd. The protesters were escorted out.When I watched a video of this scene, my heart sank. It reminded me of another interruption, at a Democratic fund-raiser at a nightclub in New York, 32 years ago. Bill Clinton was speaking when Bob Rafsky, a member of the AIDS activist group ACT UP, stood up to challenge him on his plans to deal with the AIDS epidemic. “We’re dying,” Rafsky said. Clinton engaged at first, saying he was running for president “to do something about it.” Rafsky continued to shout. Clinton became angry. “Would you just calm down?” he said.I knew Rafsky. I was a member of ACT UP, and a journalist covering AIDS in the gay press. When Clinton said, “Calm down,” I heard, Some things are more important than your life. In campaign math, this was probably true: Only a fraction of a percent of Americans were living with AIDS. Clinton had statistically bigger issues to address.Yes, before her Detroit speech, Harris met very briefly with a group of pro-Palestinian activists. But at the rally, I heard the same steely political calculus in Harris’s admonition to the protesters: She has to focus on beating Trump, not on a genocide occurring 6,000 miles away and affecting about two million people, some of whom are related to or have close ties with a small fraction of the American electorate for which the war in Gaza is a decisive issue in this election. And, like people confronting AIDS in 1992, Palestinian Americans and others who want an end to Israel’s war should know that the other candidate would be even worse.Such reasoning is as statistically sound as it is tone-deaf and emotionally blind. It appears that at least one of the protesters at the rally is of Palestinian descent. And given the demographics of the Detroit area, it is quite likely that others in the crowd were Palestinian Americans, very possibly with family and friends in Gaza who are at risk of being killed, whether by bombing, disease or starvation in the coming months, if they are not dead already.Rafsky died in February 1993, one month into the first Clinton administration. In November 1992, on the eve of the presidential election, he gave a speech standing by the coffin of another ACT UP member, Mark Fisher, who had asked that his body be carried through the streets of New York in protest.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    There Is Still a Biden Scandal

    One of the Biden White House’s greatest achievements, from the perspective of its staffers, if not necessarily the country, has been to deny the press the kind of juicy leaks that were constant under Donald Trump and frequent under his predecessors. Save for a very narrow period of time, that is, when there was a push to force an aging president toward the exits: Then and only then we got a drip-drip-drip of fascinating inside information.For instance, we learned that Biden hadn’t held a full cabinet meeting since last October and that his handlers expected scripted questions from his cabinet officials. We learned that his capacities peak between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. and diminish outside that six-hour window. We learned that congressional Democrats, liberal donors and some journalists all had exposure to Biden’s decline that they didn’t discuss publicly until the debacle of the June debate. We learned that none other than Hunter Biden was acting as a close adviser to his father in the crucial days after that debate.We even learned that from early in his presidency, the first lady’s closest aides worked to shield her husband from the staff that serves the first family in its living quarters, even as the aides themselves were given unusual access to the residence — as though it were essential to create a cocoon of loyalty and silence around the nation’s chief executive even when he isn’t on the job.These are all interesting and pertinent facts about the man who officially leads the United States in a time of global danger — and they have not ceased to be pertinent because that president is no longer running for re-election.For a few weeks the media coverage of the Biden White House built up the idea that there was a major scandal here, implicating the inner circle that encouraged the president to run for re-election and practiced deception amid his obvious decline.The potential scale of that scandal has diminished now that the country is no longer being asked to entrust the Oval Office to Biden for another four years. And concerns about the capacities of Donald Trump, the aging candidate actually running for the White House, are naturally going to claim more attention now that they’re contrasted with a younger rival.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Harris Rides Momentum to Arizona, for What Campaign Says Is Largest Rally Yet

    Vice President Kamala Harris rolled into Arizona on Friday evening with the same political momentum that has infused her first swing across the country this week, drawing a crowd that her campaign estimated at more than 15,000 — her largest yet — in a Western state that not long ago appeared to be falling off the battleground map.Along with her newly minted running mate, Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, Ms. Harris delivered a stump speech that is barely a week old, and yet familiar enough to an impassioned new following that some shouted her lines before she did.The rally was her fourth in four days with an arena-filling crowd that demonstrated the degree to which her candidacy replacing President Biden’s had remade the 2024 race.Mr. Walz relished the crowd that filed into the Desert Diamond Arena in Glendale, Ariz., in 100-degree heat as he poked fun at Mr. Trump’s obsession with rally crowds.“It’s not as if anybody cares about crowd sizes or anything,” Mr. Walz said to knowing cheers.Despite her momentum, Ms. Harris faces an uphill battle in Arizona, a longtime Republican stronghold that flipped to Mr. Biden in 2020 but, according to polling, had been drifting back to former President Donald J. Trump this year.To win, she will need to reunite the diverse coalition of voters who delivered the state four years ago, and she made an explicit appeal to one part of that group on Friday: Native American voters.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Harris Has a Big Campaign Launch — and Big Tests Ahead

    Fresh challenges in the offing could determine how long the vice president’s honeymoon will last.If you are Vice President Kamala Harris, another Democrat or any other person who happens to want Harris to become president, the last two weeks and five days have probably felt like a dream.There is a tougher reality for Harris, though, belied by the euphoric haze.The contest between Harris and former President Donald Trump remains remarkably close, and she is tied with him in must-win states like Wisconsin and Michigan, according to The New York Times’s polling averages. Trump’s allies are sharpening their attacks. And in a candidacy measured in days not months, she has yet to face the scrutiny of an interview or release a detailed vision for her potential presidency.Every presidential campaign is a series of tests. Can you excite voters? Can you raise money? For Harris, the answer to both of those questions so far is yes. Her party coalesced around her instantly. She has smashed fund-raising records and held overflowing rallies, and she seems to be tugging key swing states her way.But as Harris wraps up a battleground campaign tour with her brand-new running mate this weekend and turns her attention toward the Democratic National Convention this month, fresh challenges are in the offing. And the short campaign leaves a candidate who is still introducing herself to voters with little time for do-overs.“She will be tested,” Neil Newhouse, a Republican pollster, said. “She’ll be tested by the Trump campaign. She’ll be tested by the press, and just by everyday events.”That may be why Harris has been careful to sound a note of caution to supporters who might prefer to luxuriate in the optimism.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Trump dijo que estuvo a punto de morir en un helicóptero, pero eso no sucedió

    No hubo aterrizaje de emergencia, y los pasajeros del helicóptero nunca corrieron ningún tipo de peligro, según el gobernador Gavin Newsom, quien también estaba en el vuelo.[Estamos en WhatsApp. Empieza a seguirnos ahora]El expresidente Donald Trump contó una anécdota el jueves que dejó boquiabiertos a todos: era sobre cómo estuvo a punto de morir en un viaje en helicóptero con Willie Brown, el expolítico californiano y exnovio de su rival, la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris.Solo había un problema con el relato. O quizá dos. O quizá tres.En el vuelo en helicóptero no viajaba el famoso exalcalde de San Francisco. Era el gobernador Jerry Brown, exgobernador de California, quien se parece muy poco a Willie Brown.Tampoco hubo aterrizaje de emergencia, y los pasajeros del helicóptero nunca corrieron ningún tipo de peligro, según el gobernador Gavin Newsom, quien también estaba en el vuelo.Jerry Brown, quien dejó el cargo en enero de 2019, dijo a través de un portavoz: “No hubo ningún aterrizaje de emergencia y ninguna conversación sobre Kamala Harris”.“Yo digo que es pura mentira”, dijo Newsom, riendo a carcajadas.El relato erróneo del expresidente, pronunciado durante una rueda de prensa en su club Mar-a-Lago en Florida, se produjo en respuesta a un periodista que le hizo una pregunta tendenciosa sobre la relación de Harris con Willie Brown, y si Trump pensaba que podría haber tenido algo que ver con su trayectoria profesional.

    @font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-300.fb6b1cd2191b4a3104e3c6b15ce6f294.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-300.48a5e4779dc70097e8f97e08332d1bad.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-300.8fede15c30e43cbc1a20bfa59c045fec.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:italic;font-weight:300;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-500.0fb05587186331cd0a9b0f1a30805e76.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-500.7e321c8cb9da34f32d82e47114f36150.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-500.1a8164a7ba9402b7938a4a088ecdc7c0.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:italic;font-weight:500;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-600.53344665e817d0e6b779b0b12e75db89.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-600.e1875f795ba0d365d032a007eb563b24.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-600.61fa2129de43c6b22d6251bb874e7967.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:italic;font-weight:600;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-700.c2f31454e8f67e6a409c1b5a37c42847.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-700.61d53ea1c2607892d4a7ff00798dbc59.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-700.45666736077d2b862dee9d95a85d8cee.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:italic;font-weight:700;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-800.be53478fd7c32b04647c16795817c00a.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-800.7528246ef94af7fbf426e92d1a234593.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-800.392e85363c515d58d504069f5bff16cc.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:italic;font-weight:800;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-900.93f61fe226df92cc8d8c7aa742f291e7.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-900.b9511ff3ec4a8ab7178d19c1b655c84a.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-italic-900.eb0ff72a1864b509d830becfb3ff9c1f.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:italic;font-weight:900;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-300.a6479a5200f9a6352bdb71589c27c9c3.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-300.fe2bd94ddc6ab147c15e7a4f748b4a9e.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-300.84db46c4aa8492fa2657618cb23f3a2b.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:normal;font-weight:300;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-500.0f4aea3d462cdb64748629efcbbf36bc.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-500.cb85480c30b6ca5f53f673993211036f.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-500.9061b25032eb73a747c2edf738888891.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:normal;font-weight:500;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-600.75739ac267f076931c6da9740386ee6b.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-600.e27b5ffa7bfaa0ac78e146668c74e6f4.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-600.23949bc217f2c95dfe21d3e66ba59445.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:normal;font-weight:600;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-700.91eaf6b5642463af4091160b4bbfdfcb.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-700.ab057a3b069a4ecbde7c3ea74411284e.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-700.3acbe40693cbd3029afc346368ed1b29.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:normal;font-weight:700;font-display:swap;}@font-face{font-family:’nyt-franklin’;src:url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-800.fdc7cad17deeec2db1fe2f9f8c0520ed.woff2’) format(‘woff2’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-800.932fec957ef6d36632bd5494d05ad13b.woff’) format(‘woff’), url(‘https://g1.nyt.com/fonts/mous/fonts/family/franklin/franklin-normal-800.1dc34c8d18e3128867d8e77368f0da56.ttf’) format(‘truetype’);font-style:normal;font-weight:800;font-display:swap;}.css-1ga3qu9{-webkit-flex-basis:50%;-ms-flex-preferred-size:50%;flex-basis:50%;}.css-rrq38y{margin:1rem auto;max-width:945px;}.css-1wsofa1{margin-top:10px;color:var(–color-content-quaternary,#727272);font-family:nyt-imperial,georgia,’times new roman’,times,Songti TC,simsun,serif;font-weight:400;font-size:0.875rem;line-height:1.125rem;}@media (min-width:740px){.css-1wsofa1{font-size:0.9375rem;line-height:1.25rem;}}@media (max-width:600px){.css-1wsofa1{margin-left:20px;margin-right:20px;}}.css-1p3zryq{display:-webkit-box;display:-webkit-flex;display:-ms-flexbox;display:flex;-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;margin:0;gap:4px;}@media (min-width:600px){.css-1p3zryq{-webkit-flex-direction:row;-ms-flex-direction:row;flex-direction:row;-webkit-box-pack:justify;-webkit-justify-content:space-between;-ms-flex-pack:justify;justify-content:space-between;height:auto;margin:0 auto;gap:8px;}}Both Jerry Brown, left, and Willie Brown, refuted Mr. Trump’s story of a helicopter ride gone wrong.

    We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Donald Trump no puede superar que Biden ya no es su rival

    En una conferencia de prensa en Florida, Trump dijo que “la presidencia le fue arrebatada a Joe Biden” por un grupo de demócratas que incluye a Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi y Kamala Harris.[Estamos en WhatsApp. Empieza a seguirnos ahora]Por lo que cuenta el expresidente Donald Trump, acaba de quedar con el corazón roto por todo lo que le ha pasado al pobre presidente Joe Biden estas últimas semanas.“Le quitaron la presidencia a Joe Biden”, dijo Trump en una conferencia de prensa en Mar-a-Lago, su club privado y residencia en Palm Beach, Florida, el jueves por la tarde. “No soy su fan, como probablemente se habrán dado cuenta. Tuvo un debate duro. Pero eso no significa que se le haga a un lado así como así”.Han pasado 18 días desde que el 46º presidente fue apartado por su propio partido, y el 45º aún no lo ha superado. Trump se angustió por Biden, contando una historia de traición perpetrada contra este por el expresidente Barack Obama, la expresidenta de la Cámara de Representantes Nancy Pelosi y, sobre todo, la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris.Recordó cómo Harris había atacado a Biden en un debate de las primarias demócratas en 2019: “Ella fue despreciable al llamarlo racista y el bus escolar y todas esas distintas cosas”. Trump dijo que Biden había cometido un grave error al elegirla como su compañera de fórmula.“Por alguna razón, y sé que él lo lamenta —ustedes también—, la eligió a ella”, dijo Trump. “Y ella también se puso en contra de él. Ella estaba trabajando con la gente que lo quería fuera”. (Tras 27 minutos de abandonar la carrera, Biden apoyó la candidatura de Harris a la presidencia).We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

  • in

    Why Isn’t Kamala Harris Giving Interviews or Holding News Conferences?

    Critics say the vice president has been too cautious with the press. Her supporters think it’s the right strategy at the right time.The press has questions for Vice President Kamala Harris. She isn’t giving a whole lot of answers.In the nearly three weeks since President Biden withdrew his candidacy, catapulting Ms. Harris to the top of the Democratic ticket, the vice president has shown little eagerness to meet journalists in unscripted settings. She has not granted an interview or held a news conference. On Thursday, after a rally in Michigan, she held her first “gaggle” — an impromptu Q.-and-A. session — with reporters covering her campaign.It lasted 70 seconds.Ms. Harris replaced a Democratic nominee who has hosted fewer White House news conferences than any president since Ronald Reagan. Now she is taking a similarly cautious approach, relying on televised rallies and prepared statements amid a tightly controlled rollout of her candidacy.Asked on Thursday if she might sit for an interview anytime soon, Ms. Harris suggested that she would get through the convention first. “I want us to get an interview scheduled before the end of the month,” she said, as aides signaled to the scrum of journalists that question time was over.Ms. Harris’s lack of engagement with the media has become a constant rallying cry on the political right, with Republican critics and Fox News stars accusing the vice president of ducking scrutiny. The Harris campaign says it is being thoughtful about how best to deploy its message, and to introduce a new candidate to crucial voters in battleground states.David Axelrod, the architect of former President Barack Obama’s winning campaigns, believes that Ms. Harris — who on Thursday said she had agreed to a prime-time debate on Sept. 10 with her opponent, former President Donald J. Trump — was trying to strike a balance.“This has been a whirlwind few weeks, and right now, buoyant rally speeches are working really well, so she’s riding the wave,” Mr. Axelrod wrote in an email. “But I’m sure they know that, in addition, presidential races impose a series of tests, including debates and unscripted interactions with voters and media, by which people come to know you. There is time, and I’m sure she’ll get there.”We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More