More stories

  • in

    Local authorities should be given greater powers over ‘unfair’ council tax, MPs warn

    Councils should be granted greater control over council tax, MPs have warned, arguing that the current disconnect between local charges and service quality risks undermining the very foundations of local democracy. An inquiry into the financial sustainability of local government concluded that interim powers should be devolved to councils, ahead of a more comprehensive overhaul of what it described as “the most unfair and regressive tax in use in England today”.The Commons Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee’s report recommended that individual authorities be empowered to revalue properties in their areas, define property bands, set the rates for those bands, and apply discounts. Beyond council tax, the report suggested that a broader devolution of fiscal powers, such as the ability to apply a tourist tax, should also be considered to address the growing financial strain on local government, exacerbated by austerity measures introduced in the 2010s.Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner recently voiced her support for “more push” towards fiscal devolution, aligning with the government’s commitment to transfer central decision-making to local areas. Furthermore, the committee advocated for replacing central government ringfencing of funding with “a rigorous outcomes-based system of accountability”. This would ensure local authorities are held responsible for achieving agreed outcomes within their overall budgets, rather than simply meeting spending targets.Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner recently said she wanted ‘more push’ towards fiscal devolution as part of the Government’s pledge to transfer central decision-making to local areas More

  • in

    Voices: ‘Work until we die?’ Independent readers outraged over retirement age review

    Liz Kendall’s announcement of a new review into the state pension age has drawn a strong response from readers, especially older workers and pensioners who feel increasingly squeezed by reforms they see as both unfair and unrealistic.Many took issue with the idea of raising the retirement age again, warning that it fails to account for physical decline, especially among manual workers. “My knees have packed in,” said one 73-year-old, who retired at 65 after a lifetime of physical labour. “There’s no way I could keep doing the work I used to.”Several readers questioned Ms Kendall’s assertion that future pensioners should take heed and save more, with many pointing out that saving is only an option for the wealthy or those with disposable incomes.A recurring theme was frustration at a system seen to punish those who had “done everything right” – saving into private pensions and paying contributions, only to be left with little support. “He told me to retire penniless,” another reader said of her father’s bitter advice, “because then you get everything.”A few commenters looked to the future, suggesting that instead of clinging to outdated models, the government should explore policies like basic income to address the long-term impacts of AI and inequality.Here’s what you had to say:Pensioners don’t drain the systemPensioners are nearly always referred to as if they’re draining the system of something they’re not entitled to. Forgotten is the fact that most of them worked until 65 and paid what was due until they did. As we now know, it doesn’t protect them from poverty in old age. Only those with private pensions, which are also subject to taxation that wasn’t foreseen when many set these plans up, have enough to cover basic costs.Saving? How does the average worker do that? They can hardly afford to put food on the table and get by. Take more money out of people’s pockets, which cuts spending, and even more high streets will become derelict and industries will fail.Increasing retirement age? A friend died at 69 recently, and another at 72 (neither were manual workers). Increasing retirement age for manual workers would be cruel as well as disastrous, or are people supposed to work until they drop? Too many pensioners are having to desperately look for jobs to boost pensions that don’t enable them to eat and heat. Maybe it’s time the government took a look at some of the systems that work in other countries!Quick-fix ideas aren’t the solution. A system fit for purpose, where everyone pays their fair share and people can retain their dignity and are able to live without having to calculate how and if they’re entitled to benefits or charity to get by, is the only sensible way forward. Will it happen? I would lie if I said I was optimistic!AmbigirlsDo you think the state pension age should rise — or is it already too high? Share your thoughts in the comments below.Reform, not tinkeringThere are issues with the triple lock, but the savings narrative is a fiction. As people (particularly working-class people) approach 70, they are more likely to find themselves unable to find suitable employment or be underemployed. So they will require working-age benefits. It is not difficult to imagine that there would also be increased costs on the health system as ageing bodies are required to work more and more.Further, it is likely that around one-third of millennials will end their working lives in the private rental sector, so housing support will be required at greater levels.We cannot keep tinkering with these systems just to balance the books on paper. We must reform the tax code and the social security net to make both fit for the modern age.lostboy88Punished for savingMy dad saved, paid into private pensions and paid his contributions. He was never unemployed and did everything the government asked him to do. When he retired, he found to his disgust that he was entitled to very little from the state – effectively punished for having saved, etc, whilst others who contributed nothing were given everything by the state. That’s socialism. He told me to never make his mistake and ensure I retired penniless to get the maximum back from all I had paid in.saghiaWork until we die?OK, so here we have the result of all those people who wanted to avoid benefits cuts. The alternative is for working people to work longer.Some benefit cuts were needed, in my opinion.And before anyone suggests a 0.2 per cent tax on billionaires – whether we like it or not – they can leave the UK, fly in from time to time if they really want to, and then we’d lose the huge amount they do pay in tax. What then? Work until we die? Ordinary people are paying for a few too many freeloaders, in my opinion. Where is the sympathy for non-unionised people who work and pay tax?Hi5Saving is not the answerSaving? Saving is NOT the answer. If we try to save more, we spend less. If we spend less, businesses sell and make less, so they invest less… just the opposite of what we need to increase the output needed to pay pensions.It is a good example of the confused thinking that affects so many people. An individual who saves more will have more to spend in retirement than they would otherwise have. If we all try to do that, we are all worse off. What is right for an individual is often not right collectively (wet wipes, panic buying, burning smoky fuel, saving for retirement, etc). The Fallacy of Composition.much0adoPeople aren’t saving because they can’tPeople aren’t saving because they can’t – it’s that simple. There is no money left at the end of the month to save anything because of the cost of living. A large majority of people are having to live pay cheque to pay cheque with no slack. Unless something is done about that, then there is a huge problem being stored up for the future, let alone Reeves saying she was going after people’s savings!!deadduckGross inequality is the root of our problemsThe government can’t simply keep increasing the state pension age for one reason: some people become physically incapable of working when they get a little bit older. Asking a manual worker to keep digging holes when he’s nearly 70 is absurd. The government needs to deal with tax evasion and avoidance, including offshore. I’d also introduce a land value tax, which forces the wealthy to pay their share. Gross inequality is the root cause of many of our societal problems, and it’s time it was addressed. You don’t deal with it by taxing working people more – you tax the ultra wealthy who pay basically nothing.flying scotIt makes sense to raise the pension agePeople are largely living longer because of better living conditions, nutrition and healthcare. For example, I’m now much older than all my grandparents were when they died. Although the most vulnerable must still be cared for, it makes sense to raise the pension age to reflect this change in society – it is the 21st century rather than the 1900s…haynemanOnsalught on working-class peopleI’m 73, retired at 65 and did manual work most of my life. My knees have packed in, and the rest of my body is slowly packing in now – there is no way I am able to do the sort of work I did when I was younger, and haven’t been able for well over 10 years now. This is the case for many manual workers.How can Kendall, Reeves, Streeting, Starmer etc. call themselves a Labour government with this continual onslaught on working-class people? The trade unions should withdraw support and funding immediately and advise their members to place their votes elsewhere, preferably not in Farage’s direction, though.manwithnonameThe future looks unpredictableWe must bear in mind that the relentless march of AI and other systems is considerably reducing the number of jobs in many sectors dependent on ‘exchanges of data’, from simple insurance to DVLA or HMRC, for instance… The list is endless.How can these workers be ‘recycled’ in the short term? How do we ensure that those mythical 16-year-old voters HAVE some employment to look forward to after finishing their studies, at whatever level?Importing ‘low-grade’ labour is eating into the job supply at the bottom end, while all those ‘surgeons and engineers’ cream off the top end…The future looks unpredictable for too many youngsters. Problems must be addressed now!Failure to do that will make the triple lock – an invaluable resource to many pensioners still – look like change from the back of the sofa…YvesFerrerThese reviews are so detached from people’s realitiesFinancial literacy is not taught in schools. I suspect a large proportion of people who are not planning for retirement don’t understand money very well. Also, a huge number of people don’t have enough disposable income to save at a level that would give a comfortable retirement. You need, in current terms, around £300,000 to £500,000 in private funds. That is for someone who owns their own home. If you retire but have to still pay for rented accommodation, you’ve got no chance.These reviews are so detached from people’s realities. After paying tax and National Insurance for 50 years, I get my State Pension next year – and I will be paying income tax on it :)LithiumironSome of the comments have been edited for this article for brevity and clarity.Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day’s top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click ‘log in’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.RecommendedMake sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here. More

  • in

    Peter Mandelson enlisted help to return to Tony Blair’s government

    Newly released official files reveal the extent of Peter Mandelson’s determination to re-enter government after twice being forced to resign from Tony Blair’s cabinet. The papers, made public by the National Archives in Kew, west London, show that Mr Mandelson even sought the assistance of Lord Birt, the former BBC director general, in his bid to secure a senior position.Mr Mandelson had been compelled to step down as Northern Ireland secretary in January 2001 amid allegations he had facilitated a UK passport for controversial Indian businessman Srichand Hinduja, in connection with the Millennium Dome. This followed an earlier resignation over an undeclared home loan from fellow Labour minister Geoffrey Robinson.Despite an official inquiry clearing him of impropriety in the Hinduja affair, Mr Blair was hesitant to reinstate his long-time ally, given his prior departures. However, in April 2003, Lord Birt, then a senior policy adviser in No 10, wrote to the prime minister, urging him to reconsider. Peter Mandelson is currently the British Ambassador to the United States More

  • in

    Voices: How can the UK’s broken water industry be fixed? Join The Independent Debate

    As public outrage over sewage spills, rising bills and shareholder payouts reaches boiling point, a landmark review has called for a radical overhaul of how the water industry is regulated. The Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England Deputy Governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, has recommended scrapping Ofwat entirely and replacing it, along with other regulators such as the Environment Agency and Natural England, with a single, powerful body.The current system is “fragmented and overlapping”, the report argues, and has failed to keep companies in check as infrastructure crumbled and pollution soared. Environment Secretary Steve Reed has said Ofwat is “clearly failing” and signalled he will act on the findings.But would a single super-regulator really fix the system, or just shuffle responsibilities without addressing deeper problems? Sir Jon has warned that bills will rise by nearly a third in the next five years, even with reform. Campaigners, meanwhile, continue to call for full public ownership, pointing to the £85bn paid out to shareholders since privatisation.So what needs to change? Should regulation be overhauled – or the whole system taken back into public hands? And how do we make sure customers and the environment aren’t left paying the price?We want to hear from you. Share your thoughts in the comments and vote in the poll below – we’ll feature the most compelling responses and discuss the results in the coming days.All you have to do is sign up and register your details – then you can take part in the debate. You can also sign up by clicking ‘log in’ on the top right-hand corner of the screen. More

  • in

    Sainsbury’s to ban unhealthy snacks for staff amid government obesity crackdown

    Sainsbury’s is set to remove free crisps and biscuits from its staff rooms in a bid to support the government’s campaign against obesity in the UK.Staff members will, instead, be offered items from a list of approved “light meal” options, including soups, porridge and bread.These options are intended to replace the “largely unhealthy snacks” that colleagues had complained about, and which, some staff claimed, were vanishing before the end of their shifts.Sainsbury’s has hailed its highest market share for nearly a decade as sales were given a boost by warm weather and a temporary boost from the cyber attack disruption at Marks & Spencer (Alamy/PA) More

  • in

    Voices: ‘We failed those who protected us’: Independent readers react to UK’s ‘shameful’ MoD data breach

    A catastrophic Ministry of Defence data breach that exposed the details of thousands of Afghans seeking refuge in the UK was kept secret for nearly two years under an unprecedented superinjunction, The Independent has revealed.The leak, which occurred in February 2022, compromised sensitive information about applicants to the MoD’s Arap resettlement scheme – a programme for Afghans who had supported British forces and now feared Taliban reprisals. Officials launched a top-secret response, codenamed Operation Rubific, resulting in the covert evacuation of more than 16,000 people to the UK. The government was prepared to relocate up to 42,000 in total at a projected cost of £7bn.The extraordinary cover-up meant MPs, the public and even many within Whitehall were kept in the dark. A court battle led by The Independent and other media finally overturned the superinjunction this week, raising serious questions about transparency, accountability, and the treatment of those who risked their lives for Britain.Reactions from readers have been swift and damning, touching on moral responsibility, government secrecy, institutional incompetence, and the human cost of this breach. Many drew parallels with past scandals, while others demanded consequences and urgent reform.Here’s what you had to say:Britain has a moral responsibilityIt is an expensive programme, that is true, but the problem is a very big one. The whole thing was bungled from the start – remember Dominic Raab staying on his holiday in Crete while Kabul was being evacuated? And the nature of the leak is just incredible.The billions this costs, spread out over several years, are desperately needed elsewhere, but as with the Gurkhas, Britain has a moral responsibility.RegCostelloThis story has shocked many – what’s your reaction? Add your voice in the comments.(i) ‘Prioritisation of Ukrainian nationals’ and (ii) ‘drastically increased work-from-home arrangements for civil servants’ were the main reasons given for the months-long consular waits for visas and passport processing in 2022 and 2023. I wonder whether this massive evacuation from Afghanistan contributed to that strain, or whether it was all managed by a separate–and–covert department. Either way, covert or not, every resource has its limit, doesn’t it?Ever more freely and transparently may truths emerge!IndySpannerPhonesMany are still in dangerHopefully the Labour government will quickly step up the process of getting all to safety. It’s been over a year, but many are still in danger.The government needs to ensure that 10 per cent of evacuees do not end up homeless, as they suggested could be the case in October 2024.PropagandaoftheDeedA national shameThe way we treated these people who helped us at great risk is a national shame.Albert GinwallahCorruption or shambles?Hmmm… so Britain’s security is more at risk from the government and MoD! Well, I for one am not surprised at all. And that goes for the cover-up and lies from successive governments! Look at the Post Office and Horizon, the blood contamination saga. Is it corruption or a shambles?Red DragonHas the person been sacked?My first question is: has the person who sent the email been sacked and prosecuted for breaching confidentiality as well as costing the country some £400m?If not, why not?TomHawkSpare a thought for Afghan womenThis was a chaotic Tory mess-up, as is traditional. Against the scale of the issue, this ethical UK response is tiny. Spare a thought for the 450k Afghan refugee women forcibly repatriated from Iran and Pakistan since Jan 2025, who are instantly criminalised for travelling alone back to a medieval regime where women and girls have a value less than livestock.HerbaciousScandal after scandalIs there anything the UK government can run?Scandal after scandal after scandal. Billions upon billions p***** up the wall. A little bridge in a London park, £36 million?ChicheeLet’s have an expensive public inquiryWow – a government cover-up. That’s a surprise. Let’s have an expensive public inquiry at the cost to us taxpayers that will last the next five years, with the familiar outcome stating lessons will be learnt…Once that’s out of the way, we can then promote the ‘guilty’ individuals to the House of Lords.theSpycatcherA get-out clauseA “superinjunction” is basically the get-out clause for despotic governments (or in the case of Britain, the rancid ruling class).stoniaKeeping the public in the darkHow ironic that the British establishment invests huge efforts in keeping the public in the dark about so many things of public interest – and yet is incapable of protecting sensitive data when lives actually depend on it.DanilovData like this should never leave a secure government server. What on earth is it doing being emailed to random people and posted on Facebook? And how do you “inadvertently share” a file?sj99Incompetence should have consequencesIncompetence on such a massive scale should have consequences; otherwise, it sends the wrong message. It says: don’t worry about being diligent, do what you like, it doesn’t matter.Sean As if the data breach itself wasn’t appalling enough, the fact that this individual is still employed in another department at the MoD is absolutely shameful.Cyclone8Only in the UK public sector…Where else but the UK public sector can someone do something that puts people’s lives at risk and costs £400m to sort out, yet keep your job and your pension?If there is any better illustration of how we are let down by our public sector, I can’t think of it.These days, our public sector is the refuge of those who should not be let loose with a broom, let alone handle sensitive matters.TomHawkWe are failing to protect those we put at riskBloody shambles. We should have offered sanctuary to those who were at risk just because of who their former employer was – the MoD. While the news and politics are all about ‘illegal immigrants, ’ we are failing to protect those we put at risk. Shameful.SnaughterSome of the comments have been edited for this article for brevity and clarity.Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day’s top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click ‘log in’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here. More

  • in

    Nearly 1.7m children hit by two-child benefit cap as Labour urged to scrap ‘brutal’ policy

    New figures have revealed that more than 1.66 million children are living in households affected by the two-child benefit cap as campaigners ramp up calls for the controversial measure to be scrapped.The new data brings the total number of children affected by the cap since Labour came into power a year ago to 300,000.There are nearly 470,000 households facing benefit reductions due to the policy, the latest official figures from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) show, housing nearly 1.7 million children.The government has faced intense pressure from campaigners, charities and opposition parties over the measure, which experts say is a chief driver of child poverty in the UK.Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer has resisted calls to drop the cap More

  • in

    Angela Rayner to ban businesses from using NDAs to cover up harassment and discrimination

    UK businesses will be barred from using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of harassment and discrimination as a part of the government’s bid to boost workers’ rights.Angela Rayner has proposed an amendment to the Employment Rights Bill which would void and prohibit such agreements against employees in such situations to prevent people from having to “suffer in silence”.The deputy prime minister said the government had “heard the calls from victims of harassment and discrimination”, as she announced the move following repeated calls from campaigners and Labour politicians.Zelda Perkins, Weinstein’s former assistant and founder of the campaign group Can’t Buy My Silence UK, said the move was “a huge milestone”.Angela Rayner has proposed an amendment to the Employment Rights Bill which would void and prohibit such agreements against employees in such situations to prevent people from having to “suffer in silence”. More