More stories

  • in

    Read the Letter from Nobel Laureates Endorsing Kamala Harris for President

    At no time in our nation’s history has there been a greater need for our leaders to appreciate the
    value of science in formulating public policy.
    The enormous increases in living standards and life expectancies over the past two centuries are
    largely the result of advances in science and technology. Kamala Harris recognizes this and
    understands that maintaining America’s leadership in these fields requires budgetary support
    from the federal government, independent universities, and international collaboration. Harris
    also recognizes the key role that immigrants have always played in the advancement of science.
    Should Donald Trump win the presidential election, he would undermine future US leadership on
    these and other fronts, as well as jeopardize any advancements in our standards of living, slow
    the progress of science and technology, and impede our responses to climate change.
    This is the most consequential presidential election in a long time, perhaps ever, for the future of
    science and the United States. We, the undersigned, strongly support Harris.
    Signed,
    Peter Agre
    Chemistry 2003
    Frances H. Arnold
    Chemistry 2018
    David Baker
    Chemistry 2024
    Moungi G. Bawendi Chemistry 2023
    Martin Chalfie
    Chemistry 2008
    Elias James Corey,
    Chemistry 1990
    Johann Deisenhofer
    Chemistry 1988
    Joachim Frank
    Chemistry 2017
    Alan Heeger
    Roald Hoffmann
    Brian K. Kobilka
    Chemistry 2000
    Chemistry 1981
    Chemistry 2012
    Roger D. Kornberg
    Chemistry 2006
    Robert J. Lefkowitz
    Chemistry 2012
    Michael Levitt
    Chemistry 2013
    William E. Moerner Chemistry 2014
    Richard R. Schrock Chemistry 2005
    Sir James Fraser Stoddart
    Chemistry 2016
    Sir M. Stanley Whittingham Chemistry 2019 More

  • in

    A Shift in the World of Science

    What this year’s Nobels can teach us about science and humanity.Alan Burdick and Technology observers have grown increasingly vocal in recent years about the threat that artificial intelligence poses to the human variety. A.I. models can write and talk like us, draw and paint like us, crush us at chess and Go. They express an unnerving simulacrum of creativity, not least where the truth is concerned.A.I. is coming for science, too, as this week’s Nobel Prizes seemed keen to demonstrate. On Tuesday, the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to two scientists who helped computers “learn” closer to the way the human brain does. A day later, the Nobel Prize in Chemistry went to three researchers for using A.I. to invent new proteins and reveal the structure of existing ones — a problem that stumped biologists for decades, yet could be solved by A.I. in minutes.The Nobel Committee for Chemistry announced the winners last week.Jonathan Nackstrand/Agence France-Presse — Getty ImagesCue the grousing: This was computer science, not physics or chemistry! Indeed, of the five laureates on Tuesday and Wednesday, arguably only one, the University of Washington biochemist David Baker, works in the field he was awarded in.The scientific Nobels tend to award concrete results over theories, empirical discovery over pure idea. But that schema didn’t quite hold this year, either. One prize went to scientists who leaned into physics as a foundation on which to build computer models used for no groundbreaking result in particular. The laureates on Wednesday, on the other hand, had created computer models that made big advancements in biochemistry.These were outstanding and fundamentally human accomplishments, to be sure. But the Nobel recognition underscored a chilling prospect: Henceforth, perhaps scientists will merely craft the tools that make the breakthroughs, rather than do the revolutionary work themselves or even understand how it came about. Artificial intelligence designs and builds hundreds of molecular Notre Dames and Hagia Sophias, and a researcher gets a pat for inventing the shovel.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More