More stories

  • in

    Democrats smash fundraising records after Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death

    As Democrats and Republicans braced for a supreme court nomination fight that has upended the November presidential election, Democratic donors smashed fundraising records, funneling more than $90m to candidates and progressive groups after the death on Friday of Ruth Bader Ginsburg.As Senate Republicans prepared to push through Ginsburg’s replacement, politicians on both sides of the divide, from the presidential candidates to senators running for re-election, House candidates and more, used the situation to appeal to supporters for funds.One Republican senator, Joni Ernst of Iowa, apologised for a fundraising email that was sent out shortly after Ginsburg’s death was announced.On the other side of the aisle, the online fundraising organization ActBlue said grassroots donors gave $91.4m to Democratic candidates and causes in 28 hours after 8pm on Friday, around the time of the news of Ginsburg’s death.That figure, coming from 1.5 million donations, broke records for dollars raised in one day and dollars raised in one hour, said Erin Hill, the non-profit’s executive director.Donors gave $70.6m on Saturday alone, and $6.3m in one hour on Friday, Hill said, beating previous records of $41.6m in one day and $4.3m in one hour.If Donald Trump is able to install a conservative replacement for the liberal Ginsburg, the move would cement a 6-3 conservative majority on the court. Democrats will seek to defeat the nomination, over which two Republican senators have already said no vote should be held until after the election.Much of the Democratic money will be poured into key Senate races, as the party seeks to retake the chamber, and also to pressure vulnerable Republican incumbents into opposing the move to install a new justice before the election.“BREAKING: the future of the supreme court is on the line,” said a fundraising email from Republican senator Ernst’s Iowa campaign, shortly after the justice’s death was announced. Ernst is in a close race.“Our conservative values and constitutional rights are now on the line,” the email said. “The next supreme court nominee will shape major decisions for decades to come.”Ernst later issued an apology.“This email never should have gone out,” she said in a statement. “Though I never saw it, it was sent out under my name and I take responsibility for it. Tonight, my prayers are with the family of Justice Ginsburg.”On Saturday, Trump’s campaign also texted out a fundraising solicitation.“President Trump will fill the supreme court vacancy with a conservative justice,” the message read. “Make America Great Again!”The Biden campaign also appealed for funds.One group of Democratic strategists is raising money through an effort called “Get Mitch or Die Trying”, named for Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, the man who will steer the nomination process.The effort, which shares donations among Democratic Senate contenders, reported that within hours of Ginsburg’s death it more than doubled what it had previously raised.“In tribute to the extraordinary life of Justice Ginsberg, I’m matching donations to this fund up to $10,000 tonight,” tweeted Grey’s Anatomy showrunner Krista Vernoff.Senator Brian Schatz of Hawaii included a link to the fundraising effort in a tweet: “Don’t pick your favorite candidate or the one you’ve heard of. Give here. I repeat, this money goes directly to the most competitive races, not just the most famous candidates.”An ActBlue Senate-focused Democratic fundraising push specifically mentioned Ginsburg’s legacy.“In this moment it is vital to give to Senate candidates,” read a fundraising page called “Protect RBG’s Legacy”.“Time to apply maximum pressure so that they do the right thing and refuse to vote to confirm before the 2020 election.”A representative for ActBlue did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesman for WinRed, Republican’s ActBlue counterpart, also did not respond. More

  • in

    'Follow your conscience,' Biden urges Republicans as Trump pushes for supreme court nominee – video

    Play Video

    1:13

    Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden makes a plea to Senate Republicans, asking them to ‘follow their conscience’ and defy president Donald Trump’s push to name his nominee for the supreme court ahead of November’s election. Trump says he plans to nominate a women for the seat as soon as possible, after Ruth Bader Ginsburg died aged 87 six weeks out from the US election. ‘I appeal to those few Senate Republicans, that handful who really will decide what happens. Please follow your conscience,’ Biden says. ‘Don’t vote to confirm anyone nominated under the circumstances President Trump and Senator McConnell have created. Don’t go there. Uphold your constitutional duty, your conscience’
    Supreme court: Biden accuses Trump and Republicans of abuse of power
    Second Republican senator says there should be no supreme court vote before election
    ‘I will fight!’: mourners’ vow at supreme court vigil for Ruth Bader Ginsburg

    Topics

    US elections 2020

    US politics

    Joe Biden

    Donald Trump

    Trump administration

    Democrats

    Republicans More

  • in

    Second Republican senator says there should be no supreme court vote before election

    Alaska Republican senator Lisa Murkowski said on Sunday she would not support efforts to confirm Donald Trump’s third supreme court pick before the presidential election on 3 November. The move came a day after Susan Collins of Maine, another Republican moderate, took the same position.Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell can now afford to lose only one more senator if he is to achieve his aim of tilting the court firmly to the right for a generation or more.Thanks to reforms initiated by Democrats in 2013 but completed by Republicans in 2017, a simple Senate majority is required to confirm a supreme court justice.Murkowski and Collins’ statements mean that if no Democrats or independents come over to the Republican side, McConnell can count on a win by 51 votes to 49. He could afford to lose one more senator, as Vice-President Mike Pence would break any tie.The Senate majority leader is looking to hold a vote before election day – or even in the lame duck period after the election and before the next presidential inauguration, on 20 January, even if Democrats take the White House and the Senate.A seat on the nine-member court fell open with the death on Friday night of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, of pancreatic cancer and at the age of 87.We need to begin thinking about the credibility and integrity of our institutionsLisa Murkowski – in 2018Trump has already named Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to the court, but they were conservatives who replaced conservatives. A rightwing replacement for Ginsburg, a heroine to liberals, would weight the court 6-3 in favour of conservatives.Ginsburg’s family said the justice had wished not to be replaced before the election, which is less than 50 days away and for which some states have begun early voting.McConnell immediately disregarded that wish, vowing to advance a Trump nominee.His opponents immediately cried foul, over McConnell’s refusal in in 2016 to sanction even a hearing for Merrick Garland, Barack Obama’s nominee to replace Antonin Scalia, who died in February that year. McConnell argued then that a vacancy should not be filled in the final year of a presidency.On Saturday, Collins said she did not support moves to vote on any nominee before an election. That evening, Trump told a rally in North Carolina he would nominate a woman, promising to reveal the name in the coming days.Murkowski had already indicated her opposition to a vote so close to the election. In a statement on Sunday, she made it official.“For weeks,” she said, “I have stated that I would not support taking up a potential supreme court vacancy this close to the election. Sadly, what was then a hypothetical is now our reality, but my position has not changed.“I did not support taking up a nomination eight months before the 2016 election to fill the vacancy created by the passing of Justice Scalia. We are now even closer to the 2020 election – less than two months out – and I believe the same standard must apply.”Republicans insist the Garland precedent does not apply, because their party holds both the Senate and the White House. But there is no constitutional provision which says a president and Senate of different parties cannot confirm a justice. Clarence Thomas, a staunch conservative on the current court, was the last justice confirmed by a Senate held by the party opposing the president.If the Democratic candidate Mark Kelly wins a special election in Arizona, he could be seated by 30 November, producing a tie if a vote has not already been held.More immediately, Republicans either vulnerable to re-election defeat, like Collins, or less likely to toe the Trumpist line than most, like Murkowksi, are being watched closely.Cory Gardner of Colorado is struggling in his re-election race, while Thom Tillis is in a tight fight in North Carolina.Lamar Alexander of Tennessee is both relatively collegially minded and retiring, so relatively free of pressure.Mitt Romney of Utah is a former presidential candidate with one eye on his place in history, the son of a governor who cited his father, his conscience and fidelity to the constitution when he became the sole Republican to vote for Trump’s impeachment. More

  • in

    Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Republicans and Democrats draw battle lines over replacement – video

    Play Video

    3:05

    A further feud has emerged just weeks before the US election after the death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Donald Trump is advocating that the seat be filled with a ‘very brilliant’ woman as soon as possible. However, Democrats are rallying in an attempt to prevent Trump filling the seat until after the election. Joe Biden and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have said Republicans should follow the precedent that GOP legislators set in 2016 by refusing to consider a supreme court choice in the run-up to an election. If the Republicans were to get their way it could result in a conservative majority on the supreme court for decades to come
    Supreme court: Democrats rally in bid to stop Trump filling Ginsburg’s seat

    Topics

    Ruth Bader Ginsburg

    Donald Trump

    US supreme court

    US politics More