UK Politics

For those of us who covered the infamous 2016 EU referendum and subsequent negotiations to “get Brexit done”, the bitter memories and toxicity displayed by both sides scarred almost all involved.Throughout the painful negotiations, particularly when Theresa May was prime minister, the constant refrain to the UK was “you can’t have your cake and eat it” – you cannot have the benefits of EU membership without being part of the bloc.Yet the deal struck in London on Monday, in the wake of the India trade deal and US agreement with Trump, suggests that Sir Keir has succeeded where others failed and managed to break the Brexit conundrum.But much of how he has achieved the apparently impossible can be explained by the markedly different tone between the UK and EU at this summit.Sir Keir Starmer and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen at a press conference at the end of the UK-EU Summit at Lancaster House in London (Carl Court/PA) More

Critics have branded Keir Starmer’s fishing deal with the EU “a horror show” for the industry after he granted European trawler fleets 12 years of access to UK waters.The roll over of the existing fisheries deal to 2038 will benefit the British fishing industry, the prime minister has claimed, by allowing the sale of fish caught in UK waters to be sold in the EU without veterinary checks, removing a costly post-Brexit barrier. Sir Keir has also unveiled a £360m fund to support fishing communities and modernise the British fishing fleet.He told reporters: “It’s time to look forward. To move on from the stale old debates and political fights to find common sense, practical solutions which get the best for the British people.”But he faces another argument with the Scottish government after failing to consult them before signing his deal, which impacts Scottish fisheries. The Scottish Fishermen’s Federation (SFF) branded the UK-EU deal a “horror show” for the sector, while Scottish constitution secretary Angus Robertson blasted the UK for agreeing a fisheries deal in principle “without any recourse, involvement or approval of devolved administrations”.However, government sources have briefed that UK hands were tied because the Windsor Framework Agreement struck last year by Rishi Sunak meant the UK would have to negotiate fishing rights at the same time as access to the energy market.The core elements remain unchanged from the Conservatives’ post-Brexit fisheries deal, first implemented in 2020, and continues to allow EU fishermen access to UK waters. However, Tory Party leader Kemi Badenoch claimed that the fishing agreement was three times longer than the government wanted.But Richard Kilpatrick, head of campaigns at thinktank European Movement UK, said the certainty provided by the longer timeframe will benefit the industry. Scottish SNP First Minister John Swinney said the deal showed Scotland is an ‘afterthought’ to UK ministers. (Andrew Milligan/PA)“This will open a serious food deal with the EU, which is of huge benefit to all of us – including the fishing industry,” he told the Independent.“Even if it is not quite what they wanted, [the fisheries deal] gives the industry certainty, which can guide their investment decisions – much clearer than returning to it every few years.”‘Betrayal’ over fisheriesThe EU is still Britain’s top market for fish but since Brexit, the UK’s seafood exports have dropped by 26 per cent to just 336,000 tonnes in 2023 compared to 454,000 in 2019. EU fishing vessels will have access to UK waters until 2038 under the new agreement, though quotas will see no increase. More

Sir Keir Starmer today “turned a page” on Britain’s relations with the EU as he ushered in a “new era” of cooperation and friendship with his landmark Brexit reset deal.A clearly jubilant prime minister said the deal — his third major international agreement this month after securing trade deals with India and the US — would be a “win-win” for both sides and showed Britain is “back on the world stage”. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen described it as an “historic moment” as she appeared alongside the PM at a press conference in London, just hours after frantic negotiations concluded to get the deal over the line. “We are turning a page,” she said. “We are opening a new chapter in our unique relationship.”The agreement, which officials claim will boost the UK economy by £9 billion by 2040, appears to be a major coup for the Labour leader with “the pragmatic and positive” elements of removing red tape and border checks lauded by some.It represents the first serious attempt to fix the harms caused by Brexit from Boris Johnson’s flawed deal in late 2019 which Rishi Sunak tinkered with last year in the Windsor Framework.European Council president Antonio Costa, Britain’s prime minister Keir Starmer and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen host a joint press conference More

The “antiquated” IT system used by the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) has come under fire after a major cyber attack saw potentially millions of pieces of personal data stolen, including criminal records.A “significant amount of personal data” of people who applied to the agency since 2010 was accessed and downloaded in a cyber attack in April this year, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has said.Those eligible to apply for legal aid include domestic violence and modern slavery victims, people involved in cases in the family court, as well as those accused of criminal offences.The group that carried out the attack has claimed it accessed 2.1 million pieces of data but the MoJ has not verified that figure.Richard Atkinson, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, a professional body that represents solicitors, said: “It is extremely concerning that members of the public have had their personal data compromised in this cyber security incident and the LAA must get a grip on the situation immediately.“The incident once again demonstrates the need for sustained investment to bring the LAA’s antiquated IT system up to date and ensure the public have continued trust in the justice system.“The fragility of the IT system has prevented vital reforms, including updates to the means test that could help millions more access legal aid, and interim payments for firms whose cash flow is being decimated by the backlogs in the courts, through no fault of their own.“If it is now also proving vulnerable to cyber attack, further delay is untenable.“Legal aid firms are small businesses providing an important public service and are operating on the margins of financial viability. Given that vulnerability, these financial security concerns are the last thing they need.”The National Crime Agency is investigating the breach. It is understood that so far there is not believed to be any link to the cyber attacks on Marks and Spencer, the Co-op and Harrods, but investigators are keeping an open mind.The Government became aware of a cyber attack on the LAA’s online digital services on April 23, but realised on Friday that it was more extensive than originally thought.The data accessed may include contact details and addresses of legal aid applicants, their dates of birth, national insurance numbers, criminal history, employment status and financial data such as contribution amounts, debts and payments.Officials will try to contact anyone identified in the data believed to be at significant risk of harm.The LAA’s online digital services, which are used by legal aid providers to log their work and get paid by the Government, have been taken offline.An MoJ source put the breach down to the “neglect and mismanagement” of the previous government, saying vulnerabilities in the LAA’s systems have been known for many years.“This data breach was made possible by the long years of neglect and mismanagement of the justice system under the last government.“They knew about the vulnerabilities of the LAA digital systems, but did not act,” the source said.It is understood the attack happened as the MoJ has been working on replacing the internal system with a new version hoped to be up and running in the coming weeks.The MoJ is urging anyone who has applied for legal aid since 2010 to be alert for unknown messages and phone calls and to update any passwords that could have been exposed.The ministry has been working with the National Crime Agency and the National Cyber Security Centre, and has informed the Information Commissioner.Legal Aid Agency chief executive Jane Harbottle apologised for the breach.“I understand this news will be shocking and upsetting for people and I am extremely sorry this has happened.“Since the discovery of the attack, my team has been working around the clock with the National Cyber Security Centre to bolster the security of our systems so we can safely continue the vital work of the agency.“However, it has become clear that, to safeguard the service and its users, we needed to take radical action. That is why we’ve taken the decision to take the online service down,” she said.Ms Harbottle said contingency plans are in place to make sure those in need of legal support and advice can continue to access it.Reacting to the attack, global cyber security adviser Jake Moore, from software company ESET, said it highlights how critical it is for public bodies to invest in stronger cyber defences and be transparent immediately when things go wrong.“When criminal records and other sensitive personal data are exposed, it is not just a matter of IT failure, it’s a breach of trust, privacy, and even safety in this case,” he said.“Many of the individuals affected may already be in vulnerable situations and could now face the added stress of not knowing where their data will end up or how it might be used.“Delays in notifying victims or vague reassurances can often worsen the damage whether it’s a Government agency or private company.” More

A landmark deal has been agreed between Britain and the European Union after a last minute breakthrough in Sir Keir Starmer’s reset talks.Sir Keir — who has made the Brexit reset a centrepiece of his administration — said Monday’s summit marks a “new era” of relations with the bloc, adding that it is about “moving on from stale old debates” and “looking forward, not backwards”.Some issues have proven thornier than others, with the topic of fishing rights understood to have been a key stumbling bloc for negotiators that was only solved in the early hours of the morning. Meanwhile, talks surrounding a youth mobility scheme appear to have ended in a deadlock. As the the prime minister faces judgement on how successful his mission to reset relations with the EU has really been,The Independent takes a look exactly what has been agreed. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen More

Sir Keir Starmer’s post-Brexit reset is going down to the wire just hours before the prime minister is to host Ursula von der Leyen and Antonio Costa in London. British and European negotiators were working overnight to hash out a deal before the prime minister appears at a press conference alongside Ms Von der Leyen, the European Commission president, and Mr Costa, president of the European Council, on Monday. Downing Street sources said there are “outstanding issues on both sides”. “Negotiations are going down to the wire and a deal is not yet done… conversations will continue overnight,” an official said. EU ambassadors were reportedly meeting in Brussels on Sunday to agree to any further compromises on either side. Keir Starmer will unveil the results of his post-Brexit reset on Monday More

Sir Keir Starmer faces one of the biggest days of his premiership on Monday, when he is expected to unveil his plans for Britain’s post-Brexit reset deal towards closer ties with the EU. Although officials were still locked in negotiations on Sunday night, the prime minister is hopeful of a deal to rebuild ties with the bloc after years of tension and mistrust under the Conservatives. Sir Keir has made the reset a centrepiece of his administration, but has been keen to stress that its scope will be limited while the Brexit vote will be respected. So when European Commission president Ursula Von Der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa appear at the first EU and UK bilateral summit since Brexit on Monday afternoon, he will be keen to show progress has been made. Sir Keir Starmer is resetting Britain’s relationship with the EU More

The UK looks increasingly likely to agree to a post-Brexit youth mobility scheme with the European Union at a major UK-EU summit on Monday. Such an agreement would be a major step towards resetting Boris Johnson’s damaging Brexit deal, and has been pushed by European officials for months.The move, which is being demanded by European countries and commissioners in Brussels, would help to create much closer ties with the bloc and begin to repair the shattered relationship left by the previous Tory government.Here, The Independent looks at how such a scheme would work in practice, who would be eligible to take part and whether or not there is support for it in Britain.What would be the key features of a youth mobility scheme? An agreement of this nature would allow young people in the UK and the EU to move and work freely between countries for a limited period of time. It is likely to include 18- to 30-year-olds, potentially extending to those under 35 as well. It is thought that they would be able to live and work abroad for up to two years. However, there is some suggestion that figures in the government are pushing for this period to be reduced to just one year instead. Do similar schemes exist already? Britain already has similar agreements with 13 countries, including Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Iceland, Uruguay, Hong Kong and Taiwan.The scheme is currently available for those aged 18 to 30 or 18 to 35, depending on where they are from, and allows them to live and work in the UK for up to two years. In order to qualify for the scheme, individuals must have £2,530 in savings to show they are able to support themselves while living in Britain. Would the British public back the scheme? There is widespread support for such an agreement, with a YouGov survey of almost 15,000 people indicating that two-thirds (66 per cent) backed the scheme, compared to just one in five (18 per cent) who are opposed.In Nigel Farage’s Clacton-on-Sea constituency, which voted overwhelmingly in favour of leaving the EU in 2016, more than twice as many people were in favour (57 per cent) than against (25 per cent) the idea of a mobility scheme.Would it drive up net migration?Supporters of the agreement insist it wouldn’t drive up net migration, arguing that young people in the UK would be keen to move abroad, in the same way that young people in the EU would be keen to come here. Meanwhile, the time-limited nature of the scheme means they wouldn’t be able to permanently settle abroad. There is also speculation that there would be a cap on numbers – or a “one-in-one-out” policy – to ensure that those coming to the UK remain balanced with the number of people leaving. However, without that cap, critics argue Britain would end up taking more young people than it loses. Meanwhile, others argue that a youth mobility scheme would be a return to freedom of movement enjoyed by travellers when the UK was part of the EU by the back door.Sir Keir’s “red lines” for the negotiations with Brussels include no return to freedom of movement between countries. But it is understood that the government considers a limited youth mobility scheme would not break that promise because of the time limit. More