More stories

  • in

    Local authorities should be given greater powers over ‘unfair’ council tax, MPs warn

    Councils should be granted greater control over council tax, MPs have warned, arguing that the current disconnect between local charges and service quality risks undermining the very foundations of local democracy. An inquiry into the financial sustainability of local government concluded that interim powers should be devolved to councils, ahead of a more comprehensive overhaul of what it described as “the most unfair and regressive tax in use in England today”.The Commons Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee’s report recommended that individual authorities be empowered to revalue properties in their areas, define property bands, set the rates for those bands, and apply discounts. Beyond council tax, the report suggested that a broader devolution of fiscal powers, such as the ability to apply a tourist tax, should also be considered to address the growing financial strain on local government, exacerbated by austerity measures introduced in the 2010s.Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner recently voiced her support for “more push” towards fiscal devolution, aligning with the government’s commitment to transfer central decision-making to local areas. Furthermore, the committee advocated for replacing central government ringfencing of funding with “a rigorous outcomes-based system of accountability”. This would ensure local authorities are held responsible for achieving agreed outcomes within their overall budgets, rather than simply meeting spending targets.Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner recently said she wanted ‘more push’ towards fiscal devolution as part of the Government’s pledge to transfer central decision-making to local areas More

  • in

    Rayner warns Starmer UK faces another summer of riots if Labour fails to deliver

    Angela Rayner has issued an ultimatum to Sir Keir Starmer, warning that the UK faces a repeat of last year’s summer riots unless “the government shows it can address people’s concerns”.In a dramatic intervention in the final cabinet meeting before the summer recess, the deputy prime minister said economic insecurity, immigration, the increasing time people spend online, and declining trust in institutions were having a “profound impact on society”.She warned ministers that it was “incumbent on the government to acknowledge the real concerns people have and to deliver improvements to people’s lives in their communities” amid growing concerns that there could be a repeat of the unrest that scarred communities in the wake of the Southport murders.Her words come days after violent protests broke out outside an asylum hotel in Epping, Essex, which has pushed the community to “boiling point”, according to local Tory MP Neil Hudson.Deputy PM Angela Rayner More

  • in

    Grieving families warned they will have to work out inheritance tax on pensions

    Grieving families will be forced to pay inheritance tax (IHT) on pensions after ministers decided to press ahead with reforms despite a fierce backlash. Rachel Reeves announced in last year’s Budget that unspent pensions would be added to estates from April 2027 in a move that is expected to raise more than £1bn a year for the Exchequer by the end of the decade.However, while it previously thought that pension providers would be responsible for calculating and paying any death duties, HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has confirmed this will instead be the responsibility of the “personal representative”, or executor, of the estate.Death in service payments, meanwhile, will be exempt, ministers confirmed as they published the results of a consultation on how the scheme will work. The government estimates that around 10,500 estates will become newly liable for inheritance tax under the changes in 2027. Polling earlier this month found the move was the most unpopular tax measure announced by Labour since entering office. Just a fifth of Britons (21 per cent) supported the policy, while 44 per cent were opposed. Sir Steve Webb, a former pensions minister, told the Times: “Life is tough enough when you have just lost a loved one without having extra layers of bureaucracy on top. In future, the person dealing with the estate will need to track down all of the pensions held by the deceased which may have any balances in them, contact the schemes, collate all the information and put it into an online calculator and then work out and pay the IHT bill.“Complications will no doubt arise where the family member cannot track down all of the deceased’s pensions or where providers are slow to supply the information needed to work out the IHT bill.”He called for “serious thought” to be given to changing the rules around penalties for late payment. Pete Maddern from the insurer Canada Life said death in service benefits “provide a critical short-term financial lifeline for loved ones following the death of a working-age earner. Including them in the changes risked much wider repercussions not only for grieving families, but also for the employers that provide these benefits for their workforce.”It was released just a day after cabinet minister Liz Kendall warned Britain faces a “tsunami of pensioner poverty” without major reform to the system, as she launched a review of the state pension age, opening the door for it to be increased. Age UK warns those looking to retire in 2050 are already on course to receive £800 per year less than current pensioners. The state pension age is currently 66 but is already set to rise to 67 in 2028 and 68 by 2046.Labour has already come under fire for the so-called ‘tractor tax’, an inheritance tax raid which critics warn could sound the death knell for family farms in England.Under those changes farms valued at £1m or more will be liable for 20 per cent inheritance tax for the first time. More

  • in

    Teenager to run Reform-led county council with multimillion-pound budget

    Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party has put a teenager in charge of a major county council, overseeing hundreds of millions of pounds of public spending.George Finch, 19, took over temporarily after the previous council leader, also a member of Reform, resigned just weeks after being elected.Now he has been voted in as the leader of Warwickshire County Council, which has £1.5bn of assets and a budget of around £500m.George Finch More

  • in

    Voices: Readers deeply divided on lowering the voting age to 16 – from ‘only fair’ to ‘blatant gerrymandering’

    The government’s decision to lower the voting age to 16 has sparked intense debate among Independent readers, with opinions sharply divided over whether the move strengthens democracy or serves party politics.A poll of readers found that 38 per cent believe it’s fair for 16-year-olds to vote, while 62 per cent said they are too young to head to the polls.Critics were quick to dismiss the reform as politically motivated, arguing that most teenagers lack the life experience or political understanding needed to make informed decisions. “Why not let 13-year-olds vote next?” one reader scoffed, describing the move as “blatant gerrymandering” by Labour to win over idealistic young voters.Supporters, however, hailed the change as long overdue. Many pointed out that 16-year-olds in the UK can already marry, work, pay taxes and even join the armed forces – so it’s only fair they have a say in how the country is run.“They’re more mature than most adults I know,” said one commenter, while others noted that political education in schools has left many young people well-informed and engaged.Some readers proposed a middle ground – such as lowering the age to 17 or linking voting rights to leaving full-time education.Here’s what you had to say:If they can marry and work, they should vote Of course they should. If they don’t get the vote, they should pay no tax or National Insurance, be banned from joining the military, become a NEET or do anything the government tells them to do at that age. You can get married at 16, have sex at 16, ride a moped at 16, drive a car at 17 (16 for some severely disabled people), and yet Tories do not wish them to have a say in their futures. LadyCrumpsallShould 16-year-olds be trusted with the vote – or is it a step too far? Share your views in the comments below.Most adults don’t know what they’re voting for So much nonsense about how sixteen-year-olds don’t have the experience, wisdom, knowledge, etc., etc., etc., to have the vote. Having been politically active for most of my life, the lesson of decades of canvassing is that the majority of adults don’t really have the faintest idea what they’re voting for, or why. You’d be amazed, for instance, at the number of people who say that they’re going to vote for X Party because they think that they’ll be the election winners – as if they’re backing a horse race. bottlebank16-year-olds can be more mature than adults Many 16-year-olds I know are more mature than many adults; not all, I appreciate that, but to say they aren’t mature enough is ludicrous. If they’re allowed to get married, then they’re old enough to vote. I welcome this move – it’ll modernise the voting system and bring in more points of view. The voting population will be getting older and older, and we’ll end up with a load of pensioners making decisions based on ‘what’s good for me’ rather than what’s good for the up-and-coming generations. deadduckThey’ve studied politics – they’re clued up At the age of 16, students have studied politics as part of community studies. I am old so don’t talk to many teenagers, but those that I have spoken to – serving staff in cafés, relatives, etc. – are all pretty clued up and invested in what is their future. They can join the forces at 16, get married at 16 – surely if they are mature enough to do that, they are mature enough to vote? DafBZero life skillsA very small minority are politically aware, most aren’t. They have zero life skills, experience of bills, home or car ownership etc. Some will argue they are old enough to join the forces. Yes, where you are told what to do by others. It is clearly an idea of Labour, backed up by the Liberals and Greens, to gain a potential two million more votes – all three being poor or struggling in the polls. SooperhooperMost kids don’t care – but neither do adults I don’t think most kids today give a darn about politics or are educated well enough to know what’s at stake. I’d even go so far as to say that many adults aren’t educated well enough to understand the same things. We’re at a critical junction in world history and politics. We must make wise choices and hope those who make the laws are of good heart and want to represent their actual constituents. At the moment, and with a somewhat cynical eye, it doesn’t look that way. AwareReaderWait until they’ve left school My thoughts are they could have the voting age dropped to 17 years after they have left school and found out what the world of work is all about. Also, in the final year at secondary school they have education in politics and the voting system. BillydesOpen to influenceIn my experience, teenagers have little in the way of original thought when it comes to politics. Lacking experience, they’re still malleable and open to influence, and it would be easy to see how their thinking could be influenced by others who have a darker agenda. RickCFive reasons forYes 16-year-olds should vote. Why? Because:It should encourage an interest in politics and democracy. It might stop some claiming, “What’s the point – no-one listens to us…” It seemingly only has a marginal effect on outcomes in any case. It’ll focus politicians on our future – our yoof. Although our youngsters are often a tad idealistic – i.e. leftish – that’s fair enough, as it should help counter the barmy rightie oldies. 🙂 DevsAd They live with the consequences Young people have the most to vote for, as they are voting for their future. They are the ones who will have to live through the impact of their vote, which will mostly impact (though not entirely) those who are of working age. Legally, people aged 16 can work, pay taxes, join the military, have children, etc. – then it is only right that they get a say in the running of the country. Those complaining are all moaning about “woke leftie kids voting”, but I can assure you they won’t be voting Labour!SoMrHarrisElectoral gerrymanderingIf 16, why not 15? If 15, why not 14? If 14, why not 13? Where is the cut-off? My 7-year-old pays taxes in the form of VAT every time she uses her pocket money to buy something. Should she be allowed to vote? Labour simply has no convincing logical argument in favour of extending the franchise to 16-year-olds, especially given that we as a society currently think they are too immature to buy fireworks, get tattoos, open a bank account, gamble, pawn something in a pawn shop, and view pornography. Yet we are supposed to buy into the notion that they should be allowed to help choose the next government “because they can pay taxes”. It is blatant and desperate electoral gerrymandering of the most partisan kind, from a man who promised to “put country before party”. Labour appears to have belatedly bought into the idea that there is an emerging crisis of legitimacy in politics that has been brewing for decades. Their publicly-stated analysis of the cause of this crisis is frankly laughable. Do they seriously believe that this crisis can be fixed by managerial tinkering with the electoral process? That people think politicians are duplicitous troughers only because 16 and 17-year-olds are not more engaged with politics? It is nonsense. The issue is that people see politicians continually lying, gaslighting, claiming they will do one thing while literally doing the exact opposite, and generally serving their own agenda rather than that of voters, who they treat with barely disguised contempt. Will giving 16-year-olds the vote solve that? Of course not. It will make it worse. sj99I trust my teenage son more than some voters My son was 17 this week. He is sane, smart, sober, politically aware and I would back his judgement in a polling booth ahead of any Reform UK voter of any age. SteveHillWhy not? They are at least as intelligent and mature as the pensioner gammons who voted for Brexit. I suggest that as well as lowering the voting age, we should insist on a mental competence test for people over seventy – just like you need to renew your driving licence beyond that age – and I speak as a seventy-two-year-old. RedRooster Some of the comments have been edited for this article for brevity and clarity.Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day’s top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click ‘log in’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here. More

  • in

    Who is Nigel Farage’s latest Reform recruit? From drink driving conviction to ‘chav shooting’ post

    Welsh Senedd member Laura Anne Jones has defected from the Conservatives to Reform UK, becoming the party’s highest-profile defection in Wales. Nigel Farage announced the news at the Royal Welsh Show, with Ms Jones – who was first elected in 2003 – saying she could longer justify Conservative policies on the doorstep.Standing alongside Mr Farage, she said: “I’ve just suddenly felt that the Conservative Party was unrecognisable to me. It wasn’t the party that I joined over three decades ago.”She said Reform, meanwhile, was “listening to the people of Great Britain”.Ms Jones is the latest in a growing list of high-profile Tories to have defected to Reform, following former Conservative Party chairman Sir Jake Berry earlier this month, as well as Dame Andrea Jenkyns and former Wales secretary David Jones. Her defection means the Conservatives are down to 14 politicians in the Welsh Parliament, ahead of crunch elections next year.But who is Ms Jones?From waitressing to the Welsh AssemblyMs Jones was first elected to the then-National Assembly in 2003, becoming the joint-first Welsh Conservative female assembly member (AM).She had the backing of the Conservative Party despite a conviction for drink-driving in 2002, which saw her banned from driving for 12 months and fined £75. Jones said after the hearing: “I’ve never justified drink-driving and the decision is one I deserve. I’ve never done it on purpose.” She had been earning £5 per hour as a waitress before she was elected.Ms Jones served one term, until 2007, before returning in 2020 after the death of Mohammad Asghar. She was re-elected in 2021, for South Wales East.She once used a racist slur in a WhatsApp chatMs Jones hit the headlines last year when it emerged she had used a racist slur about Chinese people in a WhatsApp group chat.The Senedd member used the offensive term in an exchange about the Chinese-owned video app TikTok.She later apologised and issued a statement, saying the word was “unacceptable and I deeply regret using it”.”I sincerely apologise for any offence this has caused,” she added.Nigel Farage and former Conservative Member of the Senedd, Laura Anne Jones, at the Royal Welsh Agricultural Show More

  • in

    Politics latest: Cleverly returns to shadow cabinet but Jenrick could miss out on top role in Tory reshuffle

    Moment Kemi Badenoch is announced as new Tory leader to replace Rishi SunakKemi Badenoch has given a top job to her former rival for the party leadership Sir James Cleverly, as she reshuffles her shadow cabinet ahead of the summer recess. The former foreign secretary becomes shadow secretary of state for housing, communities and local government, opposite Labour’s Angela Rayner.But shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick, who also ran for the party leadership last year, is expected to miss out on a move to the highly coveted shadow chancellor role occupied by Sir Mel Stride. Mr Jenrick has strayed well beyond his justice brief, building a prominent social media presence with campaigns on issues from tackling fare dodgers on the London Underground to the effect of immigration on housing. Questions have also emerged whether other former ministers including Suella Braverman will be called upon for senior leadership positions. The reshuffle comes just eight months after Ms Badenoch was elected as leader of the opposition, with the Tories underperforming against the rise of Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party. Shadow health and social care secretary Edward Argar has stepped back to the Conservative front bench. It’s understood his decision to leave the front bench follows a health scare. Trump visit will not impact policing in Scotland, says John SwinneyFirst minister John Swinney has shut down claims that the cost of Donald Trump’s visit later this week will put policing in Scotland “in a detrimental position.”The US president is due to arrive in Scotland later this week and visit both his golf courses in the country, but concerns have been raised about the policing operation required after substantial protests sprang up last time he visited – when he was no longer in office.He is expected to meet both Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Swinney during his time in Scotland.Speaking to the PA news agency during a visit to Aberdeen, First Minister John Swinney said talks were still ongoing about how costs would be handled for the visit, but said that Scotland’s police force would not suffer as a result.( More

  • in

    Kemi Badenoch brings back James Cleverly as Tory leader launches reshuffle

    Kemi Badenoch has kicked off a reshuffle of her shadow cabinet, with Sir James Cleverly set to return to the Conservative Party front bench. The Tory leader is bringing her former leadership rival back to the frontline to build party unity and bolster the party’s credibility. A senior Tory source said Sir James would help “take the fight to this dreadful Labour government”. Kemi Badenoch launching a shadow Cabinet reshuffle More