More stories

  • in

    What happened this week in the UK election campaign, from a betting controversy to Farage’s ambition

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster email The U.K.’s general election campaign is less than two weeks away now, and the prevailing trends don’t appear to have changed much.The left-of-center Labour Party is the clear favorite to defeat Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives, with Keir Starmer looking set to replace him as U.K. leader on the morning of July 5. Given how condensed U.K. election campaigns are — it’s not been a month since Sunak called the election for July 4 outside his residence at No. 10 Downing Street in the pouring rain — the leaders must be getting pretty tired.At least the European Championship soccer tournament has arrived — as has summer. Both should provide a distraction for one and all.Here are some things we’ve learned in the past week: Fancy a flutter Britain, it’s often said, is a nation of gamblers. Mostly on horses, or the football. But the bookmakers can offer odds on almost anything.For general elections, there’s a growing market over the date of the vote, as unlike most other democracies that decision rests solely in the hands of the prime minister.All everyone knew was that Sunak had to call an election by January 2025. For months, he’d been saying that his “working assumption” was that it would be in the second half of the year. Given the upcoming summer vacation period, most pundits and lawmakers in his Conservative Party, were predicting that it would likely take place in the fall. So it came as something of a surprise that Sunak announced the date on May 22. It wasn’t that much of a surprise to some people apparently. The Gambling Commission, the industry’s regulator, has revealed that it’s investigating allegations that a string of people with links to Sunak bet on the timing of the July 4 contest before he announced it. The sums aren’t massive but they are potentially hugely damaging for a party that, according to opinion polls, is facing a big defeat. Four people are said to be involved, including one of Sunak’s bodyguards, who has been suspended, and two candidates for Parliament, one of whose husband happened to be the party’s campaign chief. He’s been put on a leave of absence, but the candidates haven’t been suspended from the party. There’s a growing expectation that more people may be implicated. Sunak has said that he’s “incredibly angry” about the allegations and said that anyone involved in using inside information to bet on the date of the election should face the full force of the law as well as being expelled from party.His opponents including, Keir Starmer have seized on the allegations and said Sunak should go further and suspend the candidates now. The odds for a Starmer win are 33-1, which means anyone fancying a flutter on that outcome would have to bet 33 pounds just to get one pound in return. Not really worth it, is it? Footie fever One thing that the public, including politicians, can bet on without knowing the outcome is Euro 2024, which is taking place in Germany. Both England and Scotland have qualified for the monthlong tournament, though neither has impressed. At least it’s providing a distraction from the election coverage, for the leaders as well as the public. Three matches a day, all live on television. With summer finally making its presence felt, it’s certainly going to be a boon for the pubs. Both Sunak and Starmer are keen football fans. For the record, Sunak supports Southampton, which has just been promoted back to the Premier League. Starmer supports Arsenal, which was just nipped to the title by Manchester City.He’ll be hoping that he goes one better, come the morning of July 5.There’s not much mileage in putting a bet on though. See above. Farage’s ambition Nigel Farage, the self-styled political disruptor who was so instrumental in Britain’s vote in 2016 to leave the European Union, has never readily undersold himself.He was at it again this week, as his Reform U.K. party launched its manifesto for government, though it wasn’t a manifesto in fact. Farage, who only became leader of the party on June 4, said that it was a “contract” with the British public. Admitting that the document was “not something with which we’re going to govern the country,” Farage said he is aiming to become the leader of the opposition to Labour, which he claims has already won the election. Seeking to woo Conservative voters from the right, he said he wants to scrap the country’s commitments to “net zero” and get net migration to zero.Though Reform U.K. is third in most opinion polls, it’s not expected to win many seats in the House of Commons. Bookmakers — yes, them again — think he is favorite to finally win a seat in Parliament, when he contests the southeastern seaside town of Clacton. If he does, it won’t be for a lack of trying. This is the eighth attempt by the 60-year-old Farage.His aim is clear. He openly states he wants to be a candidate for prime minister by the next election, which will have to take place by 2029.He really doesn’t undersell himself. Persistent polls In two weeks time, the results will be in. The left-of-center Labour Party remains favorite to win the most seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. While major pollsters give varying figures, all show a double-digit Labour lead, with relatively little change since Sunak called the election.According to Ipsos, Labour could win 453 seats and the Conservatives 115, with a Labour majority of 256, its biggest ever. Other pollsters have predicted something worse for the Conservatives, which have been in government since 2010.There are signs from some leading Conservative figures that they think that’s the most likely outcome. Even Treasury chief Jeremy Hunt said the Conservatives aren’t pretending that the party winning the election is “the most likely outcome” and said his own political future is “too close to call” — his constituency is in a leafy area outside of London, a traditional Conservative safe seat. More

  • in

    Windrush campaigners demand citizenship for all families in first 100 days of new government

    Sign up to our free fortnightly newsletter from The Independent’s Race Correspondent Nadine WhiteSign up to our free fortnightly newsletter The Race ReportCampaigners are demanding citizenship to be granted for all families affected by the Home Office’s Windrush scandal within the first 100 days of the new government.Ahead of Windrush Day celebrations on Saturday, a coalition of anti-racism charities and groups has unveiled a “Home Office scandal manifesto”, outlining key demands for new ministers after the 4 July general election.The Manifesto for Windrush Justice is calling for the government to give British citizenship and waive passport fees for everyone affected by the Windrush scandal who arrived before 1 January 1973 and their children, as well as an amnesty for Commonwealth citizens who have lived in the UK for more than 30 years. Campaigners say a significant backlog exists in the Windrush documentation scheme and that the government’s own estimates suggest more than 50,000 people may be eligible. The manifesto, led by the Action for Race Equality charity (ARE), calls for urgent reforms to heal the “unconscionable” trauma inflicted on Windrush generations, including a statutory inquiry into the scandal.Glenda Caesar, community campaigner and survivor of the Windrush Scandal, said: “It’s time the Windrush generation received full and rightful recognition as British citizens, and real progress is made to rectify the harm done by the scandal.“With this important Windrush manifesto launch, Windrush advocates and community leaders would like to remind all political parties that the Windrush generation were invited to the UK to help rebuild Great Britain. A decision to drop three recommendations made by a Windrush review ‘amounts to unlawful discrimination’, the High Court has been told (Kendall Brown/PA) More

  • in

    Labour’s VAT on private school fees would not come in until 2025, Rachel Reeves says

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailLabour will not impose VAT on private school fees until at least 2025 if it wins the general election, shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves has suggested.Sir Keir Starmer’s party believes it can raise some £1.6bn a year by ending the 20 per cent VAT exemption as part of its plans to recruit around 6,500 specialist state school teachers in England.The policy is among the most-discussed in Labour’s manifesto, and has raised concerns of local authority schools being strained by a sudden influx of pupils taken out of private schools due to rising fees.Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves speaking during the Times CEO Summit in London More

  • in

    Farage condemned for saying influencer Andrew Tate is ‘important voice for emasculated men’

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailNigel Farage has been condemned for saying Andrew Tate is an “important voice for men”.The Reform UK leader claimed the online influencer had raised awareness of “men becoming feminine” and stood up for their ability to “be a bloke”. Tate has been facing charges since December 2022 of rape, human trafficking and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women, all of which he denies.Click here for our live coverage of the general election campaign.Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has spoken out in support of Andrew Tate More

  • in

    Sunak ‘incredibly angry’ over gambling scandal but refuses to suspend candidates involved

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailRishi Sunak confessed to being “incredibly angry” over members of his inner circle being caught up in a gambling scandal over bets on the date of the election.But, as the prime minister faced a BBC Question Time audience with just two weeks of the election to go, he refused to suspend two candidates currently being investigated by the Gambling Commission.With polls still pointing to a massive Labour majority and a Tory wipeout with many voters defecting to Reform, Mr Sunak needed his half-hour slot in the debate to be a platform to turn things around in the closing stages of the election campaign.Instead he was confronted by the betting scandal which saw his director of campaigning Tony Lee “take a leave of absence”. Meanwhile, Mr Lee’s wife Laura Saunders, a candidate in Bristol who has worked for the party since 2015, and Craig Williams, his parliamentary private secretary, are all being investigated for placing bets just before Mr Sunak called his surprise snap election.Keir Starmer was asked about his previous comments on Jeremy Corbyn More

  • in

    Terror attack survivors urge politicians to make clear pledges for victims

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailTerror attack survivors who have accused politicians of missing opportunities to act on the threat of terrorism are calling for commitments from all parties ahead of the election.More than one hundred and twenty survivors wrote an open letter to all party leaders on Thursday, urging them to make clear pledges to terror victims, their families and the wider public before the upcoming general election.The survivors, who are part of the charity Survivors Against Terror, said they “lament the missed opportunities to act” and politicians’ broken promises, which has led them to feel no safer or better supported than they were at the last general election nearly five years ago.The group’s letter reads: “Days ahead of the last election, a terror attack struck at Fishmongers Hall. In the aftermath, we were promised that Martyn’s Law (a law focused on improving security at public venues) would be enacted and a Survivor’s Charter (guaranteeing the rights of survivors of terror attacks) would be brought forward.Tributes to the two victims of the terror attack that struck at Fishmongers Hall in 2019 More

  • in

    TikTok launches media literacy hub to help users spot misinformation

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailTikTok is launching a media literacy hub to help its users recognise fake news and misinformation online ahead of the General Election.The social media giant said the hub had been created alongside fact-checking organisation Logically Facts.The new in-app space will focus on critical thinking and news literacy, TikTok said, covering topics such as how to spot fake news online and tips for consuming a balanced range of news.“With misinformation and disinformation being found on every corner of the internet, the hub contains guidelines which have been designed to help critique and judge the trustworthiness of the information we find online,” TikTok said in blog post on the new tool.“Whenever or wherever they engage in content, we encourage our community to stop, think and check the resources.”The move follows the rollout of a dedicated General Election Centre on the platform in the UK, which directs users to official information from the Electoral Commission.Prompts for the centre appear on election-related content and when users make election-related searches.“As the United Kingdom prepares to go to the polls for the General Election, we are committed to ensuring that our TikTok community has the skills to assess whether the information that they read, see or hear during this busy time is reliable and accurate,” TikTok said. More

  • in

    Jeremy Corbyn would have been better PM than Boris Johnson, says Keir Starmer

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailJeremy Corbyn would have made a better prime minister than Boris Johnson had he been elected in 2019, Sir Keir Starmer said.Sir Keir dodged a series of questions during a BBC Question Time debate on Thursday night over whether he truly believed his predecessor would have made a “great” prime minister, as he said five years ago.Host Fiona Bruce repeatedly challenged him over his one-time statement, with Sir Keir insisting: “It wasn’t a question that really arose because I didn’t think we were going to win the election.”Follow live updates hereBut when Bruce asked for a “yes” or “no” answer to whether he meant it, Sir Keir insisted that Mr Corbyn would have made a better prime minister than Mr Johnson.Sir Keir Starmer said he believed Jeremy Corbyn would have made a better PM than Boris Johnson (Stefan Rousseau/PA) More