More stories

  • in

    Voices: ‘I feel like an expensive pet’: Independent readers open up on the human cost of disability cuts

    As Labour faces mounting backlash over plans to cut disability benefits, dozens of Independent readers have voiced fear, anger and despair over what they see as a betrayal of society’s most vulnerable.Their comments reveal the human cost behind the headlines: carers facing destitution, disabled people fearing the loss of their last shred of financial independence, and a pervasive feeling that the reforms are not about support, but punishment. Several readers spoke of lifelong conditions that make work impossible, and how benefit cuts would not help them back into employment, only into poverty. Others warned that the reforms are economically short-sighted, creating more strain on the NHS, social services and unpaid carers.Beyond practical concerns, many touched on the emotional toll of feeling vilified, dismissed or forgotten by politicians and the general public. Here’s what you had to say:It’s not just PIP cuts!It’s not just PIP cuts! It’s the cuts to the Universal Credit Health Element and Carer’s Element too that many will lose. Those who work part-time and do not claim PIP will lose out, and those who have paid in, getting contribution-based benefits, will be thrown under the bus by unemployment insurance, limited to six or 12 months, because they may have a partner, when normally they would claim in their own right. These issues are not being talked about. Disabled people in all these situations will lose massively and Labour have learnt nothing from the deaths of claimants under the Tories. They know and have heard the evidence, criticised the Tories for being cruel, yet they think this is acceptable.This is not about helping people into work; it is punishing them for being unable to do so!The ForceAre you worried about disability benefit cuts? Share your thoughts in the commentsGrinding existence of povertyI have fibromyalgia and many other chronic long-term conditions, and those 14 years under the Tories forced unnecessary austerity and cruel, draconian DWP cuts to the most vulnerable people in society, many with lifelong chronic health conditions, making work impossible, and no employer would give us a second look.Those years of horrific treatment by the DWP, constant demonisation and vilification in the media and press, being made to feel like a criminal for just being alive, although it is more like a grinding existence of poverty and constant scapegoating – which feels like a form of abuse via proxy, designed to wear us down until we are broken and prone to taking our own lives… I’ve been there!That this isn’t a national scandal on the level of the Infected Blood, Post Office Horizon, Windrush etc., is utterly shameful. But for decades, the disabled and chronically long-term sick amongst us have been treated as a drain on society – thus our plight is swept under the carpet and our lives deemed of no value.The Tories were ‘stealth culling’ us for years, but I never thought I’d see the day that Labour would carry through their callous policies.RedRocket68Insulting assessmentsSimply cutting benefits across the board isn’t the way to deal with this. There is undoubtedly misuse in the system, like in all systems, and that’s why there needs to be a workable structure in place to address this. Nothing here can or ever will be foolproof!The severely disabled and their carers need support, and not to be living in fear that they won’t be able to survive. Anyone who’s cared for someone knows what a hard, unrelenting job it is – often 24/7. Some of those making these assessments seem to be oblivious as to what disability means for those who can never get away from it. Insulting questions, which lead to people saying they can manage things they can’t, are just a small example of what people are faced with in these so-called ‘assessments’.Often disabled people face more challenges than most can imagine or are even interested in. Those who do get jobs face the daily challenge of getting there – especially if they’re dependent on a wheelchair.There’s no quick fix for this, and slashing vital payments certainly isn’t one!AmbigirlsThese cuts will break peopleNone of the arguments the government is using stand up to scrutiny; there’s no evidence which supports the cuts.The majority of the impact of disability is hidden outside people’s close circle, especially intimate, embarrassing, and financial issues.People do not realise how bad things are, or how a lack of support can destroy you.These cuts will BREAK people.Cuts will also negatively impact the economy and cause higher dependency and increased costs to the NHS and local services in the medium to long term.KittyKatThey’ve already cut mine by 36%Not badly so, but I’m disabled and have lived with not only the endless threat of losing my benefits – I have had them slashed (36%) and halted altogether. I wonder how far this has gone toward the destruction of my health, and yet there are many far worse off than myself.TomSnoutWe are where we areUnfortunately, the government does not have a time machine to go back and change decisions that some people may not like. We are where we are now. And where we are now is even higher taxes than the current record, to pay for even higher benefits spending, which, again, is already at a record (all in real terms).MarkConstant cycle of tortureIt’s not about ‘people who can work, should’. Realistically, no employer will jump at the chance to employ a disabled person – and if they do, it’ll be a constant cycle of torture for the worst affected, who will be forced – and it is forced—into work they cannot do. In six months or less, they’ll have worsened in health and require the services of occupational health. And what is occupational health going to tell them? Quit! Resign! You can’t work after all!This welfare reform needs total scrapping.VIMS2022Universal Credit won’t help carersThere will be many carers left destitute because the benefit system doesn’t allow them to claim any other benefits. Universal Credit doesn’t cover someone who’s unable to work due to caring responsibilities. They will get nothing!EverlastingI’ve been waiting five yearsI would love nothing more than to walk again. But this is my fifth year of waiting. In case you’re thinking I can’t be so bad, I have severe end-stage arthritis. What bone I have left is twisting. I’m pretty darn sure I’m not the only one.CynicalmeA vendetta against the most vulnerableHaving attended the consultations into the green paper, I witnessed so many who were terrified of how the cuts would rob them of their hard-fought careers.A warning for those calling for an end to disability support: these measures only save a pittance, so expect more cuts. If they can stoop low enough to give the most vulnerable a good kicking, then nothing will stop them going after pensioners next, who are the biggest slice, by over half, of the welfare bill after all.TalkingSenseEasy targetsPIP isn’t awarded because of your ability to work or not. Why cut PIP? To save money and pretend that those who have disabilities don’t have them anymore. And we are the easiest ones to target. Starmer has calculated that the ‘grey vote’ will be useful in the next general election, and voters will be upset if their granny and grandad die from cold. Children have voting parents and will grow up to be voters. But the disabled? Nah. Sub-humans without a voice. As I said, easy targets.News for him: disabled people also have loved ones who are voters, and we are voters too. I am about to be a grey voter, and I have a disability. Labour won’t be getting my vote ever again.LizzieMI feel like an expensive petI’m disabled. My partner works. I can’t claim any benefits due to her income. PIP is therefore my only source of income and independence. It allows me to get to my own appointments, and it pays for my prescriptions, eye tests, and dental care (not that it covers this—I haven’t seen a dentist in years due to the cost).PIP also makes me marginally less of a burden on my partner, as I can pay for my own prescriptions and even pick them up or get them delivered. To remove this money will drive me into poverty, make me rely more on my partner, and cost her more money. This will put pressure on our already strained relationship, as I will feel like an expensive pet, rather than a valued human being. It is cruel, vindictive and callous. I would have expected this from the Conservatives after the minefield they created throughout austerity, but for a Labour government to penalise disabled people in such a manner is bordering on political insanity – and the very definition of cruelty.SilvafoxWhy do they always pick on us?My husband is disabled, paralysed, uses a wheelchair – only one side of his body works. Due to other health issues, he can’t have a motorised wheelchair, so we have a manual one. I take him where he has to go. He is so stressed by all of this that his condition is worse. Why does the government always pick on people who cannot defend themselves? It happens all the time.BonniebellEmployers won’t take the riskThe problem with DWP trying to engage disabled individuals in finding suitable work leaves a lot to be desired. Employers are more reluctant to take on disabled people on the grounds that they have to look after them. They consider disabled people as cheap labour, and the cost of employing them far outweighs the benefits. There is a pool of people who have no skills, and that is disadvantageous, not to mention that disabled people have no history or record of having worked for a considerable time.KingdanielSome of the comments have been edited for this article for brevity and clarity.Want to share your views? Simply register your details below. Once registered, you can comment on the day’s top stories for a chance to be featured. Alternatively, click ‘log in’ or ‘register’ in the top right corner to sign in or sign up.Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here. More

  • in

    Starmer braces for biggest backbench rebellion yet as ‘horrendous’ welfare cuts spark immediate backlash

    Sir Keir Starmer is bracing for the biggest backbench rebellion of his leadership to date after the publication of his flagship welfare reforms sparked an immediate backlash from MPs and campaigners.The government’s plans to cut disability benefits have been described as “horrendous”, “harmful” and “a disaster”, with campaigners warning it will drive already struggling disabled people into poverty. The reforms – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – are set to include the tightening of criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), which is the main disability benefit, as well as a cut to the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC) and delayed access to only those aged 22 and over.The bill will remove PIP from up to 800,000 people and the Department for Work and Pensions’ (DWP) own impact assessment, published earlier this year, estimated the reforms would see an additional 250,000 people – including 50,000 children – pushed into relative poverty.Liz Kendall is responsible for the cuts More

  • in

    Why Keir Starmer risks making the same mistake as David Cameron when it comes to Europe

    Shabana Mahmood has said the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) must be reformed to restore public confidence as Keir Starmer’s government seeks to tackle the issue head-on.The justice secretary joined calls for an overhaul of the convention, warning that “public confidence in the rule of law is fraying” and “there is a growing perception human rights laws are a tool for criminals to avoid responsibility”. It comes after similar comments were made by Tory party leader Kemi Badenoch, who this month warned human rights laws had gone from being a “shield” to a “sword used to attack democracies”. Shabana Mahmood called for the ECHR to be reformed More

  • in

    Starmer refuses to step in to delay final Commons vote on assisted dying

    Sir Keir Starmer has refused calls from dozens of his own MPs to delay the crunch vote on assisted dying later this week.A letter from 52 Labour backbenchers, first published by The Independent, had appealed to the government to allow more time to scrutinise Kim Leadbeater’s backbench bill to allow assisted dying.But Sir Keir’s rejection of their request means that the final crunch third reading vote will go ahead on Friday as planned, before it is sent to the Lords.The news comes as polling revealed voters’ concerns that disabled people will face coercion to end their lives early if Ms Leadbeater’s bill becomes law.Labour MP Kim Leadbeater is behind the assisted dying Bill More

  • in

    Reeves considers U-turn on non-dom crackdown to halt exodus of wealthy

    Rachel Reeves is considering climbing down on her non-dom crackdown to stem the flow of ultra-rich taxpayers leaving the UK.The chancellor is deciding whether to U-turn on the decision to tax non-domiciled individuals inheritance tax based on their global assets. The changes, which formed a key part of Labour’s general election campaign, have raised concerns about an exodus of the wealthy as they flee in search of lower taxes. And a senior City figure told the Financial Times “there will most likely be some tweaks to inheritance tax to stop the non-dom exodus”.Billionaire steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal is among those said to be considering leaving Britain as a result of the chancellor’s changes. Rachel Reeves is considering a change to her non-dom crackdown More

  • in

    Defiant Rayner says ‘underestimate me at your peril’ over criticism of huge housing pledge

    Angela Rayner has hit back at critics of Labour’s ambitious plan to build 1.5 million homes, warning them to “underestimate me at your peril”. The deputy prime minister has come under increasing pressure over the flagship target after property agent Savills forecast that there would be only 840,000 new homes – just over half.Ms Rayner, who is the cabinet minister in charge of the policy, said she had been underestimated “all my life” as she announced the launch of a new government-backed project to support builders.She says the National Housing Bank will unlock new housing schemes across the UK, thanks to low-interest loans provided to developers hampered by rising inflation and higher interest and mortgage costs.The move, backed by £22bn in government finance, will see more than 500,000 new homes built, including many social and affordable properties, says Ms Rayner.It comes after warnings to the local government secretary that Labour’s election pledge for 1.5 million homes over this parliament is unachievable. In its forecast on housebuilding published earlier this month, Savills said 840,000 new homes will be completed over the next five years, with the property firm blaming a low demand from buyers.Government figures for 2024 also show a 28 per cent fall in new-build starts in England compared to 2023.However, writing exclusively for The Independent, Ms Rayner tells critics to “underestimate me at your peril” as she announced the housing bank scheme, which she claims would finally give access to housing for many hard-working families.Angela Rayner says the task ahead is ‘tough’, but has warned critics to ‘underestimate me at your peril’ as she targets the 1.5 million homes plan set by Labour before the election More

  • in

    MPs vote to decriminalise abortion in biggest change to reproductive rights in decades

    MPs have voted to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales in a historic step that will usher in the most far-reaching change to reproductive rights in decades. After an emotional and impassioned debate in the House of Commons, MPs voted by 379 to 137 in favour of the reform. They overwhelmingly backed an amendment by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi to remove “the threat of investigation, arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment” of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy.The reform is designed to protect women while retaining penalties for abusive partners or medical professionals who terminate a pregnancy outside the current framework of the law.During the debate, MPs had argued that the UK’s “Victorian” abortion law was “increasingly used against vulnerable women and girls”. Under the current law, abortion in England and Wales is a criminal offence but is legal up to 24 weeks, with the sign-off from two doctors. It is also allowed under limited circumstances after this time, including when the mother’s life is at risk. Women can also be prescribed medication to end a pregnancy at home if they are less than 10 weeks pregnant.Campaigners had called for a change in the law More

  • in

    Decriminalising abortion is a major step toward giving women full control over their bodies

    The vote to decriminalise abortion will herald the largest changes to the law on terminations in decades. The changes are designed to ensure women cannot be prosecuted for terminating their own pregnancy at any stage. While access to abortions is generally available in practice, this legal aspect imposes unnecessary stigma, restricts autonomy, and risks criminalising women and healthcare providers, campaigners say.Removing abortion from criminal law allows it to be treated like any other healthcare issue – governed by clinical guidance, not courts.This decision aligns England and Wales with countries like Canada, New Zealand, and parts of Australia, which have seen improved access and no increase in abortion rates – only safer outcomes.( More