More stories

  • in

    Kamala Harris's DNC speech claimed a new moment for progressive Democrats

    Kamala Harris

    Harris spoke about structural racism, injustice in healthcare and being a ‘proud black woman’ – fresh words for the presidential stage

    Play Video

    3:02

    Kamala Harris reflects on vice-presidential nomination at DNC – video

    The first note that Kamala Harris sounded in her first speech as the Democrats’ official vice-presidential nominee was not about Donald Trump, or Joe Biden, or the crossroads to which the country has arrived.
    Instead Harris began her acceptance speech at the party’s national convention Wednesday by looking backwards, to the black women activists who fought historically for the right to vote and then for “a seat at the table”.
    “We’re not often taught their stories,” Harris said. “But as Americans, we all stand on their shoulders.”
    It was a powerful and graceful tribute to open a speech most often used for quickie biographical sketches to introduce candidates to the big convention audiences watching at home.
    It also performed the magnificent trick, in turning the lens away from Harris, of underscoring for Democrats just how different the new vice-presidential nominee is from the party leaders of yore – and how well she might lead the party of tomorrow.
    If Biden is elected president – which remains a significant if – the victory will be built on many shoulders. The question is who will be standing on them. The obvious answer, for a few years at least, would be Biden, the prospective Oval Office occupant.
    But for some Democrats watching Harris’s acceptance speech at the national convention on Wednesday night, in which she spoke personally about racial justice, immigration and gender equality – exactly the key planks of the party platform – the identity of the new leader of the Democratic party was equally obvious, and it was not Biden.
    “That I am here tonight is a testament to the dedication of generations before me,” said Harris, the first woman of color on a major-party presidential ticket. “Women and men who believed so fiercely in the promise of equality, liberty and justice for all.”
    Just as Harris, the daughter of Jamaican and south Asian immigrants, embodies a future the Democratic party has aligned with – non-white, non-male, pluralistic, non-dynastic – her speech reached corners of the party identity that no one else in speeches to the convention, not even Barack Obama, could touch.
    Harris’s acceptance speech had the familiar cadence of a political speech, but it was full of lines that were totally new in the mouth of an elected official on the presidential stage. Harris used the phrase “structural racism” to describe why black, Latino and indigenous people are “suffering and dying disproportionately” from Covid-19. She called out “the injustice in reproductive and maternal healthcare”.
    Praising her mother, the potential future vice-president said: “She raised us to be proud, strong black women. And she raised us to know and be proud of our Indian heritage.”
    The focus on Harris as the potential standard bearer for Democrats owes in part to Biden’s age. At 77, he would be the oldest person ever to be sworn in for a first term as president, and speculation has abounded that he would serve a single term if elected.
    Setting aside the significant question of whether the vice-presidency automatically elevates a politician as the party’s leader – Biden himself might differ – Harris faces obstacles to capturing the heart of a party invigorated by calls for generational change.
    She failed to attract significant Democratic support as a presidential candidate in her own right earlier this year. Her perceived coziness with law enforcement and perceived failure to challenge wrongful convictions as attorney general of California have drawn criticism from progressives, who harbor some skepticism about her incarnation on the campaign trail as a warrior for equal justice.
    “Women of color, particularly progressives, might feel torn,” Guardian columnist Derecka Purnell wrote earlier this month. “Progressives will have to defend the California senator’s personal identity, while maneuvering against her political identity.”
    At 55, Harris is two decades younger than Biden, and in something of a historic sweet spot age-wise for presidential candidates – but the intensity of the party’s progressive wing could focus an increasing amount of Democratic energy behind a younger leader, closer to Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s generation than Harris’s.
    Whether Harris’s biggest moment is yet to come, she is in the middle of a moment now. In his speech on Wednesday night, Obama described her as a “friend” and “an ideal partner” for Biden “who’s more than prepared for the job”.
    “We’re at an inflection point,” Harris said. She was talking about the promise of equal justice under the law, but she could have been talking about the future of Democratic party politics.

    Topics

    Kamala Harris

    US politics

    US elections 2020

    Democrats

    Democratic national convention 2020

    Joe Biden

    analysis

    Share on Facebook

    Share on Twitter

    Share via Email

    Share on LinkedIn

    Share on Pinterest

    Share on WhatsApp

    Share on Messenger

    Reuse this content More

  • in

    Steve Bannon indicted by federal prosecutors, charged with defrauding ‘We Build the Wall’ donors – live

    Bannon and three others arrested for leading online campaign
    Kamala Harris accepts vice-presidential nomination on historic night
    Obama delivers searing Trump attack
    Trump tacitly endorses baseless QAnon conspiracy theory
    1.1m Americans made claim for unemployment last week
    Sign up to our First Thing newsletter

    LIVE
    Updated More

  • in

    Kamala Harris makes history, Barack Obama slams Trump: day three at the DNC – video highlights

    Play Video

    4:12

    Kamala Harris officially accepted her vice-presidential nomination on the third day of the Democratic national convention. Her husband, Douglas Emhoff, joined her on stage alongside Joe Biden and his wife, Jill. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and Gabrielle Giffords were among the many figures who condemned Donald Trump’s presidency and pledged their support for the Biden-Harris ticket
    Harris makes history and Obama issues warning: key takeaways from the DNC’s third night
    Kamala Harris makes history at DNC after Barack Obama rallies voters against Trump – as it happened

    Topics

    Democratic national convention 2020

    Kamala Harris

    US elections 2020

    Joe Biden

    Barack Obama

    Hillary Clinton

    Democrats More

  • in

    Trump's USPS attacks are already undermining confidence in vote by mail

    Some election officials are receiving a flood of questions from voters suddenly concerned about whether or not their mail-in vote will count, an alarming signal of how Donald Trump’s efforts to hamstring the United States Postal Service (USPS) are already causing considerable confusion and undermining confidence in the 2020 election.Trump admitted last week he opposed additional funding for the USPS because it would make it more difficult for the agency to support mail-in voting this fall. There have been reports of significant mail delays across the country in recent weeks, a problem postal workers and Democrats have attributed in part to operational changes imposed by Louis DeJoy, the postmaster general and a major Republican donor. Facing tremendous scrutiny over the changes, DeJoy announced Tuesday he was suspending the changes until after the election “to “avoid even the appearance of any impact on election mail”. Despite that pause, it does not appear that DeJoy will replace mail-sorting machines, mailboxes and other equipment reportedly removed from postal facilities.But, regardless of DeJoy’s announcement, the damage to voters’ confidence may already have been done. Forty-five per cent of Americans believe the 2020 vote count will be accurate, a drop from the 59% who believed so in 2016, according to an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll. Seventy-three per cent of Republicans believe that votes cast by mail will not be counted accurately, the poll found.In Douglas county, Kansas – a Democratic stronghold home to the University of Kansas – hundreds of voters called the office of Jamie Shew, the county clerk, with concerns last week about whether their mail-in ballot will be delayed in the mail and ultimately counted because of problems with the mail. The calls were so frequent, Shew said, that the office receptionist was picking up new calls as soon as the person on the phone hung up.Shew said his office had already received a record number of mail-in ballot requests for November’s election. But last week voters who requested mail in ballots as far back as May and June began asking whether they could cancel their requests and vote in person and had other questions about the process. In total, about 20 voters followed through and cancelled their requests.“It’s frustrating. We’ve been doing a lot of things to try and build trust,” said Shew, whose office recently enacted a program allowing voters to track their ballots. “Election administrators like myself have worked for years to build up this system and then within a few weeks, the distrust of the system occurs because of, you know, politics.”Shew said he was counting on a significant number of people to vote by mail because he faces a shortage of election workers necessary to hold in-person voting. He’s been reassuring voters that the county’s absentee ballot program is secure and that their mail in vote will count. He also ordered more secure drop boxes where voters can leave their ballots.Many election officials like Shew are eyeing official dropboxes as an alternative to the post office for voters to return their mail-in ballots without relying on USPS. But Trump opposes drop boxes too – his campaign is suing to block Pennsylvania from using them. More

  • in

    Does mail-in voting lead to fraud – and does it help Democrats? The facts

    The 2020 presidential election is already unlike any other America has ever seen.Election officials are scrambling to figure out how they can safely hold in-person voting in a pandemic, and a record number of Americans are expected to vote bymail, a process Donald Trump has falsely said will lead to fraud. Because of the surge in mail-in voting, which can take days to count, Americans are unlikely to know the results on election night. There is already concern Trump will use the period of uncertainty to claim he won before ballot totals are final.But is voting by mail really a threat to the election? We tried to answer some questions.What is mail-in voting and why is it such a big deal this year?Mail-in voting describes the process voters can use to cast their ballots without having to appear in person at a polling place. Every state allows voters to cast a vote by mail in some form, though the rules around who is eligible to do so vary widely from state to state.With the exception of a few states, voters are required to submit an application and then, once election officials verify their eligibility, receive a ballot. A handful of states – including Washington, Oregon and Colorado – automatically mail all eligible voters a ballot. This practice is often called universal mail-in voting.About a quarter of all of the votes 2016 and 2018 were cast by mail, according to federal data. But that number is expected to grow this year because of concerns about voting in person amid Covid-19. Michael McDonald, a professor at the University of Florida who closely tracks voter turnout, estimates mail-in votes will account for about 50% in November. And during the primaries this year, election officials in many states saw an unprecedented surge in the use of mail-in ballots. In Georgia, for example, more than 1.1 million people voted by mail in the state’s June primary, more than four times the state’s previous record of 219,731 in 2018.That surge is prompting a host of concerns about whether states are adequately prepared to hold the November elections. Many places are not accustomed to seeing high volumes of mail-in ballots and election offices – already on shoestring budgets and staffed by just a few employees – have struggled to keep up with the demand. Congress has allocated just $400m of the $4bn the Brennan Center for Justice estimates states need to successfully run elections.Is mail-in voting different from absentee voting?No, the two terms are often used interchangeably. Traditionally, people who requested ballots were called “absentee voters”, because they were likely to be absent from their polling place on election day, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).There are instances of absentee voting for military members going back to the American revolution, but as mail-in voting has become more widespread among the general public over the last 30 years, the terminology has become more flexible and states refer to the practice as both absentee and mail-in voting. Regardless of the term, the process is the same: a voter submits a request for a ballot and the election official sends them one once they verify they are eligible.Donald Trump and the White House have repeatedly tried to make a false distinction between “absentee” and “mail-in” ballots. Trump has argued that “absentee” ballots, which he uses, are acceptable because a voter needs an excuse (such as illness or military duty) to use them while “mail-in” ballots will lead to fraud and are problematic. But 34 states do not require a voter to give an excuse if they want to vote by mail and incidents of fraud are still extremely rare.Overall, 76% of Americans – 158 million voters – are currently eligible to vote by mail without having to provide an excuse.If more people are going to vote by mail because of the pandemic, why have there been reports of long lines during the primaries?One big lesson from the primaries this year has been that a lot of voters still are going to come out and vote in person. That may be for a number of reasons – a voter may request a ballot that doesn’t arrive by election day or they might just prefer to cast a ballot in person.Figuring out how to accommodate in-person voters has emerged as a major challenge for election administrators. Poll workers tend to skew older and many have dropped out this year because over fears of contracting Covid-19. Facilities like schools and nursing homes that would ordinarily be polling sites may also be less willing to open to the public this year. That has forced election officials to drastically scale back availability for in-person voting – in Milwaukee, for example, the city opened just five locations during the April primary, compared with the usual 180 (the city was able to open many more polling locations for its August primary).Figuring out how states can provide adequate and safe in-person voting is one of the greatest challenges election administrators are facing this year. Some places are getting creative; some professional sports teams are offering arenas and stadiums as polling sites to leave more space for distancing.Will mail-in voting hurt Trump’s chances of being re-elected?There’s no evidence that mail-in voting benefits either Democrats or Republicans. One study by Stanford researchers found that vote by mail does not benefit one party over the other.In some places, Republicans have long used mail-in voting as part of their strategy to drive voter turnout. “It was a staple of our strategy,” said Mac Stipanovich, a retired Florida Republican political operative, told the Guardian in April. “Republicans probably ought not to be complaining about it.” Republicans in some key states, including Florida and Pennsylvania have encouraged their voters to cast mail-in ballots in recent months. Even Trump reversed course in recent weeks and encouraged people to vote by mail in Florida.Trump’s opposition to vote by mail appears to be framed by a belief that increased voting will hurt Republicans. Discussing a congressional proposal to make it easier to vote in March, Trump said: “They had things, levels of voting, that if you’d ever agreed to it, you’d never have a Republican elected in this country again.”But does Trump have a point that mail-in voting could lead to more fraud?Voter fraud is extremely rare and when it does occur, it is isolated. The same is true when it comes to voting by mail; an analysis of voter fraud cases maintained by the Heritage Foundation, a conservative thinktank, found 143 cases of criminal convictions involving absentee ballots over the last 20 years. That amounts to 0.00006% of total votes cast. A Washington Post analysis in states that conduct their elections entirely by mail found little evidence of fraud.Election officials use several measures to prevent fraud. Some states allow voters to track their ballots, ensuring they can verify when it arrives at the board of elections. Election officials also compare the signatures on an absentee ballot envelope to verify a voter’s identity.Trump has repeatedly pointed to an election in Paterson, New Jersey, earlier this year where four people have been indicted on fraud charges to bolster his claims, but those are misleading; he has claimed that 19% of the ballots were rejected because of fraud, but ballots can be rejected if a voter makes even a minor error in filling out the envelope it comes in.What are the mail-in voting rules states are fighting over?One of the biggest disputes over the last few months has been over how easy it should be to send someone a mail-in ballot. California, Nevada, Vermont, New Jersey and the District of Columbia have all moved this year to automatically mail ballots to eligible voters. Other states have opted to mail absentee ballot applications to all voters. In some places, local election officials are choosing to mail absentee ballot applications to voters, even if the state has opted not to.The Trump campaign and Republican National Committee have staunchly opposed these efforts, falsely saying they will lead to widespread fraud. The campaign has sued California and Nevada to block the mailing of ballots, as well as local clerks in Iowa to block them from sending absentee ballot applications.Democrats and voting rights groups have also brought a slew of lawsuits challenging restrictions around absentee voting, including requirements that voters provide an excuse if they want to vote absentee or get their ballot signed by a witness or notary. They argue these laws overly burden voters in the middle of a pandemic.How can I be sure my mail-in vote will count?Many states allow voters to track their absentee ballots, allowing voters to see when their ballots are received and counted. Experts are pushing for more states to adopt tracking mechanisms before November to give voters more confidence about the status of their ballot.There are also high-stakes legal battles over the processes states use to reject absentee ballots. A mail-in ballot can be rejected if election officials – who may not be trained in handwriting analysis – determine the signature on the ballot envelope doesn’t match the one on file or if the ballot arrives after election day, regardless of when the voter put it in the mail. Research has shown that minorities, young and first-time voters are all more likely to have their mail-in ballots rejected. Democrats have brought a number of legal challenges to require states to count ballots as long as they are postmarked by election day and arrive in the days after and to notify voters of any deficiencies before they reject a ballot.Are we going to know who won the presidential election on election night?Barring a landslide election result, it is very unlikely that we are going to know who won the presidential election on 3 November. There is probably going to be an influx of ballots that come in either on election day or in the days after, and it will probably take election officials at least a few days to continue to verify, open and count those ballots. In some states, including Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, election officials are barred from beginning to count ballots until election day, which could lead to further delays.There’s nothing fishy about this – it takes time to count mail-in ballots and election officials want to be careful they get the results right. But Trump has already laid the groundwork for contesting the results of the election, stoking fears about the integrity of mail-in ballots and suggesting the election could be stolen from him.There is deep concern about what will happen during the period of uncertainty while those ballots are being counted. If Trump voters overwhelmingly go to the polls in person, he may hold a lead on election night, only to see it disappear as mail-in votes are counted. The Trump campaign and Republican National Committee are reportedly preparing for a “weeks-long” legal fight after the election and readying efforts to get absentee ballots rejected if they lack postmarks.What can I do to guarantee a free and fair election this year?First, you should make sure that your voter registration is up to date and current. If you’ve moved, or need to register, you should take care of that now, just so you’re all set. Then, you can help your family and friends do the same.Next, check to see how and when you can request an absentee ballot in your state. Many states already allow voters to request ballots for the November election (yes, really!) and requesting your ballot early will ease some of the burden on election administrators as they try to process mail-in ballots in the fall.Lastly, if you are able to, sign up to be a poll worker. Having a reserve of healthy people willing to work the polls will ensure that election officials can plan to preserve adequate in-person options for voters who want to cast their ballots in person. More

  • in

    Spotlight on anti-Trump Republicans at Democratic convention is no fluke

    Democrats are eagerly hoisting rebel Republican politicians opposed to Donald Trump into the national spotlight in an effort to attract dissatisfied conservatives over to their side.As the Democratic national convention has unfolded, a wave of Republicans have been given plum speaking slots and high-profile platforms to show their support for former vice-president Joe Biden, the newly minted Democratic nominee for president of the United States.On Monday, the former Ohio governor John Kasich, former New Jersey governor Christine Todd Whitman, former Hewlett Packard CEO Meg Whitman and former New York congresswoman Susan Molinari – all Republicans – spoke. On Tuesday, the convention schedule included an endorsement by the former Bush administration secretary of state Colin Powell and a video by Cindy McCain, the widow of the late Arizona senator John McCain. The night also included a video from Chuck Hagel, who served as defense secretary under Barack Obama despite having been a Republican senator for Nebraska.“I think they’re just doing old-fashioned coalition building,” said Stuart Stevens, a longtime Republican strategist who is helping lead the Lincoln Project, an anti-Trump organization run by Republicans.Alabama senator Doug Jones, a moderate Democrat, said the outreach and support from Republicans during the convention is meant to “to get folks comfortable with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris” and show that “that they are not going to lead this country in some socialist agenda”.The inclusion of many Republicans during the biggest Democratic summit every four years illustrates the effort the Biden campaign is putting in to woo disgruntled Republican voters over to Biden’s camp.“It’s important to let them know they’re not alone,” the Louisiana congressman Cedric Richmond, a Biden campaign co-chairman, said. “It’s OK that there are Republican leaders that vote for Biden-Harris.”Polls show Trump maintains a firm grip on most of his party. But, Democrats argue, the rebel politicians could be a gateway to a slice of the American electorate that’s attainable and potentially crucial to Biden ousting Trump from the White House. More

  • in

    Billie Eilish at the DNC: 'Trump is destroying our country and everything we care about' – video

    Play Video

    0:53

    The 18-year old singer, who will be a first-time voter in 2020, made an impassioned plea for people to get out and cast their ballot in November’s election.
    Eilish also spoke out against the current president during her appeal on the third night of the Democratic national convention, saying: ‘You don’t need me to tell you things are a mess … Donald Trump is destroying our country and everything we care about’
    Obama’s stark message: America must save itself from Trump

    Topics

    Billie Eilish

    Democratic national convention 2020

    US elections 2020

    Democrats

    US politics

    Donald Trump More