'Things have changed': can Biden overcome the racist legacy of the crime bill he backed?
US elections 2020
The 1994 crime bill paved the way to mass incarceration of Black Americans. Biden says his support was a ‘mistake’ More
Subterms
188 Shares189 Views
in US PoliticsUS elections 2020
The 1994 crime bill paved the way to mass incarceration of Black Americans. Biden says his support was a ‘mistake’ More
175 Shares129 Views
in US PoliticsOn a Wednesday afternoon earlier this month, Tony Lewis Sr, a former Washington DC drug dealer in his 32nd year of a life sentence, didn’t imagine anything exciting was in the cards. Then a prison counselor at the correctional institute in Maryland told him his voter registration form had arrived.“I couldn’t believe what I was hearing,” he told his son, Tony Lewis Jr, via text message. “I feel pride today, I feel like a real man, a citizen of my community and city.”Lewis Sr’s joy stemmed from legislation passed by DC’s council in July, extending the right to vote to incarcerated residents for the first time, a right that only Maine and Vermont currently allow. The DC Board of Elections says it has sent registration applications to 2,400 people in prison since the law passed, allowing them to vote in November’s presidential election. That number is lower than the 4,500 DC residents who were believed to be incarcerated earlier this year, a discrepancy likely in part due to prisoners being released because of Covid-19.But pinpointing an exact number is also difficult for DC officials because, unlike states, the nation’s capital doesn’t have its own prison system, meaning its incarcerated residents are scattered in over 100 federal facilities across the country.“We have no information other than the information we’ve been provided,” said Alice Miller, the executive director of the DC Board of Elections. “This is [the number the Federal Bureau of Prisons] gave us. This is what they identified.”Despite these complications, advocates of voting rights for felons have hailed DC’s new legislation as hugely significant in the precedent it sets in reversing the suppression of votes of Black Americans like Lewis Sr, nationwide. US restrictions on voting rights for felons are among the world’s harshest, and many were created to disenfranchise Black Americans after they gained voting rights in the Jim Crow era.According to the Sentencing Project, an advocacy and research organization, Black American adults are over four times more likely to lose their voting rights than other Americans, and overall, 2.2 million Black Americans are banned from voting. More
163 Shares169 Views
in ElectionsThe fight to vote
US prisons
Advocates worry cuts will have an outsized effect on jailed voters who rely on the service to exercise their constitutional right More
138 Shares169 Views
in US PoliticsUS prisons
The debtors’ jail where those locked inside lived among rats and roaches is finally set to close after recent mass anti-racism protests More
175 Shares189 Views
in US PoliticsA new law restored voting rights to 83,000 people but advocates struggled to inform tens of thousands of people amid pandemic More
138 Shares159 Views
in US PoliticsRashida Tlaib pushes to free US inmates from coronavirus ‘death sentence’ Exclusive: Democratic congresswoman tells Guardian that keeping prisoners locked up ‘is hurting the most vulnerable’ Representative Rashida Tlaib addresses a rally in Detroit, Michigan, on 6 June, protesting against racial inequality in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death. Photograph: Rebecca Cook/Reuters US prisons and […] More
125 Shares169 Views
in US PoliticsSome north-west states were informed of social distancing practices, but accounts from inmates and advocates say their implementation may be scattered Coronavirus – live US updates Live global updates See all our coronavirus coverage Prisonprotests in Oregon and Washington highlighted concerns among inmates about the way authorities there are managing their safety amid the coronavirus […] More
This portal is not a newspaper as it is updated without periodicity. It cannot be considered an editorial product pursuant to law n. 62 of 7.03.2001. The author of the portal is not responsible for the content of comments to posts, the content of the linked sites. Some texts or images included in this portal are taken from the internet and, therefore, considered to be in the public domain; if their publication is violated, the copyright will be promptly communicated via e-mail. They will be immediately removed.