More stories

  • in

    US supreme court vacancy upends Senate races with just weeks to go

    The shock of a sudden new vacancy on the US supreme court has rippled out to some of the most contentious Senate races in the final weeks before the 3 November elections, throwing the vital issue of who might win control of the body into confusion.The recent death of Ruth Bader Ginsburg while Republicans control the Senate and the White House virtually ensures that her replacement will be conservative, swinging the court into a 6-3 conservative majority.Donald Trump and Republicans have indicated they plan to move swiftly to install a new justice, meaning the vetting period and confirmation battle will happen during the days when incumbent senators and their challengers are making their final pitches to voters.As a result, the dynamic in key races has shifted to varying degrees across the country, from Maine to Colorado. For Republicans, the battle for the Senate is an essential bid to cling to a hugely powerful body; for Democrats, wresting control of the chamber would be a hugely welcome – if previously unexpected – triumph.In some races, the supreme court vacancy offers a chance for Democrats to rally their bases in states that increasingly lean left. In others, the vacancy gives Republican candidates the opportunity to remind voters who want the high court to tackle cases on abortion, deregulation, and overturning healthcare reform that senators can play a role.“It should help red-state enthusiasm in that it’ll remind people what’s at stake in this election,” said the Republican strategist Cam Savage. “[But] there will be places in the country where it benefits the Democrats.”Strategists and officials for both parties stress the campaign landscape is not yet clear.Trump has not announced a nominee and only in the past few days have swing senators indicated whether they support quickly going through the process of confirmation.In deciding whether to confirm a justice before the election or after, senators have signaled they are taking their own electoral prospects into account.In Democratic-leaning Maine, where Senator Susan Collins is trailing her Democratic challenger, Sara Gideon, Collins has split with most of her Republican colleagues and said she would hold off on confirming a justice until after the November election. More

  • in

    'Who wants to see a man?' Trump promises to name supreme court nominee on Saturday – video

    Play Video

    2:01

    President Donald Trump says he will reveal his nominee to fill the vacant US supreme court seat this Saturday and promises it will be a woman, following the death of Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Speaking at an election rally in Jacksonville, Florida, Trump told the crowd he aimed to fill the seat before the November election. Despite promising his nominee would be female, the president played to the crowd, asking the assembled audience: ‘Who would rather see a man?’
    Fight to Vote: will Trump concede if he loses and can Democrats fight back?

    Topics

    US elections 2020

    US supreme court

    Donald Trump More

  • in

    'Vote him out': Trump booed while paying respects to Ruth Bader Ginsburg – video

    Play Video

    0:50

    Donald Trump was loudly booed by crowds as he visited the supreme court to pay his respects to Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the late justice and liberal icon who died last week aged 87.
    As the president and the first lady paused at Ginsburg’s casket, the crowd yelled: ‘Vote him out!’  Ginsburg is the first woman in history to lie in state in the US Capitol 
    Ruth Bader Ginsburg in her own words – video obituary
    ‘She was what America should be’: mourners bid farewell to Ruth Bader Ginsburg

    Topics

    Donald Trump

    Ruth Bader Ginsburg

    US supreme court

    US politics More

  • in

    The US supreme court has become a threat to democracy. Here's how we fix it | Sabeel Rahman

    Just a few days after Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s passing, Donald Trump and Senate Republicans are moving quickly to appoint and confirm a replacement. A growing number of moderates, such as Eric Holder, are warning that should Republicans ram through an appointment, this fact, plus the deliberate blockade of Barack Obama’s appointment of Merrick Garland in 2016, would justify a new Democratic administration and Congress to add seats to the supreme court to restore balance.With voting already under way in the 2020 election, a rushed appointment and confirmation in this moment would be a clear partisan power play, and further collapse the legitimacy of the supreme court. But more broadly, the firestorm over Justice Ginsburg’s replacement is a reminder of how the modern supreme court has too much power in the first place. It is critical that our democracy reform agenda also consider how to reform the judiciary.Courts have too much power to radically remake our social and economic lifeFirst, courts have too much power to radically remake our social and economic life. If this latest Trump appointment goes through, the resulting 6-3 far-right majority on the supreme court would have the power and opportunity next month to invalidate the Affordable Care Act (in the middle of a deadly pandemic). They would be positioned to further gut voting rights, reproductive rights and rollback anti-discrimination protections for LGBTQ+ and Black and brown Americans, while further shielding police departments and immigration officials from accountability for racist state-sponsored violence against people of color. While courts have at times also ruled in more progressive directions to advance rights and equity, on balance this concentration of power without sufficient accountability is a threat to democracy – and to the ability of our communities to thrive.Second, courts today are a threat to democracy because of how they have been weaponized to skew political power and insulate extreme conservative coalitions from democratic accountability. Over the last decade, conservative jurists and their aligned partisans in the states and the Congress have combined to radically shift the terms of political power in the country towards corporations and away from working class communities and Black and brown communities in particular. More

  • in

    Donald Trump says he expects US election to end up at supreme court – video

    Play Video

    1:20

    Donald Trump said he wants to confirm a ninth justice to the supreme court because he believes the court will determine the outcome of the presidential election.
    ‘I think this will end up in the supreme court, and I think it’s very important that we have nine justices,’ Trump told reporters at a White House event.
    The president has previously indicated the federal courts will need to become involved in the election because it will be tainted by fraud. Trump has provided no evidence for that extraordinary claim, and voter fraud is rare.
    US politics live

    Topics

    Donald Trump

    US supreme court

    US elections 2020 More