Williams, Damian (Attorney)

Subterms

    Latest story

    113 Shares91 Views

    Read the Justice Department’s filing in the Adams case.

    by

    Case 1:24-cr-00556-DEH Document 175-1 Filed 03/25/25
    Page 10 of 15
    the motion is uncontested, the court should ordinarily presume that the prosecutor is acting in good
    faith and dismiss the indictment without prejudice”). But Adams’s consent-which was
    negotiated without my Office’s awareness or participation-would not guarantee a successful
    motion, given the basic flaws in the Department’s rationales. See Nederlandsche Combinatie, 428
    F. Supp. at 117 (declining to “rubber stamp” dismissal because although defendant did not appear
    to object, “the court is vested with the responsibility of protecting the interests of the public on
    whose behalf the criminal action is brought”).
    The Government “may, with leave of court, dismiss an indictment” under Rule 48(a) of the
    Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. “The principal object of the ‘leave of court’ requirement is
    apparently to protect a defendant against prosecutorial harassment, e.g., charging, dismissing, and
    recharging, when the Government moves to dismiss an indictment over the defendant’s objection.”
    Rinaldi v. United States, 434 U.S. 22, 30 n.15 (1977). “But the Rule has also been held to permit
    the court to deny a Government dismissal motion to which the defendant has consented if the
    motion is prompted by considerations clearly contrary to the public interest.” Id.; see also JM 9-
    2.050 (reflecting Department’s position that a “court may decline leave to dismiss if the manifest
    public interest requires it).
    “Rarely will the judiciary overrule the Executive Branch’s exercise of these prosecutorial
    decisions.” Blaszczak, 56 F.4th at 238. But courts, including the Second Circuit, will nonetheless
    inquire as to whether dismissal would be clearly contrary to the public interest. See, e.g., id. at
    238-42 (extended discussion of contrary to public interest standard and cases applying it); see also
    JM 9-2.050 (requiring “a written motion for leave to dismiss. . . explaining fully the reason for
    the request” to dismiss for cases of public interest as well as for cases involving bribery). Although
    it appears rare, at least one court in our district has rejected a dismissal under Rule 48(a) as contrary
    to the public interest, regardless of the defendant’s consent. See Nederlandsche Combinatie, 428
    F. Supp. At 116-17 (“After reviewing the entire record, the court has determined that a dismissal
    of the indictment against Mr. Massaut is not in the public interest. Therefore, the government’s
    motion to dismiss as to Mr. Massaut must be and is denied.”).
    The cases show some inconsistency concerning what courts should do if they find the
    standard for dismissal without prejudice not met. Some have instead dismissed indictments with
    prejudice. See, e.g., United States v. Madzarac, 678 F. Supp. 3d 43 (D.D.C. 2023). The better-
    reasoned view, however, is that courts considering a Rule 48(a) motion to dismiss without
    prejudice must either grant or deny the motion as made-they cannot grant the dismissal, but do
    so with prejudice, unless the Government consents. See United States v. B.G.G., 53 F.4th 1353,
    1369 (11th Cir. 2022) (“[R]ule 48(a) does not give the district court the discretion to rewrite the
    government’s dismissal motion from one without prejudice to one with prejudice.”); United States
    v. Flotron, 17 Cr. 00220 (JAM), 2018 WL 940554, at *5 (D. Conn. Feb. 19, 2018) (denying
    Government’s motion to dismiss without prejudice as contrary to public interest and requiring
    Government to proceed to trial); see also In re United States, 345 F.3d 450, 453 (7th Cir. 2003)
    (suggesting that courts might condition grant of Rule 48(a) motion on Government’s consent that
    prejudice attach).
    The assigned District Judge, the Honorable Dale E. Ho, appears likely to conduct a
    searching inquiry in this case. Although Judge Ho is a recent appointee with little judicial track
    record, he has resolved the motions in this case in lengthy written opinions that included research
    5 More

    More stories

    • 138 Shares189 Views

      in Elections

      Urologist Who Sexually Abused Patients Is Sentenced to Life in Prison

      by

      Darius A. Paduch, a fertility specialist, assaulted men and boys for years at prominent New York hospitals, prosecutors said.A urologist convicted of sexually abusing seven patients, including five who were minors, was sentenced to life in prison on Wednesday, prosecutors said.The doctor, Darius A. Paduch, a fertility specialist, molested boys and young men for years at two prominent New York hospitals, prosecutors said. Hundreds of other young men and boys have also accused Dr. Paduch, 57, of abuse spanning more than 15 years in scores of civil suits.Dr. Paduch “was a sexual predator who preyed on patients seeking treatment for sensitive medical issues,” Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney in Manhattan, said in a statement on Wednesday. “He used his position as a renowned urologist at prestigious hospitals to sexually assault vulnerable patients, including children, to gratify his own sexual desires.”In May, a jury found him guilty of five counts of inducing a minor to engage in unlawful sexual activity and six counts of enticing people to travel to engage in unlawful sexual activity. The trial lasted just two weeks.On Wednesday, his sentence was handed down by Judge Ronnie Abrams in federal court in Manhattan.Dr. Paduch, of North Bergen, N.J., was arrested last April. He has been barred from practicing in New York. Through the trial, he maintained his innocence. A lawyer who represented him, Michael Baldassare, said on Wednesday that “we are confident that one day he will be vindicated.”Once a urologist who specialized in treating patients with a genetic condition, Dr. Paduch worked at hospitals including NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill-Cornell Medical Center in Manhattan and Northwell Health on Long Island. According to prosecutors, he used his position at prominent hospitals “to make the victims believe that the sexual abuse he inflicted on them was medically necessary and appropriate, when, in fact, it was not.”The abuse continued over several years in some cases, as Dr. Paduch instructed the patients to return for follow-up appointments, where he continued to assault them. During appointments, the indictment said, Dr. Paduch told patients to masturbate in front of him, sometimes groping them or showing them pornography.During the course of the trial, 11 victims testified about abuse they had suffered under Dr. Paduch’s care, and dozens more wrote impact statements before he was sentenced Wednesday.Mallory Allen, a lawyer for a firm that represents 140 former patients who have filed civil suits against him, said in a statement that the sentence affirms that “heinous sexual abuse will not be overlooked.”Survivors of the abuse have also sued the hospitals where he worked under the Adult Survivors Act, which opened a yearlong window between 2022 and 2023 during which adult victims of abuse could file claims even after the statute of limitations had passed.“While no sentence can ever undo the pain and suffering endured by each and every survivor who experienced abuse at the hands of Dr. Darius Paduch, the sentencing closes an important chapter for these survivors,” Ms. Allen said in the statement. More

    • 138 Shares169 Views

      in Elections

      Prosecutors Urge Judge Not to Dismiss Bribery Charge Against Eric Adams

      by

      Within days of being criminally indicted, Mayor Eric Adams asked a judge to drop one of five counts against him. Prosecutors say a jury should get to hear their evidence.Federal prosecutors on Friday argued against a request by Mayor Eric Adams that a judge throw out a bribery charge against Mr. Adams, saying they had clearly demonstrated his alleged pattern of soliciting and accepting luxury travel.In a 25-page filing, prosecutors with the U.S. attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan also said that Mr. Adams, the first sitting New York City mayor in modern history to be indicted on criminal charges, was mistaken in arguing that his actions were routine for a public official. They said a jury should decide the issue.“It should be clear from the face of the indictment that there is nothing routine about a public official accepting over $100,000 in benefits from a foreign diplomat, which he took great pains to conceal — including by manufacturing fake paper trails to create the illusion of payment,” prosecutors said.The filing is the latest installment in what will most likely be a long, contentious legal battle between the mayor and federal prosecutors, led by Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District.In September, federal prosecutors announced a five-count indictment against Mr. Adams that included charges of bribery and fraud. Prosecutors have said in court that they might bring additional charges against the mayor and others.Mr. Adams has pleaded not guilty and has asked the federal judge overseeing the case, Dale E. Ho, to issue sanctions against prosecutors after accusing them of leaking information about the investigation to reporters. Prosecutors were expected to file a response later on Friday to the allegations that they had leaked information.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 125 Shares179 Views

      in Elections

      City Hall Official Charged With Witness Tampering in Adams Inquiry

      by

      Mohamed Bahi, who worked in the mayor’s office of community affairs, was accused of instructing witnesses to lie to federal authorities.F.B.I. agents on Tuesday morning arrested Mayor Eric Adams’s former senior chief liaison to the Muslim community on federal witness tampering and destruction of evidence charges that grew out of the investigation leading to the mayor’s indictment last month.The liaison, Mohamed Bahi, was charged in a criminal complaint in connection with unlawful contributions made to Mr. Adams’s 2021 mayoral campaign, officials said.Mr. Bahi instructed witnesses to lie to federal authorities conducting the investigation, Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York, said in a statement.Mr. Bahi, who on Monday resigned from his position as senior chief liaison, was expected to appear in court later in the day.Tracking Charges and Investigations in Eric Adams’s OrbitFour federal corruption inquiries have reached into the world of Mayor Eric Adams of New York. Here is a closer look at the charges against Mr. Adams and how people with ties to him are related to the inquiries.This is a developing story and will be updated. More

    • 100 Shares99 Views

      in Elections

      Eric Adams Is Indicted After Federal Corruption Investigation

      by

      Eric L. Adams, a retired police captain who was elected as New York City’s 110th mayor nearly three years ago on a promise to rein in crime, has been indicted following a federal corruption investigation, people with knowledge of the matter said.The indictment remained sealed on Wednesday night, and it was unclear what charge or charges Mr. Adams will face. But the federal investigation has focused at least in part on whether Mr. Adams and his campaign conspired with the Turkish government to receive illegal foreign donations.When the indictment is made public, Mr. Adams will become the first New York City mayor to face a federal charge while in office.The indictment promised to reverberate across the nation’s largest city and beyond, plunging Mr. Adams’s embattled administration further into chaos just months before he is set to face challengers in a hotly contested mayoral primary.And, if it contains allegations of conspiring to commit crimes with foreign nationals, it will have landed on the same week that the city was playing host to leaders from across the world at the United Nations General Assembly, including Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdogan.In a statement, Mr. Adams said he had done nothing wrong.“I always knew that if I stood my ground for New Yorkers that I would be a target — and a target I became,” he said. “If I am charged, I am innocent, and I will fight this with every ounce of my strength and spirit.”We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 138 Shares139 Views

      in Elections

      U.S. Charges 8 in Beer Heists That Targeted Trains and Warehouses

      by

      The men stole hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of beer, mostly Modelo and Corona, by robbing rail yards and warehouses across the Northeast, federal prosecutors said.Eight Bronx men were charged on Wednesday with stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars’ worth of beer, mostly Modelo and Corona imported from Mexico, by robbing train yards and warehouses in dozens of thefts across the Northeast over the past two years.An indictment unsealed by federal prosecutors in Manhattan accuses Jose Cesari as being the mastermind of what it describes as the “Beer Theft Enterprise” and says he recruited other participants in the brazen heists via Instagram posts.In one post, the indictment says, Mr. Cesari wrote, “Need workers who want to make money.” The post had a “Yes” or “No” button, a moneybag emoji and a railroad track in the background, the indictment says. In another, the indictment says, he offered a “guarantee” that those he hired would “make 100k+ in a month” by following the “beer train method.”Mr. Cesari, 27, who was at large on Wednesday, was charged with conspiracy to steal from interstate or foreign shipments by carrier and six other counts. The seven others face the same conspiracy charge, and several were also charged with other crimes.Those charged as Mr. Cesari’s co-defendants are Kemar Bonitto, 38; Justin Bruno, 23; Miguel Cintron, 32; Antonio Gonzalez, 33; Luis Izquierdo, 40; Wakeim Johnson, 31; and Deylin Martinez-Guerrero, 28.“Today’s arrests reinforce that the Beer Theft Enterprise’s staggering thefts will not be tolerated,” Damian Williams, the U.S. attorney in Manhattan, said in a statement.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More