This article is part of the Debatable newsletter. You can sign up here to receive it on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
This week, Joe Biden selected Senator Kamala Harris of California to be his running mate, the first Black woman as well as the first person of Indian descent to be nominated for a major party’s presidential ticket. “We need more than a victory on Nov. 3,” Ms. Harris said in an appearance with Mr. Biden on Wednesday. “We need a mandate that proves that the past few years do not represent who we are or who we aspire to be.”
Are Ms. Harris and Mr. Biden the right pair to win that mandate? Here’s what people are saying about what her nomination means for the election and the future of the Democratic Party.
For many Democrats, it was the right choice
The reaction within the Democratic Party, from Beltway professionals to grass-roots activists, was largely relief, Astead Herndon and Jonathan Martin reported for The Times. There was obvious excitement, too: Within 24 hours after the announcement, the Biden campaign reported raising $26 million in donations, including from 150,000 first-time contributors. “Her selection as Joe Biden’s running mate was conventional by some political standards,” Mr. Herndon and Mr. Martin wrote. “But it was historic most of all, and especially sweet for many Black women.”
As Melanye Price, a professor of political science at Prairie View A&M University in Texas, points out in a Times Op-Ed, Black women have been the most loyal major demographic in the Democratic Party for decades, even though they have never before been represented on the presidential ticket. (Ms. Harris is herself only the second Black female senator in American history.) “Millions of Black women and their political labor have made this historic day possible,” she writes.
Manisha Sinha, a professor of African-American history at the University of Connecticut, writes in The Times that Ms. Harris’s nomination is also deeply meaningful to many Indian-American immigrants like her. When she arrived in the United States in 1984, she says, “I could have ill imagined that one day an African-American man would become the president or that a woman of Jamaican and Indian descent would be a candidate for the vice presidency.”
Both Dr. Sinha and Dr. Price stress that the nomination is not a victory just for Ms. Harris. Rather, Dr. Price says, “The selection is a win for Black women politicians who have higher political ambitions, Black women operatives who want to have more say in how campaigns are run, and Black women voters who want to see themselves among the many candidates the party fields every election.”
Politically, Ms. Harris is something of a more orthodox choice: She is “a thoroughly establishment-friendly figure,” as Mr. Herndon and Mr. Martin write, one who, like Mr. Biden, has toed the Democratic Party line for years, “shifting left with the times but always with an eye on the broader electorate and higher office.”
Even so, many progressive activists and elected officials have thrown their support behind her. They’ve done so partly out of political expedience, but also because Ms. Harris has been consistently to the left of Mr. Biden on certain issues, perhaps most notably climate change. In a statement, Varshini Prakash, the co-founder of the Sunrise Movement, praised Harris for taking on the oil industry as California attorney general, campaigning on a Green New Deal and being one of the first candidates to call for eliminating the filibuster to pass it. “Throughout the course of her campaign for president, Senator Kamala Harris showed her responsiveness to activist and movement pressure to make climate a top priority, and demonstrated her willingness to be held accountable,” Ms. Prakash said.
Many Democrats also view Ms. Harris as a strategically smart choice: Having run for both the Senate and the presidency, she has already been subjected to national scrutiny. And although Ms. Harris’s presidential campaign burned out sooner than expected, the Times columnist Frank Bruni predicts that she’ll fare better competing against Republicans instead of her fellow Democrats.
“She’s running for the vice presidency against Trump and Pence, and there’s a real chance that the same Black voters who were cool to her in the primary will thrill to her now that she’s on a history-making ticket, prosecuting the case against a president who has consistently and deeply offended them,” he says. The same may be true of Indian-American voters, too, as Philip Bump reports for The Washington Post.
And sure enough, a poll released on Wednesday suggested that Ms. Harris has the potential to expand Mr. Biden’s support: Nearly nine out of 10 Democrats approve of her, and she is more popular than Mr. Biden among women, young voters and even some Republicans.
But on both the right and the left, some see deep flaws — and risks
Predictably, the Republican establishment has responded to Ms. Harris’s nomination by painting her as an extremist. “It’s going to be President Trump and Vice President Pence on the ballot against two of our Nation’s most RADICAL Democrats: Sleepy Joe Biden and Phony Kamala Harris,” said a fund-raising email from Trump’s campaign. “Both of them are corrupt career politicians who LOVE anarchy and HATE America. … It’s REAL Americans vs. SOCIALISTS.” The Wall Street Journal editorial board advanced a more restrained version of that assessment, describing Ms. Harris’s nomination as a sign that “coastal progressives” now “dominate the Democratic Party.”
This line of attack may well become the dominant one against Ms. Harris in the next few months, but it obscures the depth of criticism she has received from people on both the left and the right who see her as embodying a kind of triangulating centrism that has defined the Democratic Party for decades. In The American Conservative, for example, Rod Dreher laments how executives both in Silicon Valley and on Wall Street greeted her selection with excitement.
“All of her left-wing vigor, both as a vice-presidential candidate and in whatever her promising future brings, will be directed at social conservatives,” Mr. Dreher writes. “The fact that Wall Street considers her to be a ‘moderate’ tells you everything. Joe Biden has made a choice that is safe for Woke Capitalism.”
That perception is shared by many on the left. In The Guardian, Malaika Jabali points out that when she was California’s attorney general, Ms. Harris declined to prosecute Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, then the C.E.O. of OneWest Bank, for allegedly violating foreclosure laws more than a thousand times after the 2008 financial crisis. “Today, hundreds of thousands of Black men and women on the front lines of a deadly pandemic face death, evictions and massive unemployment,” she writes. “I wish I could believe that Vice President Kamala Harris would make a material difference in our lives, but I find it hard to.”
On criminal justice issues, too, the Trump campaign may find it difficult to cast Ms. Harris as a radical. During her tenure as San Francisco’s district attorney and California’s attorney general, Ms. Harris adopted a “tough on crime” approach — championing legislation that permitted arresting parents of truant children, for example, and fighting an order to release nonviolent inmates even after the Supreme Court found that overcrowding in California prisons was unconstitutionally facilitating “needless suffering and death” — that alienated criminal justice advocates during her presidential run.
At the same time, Ms. Harris’s relatively conventional politics may not make her a strategically safe choice, as Mr. Herndon and Mr. Martin explain. By choosing her over candidates like Gov. Gretchen Whitmer of Michigan, who might have attracted more white moderates and even Republicans in swing states, “Mr. Biden is now taking direct aim at Mr. Trump’s brand of racial grievance politics.” That may come back to bite him if Mr. Trump tries to use Ms. Harris’s prosecutorial record to cut into her appeal among Black male voters, as the Times columnist Charles Blow suspects he might. And as the 2016 election reminded Democrats, white women, a majority of whom backed Mr. Trump, do not vote as a bloc.
Ms. Harris will also face obstacles because of her sex and race that her running mate and opponents will not. “Research on attitudes toward Black women shows that there are expectations and stereotypes often leveraged against them to be more assertive and tough, while also nurturing and caring,” Chryl Laird, an assistant professor of political science at Bowdoin, writes in The Times. “She will be expected to be everything to everyone.”
For many progressive Black women, Derecka Purnell writes in The Guardian, the prospect of having to defend Ms. Harris against sexist, racist attacks while attempting to push her and Mr. Biden left on issues like health care and police reform is wearying. “This generational fatigue, from Nina Simone to Nina Turner, from Fannie Lou Hamer to Cori Bush, compounds with the political fatigue of doing progressive work around a party that undermines progressive values,” she says. “Together, they will affirm the power of the Black vote, while daring, do you really think you have any other choice?”
Do you have a point of view we missed? Email us at debatable@nytimes.com. Please note your name, age and location in your response, which may be included in the next newsletter.
MORE ON THE V.P. PICK
“Kamala Harris Reading Guide: The Best Reporting on the Vice Presidential Candidate” [ProPublica]
“‘Progressive Prosecutor’: Can Kamala Harris Square the Circle?” [The New York Times]
“Kamala Harris Gives New Meaning to the Biden Campaign” [The New Yorker]
“Biden’s Choice of Kamala Harris Is Historic — And Necessary” [Newsweek]
“Dehumanization by Deification: On Kamala Harris and ‘Black Women Will Save Us’” [Verso Books]l
WHAT YOU’RE SAYING
Here’s what readers had to say about the last edition: How to Protect the 2020 Election.
Wolfgang, from Germany: “I am quite puzzled why there is so much discussion and (fake?) problems raised in the U.S. about mail-in voting. In Germany, the procedure is simple and effective as every eligible voter receives weeks before the election by mail a card which is to be brought along when voting in person and which can be returned in order to request mail-in voting documents. … To me, this sounds like an easy, straightforward process without a significant chance of fraud to occur. I question why such procedures should be difficult to introduce for elections in the U.S.?”
Frank McNeil, a former U.S. ambassador to Costa Rica, from Florida: “My wife and I, in our eighties, plan to vote in person, during early Florida voting. There’s a Covid risk but it’s worth taking to get rid of our would-be Mussolini.”
Source: Elections - nytimes.com
