More stories

  • in

    Ministers must fix the £4bn hole in council funding or risk more going bankrupt, MPs warn

    Get the free Morning Headlines email for news from our reporters across the worldSign up to our free Morning Headlines emailThe government must fix a £4bn hole in council funding or risk severe impact to services and more local authorities going bankrupt, MPs have warned. In the last six years, eight local authorities have issued a section 114 notice, which notifies ministers that councils can’t balance their budgets properly. None had done so in the preceding 18 years. Cross-party MPs on the levelling up, housing and communities committee have called on the government to “act now” to avert “the severe crisis and financial distress” faced by councils. They pointed to social care, children’s services and homelessness as growing areas that are adding millions to councils’ bills. As many as one in five councils in England are on the brink of effective bankruptcy, the Local Government Association has previously warned, with half of council leaders not confident they have enough money to fund legally required services – such as providing emergency housing for homeless people. In a report published on Thursday, parliamentarians wrote: “The levels of funding available to local authorities, through council tax, retained business rates, and government grants have not kept pace with these pressures, leading to a funding gap which is already estimated at £4bn over the next two years”.Children’s social care is a soaring cost that councils with depleting budgets are having to deal with Chair of the committee, MP Clive Betts, said the financial crisis facing English councils was “out of control”. He added: “Increasing demands on council services such as social care and special educational needs and disabilities (Send) provision has resulted in rocketing costs but the levels of funding available to councils has failed to keep track.”He said that without emergency funding from government “well-run councils could face the very real prospect of effectively going bust”.The report calls on the next government to overhaul how councils in England are funded and to consider land value taxes. It comes after more than 40 Tory backbenchers signed a letter to Rishi Sunak warning that without emergency cash, many councils will be forced to cut basic services and hike council tax in an election year.In December, the government proposed an increase of core council funding of 6.5 per cent in cash terms for the year 2024-5, compared to 2023-4. However, MPs warned that this increase came from the assumption that all local authorities would raise council tax by the maximum permitted amounts. MPs also said that the extra cash would not affect the £4bn funding hole.MPs pointed to the government’s decision to freeze local housing allowance rates at 2020 levels as a factor in driving homelessness rates. The report explained that the “effect of the freeze has been to constrain the available supply of housing by making increasing numbers of properties unaffordable to those receiving benefits”.Tory MPs wrote to Rishi Sunak to ask that he provides emergency funding to councils Councillors told the committee that funding basic services, such as children’s social care provisions, was becoming unsustainable. Leader of Bradford council, Susan Hinchcliffe, said: “Nearly 50 per cent of the council’s entire budget is now spent on children’s social care through [the children and families] trust, yet the trust is telling us this is not enough to cope with the current pressures.”She added: “It is grappling with high agency costs, high placement costs and dizzying levels of demand.” The trust, which is run independently of the council by the Department for Education but depends on council funding, is forecasting spending £242m this year. Bradford council only collects £233m in council tax annually, Ms Hinchcliffe explained. Councils have also seen an increase in special needs children needing transport from home to school, a service that local authorities have a statutory duty to provide. Gary Fielding, corporate resources director at Yorkshire Council, explained: “Five years ago, in North Yorkshire, we spent £5m a year on Send school transport; we now spend £21m.”Rising homelessness is also stripping councils of their funding. Lambeth councillor Clair Holland said that London boroughs were forecast to overspend more than £90m on temporary accommodation this year, with an estimated one in 50 Londoners being homeless. Cllr Peter Marland, of the Local Government Association, said the report showed there were “significant challenges” ahead this year. “Councils have led the way at finding ways to save money and reduce costs, but they will still need to raise council tax this year and many will need to make further savings to local services.”Liberal Democrat Leader Ed Davey said that that youth services are being “torn away from children” and “the elderly are not getting the care they deserve” because this Conservative government has left a blackhole in council finances.He added: “Instead of ensuring that councils have the resources they need, Rishi Sunak has turned a blind eye to disappearing breakfast clubs, tennis courts, and bus routes.“The Conservatives have decimated council finances and it is local people up and down the country who are paying the price. Without proper funding for local services, it is communities and local people who will continue to suffer.”A Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities spokesperson said: “We recognise councils are facing challenges and that is why we recently announced an additional £600m support package for councils across England, increasing their overall proposed funding for next year to £64.7bn – a 7.5 per cent increase in cash terms.“This additional funding has been welcomed by leading local government organisations, but we remain ready to talk to any concerned council about its financial position.” More

  • in

    Voices: Will a disposable vape ban actually stop children vaping? Join The Independent Debate

    Get the free Morning Headlines email for news from our reporters across the worldSign up to our free Morning Headlines emailA ban on disposable vapes in the UK is looming – but will it actually stop children from taking up the habit?Rishi Sunak has announced plans for a ban on disposable vapes by the end of 2025. The government also says it will limit reusable vapes to just four flavours and end the use of colourful packaging marketing them to young people.New data shows the number of children vaping has tripled in the last three years with a significant proportion (nine per cent) of 11 to 15-year-olds using the devices, while the number of 11 to 17-year-old vapers increased almost ninefold in the last two years.Powers will be introduced to restrict flavours, enforce plainer packaging and change how vapes are displayed in shops, moving them out of children’s sight. Campaigning MPs have long commented on how flavours are named after sweets and displayed in bright colours.New fines will be brought in for shops selling vapes illegally to children allowing trading standards officers to act “on the spot”. Local authorities can already impose a maximum £2,500 fine and the new fines are expected to build on this. Vaping alternatives – such as nicotine pouches – will also be banned for children.We want to know your opinions on the disposable vape ban. Are the plans outlined by the government enough? Or is it too late for these changes to make a material impact? If you want to share your opinion then add it in the comments and we’ll highlight the most insightful ones as they come in.All you have to do is sign up and register your details – then you can then take part in the discussion. You can also sign up by clicking ‘log in’ on the top right-hand corner of the screen.Make sure you adhere to our community guidelines, which can be found here. For a full guide on how to comment click here.Join the conversation with other Independent readers below or by clicking here. More

  • in

    Lindsay Hoyle reveals ‘we all get death threats’ as he addresses Mike Freer resignation

    Lindsay Hoyle has revealed that all MPs “get death threats” as he addressed Mike Freer’s resignation.The government minister has said he will stand down at the next general election after a series of threats and an arson attack on his constituency office.Mr Freer has said he can no longer put his family through the anxiety for his safety.“We all get death threats, but Mike really has been targeted,” Sir Lindsay said, reacting to the resignation on Thursday morning (1 February).“Thankfully, he’s here to tell the story, but I’m really saddened he’s felt he’s had to stand down.” More

  • in

    Tearful Nicola Sturgeon admits deleting WhatsApps – but denies politicising Covid crisis

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailScotland’s former first minister Nicola Sturgeon fought back tears at the Covid inquiry as she denied using the pandemic for political purposes.The ex-SNP leader choked up as she rejected claims that she had pushed for fights with Boris Johnson’s government to boost her Scottish independence cause.She insisted that she had not been “thinking of political opportunity”, as she was grilled about WhatsApps which showed she wanted public arguments with Mr Johnson.Ms Sturgeon also finally admitted that she had deleted her own WhatsApp messages with officials and ministers, but attempted to play down the importance of the messages.The former first minister said she “did not make extensive use of informal messaging” – claiming that her officials’ discussion of deleting messages was merely “light-hearted” banter.And she became visibly emotional as she spoke of being “overwhelmed” at times during the crisis. “There’s a large part of me wishes that I hadn’t been, but I was, and I wanted to be the best first minister.”Former first minister Nicola Sturgeon arrives at the Covid inquiry It came as Ms Sturgeon vehemently denied that the government had politicised the pandemic to pursue Scottish independence, stating that would have been “robbing people of their livelihoods” and would “absolutely” have been a betrayal of the Scottish public.She told the Covid inquiry that she had never thought less about Scottish independence as she did during the course of the pandemic.The former SNP boss also said that she “will absolutely assert” that no decisions were made for political reasons, “or that were influenced in some way by considerations for the constitutional argument”.Tory cabinet minister Michael Gove previously accused the Scottish government of seeking “political conflict” with Westminster government during the pandemic.Messages between Ms Sturgeon and her top adviser Liz Lloyd showed they had discussed a “good old-fashioned rammy” with Boris Johnson’s government over the furlough scheme. It emerged that Ms Sturgeon called Mr Johnson a “f***ing clown”, while Ms Lloyd said she sought a “spat with a purpose”.The former SNP leader, fighting back tears, told the inquiry: “The idea that in those horrendous days, weeks, I was thinking of political opportunity” was “not the case”. She added: “It wasn’t true.”Sturgeon cabinet meeting minutes from June 2020 show that her ministers agreed to consider how the Covid crisis could be used to boost support for Scottish independence.But Ms Sturgeon pointed to a 2020 letter from her then constitution secretary, Mike Russell, to Mr Gove saying the Scottish government was suspending all work on an independence referendum.Nicola Sturgeon leaving the Covid inquiry hearing Ms Sturgeon apologised when grilled about her statement to a Channel 4 journalist during the Covid crisis saying she would be fully transparent in allowing access to her WhatsApp messages. She said she could have been more “clear”.She admitted that she deleted these informal messages – but said it was in line with official advice because “salient” points were all recorded on her government’s corporate record.Amid the storm of controversy over deleted messages, Ms Sturgeon conceded that WhatsApp had become “too common” a means of communication within the Scottish government during the crisis.But she insisted that she exchanged WhatsApps with no more than a “handful” of people – including key ally Ms Lloyd, and the now first minister Humza Yousaf, who was health secretary.The ex-SNP leader also dismissed messages sent by senior civil servants and officials about the deletion of WhatsApp messages as “light-hearted”.Nicola Sturgeon admits she deleted her WhatsApp messages during Covid inquiryKen Thompson, the Scottish government’s director-general for strategy, wrote in August 2020 that “plausible deniability are my middle names”. He also told colleagues they should “know where the ‘clear chat’ button is” on WhatsApp.Ms Sturgeon said: “I look at that exchange and what I don’t see is an exchange about the decisions that were taken, I see a light-hearted discussion between officials.”Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar said Ms Sturgeon’s behaviour has “smashed” trust in the SNP, as he accused the Scottish government of having a “culture of secrecy and cover-up”.The Scottish Conservative leader Douglas Ross said the inquiry hearings had shown Ms Sturgeon to be a “liar” and a “fraud”, as he accused the former first minister of “destroying vital evidence”.And one of the Scottish Covid Bereaved group said Ms Sturgeon’s “crocodile tears aren’t washing with me” as they reacted to her evidence. Pamela Thomas lost her brother, James Cameron, said: “I don’t think they’re capable of actually telling the truth or being transparent.”Meanwhile, Ms Sturgeon also rejected accusations of “secrecy” during the pandemic. She claimed she did not have “carte blanche” to make decisions on her own, as she was grilled about her so-called “gold command” meetings of only senior cabinet ministers.Inquiry counsel Jamie Dawson KC put it to her that she “did not like light to be shone” on the way decisions were taken. “I would very strongly refute that,” Ms Sturgeon replied. “I did not have carte blanche, wide latitude to take decisions – and nor should I have had.”Ms Sturgeon confirmed that no minutes were taken of the gold command meetings. “There were not minutes taken of them in the way you would have cabinet minutes because they were not decision-making meetings.”Defending small meetings, she told the inquiry she did “not have a great deal of patience” with the idea of “everybody” wanting to be in the room – saying said there was a tendency for a “cast of thousands” to want to be in the room with her.And Ms Sturgeon also admitted that it was a mistake to use a SNP email account to conduct some government business with public health expert Professor Devi Sridhar. “On reflection, perhaps I shouldn’t have done that.”Ms Sturgeon also said she regretted not locking down “a week, two weeks” earlier than Mr Johnson’s UK government did. She said it was one “of the many regrets I have”. More

  • in

    Brexit news – live: Checks make it ‘easier to trade with China than France’ as food producers brace for cost rise

    Sign up to our free Brexit and beyond email for the latest headlines on what Brexit is meaning for the UKSign up to our Brexit email for the latest insightBoris Johnson has attacked Rishi Sunak’s new Brexit deal with the DUP – warning that it could tie the UK to EU trade rules in future.Mr Sunak’s government revealed new arrangements to remove routine checks on goods moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland in a bid to restore power-sharing at Stormont.Checks required under the previous so-called “green lane” will be further reduced – a tweak aimed at fixing some of the unresolved mess left by Mr Johnson’s Brexit deal.Despite effectively being an extension of his own deal, Mr Johnson joined Tory rebels in claiming the new arrangements could thwart Britain’s post-Brexit “freedom” to diverge from EU rules.The former PM – who has repeatedly criticised Mr Sunak since he was kicked out of No 10 – called on his successor to have the “courage” to ditch more Brussels regulations.“We must retain the appetite and the courage to diverge from the low-growth high-regulation European model,” said Mr Johnson on X, formerly Twitter.“We must at all costs avoid a return to anything remotely like the disastrous ‘Chequers’ formula, whereby artificial concerns about the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland are used to keep the whole of the UK in alignment with EU rules.”Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak at odds over Brexit again Mr Johnson’s former Brexit negotiator Lord David Frost – believed to be part of a small cabal of right-wing MPs and ex-advisers plotting to bring down Mr Sunak – said he agreed with the former PM.The trouble-making Tory peer warned that the new agreement with the DUP should not “slow” the push to diverge from the EU.Under the new deal set out in Mr Sunak’s “Safeguarding the Union” paper, the “red lane” for transporting goods from GB to NI, and then on into the EU single market in the Republic of Ireland, will remain.But routine checks will be removed from the “green lane” on goods from the GB destined to stay in NI, and replaced with only occasional checks when “smuggling and disease risks” are suspected.The old “green lane” will be rebranded as the “UK internal market system”. And the government estimates that 80 per cent of goods will now move free of routine checks.The government has pledged to amend domestic law – specifically a section of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act – to affirm the fact that new EU laws will not automatically apply in Northern Ireland, and must first be subject to oversight by Stormont.In a bid to keep both the DUP and Brexiteers happy in allowing UK-wide divergence from EU standards, there is also a legal requirement that any new legislation is assessed as to whether it “impacts on trade between Northern Ireland and Great Britain”.Northern Ireland secretary Chris Heaton-Harris sets out new deal agreed with DUP But some Brexiteer Tory MPs remain sceptical. Former home secretary Priti Patel and former business secretary Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg challenged Northern Ireland secretary Chris Heaton-Harris to explain how the UK would be able to diverge on EU rules without risking arrangements for Northern Ireland.Answering their questions in the Commons, Mr Heaton-Harris insisted that the deal did not “change the freedoms and powers we have secured through Brexit”. The minister added: “It will not reduce our ability to diverge.”But fellow right-winger Theresa Villiers – a former Northern Ireland secretary – said she was “troubled” by the deal and the prospect of it being rushed through parliament. “It is vital that there’s nothing in the deal which prevents Great Britain from diverging from EU rules,” she told The Telegraph.However, DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson has hailed the plan, claiming it would effectively scrap the contentious Irish Sea border for goods. “There should not be a border within the UK internal market,” he said. “These proposals remove that border.”Sir Jeffrey praised Mr Sunak for going further than Mr Johnson. “Whilst Boris Johnson promised us a lot of things, he didn’t deliver them. Rishi Sunak has worked with us, [Mr Heaton-Harris] worked with us, to make these changes,” the DUP leader told the BBC.The DUP has agreed to drop its two-year blockade of Stormont but there are those within the unionist party who remain deeply sceptical of the proposed agreement.Sammy Wilson, the most outspoken, said the UK would still have to follow EU rules. “This is a result of this spineless, weak-kneed, Brexit-betraying government – refusing to take on the EU and its interference in Northern Ireland.”DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson has hailed the deal Legislation promised in the deal is set to be fast-tracked through parliament on Thursday to enable the restoration of the institutions at Stormont – possibly as soon as Saturday.No 10 has insisted that the DUP deal would not mean that the Windsor Framework agreement Mr Sunak struck with the EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen would not have to be reopened.Downing Street said on Wednesday that the deal contains “significant” changes to the Windsor deal’s “operation” but is not about altering the “fundamentals” of the framework.The European Commission effectively endorsed the new arrangement by saying it had come “following in-depth technical discussions with the UK”. Vice-president Maros Sefcovic said on Wednesday that it “replies to the needs of Northern Ireland businesses while protecting our single market”.And Micheal Martin, the Republic of Ireland’s deputy PM, does not expect the European Commission to object to the new Sunak plan, saying: “I do not anticipate any particular difficulties in respect of the EU side.”It came as Tory minister Andrea Leadsom dismissed the concerns of business chiefs over the costly new checks imposed on EU imports – calling them the “price you pay” for Brexit.The Brexiteer said on Times Radio that British firms must simply “adapt” to the new rules which began on Wednesday, and suggested they should even consider “changing their trading arrangements with the EU” if they were struggling.Nigel Jenny from the Fresh Produce Consortium (FPC) warned that the checks for food and plant importers are essentially a £200m tax on the industry and would push up prices for consumers.And Paolo Arrigo, managing director of London-based importer Seeds of Italy, told The Independent that the new checks were “anti-small business” and that it was now easier to import from China than France. More

  • in

    Most Independent readers want change of government, poll shows

    Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inboxGet our free View from Westminster emailTwo in three Independent readers want a change of government at the next general election, a major new poll suggests.Only a quarter (25 per cent) of readers want Rishi Sunak’s administration to remain in Downing Street, while 69 per cent said they would prefer fresh faces in charge.The results are in line with the overall results of British voters – 63 per cent of those questioned said it was time for a change of government, while less than a quarter (24 per cent) thought the current government should stay in No 10.The poll of almost 25,000 people, a larger-than-usual survey number, found that a change of government was the most popular option across all categories of voters, including age, gender, ethnicity, religion and income level.Even groups traditionally more supportive of the Conservatives, such as the over-65s and those in the top income bracket, agreed.The poll, carried out on behalf of Best for Britain, the organisation behind getvoting.org – a tactical voting site – also showed that a fifth (19 per cent) of those who said they intended to vote Conservative in their area wanted a change of government.Mr Sunak has been in crisis mode since the start of the year – battling to get his Rwanda bill through parliament and fighting to fend off a plot by right-wing Tory rebels to bring him down.On Wednesday, his beleaguered premiership suffered three new blows, including business secretary Kemi Badenoch, a favourite to succeed Mr Sunak, being unmasked as a member of a WhatsApp group called “Evil Plotters”.At the start of the year,  Best for Britain’s constituency-level polling showed that Labour Leader Sir Keir Starmer was the most popular choice for prime minister in 390 seats, including Mr Sunak’s own North Yorkshire constituency of Richmond.The prime minister was the most popular candidate in only four out of 632 seats in Britain.Naomi Smith, founder of GetVoting.org, said: “It is now painfully obvious that after 14 years of failure, chaos and scandal, that time could soon be up for this government, but this polling shows that millions who want change still don’t know how they should vote to get it.”The poll of 24,954 adults by Focal Data on behalf of Best for Britain was conducted between 19 December and 16 January. More

  • in

    Now Boris tries to sabotage his own bungled Brexit deal with new attack on Sunak

    Sign up to our free Brexit and beyond email for the latest headlines on what Brexit is meaning for the UKSign up to our Brexit email for the latest insightBoris Johnson has attacked Rishi Sunak’s new Brexit deal with the DUP – warning that it could tie the UK to EU trade rules in future.Mr Sunak’s government revealed new arrangements to remove routine checks on goods moving from Great Britain to Northern Ireland in a bid to restore power-sharing at Stormont.Checks required under the previous so-called “green lane” will be further reduced – a tweak aimed at fixing some of the unresolved mess left by Mr Johnson’s Brexit deal.Despite effectively being an extension of his own deal, Mr Johnson joined Tory rebels in claiming the new arrangements could thwart Britain’s post-Brexit “freedom” to diverge from EU rules.The former PM – who has repeatedly criticised Mr Sunak since he was kicked out of No 10 – called on his successor to have the “courage” to ditch more Brussels regulations.“We must retain the appetite and the courage to diverge from the low-growth high-regulation European model,” said Mr Johnson on X, formerly Twitter.“We must at all costs avoid a return to anything remotely like the disastrous ‘Chequers’ formula, whereby artificial concerns about the border between Northern Ireland and Ireland are used to keep the whole of the UK in alignment with EU rules.”Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak at odds over Brexit again Mr Johnson’s former Brexit negotiator Lord David Frost – believed to be part of a small cabal of right-wing MPs and ex-advisers plotting to bring down Mr Sunak – said he agreed with the former PM.The trouble-making Tory peer warned that the new agreement with the DUP should not “slow” the push to diverge from the EU.Under the new deal set out in Mr Sunak’s “Safeguarding the Union” paper, the “red lane” for transporting goods from GB to NI, and then on into the EU single market in the Republic of Ireland, will remain.But routine checks will be removed from the “green lane” on goods from the GB destined to stay in NI, and replaced with only occasional checks when “smuggling and disease risks” are suspected.The old “green lane” will be rebranded as the “UK internal market system”. And the government estimates that 80 per cent of goods will now move free of routine checks.The government has pledged to amend domestic law – specifically a section of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act – to affirm the fact that new EU laws will not automatically apply in Northern Ireland, and must first be subject to oversight by Stormont.In a bid to keep both the DUP and Brexiteers happy in allowing UK-wide divergence from EU standards, there is also a legal requirement that any new legislation is assessed as to whether it “impacts on trade between Northern Ireland and Great Britain”.Northern Ireland secretary Chris Heaton-Harris sets out new deal agreed with DUP But some Brexiteer Tory MPs remain sceptical. Former home secretary Priti Patel and former business secretary Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg challenged Northern Ireland secretary Chris Heaton-Harris to explain how the UK would be able to diverge on EU rules without risking arrangements for Northern Ireland.Answering their questions in the Commons, Mr Heaton-Harris insisted that the deal did not “change the freedoms and powers we have secured through Brexit”. The minister added: “It will not reduce our ability to diverge.”But fellow right-winger Theresa Villiers – a former Northern Ireland secretary – said she was “troubled” by the deal and the prospect of it being rushed through parliament. “It is vital that there’s nothing in the deal which prevents Great Britain from diverging from EU rules,” she told The Telegraph.However, DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson has hailed the plan, claiming it would effectively scrap the contentious Irish Sea border for goods. “There should not be a border within the UK internal market,” he said. “These proposals remove that border.”Sir Jeffrey praised Mr Sunak for going further than Mr Johnson. “Whilst Boris Johnson promised us a lot of things, he didn’t deliver them. Rishi Sunak has worked with us, [Mr Heaton-Harris] worked with us, to make these changes,” the DUP leader told the BBC.The DUP has agreed to drop its two-year blockade of Stormont but there are those within the unionist party who remain deeply sceptical of the proposed agreement.Sammy Wilson, the most outspoken, said the UK would still have to follow EU rules. “This is a result of this spineless, weak-kneed, Brexit-betraying government – refusing to take on the EU and its interference in Northern Ireland.”DUP leader Jeffrey Donaldson has hailed the deal Legislation promised in the deal is set to be fast-tracked through parliament on Thursday to enable the restoration of the institutions at Stormont – possibly as soon as Saturday.No 10 has insisted that the DUP deal would not mean that the Windsor Framework agreement Mr Sunak struck with the EU Commission president Ursula von der Leyen would not have to be reopened.Downing Street said on Wednesday that the deal contains “significant” changes to the Windsor deal’s “operation” but is not about altering the “fundamentals” of the framework.The European Commission effectively endorsed the new arrangement by saying it had come “following in-depth technical discussions with the UK”. Vice-president Maros Sefcovic said on Wednesday that it “replies to the needs of Northern Ireland businesses while protecting our single market”.And Micheal Martin, the Republic of Ireland’s deputy PM, does not expect the European Commission to object to the new Sunak plan, saying: “I do not anticipate any particular difficulties in respect of the EU side.”It came as Tory minister Andrea Leadsom dismissed the concerns of business chiefs over the costly new checks imposed on EU imports – calling them the “price you pay” for Brexit.The Brexiteer said on Times Radio that British firms must simply “adapt” to the new rules which began on Wednesday, and suggested they should even consider “changing their trading arrangements with the EU” if they were struggling.Nigel Jenny from the Fresh Produce Consortium (FPC) warned that the checks for food and plant importers are essentially a £200m tax on the industry and would push up prices for consumers.And Paolo Arrigo, managing director of London-based importer Seeds of Italy, told The Independent that the new checks were “anti-small business” and that it was now easier to import from China than France. More

  • in

    What’s in the deal that has broken Northern Ireland’s political deadlock?

    Sign up to our free Brexit and beyond email for the latest headlines on what Brexit is meaning for the UKSign up to our Brexit email for the latest insight The U.K. government on Wednesday published the details of a deal that has broken Northern Ireland’s political deadlock and should — barring a major upset — restore the regional government in Belfast after almost two years on ice.Unveiled on the fourth anniversary of the U.K.’s departure from the European Union, the agreement eases some of the border checks imposed because of Brexit that unsettled Northern Ireland’s delicate political balance and sparked a political crisis. CRISIS, WHAT CRISIS? Britain’s exit from the European trading bloc in 2020 imposed new trade barriers between the U.K. and the EU, and also between Northern Ireland and the rest of the U.K. That’s because Northern Ireland shares a border with an EU member, the Republic of Ireland.An open border between the north and the republic is a key pillar of the peace process that ended three decades of violence in Northern Ireland, so checks were imposed instead between Northern Ireland and the rest of the U.K.That angered Northern Ireland’s British unionists, who said the east-west customs border undermined Northern Ireland’s place in the U.K. In February 2022, the Democratic Unionist Party walked out of Northern Ireland’s government in protest.The walkout collapsed the administration. Under the terms of the 1998 Good Friday peace accord, power must be shared between Northern Ireland’s two main communities — British unionists who want to stay in the U.K., and Irish nationalists who seek to unite with Ireland. One side can’t govern without the other.The DUP boycott left Northern Ireland’s 1.9 million people without a functioning administration for two years as the cost of living soared and public services creaked under the strain. WHAT BROKE THE BOYCOTT? The U.K. government sought to coax the DUP back into government by easing the burden of the border checks.In February 2023, the U.K. and the EU agreed on a deal, known as the Windsor Framework, that eased customs checks and other hurdles for goods moving to Northern Ireland from the rest of the U.K. But it didn’t go far enough for the DUP, which continued its boycott.The new changes go farther, eliminating routine checks and paperwork for goods entering Northern Ireland and making legal tweaks designed to reassure unionists that Northern Ireland’s position in the U.K. is secure.The agreement includes legislation “affirming Northern Ireland’s constitutional status” as part of the U.K. and gives local politicians “democratic oversight” of any future EU laws that might apply to Northern Ireland.More concretely, the U.K. government also agreed to give Northern Ireland more than 3 billion pounds ($3.8 billion) for its battered public services once the Belfast government is back up and running. WHAT HAPPENS NEXT? The deal doesn’t have universal support. Some unionists and hard-line Brexit supporters argue that Northern Ireland will still be treated differently to the rest of the U.K. in order to keep the U.K.’s deal with the EU intact.But the British and Irish governments, and the DUP leadership, all support the deal, and the necessary legislation is likely to be sped through the U.K. Parliament on Thursday.The Northern Ireland Assembly then can meet to elect a speaker, followed by the nomination of a first minister and a deputy first minister.The new first minister is likely to be Michelle O’Neill of Irish nationalist party Sinn Fein — a landmark in Northern Ireland, which was established as a unionist, Protestant-majority state in 1921.Unionists were the largest force in the Northern Ireland Assembly from its establishment in 1998 until 2022, when Sinn Fein won the largest number of seats in an election. That gives the nationalist party, affiliated with the militant Irish Republican Army during the Troubles, the right to hold the post of first minister, with the DUP supplying a deputy. More