United States

Subterms

    More stories

    • 88 Shares169 Views

      in Elections

      When Will Democrats Learn to Say No?

      by

      When Donald Trump held a rally in the Bronx in May, critics scoffed that there was no way he could win New York State. Yet as a strategic matter, asking the question “What would it take for a Republican to win New York?” leads to the answer, “It would take overperforming with Black, Hispanic and working-class voters.”Mr. Trump didn’t win New York, of course, but his gains with nonwhite voters helped him sweep all seven battleground states.Unlike Democrats, Mr. Trump engaged in what I call supermajority thinking: envisioning what it would take to achieve an electoral realignment and working from there.Supermajority thinking is urgently needed at this moment. We have been conditioned to think of our era of polarization as a stable arrangement of rough parity between the parties that will last indefinitely, but history teaches us that such periods usually give way to electoral realignments. Last week, Mr. Trump showed us what a conservative realignment can look like. Unless Democrats want to be consigned to minority status and be locked out of the Senate for the foreseeable future, they need to counter by building a supermajority of their own.That starts with picking an ambitious electoral goal — say, the 365 electoral votes Barack Obama won in 2008 — and thinking clearly about what Democrats need to do to achieve it.Democrats cannot do this as long as they remain crippled by a fetish for putting coalition management over a real desire for power. Whereas Mr. Trump has crafted an image as a different kind of Republican by routinely making claims that break with the party line on issues ranging from protecting Social Security and Medicare to mandating insurance coverage of in vitro fertilization, Democrats remain stuck trying to please all of their interest groups while watching voters of all races desert them over the very stances that these groups impose on the party.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 138 Shares189 Views

      in Elections

      Sharath Jois, Heir to Founder of Ashtanga Yoga, Dies at 53

      by

      He became one of the world’s most sought-after teachers of a style of yoga that his grandfather helped turn into a popular form of exercise worldwide.Sharath Jois, the yoga master who garnered legions of followers by teaching Ashtanga, the popular style of yoga founded by his grandfather, died on Monday in Virginia. He was 53.His death was confirmed by his sister, Sharmila Mahesh, and John Bultman, the yoga program manager at the University of Virginia. Mr. Bultman said that Mr. Jois had died after suffering a heart attack on a hiking trail near the university’s campus in Charlottesville, where he was visiting.Mr. Jois’s workshops, in his hometown in India and worldwide, were attended by thousands of disciples seeking a direct experience with the leader of the Ashtanga yoga tradition, which involves a demanding series of postures and dynamic movements. Rooted in Sanskrit and Hindu rituals, Ashtanga yoga is widely viewed today as one of the most accessible forms of exercise.His grandfather, Krishna Pattabhi Jois, helped lift yoga to soaring levels of popularity in the 1990s, drawing a global following that included celebrities like Gwyneth Paltrow and Madonna. Ashtanga, which is more physically arduous than other forms of yoga, later came into vogue in India with the arrival of modern fitness culture there.After inheriting his grandfather’s practice, Mr. Jois began calling himself the “Paramaguru,” which translates to “lineage holder,” on Instagram. In Mysore, a city in southern India known as the home of Ashtanga, he was referred to simply as the “boss,” and the workshops he taught there filled up within moments of opening, Kino MacGregor, one of his most prominent students, wrote in an essay published in 2016.“The crowd was growing every year,” Isha Singh Sawhney, a student of Mr. Jois’s who cowrote his 2018 book “Ageless,” said in an interview. “He was an excellent yoga teacher, one of the best.”We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 100 Shares179 Views

      in Elections

      Chris Wallace to Quit CNN After 3 Years

      by

      The 77-year-old veteran anchor told The Daily Beast that he planned to venture into streaming or podcasting.Chris Wallace, a veteran TV anchor who left Fox News for CNN three years ago, announced on Monday that he was leaving his post to venture into the streaming or podcasting worlds.Mr. Wallace, 77, told The Daily Beast that he was leaving the network to pursue independent content creation, where, he told the outlet, “the action seems to be.” He mentioned he was still unsure what form of content he would make, but said his career in broadcasting was over.He said his decision to leave CNN at the end of his three-year contract did not come from discontent. “I have nothing but positive things to say. CNN was very good to me,” he said.One of the network’s most recognizable faces, Mr. Wallace started in 2022 as an on-screen commentator and hosted a weekly talk show called “Who’s Talking to Chris Wallace?” He also anchored CNN’s coverage of the U.S. presidential election last week.Before joining CNN, Mr. Wallace worked at Fox News for 18 years and hosted “Fox News Sunday.” He turned heads at the conservative news outlet when he spoke out against President Trump’s “direct, sustained assault on freedom of the press” in 2020. He moderated an unruly presidential debate in 2020 between President Trump and Joseph R. Biden Jr.Mr. Wallace had initially joined the network to be part of its new CNN+ service, which imploded just weeks after its much-promoted release.CNN’s chief executive, Mark Thompson, confirmed Mr. Wallace’s departure in a statement posted by the network.A representative for Mr. Wallace did not respond immediately to a request for comment. More

    • 150 Shares169 Views

      in Elections

      Trump Should Not Let Putin Claim Victory in Ukraine, Says NATO Official

      by

      Adm. Rob Bauer warned against any peace deal that was too favorable to Russia, arguing that it could undermine American interests.A senior NATO military official suggested on Saturday that any peace deal negotiated by President-elect Donald J. Trump that allowed President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to claim victory in Ukraine would undermine the interests of the United States.In a wide-ranging interview on the sidelines of a European defense summit in Prague, Adm. Rob Bauer, the Dutch chairman of NATO’s Military Committee, said: “If you allow a nation like Russia to win, to come out of this as the victor, then what does it mean for other autocratic states in the world where the U.S. has also interests?”He added: “It’s important enough to talk about Ukraine on its own, but there is more at stake than just Ukraine.”Mr. Trump has said repeatedly that he could end the war in Ukraine in a day, without saying how. A settlement outlined by Vice President-elect JD Vance in September echoes what people close to the Kremlin say Mr. Putin wants: allowing Russia to keep the territory it has captured and guaranteeing that Ukraine will not join NATO.A spokeswoman for Mr. Trump’s transition team, Karoline Leavitt, said he was re-elected because the American people “trust him to lead our country and restore peace through strength around the world.”“When he returns to the White House, he will take the necessary actions to do just that,” Ms. Leavitt said on Saturday.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 75 Shares99 Views

      in Elections

      This Is All Joe Biden’s Fault

      by

      Kamala Harris lost the election this week, but I mostly don’t blame her. At least, I don’t blame her because of anything she did recently. Since she became the unofficial nominee in July, she played a difficult hand about as well as she could have, running a disciplined campaign that sought to reassure Americans about the economic issues that trouble them most, in a political environment that was very rough for Democrats and for incumbent parties around the world.But where did that bad hand come from? It was dealt to her by two people: President Biden, who produced a governing record she could not effectively defend or run away from; and herself, with all the toxic position-taking she did in 2019, generating endless attack ad fodder for Donald Trump. And Mr. Biden even bears blame for Ms. Harris’s pre-2020 baggage, since he put her on the ticket in full awareness that she was carrying it.In his own campaign rhetoric, Mr. Biden focused on the idea that democracy itself was on the ballot this year. But if democracy was on the ballot, his actions should have matched his rhetoric at every turn to ensure Democrats would win the election. Instead, he prioritized his own ego and profile.His electoral instincts weren’t always so misguided. During the 2020 primary campaign, Mr. Biden seemed to understand that the left-wing fever dreams that drove that Democratic cycle were electorally hazardous. So, unlike Ms. Harris, he never pledged to ban fracking or abolish private health insurance. He never even filled out the A.C.L.U. questionnaire that prompted Ms. Harris to support federally funded gender-transition surgery for prisoners and detained immigrants.After winning the nomination, Mr. Biden made his first big mistake that would set Democrats on a path with no route to win the 2024 election: He selected Ms. Harris as his running mate.Perversely, Ms. Harris’s apparent weakness as a potential presidential candidate was an asset to Mr. Biden. It helped insulate him from calls to step aside. The case for him running again was simple, and I even made it myself, before June’s disastrous debate: Ms. Harris had run a terrible campaign in 2019, and at the time she regularly polled worse than he did; if Mr. Biden did not seek re-election, it was highly likely that she would end up as the nominee; therefore, he had better run again.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 113 Shares149 Views

      in Elections

      Llegó el día de las elecciones: Harris versus Trump

      by

      Estados Unidos acude a las urnas y esto es lo que hay que saber.Es martes y no hay tiempo que perder. Esta es la edición exprés de nuestro boletín.Llegó el día de las elecciones en Estados Unidos.Ayer, tanto la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris como el expresidente Donald Trump estuvieron en Pensilvania, uno de siete estados con tendencia electoral inciera y que pueden inclinar la balanza en la carrera hacia la Casa Blanca.Fue un último esfuerzo por ganar el voto en unas elecciones extremadamente competitivas.“En la historia de las encuestas modernas, nunca ha habido una contienda en la que los sondeos finales muestren un resultado tan reñido”, apuntó Nate Cohn, analista político jefe del Times.Ruth Fremson/The New York Times; Doug Mills/The New York TimesTanto Harris como Trump han presentado la contienda presidencial como una batalla existencial para el país, algo que tiene en vilo a muchas personas. Numerosos votantes, reportaron Lisa Lerer y Katie Glueck, acudían con desazón a un evento cívico que los estadounidenses suelen percibir como un acto de patriotismo: una forma de emplear las urnas para resolver sus diferencias. Los votantes anticipados rellenaron sus papeletas en el Centro Cívico de Novi el domingo en Novi, Míchigan.Nick Hagen para The New York TimesEn los últimos mensajes de campaña para los votantes, Trump siguió presentando un panorama sombrío y de amenazas, mientras que Harris se inclinó por un tema de unidad.Aunque aún falta para conocer los resultados, Adam Nagourney, reportero político del Times, habló con los expertos para indagar cuáles serían los factores que llevarían a la Casa Blanca a uno u otro candidato: estas son las razones que le darían a Harris la victoria y estas son las razones que le darían el triunfo a Trump.Y, hablando de resultados, tenemos un interactivo con los tiempos en los que se espera que se concluyan los conteos en cada uno de los estados.The New York TimesP. D.: Si necesitas refrescar la memoria sobre cómo funciona el Colegio Electoral en EE. UU., aquí tenemos una guía sencilla sobre esta institución.Si alguien te reenvió este correo, puedes hacer clic aquí para recibirlo directo en tu buzón.— More

    • 163 Shares129 Views

      in Elections

      Elecciones en Estados Unidos 2024 en vivo: ¿Trump o Harris? Los votantes deciden

      by

      Collegeville, Pa.Noah Throop/The New York TimesAtlantaAudra Melton for The New York TimesBrooklyn, N.Y.Graham Dickie/The New York TimesDetroitReutersHamtramck, Mich.Emily Rhyne/The New York TimesPhoenixJon Cherry for The New York TimesPhiladelphiaBen Von Klemperer via StoryfulMiamiScott McIntyre for The New York TimesPhiladelphiaMichelle Gustafson for The New York TimesCharlottesville, Va.Dixville Notch, N.H.Ryan David Brown for The New York TimesYancey County, N.C.Dillon Deaton for The New York TimesPhiladelphiaErin Schaff/The New York TimesGrand Rapids, Mich.Doug Mills/The New York TimesMoosic, Pa. Ruth Fremson/The New York TimesReading, Pa.Doug Mills/The New York TimesPhiladelphiaErin Schaff/The New York TimesPittsburghDoug Mills/The New York Times📌 Estas son las últimas noticiasEl martes concluye una campaña presidencial divisiva, caótica y agotadora, en la que los votantes se disponen a elegir a la primera mujer que lidere Estados Unidos en sus 248 años de historia o a devolver a la Casa Blanca a un expresidente que pasó por dos juicios políticos y ha trastornado la política y la cultura estadounidenses al tiempo que moldeaba el Partido Republicano a su imagen y semejanza.Tanto si los estadounidenses se decantan por Kamala Harris, la vicepresidenta demócrata, como por Donald Trump, el expresidente republicano, los votantes estarán haciendo historia: Harris sería la primera mujer elegida a la Casa Blanca; Trump sería el primer delincuente convicto en sentarse en el Despacho Oval.Esta jornada electoral pone fin a una campaña emocionalmente agotadora que ha personificado toda la disfunción y polarización de la política estadounidense. Hasta el final, casi todos los sondeos realizados en los siete estados de tendencia electoral incierta mostraban que la contienda era un cara o cruz. La votación anticipada puso de manifiesto el intenso interés del electorado, mientras Trump y Harris realizaban sus últimas rondas por los estados en disputa, que terminaron el lunes en Pensilvania para Harris y a primera hora del martes en Michigan para Trump.“Necesitamos que todo el mundo vote, Pensilvania, ustedes marcarán la diferencia en estas elecciones”, dijo Harris en su discurso final, tras una gira por cinco ciudades del estado. “Ustedes marcarán la diferencia”.Trump, dirigiéndose a sus partidarios en Pittsburgh el lunes por la noche, descartó las encuestas que mostraban una carrera reñida mientras instaba a sus votantes a acudir a las urnas. “Dejen que todo el mundo piense que va a estar apretadísimo”, dijo. “Lo esté o no, tienen que salir y aturdirlos”.No menos desconcertante es cuándo quedará claro quién ganó las elecciones. Si los sondeos son correctos, y la contienda está así de reñida, podrían pasar días antes de que se conozca al próximo presidente o presidenta. Si los sondeos se equivocan, el país podría despertarse el miércoles por la mañana sabiendo quién sucederá al presidente Joe Biden en la Casa Blanca.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More

    • 100 Shares119 Views

      in Elections

      ¿La Corte Suprema podría decidir estas elecciones presidenciales?

      by

      Los expertos señalan que es poco probable que el tribunal termine ejerciendo un papel importante en el resultado, pero es posible. Te contamos por qué.Es día de elecciones y la contienda entre la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris y el expresidente Donald Trump parece estar empatada, lo que lleva a algunos a temer que la elección se alargue y la Corte Suprema de EE. UU. pueda determinar el resultado.Un puñado de disputas relacionadas con las elecciones ya han llegado a la Corte Suprema. La semana pasada, el tribunal emitió decisiones que permitieron a Virginia eliminar a 1600 personas de su censo electoral, se negó a retirar a Robert F. Kennedy Jr. de la papeleta electoral en dos estados disputados y permitió a los votantes de Pensilvania cuyos votos por correo se habían considerado inválidos emitir votos provisionales en persona.La cuestión sigue siendo si las elecciones presidenciales serán tan reñidas que el tribunal, que tiene una mayoría conservadora de 6-3, se ocupará en los próximos días o semanas de un caso que decida quién ocupará la presidencia.Según los expertos en elecciones, es poco probable que la Corte Suprema acabe desempeñando un papel importante en el resultado, pero es posible. Esto es lo que hay que saber.¿Qué papel podría desempeñar la Corte Suprema?Por lo general, la Corte Suprema ha tratado de mantenerse al margen de las luchas políticas y electorales, y la mayoría de los litigios relacionados con las elecciones permanecerán en los tribunales inferiores. Pero una vez que un caso está en el sistema judicial, es posible que la Corte Suprema decida asumirlo.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber? Log in.Want all of The Times? Subscribe. More