More stories

  • in

    Joe Biden plans special commission to suggest supreme court reforms

    Joe Biden has confirmed he would appoint a special commission to study the US court system over 180 days, if he is elected next month, to provide reform recommendations relating to the supreme court and beyond.
    In response to questions about the US supreme court during an interview for this Sunday’s 60 Minutes news magazine, the former vice-president and Democratic presidential nominee told CBS TV managing editor Norah O’Donnell that the court system is “getting out of whack” and that “there’s a number of alternatives that go well beyond ‘packing’”, ie increasing the number of seats on the nine-justice supreme court bench.
    “The last thing we need to do is turn the supreme court into just a political football, [that means] whoever has the most votes gets whatever they want,” Biden said in the interview, which airs just nine days ahead of the 2020 presidential election.
    “Presidents come and go. Supreme court justices stay for generations,” he added.

    60 Minutes
    (@60Minutes)
    Watch more of @NorahODonnell’s interview with Joe Biden, Sunday. pic.twitter.com/wJmb8MatVg

    October 22, 2020

    In keeping with the show’s election tradition, both candidates will be featured in separate interviews to spell out their plans for the country. The previews come following reports that Donald Trump abruptly ended what was intended to be an hour-long interview at the White House after 45 minutes, before chastising correspondent Stahl for her professionalism and lack of mask.
    Meanwhile, the US president has been talking about doing his own pre-emptive defense.

    Donald J. Trump
    (@realDonaldTrump)
    I will soon be giving a first in television history full, unedited preview of the vicious attempted “takeout” interview of me by Lesley Stahl of @60Minutes. Watch her constant interruptions & anger. Compare my full, flowing and “magnificently brilliant” answers to their “Q’s”. https://t.co/L3szccGamP

    October 22, 2020

    Biden vowed that if he prevails in November’s election he will “put together a bipartisan commission of constitutional scholars – Democrats, Republicans, liberal, conservative” over “180 days come back to me with recommendations” on the US court system.
    “It’s the way in which it’s being handled and it’s not about court packing,” Biden argued, adding “there’s a number of other things that our constitutional scholars have debated and I’ve looked to see what recommendations that commission might make.”
    While the Democrat kept the focus on the recovery from a pandemic and recession, Trump, meanwhile, vaguely looked forward to one goal: “To get back to normal”.
    “Get back to where we were, to have the economy rage and be great with jobs and everybody be happy,” he said. “And that’s where we’re going, and that’s where we’re heading.”

    60 Minutes
    (@60Minutes)
    Watch more of Lesley Stahl’s interview with President Trump, Sunday. pic.twitter.com/zA5q4pFxeI

    October 22, 2020

    The president then took aim at China, calling them “an adversary,” “a competitor” and a “foe” before slamming the country for giving rise to the Covid-19 outbreak.
    Interviews with their running mates, Republican vice-president Mike Pence and California Senator Kamala Harris, will also air during the broadcast. More

  • in

    Some Republicans Are Abandoning the Trump Ship

    To the Editor:Re “Fearing a Rout on Capitol Hill, Republicans Start to Break Ranks With the President” (news article, Oct. 17):In a pathetic display of leaping off a sinking ship, some Republican senators are finding their dissenting voice. With the election near, the realization that their seat may be in danger has caused them to speak out in rebellion against their leader.They are trying to save themselves and have shown their real two-faced approach to President Trump. After looking aside and winking at his mind-boggling tweets, statements, policies, lies and devastating failure to exhibit leadership in the face of Covid-19, they have “found religion.”Too little, too late.Harvey GlassmanBoynton Beach, Fla.To the Editor:I’m sorry, but talk is cheap. What counts is the action one takes when confronted with an ethical choice. Virtually all these senators have voted to support President Trump throughout his corrupt, cruel and demeaning presidency. Only one, Senator Mitt Romney, showed the “courage” to convict Mr. Trump after he was impeached. Other Republicans have criticized the president only when they have decided to leave the administration or, in the case of elected officials, chosen not to run for re-election.History will not be kind to these sycophants and enablers. In the meantime, the G.O.P. deserves the shellacking it is likely to face on Nov. 3.Amy S. RichOrange, Conn.To the Editor:Often when I discuss the political situation with my Republican friends, their response to my criticism of President Trump is to admit that he has many faults, but that his policies are aligned with their conservative values. They point to his tax cuts, his reduction of anti-business regulations, his support of the military, his success in changing the courts and, of course, “the economy.”But do they really support his other policies and actions? Do they applaud his trying to eliminate Obamacare, his gutting regulations that protect our environment, his withdrawing from our global relationships related to climate change, health and weapons reduction? Do they really admire him for building up our deficit to record levels, for his relentless fight to scrap DACA, for his bizarre relationships with North Korean, Turkish and Russian strongmen, not to mention the white supremacy crowd?Do they like his cabinet member choices, his decisions about whom to pardon or commute their sentences? Do they really think he has done a great — or even an OK — job managing the pandemic? How about his constant efforts to restrict voting?Bottom line: Will my Republican friends actually vote for Mr. Trump to lead this nation for another four years? I hope not.Harding Bancroft Jr.Sharon, Conn.To the Editor:Re “Meet a Secret Trump Voter” (column, Sept. 29):Bret Stephens introduces us to Chris, whom he presents as a surprising Trump voter because she is an educated gay woman from Manhattan who is not a lifelong Republican. What his profile reveals of her, though, is that she cares very much about her retirement account, she is suspicious of the media, and she doesn’t like the homeless people living near her.I saw no evidence that she gives any thought to the suffering that Donald Trump and his administration have inflicted on this country. She seems to me like a perfectly natural supporter of this president.Barth LandorChicago More

  • in

    Cómo ver el debate presidencial

    El segundo y último debate presidencial de Estados Unidos, entre el presidente Donald Trump y el exvicepresidente Joe Biden, tendrá lugar el jueves de 9:00 a 10:30 p. m. hora del Este de Estados Unidos. Aquí hay algunos modos de sintonizarlo:The New York Times ofrecerá una emisión en vivo del debate y nuestros periodistas reportarán en vivo con análisis y comentarios en inglés.El debate será televisado en una gran cantidad de televisoras estadounidenses, entre ellas ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, C-SPAN, Fox News y MSNBC.Muchas cadenas, entre ellas ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, Fox News y C-SPAN, emitirán además a través de YouTube.El canal Roku ofrecerá la emisión de varias cadenas noticiosas.La cadena de emisión en continuo Newsy presentará el debate en distintas plataformas.La cadena Telemundo tendrá emisiones con traducción y comentarios en español. More

  • in

    How Trump and Biden Differ on the Environment

    Pollution Trump has weakened regulations on mercury, methane and uranium. Before the pandemic, air quality in the U.S. was worsening for the first time in years.Biden wants to restore Obama-era regulations, increase spending on water treatment and water pipeline repairs, and prosecute companies that pollute. More

  • in

    How to Watch Tonight’s Presidential Debate

    The second and final debate between President Trump and former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. takes place on Thursday from 9 to 10:30 p.m. Eastern. Here are some of the many ways you can watch it:The Times will livestream the debate, and our reporters will provide commentary and analysis.The debate will be televised on channels including ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, C-SPAN, PBS, Fox News and MSNBC.Many news outlets, including ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, Fox News and C-SPAN, will stream the debate on YouTube.The Roku Channel will carry streams from several news outlets.The streaming network Newsy will carry the debate on several platforms. More

  • in

    Trump and Biden’s Final Debate: What to Watch For

    [Follow our live updates on the debate and the 2020 election.]President Trump and Joseph R. Biden Jr. will meet on Thursday for their second and final presidential debate.Kristen Welker of NBC News will moderate the debate, which will take place in Nashville. It will begin at 9 p.m. Eastern and run for 90 minutes. The announced topics include fighting the coronavirus, American families, race in the United States, climate change, national security and leadership.The New York Times will cover the event live, with real-time analysis from teams of reporters, on nytimes.com.The debate will be televised on channels including ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, C-SPAN, PBS, Fox News and MSNBC. Many news outlets, including ABC, CBS, NBC, PBS, Fox News and C-SPAN, will stream the debate on YouTube.The big questionsThe first question about Thursday’s debate: Will it really matter? At this point, haven’t most voters made up their minds? Many have already voted. And is there anything else to say?The answer is that it certainly may matter. There are always a few voters left who have not decided whom to support. And there are those who may need an extra last-minute nudge to turn out.Barring some cataclysmic event in the next two weeks, it is the last moment in the race guaranteed to draw a huge viewership, and it will be the final time Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump are scheduled to share a stage.And it is particularly important for Mr. Trump, who is trailing in most national and battleground state polls and whose performance at the first debate appeared to hurt his standing. The president pulled out of what was supposed to be a second debate after the Commission on Presidential Debates decided that the forum should be held virtually in light of Mr. Trump’s coronavirus diagnosis.Here’s what we’ll be watching for when the candidates face off in Nashville.Does Trump dial it back?This may be the most intriguing question of the night. Will we see a reprise of the hectoring, interrupting president who frequently talked over the moderator, Chris Wallace, and Mr. Biden? Few people thought that did him much good. And it may be more difficult this time: Microphones will be muted during portions of the debate to prevent such disruptions.“In the best of all words, he would watch the Pence-Harris debate three times and realize this isn’t 2016 and Biden is not Hillary Clinton,” said Newt Gingrich, the Republican former House speaker. “He has to move toward a calmer, more issue-oriented, less personality-driven debate. He has the perfect model with the vice president.”But time is running out. At this point, Mr. Trump needs to try to accomplish what he has been unable to do so far: Give voters who are on the fence a reason not to support Mr. Biden.“Anything Trump does now that doesn’t seek to make Biden an unacceptable alternative is a waste for Trump,” said Nelson Warfield, who was a senior campaign aide to Bob Dole, the Republican candidate for president in 1996.And Mr. Trump needs to do that while under the extra scrutiny of his manners that awaits him after their last debate.Can Biden keep running out the clock?Mr. Trump has every reason to seize this 90-minute debate to make the best case for his re-election and attack Mr. Biden. But Mr. Biden will walk on the stage with a decidedly less urgent to-do list.Given his lead in the polls and his propensity for the occasional misstatement, Mr. Biden did not really need this final debate. When Mr. Trump balked at the virtual format for the second debate, Mr. Biden moved instantly to schedule a town hall event with voters.Both Democratic and Republican strategists said that Mr. Biden’s task at the first debate was to present himself as cogent and in command, to rebut with his appearance the suggestion by Mr. Trump that Mr. Biden at 77 was getting slow with age. (Mr. Trump is 74.) By every account, Mr. Biden crossed that barrier.Mr. Biden can use the debate to make a closing argument and to lay out his case against Mr. Trump, particularly for his faltering response to a pandemic that has killed over 220,000 people in the United States. Beyond that, Mr. Biden may well be tempted to simply run out the clock. A no-runs, no-hits, no-errors performance is probably all he needs.The pandemic still trails the president.Mr. Trump will be taking the stage this time as someone who has been a coronavirus patient, announcing he had the virus shortly after the first debate. He spent three days in the hospital, where he was the beneficiary of some of the most aggressive and cutting-edge treatment, and has proclaimed himself cured. It was not just Mr. Trump: Covid-19 swept the White House after the nomination ceremony there for Judge Amy Coney Barrett, an event distinguished by the lack of social distancing or masks.Mr. Trump has seemed eager to move on from talking about the pandemic. He has argued, in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that the nation has turned a corner on the virus. He has defied medical experts in traveling the country holding rallies and mocking the use of masks.But no issue has defined this contest, or has hurt him politically, as much as the pandemic.He has struggled, in interviews and the last debate, to defend his response to the crisis and suggest that many people, including Mr. Biden, also failed to appreciate the gravity of the threat in the early days. But Mr. Trump’s personal experience — the widespread criticism that his lack of precautions contributed to the outbreak at the White House — will be a subtext for at least part of the debate.Hunter Biden in the cross hairsFrom the earliest days of this campaign, Mr. Trump has sought to damage Mr. Biden by disparaging the business dealings of his son Hunter and claiming that Mr. Biden, as vice president, embraced policies that allowed the younger Mr. Biden to enrich himself in his dealings with Ukraine and China. These allegations, many of them unproven or questionable, have circulated widely on Fox News and right-wing social media. But, to the frustration of the president and his advisers, they have so far not appeared to break through beyond that audience.The Trump campaign could not have been clearer in recent days in telegraphing that Mr. Trump intends to use this final stage to raise the allegations again. “If the media won’t ask Joe Biden these questions, the president will, and there will be no escape for Biden,” Bill Stepien, the president’s campaign manager, said in a statement.At the last debate, when pressed by Mr. Trump on the issue, Mr. Biden appeared to struggle a bit with the question; presumably he will be better prepared on Thursday. For Mr. Trump, the goal is to tarnish his opponent. For Mr. Biden, at the very least, the attacks on his son might goad him into making the kinds of mistakes that might dominate a news cycle or two.Biden may face new pressure on expanding the Supreme Court.Mr. Biden managed to elude answering questions from Mr. Trump at the first debate about whether he would, as president, support expanding the number of seats on the Supreme Court. He is under pressure from many Democrats who see an expanded court as the best way to counter Mr. Trump’s success in installing two (and very likely soon to be three) members of the court.After weeks of declining to clarify his position, Mr. Biden said in an interview made public on Thursday that if elected, he would establish a bipartisan commission of scholars to study a possible court overhaul more broadly.“I will ask them to, over 180 days, come back to me with recommendations as to how to reform the court system because it’s getting out of whack,” he told CBS News’s Norah O’Donnell, according to an interview excerpt that is expected to be broadcast in full Sunday on “60 Minutes.”Previously, Mr. Biden had said that a firm answer on expanding the court would take attention away from what he said was the main issue: the decision by Republicans and Mr. Trump to rush through the nomination of Judge Barrett to fill the vacancy created by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.But the former vice president came under increasing pressure to respond. At a town hall event with George Stephanopoulos last week, he agreed that voters had a right to know his views on such a critical issue and said that he would disclose his position before Election Day. His comments on Thursday suggested that he knows he can’t keep dodging the issue entirely, but they left open questions about what he personally intends to do. Mr. Trump senses an opening here. Polls suggest that the public at large does not support court-packing, and Mr. Biden has signaled in the past that he does not think it is a good idea. Pressing Mr. Biden to come out in opposition could depress his support in the left wing of the Democratic Party.A rare appearance on the debate agenda: climate changeMr. Trump flew to California last month to inspect the devastation from wildfires that have swept thorough the West this year, at a time of rising temperatures that scientists have long warned about with climate change. But Mr. Trump, meeting with California officials, said blame for the fires lay with the failure of California to clear dead trees and clean its forest floors, and he repeated his skepticism that the climate is changing. “It’ll start getting cooler,” he said. “You just watch.”Mr. Biden retorted by calling him a “climate arsonist.”That long-distance back-and-forth on an issue that sharply divides Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump is set to be debated Thursday evening, one of the rare times that climate change will have been raised at a presidential debate. There is much to talk about. Mr. Trump, from the moment he took power, dismissed climate change as a hoax and systematically rolled back environmental regulations that were put in place by President Barack Obama with the support of his vice president, Mr. Biden.Mr. Biden called it one of the greatest threats facing the world in the coming century.Katie Glueck contributed reporting. More

  • in

    Supreme Court Bars Curbside Voting in Alabama

    WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Wednesday blocked a trial judge’s ruling that would have allowed, but not required, counties in Alabama to offer curbside voting.The vote was 5 to 3, with the court’s more conservative members in the majority.The court’s brief, unsigned order gave no reasons, which is typical when it rules on emergency applications, and it said the order would remain in effect while appeals moved forward.In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Stephen G. Breyer and Elena Kagan, said the state’s policy discriminated against older and disabled voters.“If those vulnerable voters wish to vote in person,” Justice Sotomayor wrote, “they must wait inside, for as long as it takes, in a crowd of fellow voters whom Alabama does not require to wear face coverings,” referring to masks that help mitigate the spread of the coronavirus.She quoted from the testimony of one of the voters who sued to challenge the policy, a Black man in his 70s with asthma and Parkinson’s disease named Howard Porter Jr. Mr. Porter recalled that his ancestors had died for the right to vote. “And while I don’t mind dying to vote,” he said, “I think we’re past that — we’re past that time.”Officials in some Alabama counties agreed, Justice Sotomayor wrote. “They are ready and willing to help vulnerable voters like Mr. Porter cast their ballots without unnecessarily risking infection from a deadly virus,” she wrote. More

  • in

    Grenell Pursued Talks Over Change of Power in Venezuela

    WASHINGTON — Richard Grenell, a close Trump ally who has served numerous roles in the administration, quietly embarked on a pre-election mission last month that was at least partly intended to persuade President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela to give up power.Mr. Grenell, a vocal and combative supporter of President Trump’s re-election campaign, met near Mexico City on Sept. 17 with Jorge Rodríguez, a former Venezuelan vice president and close ally of Mr. Maduro, to facilitate a peaceful transition of power, a White House official said.Had Mr. Maduro agreed to stand down, it could have been a major foreign policy victory for Mr. Trump in the weeks before the election. But there is no evidence that Mr. Grenell’s trip had any effect, and it was not clear why Mr. Maduro, a socialist strongman who has maintained power despite international opposition, would suddenly consider stepping down.The trip, which was reported by Bloomberg News on Wednesday night, caught the State Department and even some White House officials off guard and created confusion about its purpose.A person involved in the planning of the trip said that it was intended at least partly to negotiate for the release of American detainees in Venezuela, but the White House official and Mr. Grenell denied that. Under current U.S. policy, officials can negotiate only with Mr. Maduro or his loyalists to discuss the terms of his departure.Mr. Trump demanded last year that Mr. Maduro resign, and the United States has formally recognized Juan Guaidó, the former leader of Parliament, who heads the country’s popular opposition movement, as Venezuela’s president.Mr. Trump’s stance, which was at the fore of the international community’s condemnation of Mr. Maduro, won him plaudits among American hard-liners, including among Latino voters in Florida, a pivotal swing state. More