More stories

  • in

    Joe Biden in Ohio: Trump 'turned his back on you' – video

    Play Video

    1:22

    Joe Biden told a drive-in rally in Ohio that Donald Trump ‘turned his back on you’ during the pandemic and its economic fallout.
    Biden questioned why Republicans had time for supreme court hearings but no time to come to an agreement with House Democrats on another economic relief package to help individuals, businesses and city and state governments.
    Trump has alternately called off Covid-19 relief talks, then pushed for a deal. Late last week, the White House expanded its offer to Democrats, but the Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, said it was unlikely Congress could pass a bill before the election and House speaker Nancy Pelosi said the White House offer didn’t include enough money.
    Trump won Ohio by eight percentage points in 2016, but polls have tightened and it is now a key battleground state in the upcoming election. 
    US election polls tracker: who is leading in the swing states?

    Topics

    Joe Biden

    US elections 2020

    US politics

    Donald Trump More

  • in

    Biden campaigns in red state Ohio, hoping to expand battleground map

    US elections 2020

    Biden stressed an economic message and touted his own record while casting Trump as having abandoned working-class voters

    Play Video

    1:22

    Joe Biden in Ohio: Trump ‘turned his back on you’ – video

    Joe Biden’s campaign went on a fresh offense against the Trump administration on Monday, campaigning in a red state and accusing Republicans of hypocrisy as they sought to portray Democrats as anti-religious during the supreme court hearings for the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett.
    Biden campaigned in Ohio, attempting to expand the battleground map and keep Trump on the defensive in a state thought to be out of reach for Democrats after Trump’s wide margin of victory there four years ago.
    A slew of recent polls has had the Democratic challenger leading Trump in national polls, often by double digits. Likewise, many battleground state surveys, though often narrower than the national picture, have Biden with healthy leads. The situation has led several top Republicans to make rare public warnings of losing the White House – and maybe even Republicans losing the Senate.
    On the campaign trail Biden stressed an economic message and touted his own record while casting Trump as having abandoned working-class voters who helped him win rust belt states that put him in the White House in 2016.
    In Toledo, Biden addressed United Auto Workers who represent a local General Motors’ powertrain plant. The former vice-president spoke in a parking lot with about 30 American-made cars and trucks arrayed nearby, and he struck a decidedly populist note, praising unions and arguing that he represented working-class values while the Republican Trump cared only about impressing the Ivy League and country club set.
    “I don’t measure people by the size of their bank account,” Biden said. “You and I measure people by the strength of their character, their honesty, their courage.”
    Meanwhile as the nomination hearings for Barrett began back in Washington the Biden campaign took umbrage at Republican criticisms that they had targeted Barrett’s Catholic faith as a reason not to nominate her – despite the fact that Democrats focused almost entirely on issues like healthcare.
    A spokesperson for Biden accused Republicans of double standards, noting the Democratic nominee would be only the second Catholic president in US history if elected next month. “Where were these Republican senators when Trump outrageously attacked Biden’s faith, saying he’d ‘hurt God’?” Andrew Bates said in a tweet.
    Trump said during an August campaign event that Biden would “take away your guns, destroy your second amendment. No religion, no anything, hurt the Bible, hurt God.” Trump added of Biden: “He’s against God, he’s against guns, he’s against energy, our kind of energy.”
    In Ohio Biden highlighted his role as vice-president as the Obama administration rescued the US auto industry after the 2008 financial collapse. George W Bush signed the aid package after the 2008 election, but the Obama administration managed most of the rescue program.
    “The auto industry that supported one in eight Ohioans was on the brink,” Biden said at the drive-in rally, eliciting horn honks from people listening from their vehicles. “Barack and I bet on you, and it paid off.”
    Trump, meanwhile, was resuming campaign travel for the first time since testing positive for the coronavirus, holding an evening rally in Florida. And Vice-President Mike Pence staged his own midwestern event in Ohio’s capital, Columbus, concluding remarks at Savko & Sons, an excavation company that hosted Obama at one of its job sites in 2010, shortly before Biden took the stage in Toledo.
    In a nod to Senate confirmation hearings on Barrett’s nomination to the Supreme Court – where Biden’s running mate, California senator Kamala Harris, was participating remotely – Pence declared to applause that “we’re going to fill that seat”.
    Pence also noted that Biden has refused to say whether he will heed the calls of some progressive Democrats who would like to see the party expand the number of seats on the supreme court, should Democrats win the White House and the Senate on 3 November while retaining control of the House.

    Topics

    US elections 2020

    US politics

    Joe Biden

    Donald Trump

    news

    Share on Facebook

    Share on Twitter

    Share via Email

    Share on LinkedIn

    Share on Pinterest

    Share on WhatsApp

    Share on Messenger

    Reuse this content More

  • in

    On Facebook, Misinformation Is More Popular Now Than in 2016

    During the 2016 presidential election, Russian operatives used Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and other social media platforms to spread disinformation to divide the American electorate. Since then, the social media companies have spent billions of dollars and hired tens of thousands of people to help clean up their act.But have the platforms really become more sophisticated at handling misinformation?Not necessarily.People are engaging more on Facebook today with news outlets that routinely publish misinformation than they did before the 2016 election, according to new research from the German Marshall Fund Digital, the digital arm of the public policy think tank. The organization, which has a data partnership with the start-up NewsGuard and the social media analytics firm NewsWhip, published its findings on Monday.In total, Facebook likes, comments and shares of articles from news outlets that regularly publish falsehoods and misleading content roughly tripled from the third quarter of 2016 to the third quarter of 2020, the group found.[embedded content]About two thirds of those likes and comments were of articles published by 10 outlets, which the researchers categorized as “false content producers” or “manipulators.” Those news outlets included Palmer Report and The Federalist, according to the research.The group used ratings from NewsGuard, which ranks news sites based on how they uphold nine journalistic principles, to sort them into “false content producers,” which repeatedly publish provably false content; and “manipulators,” which regularly present unsubstantiated claims or that distort information to make an argument.“We have these sites that masquerade as news outlets online. They’re allowed to,” said Karen Kornbluh, director of GMF Digital. “It’s infecting our discourse and it’s affecting the long-term health of the democracy.”Facebook did not respond to a request for comment.Ms. Kornbluh said Facebook users engaged more with articles from all news outlets this year because the coronavirus pandemic forced people to quarantine indoors. But the growth rate of likes, shares and comments of content from manipulators and false content producers exceeded the interactions that people had with what the researchers called “legitimate journalistic outlets,” such as Reuters, Associated Press and Bloomberg.Ms. Kornbluh said social media firms face a conundrum because their businesses rely on viral content to bring in users, who they can then show ads to. Tamping down on misinformation “just runs against their economic incentives,” she said. More

  • in

    What Dr Fauci actually said versus how Trump used clip in campaign ad – video

    Play Video

    1:25

    Dr Anthony Fauci, the top US infectious disease expert, has criticised Donald Trump’s re-election campaign for using his words out of context to make it appear as if he was praising the president’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic. In the video released on Saturday, Fauci can be heard saying: ‘I can’t imagine that … anyone could be doing more’ as the advert boasts of Trump’s response to Covid-19, which in the US has killed more than 214,000 and infected more than 7.7m. The clip came from an interview Fauci gave to Fox News, in which he was describing the work that he and other members of the White House coronavirus task force undertook to respond to the virus 
    Anthony Fauci criticises Donald Trump for using his words out of context

    Topics

    Donald Trump

    US elections 2020

    Coronavirus outbreak More

  • in

    What’s the Problem With Vote-by-Mail? Hint, It’s Not Fraud

    “Election night. It’s this cultural moment for the country. People invite their friends over. The families gather around the television, on the edge of our seats to see who’s going to win.” “We’re about to get to the first results.” “We are about to make a major call.” “People expect results by the 11 o’clock news. That’s just the reality, and we want to meet that reality.” “Yeah, that’s just not going to happen.” This year, Michigan, a state with one of the slimmest margins in 2016, is one of 27 states that has made a major expansion to vote by mail. “Never in our lifetimes has the way people elect their president changed so much in a single year. And it is going to have more fights, more disputes.” “There are several states that only have mail-in voting, including a Republican —” “Wolf, this is playing with fire.” “More media mayhem than anything we’ve seen.” And we may be hearing this word a lot. “Fraud.” These veteran election workers are seriously worried about election night … “Here we go.” “We got some critical calls.” “Yes, we do.” … becoming election week, or even election month. “I don’t know any industry that requires you to stay up 48 hours straight.” “No, no, no.” “Oh, geez.” “And it has huge implications on whether Americans accept the results.” To get a look at how vote-by-mail will change the election, we go to Michigan, where we lift the hood on Election Day. “So we’re in Detroit, which is right about here.” “So Michigan is an amazing place to live.” “A microcosm of the entire country.” “Hard-working, get-it-done ethos.” “Manufacturing.” “Including the auto industry.” “The auto industry.” “The auto industry.” “This is a 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass.” And when it comes to its elections, Michigan has — “The most decentralized system.” Take it from the secretary of state. “Fifteen hundred local clerks in 83 counties, all of whom are, for the most part, independently elected.” And Michigan can’t declare a winner until the results come in from every clerk. Like this guy … … Lansing Clerk Chris Swope. “Michigan has never really hit this. We’ve got the Covid crisis. In addition, Michigan passed Proposal 3 of 2018, which gave a lot of additional voter rights. And one of those was the right to vote by absentee ballot for any reason. So those two things have led to a lot of people voting by absentee ballot more than ever before.” That leaves clerks in a tight spot. They’re getting more mail-in ballots than ever, but they don’t have the tools or time to process them. Let’s review. “Shifting gears to voting by mail.” To process the wave of absentee ballots, Michigan needs more equipment, like high-speed ballot scanners, automatic letter openers, even P.P.E. for the poll workers. The federal government pitched in $11 million, but it’s not enough. And even with the right equipment, it’ll take a long time to process all those envelopes. But unlike many other states, under Michigan law poll workers must wait until 7 a.m. on Election Day to begin opening ballots, which is around the time we head to Lansing to meet up with Chris Swope. “How we doing today?” It’s an early start to a long primary day, a dry run for November. “Are we excited?” “Yay.” “How many of you have done this before?” This is Swope’s army, poll workers aged 17 to 84 … “I think everybody should have a chance to work a precinct.” … who have braved an international pandemic to preserve American democracy, and to handle paper, lots and lots of paper. “I figure we’ll be here at least until 10.” “I’m guessing 11.” “12.” “But she’s going midnight. And she’s one of my best friends.” “I am?” [laughter] “Until you really see it in action or try to do it yourself, I don’t think it really hits you about how much time this actually takes.” Over in Detroit, the largest jurisdiction in Michigan, poll workers were bogged down on Primary Day without some very basic equipment. “We attempted to purchase electronic letter openers, but they were on back order. Approximately 70,000 ballots were returned.” Which means — “Approximately 70,000 will be opened by hand.” That’ll slow things down. Over in Clinton Township, part of the largest county Trump flipped in 2016, Clerk Kim Meltzer says starting the count at 7 a.m. on Election Day leads to totally preventable mistakes. “Most important is the integrity of the election process and the accuracy of the vote. If they’re up for 48 hours straight, could mistakes be made?” Yes. And when they are, it’s Meltzer’s job to … “Find out what happened.” … which means even more time spent sorting out one issue after another. “Scott? Can you give that to Scott? Solved that problem. All right. If it came between having more money or more time, I would rather have more time.” Both Meltzer, a Republican, and Swope, a Democrat, support bills to change election laws to allow ballots to be opened before Election Day, and for poll workers to work in shifts, including a bill introduced by a Republican senator and former secretary of state, Ruth Johnson. “That needs to be done to help those workers. So I’m hoping both those bills go through.” Hers did, six weeks before the presidential election. It gives an extra day to clerks in the largest jurisdictions to open envelopes, but adds additional requirements that could slow the process. Pop quiz. “Do you know when the United States first widespread use of absentee balloting was?” “No. In 1928 or something?” “I think it was in the mid-’90s?” Well, we were going for 1864. And it was just as hotly debated as it is today. Take it away, Charles Sable. “Tell me when.” “All right, go for it.” “We’re here at the Henry Ford birthplace. And when Henry Ford was born here in 1863, Abraham Lincoln was starting to think about the 1864 election. He wanted to make sure that the soldiers in the field of battle were allowed to vote. Lincoln wanted everyone who could vote to vote.” And even then — “It was a partisan battle, except what happened then was the reverse of what’s happening today. The Republicans, the party of Abraham Lincoln, wanted absentee balloting. The Democrats were very much against absentee voting because they felt it was not in their favor politically. And they used the same arguments that Republicans are using today, that it could allow for tampering, coercion, all sorts of manipulation. So it was the opposite of today. Fascinating.” OK, back to the modern day. “As these states are trying to make voting easier, again, based on early C.D.C. guidance, in many cases, their own legislatures are fighting this because of fraud.” Like in Michigan, where the fight is playing out between the current and former secretaries of state. “Absentee isn’t good or bad. It’s more convenient, but you must have in those checks and balances to safeguard the integrity.” In response to the pandemic, Secretary Jocelyn Benson mailed out 7.7 million absentee ballot applications. “This was a mailing of applications, giving people the tools to request a vote by mail.” But for Senator Johnson, the unsolicited mailing opened the door for — “Operatives on both sides that will cheat. Here’s a stack over here, about 500 absentee ballot requests that went to non-qualified people. Here’s one, the people moved 11 years ago, 22 years ago. This person died. That’s a problem for me.” But Secretary Benson says that’s the point. The mailing actually — “Enabled us to better clean up our voter rolls by identifying people who may have moved or have passed away. A secondary benefit has been it’s enabled us to reduce the potential for fraud.” Which studies have shown — “Happens exceptionally rarely. It is so rare. It’s kind of like a narwhal. They exist, but you see them so rarely that they take on a sort of mythical status. I mean, this is a real corrosive, false narrative in the voting system, especially the vote-by-mail system.” To see why fraud is so rare, let’s look at what actually happens to that ballot once you drop it off or mail it in. It starts when you receive your ballot in a sealed envelope, which has another secrecy envelope inside. You fill out your ballot, then slide it into the secrecy envelope, then send it back, either by mail or at a special dropbox. At your local polling station, the envelopes are sorted and opened. One poll worker, who can see your name, but not how you voted, takes the ballot out of the envelope and tears off the identification tab, while another, who can see how you voted but not your name, opens the ballots. And finally, your ballot is scanned and your vote is counted. After repeating this dance almost 18,000 times, it’s past midnight for the poll workers in Lansing. “Michigan election law requires them to be sequestered. They have to work until the job is done.” So after 18 hours, the workers can leave and go home. “Goodnight.” “My name’s Barb Bynum. I’m the Ingham County clerk.” And she’s been awake for — “Well over 24, probably close to 30, 35 hours so far.” Thirty-five hours straight. “Yeah.” How does she do it? “I’m very, very thankful for coffee.” And? “Just a little more dry shampoo. On election night, all of that information comes back to me at the county level to post for public viewing the unofficial election night results. So when people are watching the news, they’re getting their information from the press, who get it from me.” Except one of the counties’ townships has had a computer error, so no results. And Barb’s still up. “And so I’m running on adrenaline and coffee.” It’s a scene many election officials fear it will be even worse in November, when two to three times as many ballots are expected. “So worst-case scenario, if the Legislature fails to act, if the feds fail to give us the resources that we need, we are going to have significant delays in results.” “Some major projections.” And a delay in reporting results in a swing state on Election Day could have serious consequences for democracy. “Now, I’m confident a delay in result does not mean anything is going wrong in the administration of elections. However —” “When you don’t really understand that process, that’s where that kind of uncertainty can be filled in with misinformation or conspiracy theories. It’s so easy for false information to spread. And that could undermine, ultimately, confidence in the process not only in Michigan, but all over the country.” And it doesn’t help when the false information is being spread by the president. “They want to try and steal this election.” “Trump has issued literally dozens of tweets. He’s posted on Facebook, and he’s given countless interviews based on nothing to say that vote-by-mail will delegitimize the entire election.” And there’s one more factor that could delay results even further, and undermine confidence even more — lawsuits. Current Michigan law requires ballots to not just be postmarked by Election Day, but to actually arrive by 8 p.m. to be counted. “At the same time, a new postmaster general, very loyal to Donald Trump, is bringing in new policies that are slowing down the mail.” Fearing these delays could potentially disenfranchise voters, groups have sued to give more time for ballots to arrive. “When you look at the reasons why ballots sent through the mail may be otherwise valid but unable to be counted, a top reason is the ballot was postmarked prior to Election Day, but received in the days that followed.” Like this stack of ballots in Detroit. They arrived on Primary Day, but after 8 p.m. “This one came in about 11:30.” So under the law, none counted. “So that could make a difference. Sure could. So yes, that’s pretty concerning.” Remember, in 2016, President Trump won Michigan by fewer than 11,000 votes. In this primary alone, more than 10,000 ballots were rejected, the majority for arriving past 8 p.m. This is just one of many issues likely to be litigated before and after Election Day in a number of different states. “The states that are full-mail states, like Washington state, it took 10 years to develop its system. Now, every state in the country is being asked to get close to an all-mail election in a few months. It’s daunting.” As a result, the limits of state constitutions are being tested. “It’s the classic building the plane while you’re flying it. And parts are going to fall off.” Facing lawsuits, many officials in battleground states are bracing for impact — Pennsylvania and Ohio over their dropboxes, Wisconsin on their postmarks, Missouri with notary requirements, and many more. “I think a lot of lawsuits, some are often filed on valid legal grounds. Some are also filed as part of a political strategy to sow seeds of doubt in the electorate about the integrity of the process.” “When does a ballot come in? How is it postmarked? Does the postmark have a date? If the postmark doesn’t have a date, how do you count that vote? Suddenly, all of these teeny little issues involving how mail flows through this country become issues for the bedrock of democracy.” “This is Alex.” “And I’m Kassie. We produced this episode of Stressed Election.” “There’s a lot going on in this election, and we want to make sure we take a deep dive into the major issues.” “Stick around for the next episodes. We’re going to cover voting rights, voting technology, disinformation and vote-by-mail.” More